食管癌分别行管状胃代食管吻合术与传统全胃代食管吻合术对术后胃食管反流病情的控制效果
The Control Effect on Postoperative GER Disease of Tubular Esophagus Stomach Anastomosis and Traditional Full Stomach Esophagus Anastomosis
-
摘要: 目的 对比食管癌分别行管状胃代食管吻合术与传统全胃代食管吻合术对术后胃食管反流病情的控制效果.方法 将2010年9月至2015年10月期间在亳州市人民医院确诊并接受择期食管癌切除术治疗的85例食管癌患者随机分为研究组(45例)与对照组(40例),2组患者均接受食管癌切除术治疗,其中研究组行管状胃代食管吻合术,对照组行传统全胃代食管吻合术.术后待患者恢复正常的胃肠道功能后采用p H动态监测仪对其进行24 h胃代食管腔p H监测,术后1、3月依据RDQ量表对患者的胃食管反流相关症状进行评分,同时统计术后1、3月的胃食管反流的发生情况.结果 2组患者均未出现死亡病例,且术后均未发生有吻合口瘘及胸胃排空障碍并发症;2组患者几乎均达到24 h的全程监测,同时组间比较监测总时间、立位监测时间、卧位监测时间均无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组的24 h反流次数及长返流次数显著少于对照组,反流持续最长时间与p H值<4.00的累计时间显著短于全胃组,De Meester评分显著低于对照组,组间比较均有统计学意义(P<0.01);研究组术后1、3月的RDQ评分以及胃食管反流发生率均显著低于对照组,组间比较均有统计学意义(P<0.01或P<0.05).结论 管状胃代食管吻合术较传统全胃代食管吻合术可对食管癌切术后的胃食管反流病情起到更为理想的控制效果,可为食管癌患者术中吻合术式的选择提供一定参考价值.Abstract: Objective To compare the control effect on postoperative GER disease between tubular EC stomach esophagus anastomosis and the traditional full stomach esophagus anastomosis.Methods From September2010 to October 2015 in Bozhou People's Hospital, 85 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer undergoing elective resection were randomly divided into a tubular stomach EC group(45 cases) and total gastrectomy group(40 cases), two patients underwent esophageal resection, wherein the tubular stomach set of rows of tubular esophagus stomach anastomosis, total gastrectomy group underwent conventional full stomach esophagus anastomosis.After the surgery until the patient to return to normal gastrointestinal function uses dynamic monitor its p H 24 h esophageal p H monitoring chamber,the other respectively after 1 March using RDQ Scale GER-relatedsymptoms in patients with score, at the same time Statistics after 1 March of the occurrence of GER.Results There were no deaths occurred,and no occurrence of postoperative anastomotic fistula and thoracic gastric emptying dysfunction,etc;the two groups were almost reached full monitoring 24 h, and between groups while monitoring the total time,Li position monitoring time,there was no significant supine monitoring time(P>0.05);24 h reflux episodes long tubular gastric reflux group and significantly less than the number of total gastrectomy group, the longest duration of reflux and p H value <4.00 The cumulative time was significantly shorter in total gastrectomy group,De Meester scores were significantly lower than the total gastrectomy group,between groups were statistically significant(P<0.01);postoperative gastric tube 1,March RDQ score and incidence of GER significantly lower than the total gastrectomy group, between groups were statistically significant(P<0.01 or P<0.05).Conclusion Tubular stomach esophagus anastomosis compared with conventional full stomach esophagus anastomosis resection of esophageal cancer has a more ideal GER disease control effect, and can provide a reference for the choice of nastomosis ways for patients with esophageal cancer surgery.
-
Key words:
- EC /
- GER /
- Tubular stomach esophagus anastomosis /
- Full stomach esophagus anastomosis
-
[1]熊玲,王芬.湖北省西北地区食管癌合并念珠菌感染的临床研究[J].实用癌症杂志,2015,30(7):1056-1058. [2]胡健,殷仕宝,叶阿奇,等.Ivor-Lewis术式在食管癌治疗中的应用价值研究[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2015,24(12):1327-1329. [3]李国立,王绪林.食管胃结合部腺癌术后反流疾病治疗与预防[J].中国实用外科杂志,2012,32(4):306-309. [4] [4]HU J,LI R,SUN L,et al.Influence of esophageal carcinoma operations on gas-troesophageal reflux[J].Ann Thorac Surg,2009,78(1):298-302. [5]徐特,张晓琦,邹晓平.胃食管反流病食管上皮损伤的机制[J].世界华人消化杂志,2014,22(21):3030-3035. [6] [6]CRONINJ,MCADAM E,DANIKAS A,et al.Epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)is overexpressed in high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and may represent a biomarker of histological progression in Barrett’s esophagus(BE)[J].Am J Gastroenterol,2011,106(1):46-56. [7]段红兵,李敏杰,康健乐.管状胃成形对预防食管癌切除术后胃食管反流的作用[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2010,17(5):417-419. [8]刘权兴,邓旭峰,戴纪刚.食管癌术后胃食管反流的机制及外科策略[J].中华临床医师杂志,2013,7(24):11745-11747. [9] [9]ANDEREGG M C,GISBERTZ S S,VAN BERGE HENEGOUWEN MI.Minimally invasive surgery for oesophageal cancer[J].Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol,2014,28(1):41. [10]吴仕光,万桂玲,李晓娟.食管癌术后胃食管反流和胃排空延迟的相关因素及处理[J].世界华人消化杂志,2006,14(1):75-78. [11]任宪伟,高锐,刘建阳,等.弯管型吻合器在经食管床行食管胃主动脉弓上吻合术中的应用[J].中国实用医药,2010,5(23):148-149. [12]李辉,张永明,杨文锋,等.食管胃侧侧吻合术预防胸段食管癌术后吻合口并发症临床价值分析[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2015,22(17):1397-1403. [13]张玉坤.全器械胃食管颈部侧侧吻合技术应用研究[J].泰山医学院学报,2015,36(1):51-52. [14] [14]HILA A,CHOWDHURY N,HAJAR N,et al.Swallow evaluation during multichannel intraluminal impedance and p H:an alternate method to assess esophageal transit[J].Clin Gastroenterol,2011,45(10):862-866. [15]郭小娜,童强.食管动态p H监测在不同术式食管癌病人中的应用研究[J].护理研究,2015,29(4):1477-1479. [16]温泽强,卿松,邓治林,等.管状胃食管吻合术对食管癌患者术后胃食管反流及生存质量的影响[J].疑难病杂志,2013,12(8):603-605. [17] [17]KIM H K,CHOI YH,SHIM J H,et al.Endoscopic evaluation of the quality of the anast omosis after esophagectomy with gastric tuberecon struction[J].World J Surg,2008,32(9):2010-2014. [18]韩孔启,杜海生.管状胃对食管癌术后胃动力及胃排空功能的影响[J].昆明医科大学学报,2016,37(2):89-92. [19]徐海萍,骆金华,孙杰,等.管状胃代食管减轻食管癌术后胃食管反流的临床效果[J].江苏医药,2011,37(14):1691-1693. [20]施庆彤,范黄新,刁亚利.管状胃宽度与食管癌术后抗胃食管反流的临床研究[J].中华胸部外科电子杂志,2016,3(1):25-28. [21]罗世忠,李明军.管状胃加胃底重建食管癌术后胃食管反流的临床研究[J].中国医药导报,2012,9(32):79-80. [22]王海东,杨康,廖克龙,等.管状胃食管吻合术对食管癌患者术后生活质量影响的临床研究[J].重庆医学,2011,40(12):1162-1163. [23]茹玉航.管状胃对食管癌切除术后患者生活质量的影响[J].实用癌症杂志,2013,28(4):376-378. [24]付军科,张勇,李新举,等.管状胃在食管贲门癌手术中的临床应用[J].现代肿瘤医学,2012,20(10):2072-2074. [25]方忠民,蓝斌,朱天翔,等.经食管床与经胸骨后上提路径行管状胃食管吻合术后患者生活质量的比较研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2013,16(11):1088-1091. [26]车嘉铭,项捷,陈凯,等.管状胃在食管、贲门癌手术中的临床应用[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2010,17(2):96-98. [27]王宗林,谢晓阳,易军.管状胃代食管术在食管癌、贲门癌中的临床应用研究[J].临床外科杂志,2011,19(8):550-552. [28]韩玉龙.管状胃技术在26例食管、贲门癌根治术中的应用分析[J].中国医师进修杂志,2011,34(8):21-23. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2544
- HTML全文浏览量: 705
- PDF下载量: 59
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
