经冠状窦心室起搏替代传统右心室起搏的可行性与安全性

闫世冉; 孙旭杜; 华宝桐; 李淑敏; 郭涛; 李琳

经冠状窦心室起搏替代传统右心室起搏的可行性与安全性

1. 昆明医科大学第一附属医院心内科
2. 菏泽市立医院心内科
3. 邢台市第三医院心内科

基金项目:

基金：云南省教育厅科学研究基金资助项目(2013C236); 云南省科技厅-昆明医科大学应用基础研究联合专项基金资助项目(2014FB037);

计量
- 文章访问数: 1979
- HTML全文浏览量: 602
- PDF下载量: 30
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-10-20

Feasibility and Safety of Ventricular Pacing Through Coronary Sinus Comparing with Traditional Right Ventricular Pacing

Funds:

基金：云南省教育厅科学研究基金资助项目(2013C236); 云南省科技厅-昆明医科大学应用基础研究联合专项基金资助项目(2014FB037);

摘要

摘要: 目的在普通心脏起搏器植入术中通过冠状窦(coronary sinus,CS)实施心室起搏,与传统右心室起搏比较其可行性与安全性.方法具有心脏永久起搏器植入适应证的61例患者随机分为传统右室起搏组和经CS心室起搏组,比较2组手术成功率、并发症、QRS波时限及起搏器参数.结果 (1)经CS心室起搏组的手术即刻成功率低于传统右室起搏组(100%和68.97%,P<0.01);其中经CS心室起搏组采用左心室专用电极手术成功率明显高于普通心室翼状电极组(85.71%与25%,P<0.05);2组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);(2)术后1月CS心室起搏组QRS波增宽的程度明显小于传统右心室起搏组(P<0.05);(3)经CS心室起搏组术中、术后1月、3月起搏阈值和电极阻抗虽高于传统右室起搏组(P<0.05),但其数值均在起搏参数允许范围内,起搏效果良好.结论与传统右心室起搏比较,经CS心室起搏具有良好的安全性和有效性,更符合生理性心室激动顺序,采用左心室专用电极可明显提高CS心室起搏手术成功率.
- 冠状窦 /
- 心室起搏 /
- 可行性
Abstract: Objective To study the feasibility and safety of coronary sinus(CS) ventricular pacing comparing with traditional right ventricular(RV) pacing in ordinary pacing treatment.Methods Sixty-one patients with an indication of pacemaker implantation were randomized into traditional RV pacing group and CS ventricular pacing group. The success rate,complications,preoperative and postoperative QRS wave duration and pacemaker parameters were compared between the two groups.Results(1) The instant success rate in traditional RV pacing and the CS pacing groups were 100% and 68.97%(P<0.01); the surgical success rate was significantly higher by using left ventricular electrode than the ventricle tined electrode in CS pacing group(85.71%and 25%,P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05);(2) The increase of QRS complex width at postoperative 1 month in CS pacing group is significantly less than the RV pacing group(P<0.05);(3) Although the pacing threshold and electrode impedance during operation,postoperative 1 month and 3 months in CS pacing group were higher than RV pacing group(P<0.05),the CS pacing was effective.Conclusion The CS ventricular pacing is as safe and effective as traditional RVpacing,and is more consistent with physiological ventricular activation sequence.Using left ventricular electrode can significantly improve the success rate of CS ventricular pacing.
- Coronary sinus /
- Ventricular Pacing /
- Feasibility

HTML全文

参考文献(30)

[1]	[1]NAZMUL M N,CHA Y M,LIN G,et al.Percutaneous pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead removal in an attempt to improve symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation[J].Europace,2013,15(3):409-413.
[2]	[2]AL-BAWARDY R,KRISHNASWAMY A,BHARGAVA M,et al.Tricuspid regurgitation in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators:a comprehensive review[J].Clin Cardiol,2013,36(5):249-254.
[3]	[3]HOKE U,AUGER D,THIJSSEN J,et al.Significant lead-induced tricuspid regurgitation is associated with poor prognosis at long-term follow-up[J].Heart,2014,100(12):960-968.
[4]	[4]ZHANG X H,CHEN H,SIU C W,et al.New-Onset heart failure after permanent right ventricular apical pacing in patients with acquired high-grade atrioventricular block and normal left ventricular function[J].J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2008,19(2):136-141.
[5]	[5]WOLBER T,HAEGELI L,HUERLIMANN D,et al.Altered left ventricular contraction pattern during right ventricular pacing:assessment using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography[J].Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2011,34(1):76-81.
[6]	[6]EICKHOLT C,SIEKIERA M,KIRMANOGLOU K,et al.Improvement of left ventricular function under cardiac resynchronization therapy goes along with a reduced incidence of ventricular arrhythmia[J].PLo S One,2012,7(11):e48926.
[7]	[7]KONECNY T,DESIMONE CV,FRIEDMAN PA,et al.Synchronous intra-myocardial ventricular pacing without crossing the tricuspid valve or entering the coronary sinus[J].Cardiovasc Revasc Med,2013,14(3):137-138.
[8]王钰,高艳,马雪娟,等.速度向量成像技术评价心脏再同步化治疗左室扭转与收缩同步性的关系[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2015,29(3):209-211.
[9]陈乔,傅春江,杨立,等.右室高位间隔部与心尖部VVI起搏对心功能的影响[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2012,26(1):39-40.
[10]周建龙,朱天哲,盛晓东,等.不同起搏部位的选择对起搏器植入患者影响的随机对照研究[J].成都医学院学报,2014,9(2):162-165.
[11]	[11]ZIPSE M M,GROVES D W,KHANNA A D,et al.An Approach to Endovascular Ventricular Pacing in a Patient with Ebstein Anomaly and a Mechanical Tricuspid Valve[J].Card Electrophysiol Clin,2016,8(1):169-171.
[12]孙旭杜,郭涛,李淑敏.永久心室起搏电极植入部位的变迁[J].昆明医科大学学报,2013,(1B):236-240.
[13]	[13]WINTER J,GRAMSCH-ZABEL H,FURST G,et al.Long-term follow-up of left ventricular pacing via a posterior cardiac vein after mechanical tricuspid valve replacement[J].Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2001,24(1):125-126.
[14]	[14]SCHEFFER M,VAN GELDER B.Transvenous implantation of a ventricular pacing lead in a patient with an artificial tricuspid valve prosthesis[J].Neth Heart J,2003,11(9):359-361.
[15]	[15]VIJAYAKUMAR M,KAMATH P,PAI P G.Permanent pacing in a patient with tricuspid prosthesis-widening therapeutic use of coronary sinus[J].Indian Heart J,2013,65(5):611-613.
[16]	[16]SIDERIS S,DRAKOPOULOU M,OIKONOMOPOULOS G,et al.Left ventricular pacing through coronary sinus is feasible and safe for patients with prior tricuspid valve intervention[J].Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2016,39(4):378-381.
[17]	[17]YODA M,NAKAI T,OKUBO K,et al.First case report in Japan of left ventricular pacing via a coronary vein in a patient with a mechanical tricuspid valve[J].Circ J,2008,72(2):335-336.
[18]	[18]DEMIR A D,SEN N,ERBAY A R,et al.An effective and safe alternative to epicardial pacemaker placement for permanent pacemaker implantation in a patient with mechanical tricuspid valve:stimulation of the left ventricle through the coronary sinus[J].Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars,2011,39(3):244-247.
[19]	[19]HERRE J M,BULLABOY C A,DERKAC W M,et al.Permanent transvenous dual-chamber pacing using the coronary sinus in a patient with a mechanical prosthetic tricuspid valve[J].Pediatr Cardiol,2004,25(1):65-66.
[20]孙旭杜,李淑敏,赵玲,等.经冠状窦植入永久心室电极实现心室起搏方法学初探[J].临床内科杂志,2014,31(4):279-280.
[21]王景峰.心脏再同步化治疗的起搏电极置入及注意事项[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2006,20(4):287-290.
[22]	[22]AHMED K,MUNAWAR M,MUNAWAR DA,et al.Left ventricular lead positioning in cardiac resynchronization therapy:an innovative retrograde approach without using snare[J].Europace,2015,17(3):495-498.
[23]冯俊,王爱玲,程景林,等.不同类型心血管介入手术辐射剂量分析[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2012,3(24):416-419.
[24]	[24]ROKA A,BORGQUIST R,SINGH J.Coronary Sinus Lead Positioning[J].Card Electrophysiol Clin,2015,7(4):635-647.
[25]陶四明,韩明华,魏巍,等.新型简化J型导丝设计引导低位房间隔起搏的可行性及安全性[J].昆明医科大学学报,2016,37(3):111-115.
[26]	[26]SCHARF C,KRASNIQI N,HELLERMANN J,et al.Electrical activation in the coronary sinus branches as a guide to cardiac resynchronisation therapy:rationale for a coordinate system[J].PLo S,2011,6(8):e19914.
[27]	[27]KORANTZOPOULOS P,ZHANG Z,LI G,et al.Meta-Analysis of the Usefulness of Change in QRS Width to Predict Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy[J].Am J Cardiol,2016,118(9):1368-1373.
[28]	[28]BRYANT A R,WILTON S B,LAI M P,et al.Association between QRS duration and outcome with cardiac resynchronization therapy:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Electrocardiol,2013,46(2):147-155.
[29]张贵生,张婷婷,李隆贵.右心室流入道起搏QRS波时限对心功能的影响[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2011,9(6):674-675.
[30]吴印生.心脏起搏的新观念:对传统心脏起搏部位的再认识[J].临床心血管病杂志,2011,27(8):635-638.

相关文章(20)

[1]	夏文华, 孙翔, 邵建林. 视神经鞘直径指导神经胶质瘤手术患者脱水治疗的可行性研究, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220620
[2]	王春晖, 徐佩琦, 史云强, 平秦榕, 杨萌, 王英宝, 钟一鸣, 毕晓方. PKEP术后短期留置尿管的可行性分析, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220313
[3]	董文辉, 邹煦, 巩忠, 苏丽琴, 李慧英, 张晗. 体检人群使用NOSAS评分作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停初筛工具的可行性分析, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210509
[4]	王亚洲, 黄芩, 李小明, 张笃飞, 韦焘. 川崎病冠状动脉损害与发热持续时间的相关性, 昆明医科大学学报.
[5]	期俊辉, 罗林, 余泽然, 施镇江, 庄永辉, 戴成国. YL-1型颅内血肿粉碎穿刺针引导行脑叶深部病灶手术可行性, 昆明医科大学学报.
[6]	杨斌, 杜伟, 段文帅. 能谱纯化技术在双能量CTA诊断颅内动脉瘤中的可行性, 昆明医科大学学报.
[7]	Mishra Prashant, 李炯明. 腹腔镜和机器人辅助回肠代输尿管术在临床应用中的可行性和治疗效果（英文）, 昆明医科大学学报.
[8]	段先忠, 黄应龙, 朱晓瑞, 董学丽, 马东升, 王剑松. 无管化PCNL治疗上尿路结石的可行性, 昆明医科大学学报.
[9]	白向锋, 陶杰, 蒙俊, 杨伟. 左心室重建术对左心室重构的影响, 昆明医科大学学报.
[10]	张莉, 邵帅, 陈涌. 内镜辅助下治疗牙源性上颌窦病变, 昆明医科大学学报.
[11]	原斌. 缺血性心肌病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对改善左心室功能、降低心血管事件发生率的作用, 昆明医科大学学报.
[12]	李政. 磁共振结合CA199、CEA、CA50、ALP对诊断肝内胆管结石合并早期胆管癌的可行性, 昆明医科大学学报.
[13]	王新文. 体表定位法留置右颈内静脉带涤纶套血液透析导管的可行性, 昆明医科大学学报.
[14]	陶四明. 新型简化J型导丝设计引导低位房间隔起搏的可行性及安全性, 昆明医科大学学报.
[15]	姚永良. 腹腔镜联合控制性创伤治疗老年性低位直肠癌的可行性分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
[16]	彭民安. NT-proBNP与冠状动脉病变严重程度的相关性, 昆明医科大学学报.
[17]	彭民安. NT-proBNP与冠状动脉病变严重程度的相关性, 昆明医科大学学报.
[18]	罗庆祎. 单心动周期全容积成像评价心肌梗死患者左心室收缩功能收缩同步性, 昆明医科大学学报.
[19]	. 踝臂指数与冠状动脉狭窄的相关性分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
[20]	. 公共卫生学院双语教学可行性的初步分析, 昆明医科大学学报.