测压吸石输尿管软镜引导鞘在输尿管软镜治疗肾结石中的应用
Application of a Pressure-measuring and Stone-extracting Ureteral Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy For Renal Stones
-
摘要: [摘要]目的 探讨测压吸石输尿管扩张鞘(UAS)在输尿管软镜治疗肾结石术中的安全性及有效性.方法 回顾性分析2014年11月至2015年9月成都军区昆明总医院泌尿外科行输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术(FURS)治疗肾结石病例98例,分为A、B 2组.A组病例软镜碎石术中使用新型测压吸石输尿管软镜引导鞘,术中联合负压吸引碎石;B组病例术中使用单纯测压型输尿管软镜引导鞘.术中设定灌注泵流量0.2 L/min,灌注压力上限设定为100 mm Hg,A组吸引负压为10 kPa,术中根据视野清晰情况及肾内压力大小对灌注流量、压力及时进行调整.记录并对比分析两组病例术中肾内压力变化及走势和灌注时间.结果 2组患者均顺利完成手术.A组患者术中压力调整及时,手术全程肾内压力均低于B组患者,肾内平均压力为(10.88±5.911)mmHg.B组患者术中平均肾内压力为(20.10±7.68)mmHg,压力控制困难、不稳定.结论 使用新型输尿管软镜引导鞘配合软镜手术,可使术中肾内压力人为可控,手术过程安全可行.
-
关键词:
- [关键词]输尿管软镜 /
- 软镜引导鞘 /
- 负压吸引 /
- 肾结石 /
- 测压
Abstract: [Abstract]Objective To investigate the application value of a pressure-measuring and stone-extracting ureteral access sheath (UAS) used together with negative pressure suction system during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal caculus.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the 98 cases of renal caculus who received flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (FURS)in the Department of Urology of the Kunming General Hospital of Chengdu Military Command from November 2014 to September 2015, and the enrolled cases were divided into two groups: group A and group B. The new UAS was used in group A combined with vacuum suction during lithotripsy, and simple manometry type UAS was used in group B. The infusion pump flow rate of 0.2 L /min was set in the operation, the perfusion pressure limit was set to 100 mmHg, the suction pressure of group A was 10 kPa. Perfusion flow rate and pressure was adjusted in a timely manner based on the clear vision and the internal pressure force on the kidney. Then we recorded and compared the internal pressure and variation trend of renal and perfusion time of two groups. Results Two groups of patients were successfully completed surgery .The renal pressures in group A were adjusted duly and were lower than the that in group B in the whole process of operation. The average renal pressure in group A was 10.88±5.911mmHg. The average renal pressure in group B was 20.10±7.68 mmHg,the pressure control was difficult and unsteady.Conclusion The new type of UAS in the flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy(FURS)can make the renal pressure in surgery controllable and is safe for the FURS. 期刊类型引用(14)
1. 马国津,李佳晶,崔金利,林秀玉. ~(18)F-FDOPA PET/CT评估放射化学治疗用于高级别脑胶质瘤效果. 中国医学影像技术. 2024(01): 27-31 . 百度学术
2. 徐惠,徐利本,吴立广,冯志俊. 恶性脑胶质瘤术后患者接受替莫唑胺联合调强放射治疗的疗效和预后分析. 中国肿瘤临床与康复. 2024(02): 87-92 . 百度学术
3. 阙晓梅. 非小细胞肺癌合并心力衰竭的临床特点及同步放化疗联合阿帕替尼的效果. 吉林医学. 2024(12): 2962-2965 . 百度学术
4. 崔萍,韩燕梅,温昌明,李媛媛,孙军. 显微镜下全切术联合同位素治疗脑胶质瘤的疗效及其对VEGF等指标和患者预后的影响. 实用癌症杂志. 2023(05): 787-789 . 百度学术
5. 包德强,吴畅,杨东晓,李泳慧. 高级别脑胶质瘤术后同步加量调强放疗和术后序贯加量调强放疗的效果比较. 中外医学研究. 2023(27): 14-18 . 百度学术
6. 黄晓燕,陈雄,李永青. 化疗联合阿帕替尼及调强放疗治疗中晚期宫颈癌老年患者的临床效果观察. 基层医学论坛. 2023(28): 16-18 . 百度学术
7. 张林. 容积旋转调强放疗与调强适形放疗治疗脑胶质瘤患者的效果比较. 中国民康医学. 2022(03): 140-142 . 百度学术
8. 王宇. 放疗联合阿帕替尼及多西他赛治疗晚期肺癌的近期疗效及安全性观察. 当代医学. 2022(08): 74-76 . 百度学术
9. 全黎莉,宋海斌,宋丽良. 贝伐株单抗与阿帕替尼分别联合替莫唑胺治疗复发性高级别脑胶质瘤的近期及远期疗效分析. 中国现代医学杂志. 2022(23): 11-15 . 百度学术
10. 何远秀,钟文君,李悦,邹彦. 复发脑胶质瘤的诊断及治疗进展. 海南医学. 2021(02): 246-249 . 百度学术
11. 方松. 适形调强放疗序贯替莫唑胺联合阿帕替尼治疗术后高级别脑胶质瘤的疗效. 医学理论与实践. 2021(14): 2439-2441 . 百度学术
12. 黄俊龙,高振文,董桂江. 伽马刀联合替莫唑胺序贯疗法治疗脑胶质瘤的临床疗效及其复发情况研究. 临床合理用药杂志. 2021(30): 58-60 . 百度学术
13. 黄俊萍,周志宇,谢昌纪,蓝欢,李光. 容积旋转调强放疗(VMRT)应用于脑胶质瘤患者的疗效. 山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院)学报. 2021(08): 598-601 . 百度学术
14. 刘颖. 立体适形放疗在治疗脑胶质母细胞瘤术后患者的临床价值. 黑龙江中医药. 2021(06): 50-51 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(2)
-

计量
- 文章访问数: 3211
- HTML全文浏览量: 1144
- PDF下载量: 111
- 被引次数: 16