乳腺钼靶和超声检查对于诊断乳腺癌的价值对比
Comparison of the Diagnosis Significance for Breast Cancer between Single High Frequency Ultrasonography and Mammography
-
摘要: 目的 为了评估高频超声、钼靶和联合检查对于诊断乳腺癌的意义.方法 2015年12月至2016年12月从昆明医科大学附属甘美医院门诊病人共12 057例病例中, 筛选出在昆明医科大学附属甘美医院行术前影像学检查, 术后病理证实为乳腺癌的患者共355例.对该355份病历进行回顾性分析, 355名患者均行超声及钼靶诊断随机分为3组, 单独统计超声结果的有125例患者, 单独统计乳房钼靶结果的有103例患者, 统计组合检测结果的有127例患者.结果 钼靶X线检查的符合率为79.4%, 误诊率为10.7%, 和漏诊率为9.8%;高频超声检测的符合率80.0%, 误诊率为11.2%, 漏诊率为4.6%;2种检查结合的符合率是89.7%, 误诊率为6.3%, 漏诊率为4.0%.2种检查组合应用和单一应用高频超声和单一应用钼靶检查相比, 灵敏度和漏诊率有统计学差异.误诊率无统计学差异.结论 钼靶X线检查和高频超声分别有自己的优势.组合应用可以使2个检查优势互补, 显著提高了检出率和准确率, 降低乳腺癌误诊率和漏诊率.Abstract: Objective To evaluate diagnostic significance of single high frequency ultrasound and mammography and combined therapy of both on breast cancer. Me thods 355 cases of female breast cancer were selected from The First Hospital of Kunming from December 2015 to December 2016. Among these 355 patients, 125 cases had only performed high frequency ultrasound, 103 cases had only performed breast X-ray radiography, 127 cases of conducted the therapy of both. Re s ults The coincidence rate of singlebreast X-ray was 79.4%, the misdiagnosis rate was 10.7%, the missed diagnosis rate was 9.8%. The coincidence rate of single high-frequency ultrasonic testis80.0%, the misdiagnosis rate was 11.2%, the missed diagnosis rate was 4.6%; the coincidence rate of combination of two test was 89.7%, the misdiagnosis rate was 6.3%, the missed diagnosis rate was 4.0%. The detection rate and the missed diagnosis of joint diagnosis had statistical difference with single high frequency ultrasound and single mammography.There was no statistical difference on misdiagnosis rate. Conclus ions Both high frequency ultrasound and mammography has their own advantages respectively. The joint application of both has better diagnosis complementary, and can significantly improve the detection rate and the accuracy rate of breast cancer, decrease the rate of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis rate.
-
[1] 吴树强, 赵朝华, 李普查, 等.中国乳腺癌全人群生存率分析[J].现代肿瘤医学, 2010, 18 (7) :1323-1325. [2]张军.钼靶和超声结合诊断早期乳腺癌分析[J].中国误诊学杂志, 2011, 11 (16) :4002-4003. [3]尚林辉, 肖刚, 郭大庆.乳腺癌的影像学方法比较研究[J].解放军医药杂志, 2011, 23 (4) :5153. [4]王娟, 王润华, 王继见, 等.钼靶X线摄影对乳腺癌的诊断价值研究[J].中国全科医学, 2010, 13 (4) :3942-3943. [5]张根娥, 张仕英, 彭德坚.高频彩色多普勒超声在乳腺癌诊断中的临床价值[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志, 2010, 18 (6) :729. [6]吴树强, 赵朝华, 李普查, 等.超声与X线铂靶检查及两者联合应用对乳腺癌的诊断价值[J].现代肿瘤医学, 2010, 18 (17) :1323-1325. [7]尹益民, 任晓萍, 潘文倩, 等.高频超声及钼靶X线检查在乳腺癌诊断中的应用价值[J].西安交通大学学报 (医学版) , 2012, 33 (5) :572-575. [8]德杰, 李彩英.数字钼靶X线摄影与彩色多普勒超声对乳腺癌的诊断价值[J].放射学实践, 2010, 25 (9) :55-58. [9]张英.彩色多普勒超声联合乳腺钼靶摄片对乳腺癌的诊断价值[J].中国基层医药, 2010, 17 (8) :2565. [10]张明满, 高根五, 余永康, 等.近红外线扫描与彩色多普勒超声对乳腺肿块诊断的临床评价[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2001, 8 (11) :326. [11]贺红艳, 张大伟, 韦德湛, 等.钼靶、超声检出微钙化灶对乳腺癌诊断价值的研究[J].中国妇幼保健, 2013, 28 (22) :3678-3681. [12]孟淑萍, 张正平, 王霈, 等.CT、超声、X线钼靶在乳腺癌诊断中的应用价值研究[J].中国CT与MRI杂志, 2014, 4 (7) :33-35. [13]唐蓉, 梁祯, 丁力, 等.高频彩超在乳腺癌筛查中的价值[J].西部医学, 2015, 27 (4) :592-594. [14]李弋, 叶兆祥.彩色多普勒超声诊断乳腺癌现状[J].国际医学放射学杂志, 2010, 33 (2) :89-91. [15]蒋新颜.高频彩超诊断早期乳腺癌的价值[J].实用临床医药杂志, 2010, 14 (15) :149-150. [16]丁玉兰, 姜海霞.乳腺癌钼靶X线与超声诊断的对比研究[J].实用医学影像杂志, 2012, 13 (6) , 129-132. [17]宿文斗, 王彤.彩色超声和X射线钼靶对乳腺癌诊断的价值评价[J].河北医药, 2010, 32 (7) :1759-1761. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 3047
- HTML全文浏览量: 1023
- PDF下载量: 71
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
