术前多频稳态残余听力对人耳蜗术后言语恢复影响的临床分析
Clinical Analysis of the Effect of Preoperative Multi-frequency Steady State Potential Residual Hearing on Speech Recovery after Cochlear Surgery
-
摘要: 目的 探讨多频稳态诱发电位高低频残余听力对人工耳蜗术后言语恢复的影响.方法 回顾性分析昆明市儿童医院2014年1月至2016年1月诊断为重度或极重度感音神经性耳聋且术前多频稳态诱发电位存在残余听力的102例患儿, 采用言语可懂度分级 (speech intelligibility rating, SIR) 得分, 判断术前多频稳态诱发电位高低频残余听力对人工耳蜗术后语训1 a言语恢复的影响.结果 多频稳态诱发电位高频组术后语训1 a言语可懂度分级 (SIR) 得分 (3.93±0.8) 分, 而低频组术后语训1 a言语可懂度分级 (SIR) 得分 (3.20±0.94) 分, 且高频组与低频组之间具有统计学意义 (P<0.05) .多频稳态诱发电位高频组 (1.0, 2.0 kHz) 术后语训1 a言语可懂度分级 (SIR) 得分为 (3.93±0.8) 分, 而低频组 (0.5, 1.0kHz) 术后语训1 a言语可懂度分级 (SIR) 得分 (3.20±0.94) 分, 且高频组与低频组之间差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05) .结论 术前为高频残余听力的患儿术后言语恢复情况较术前为低频残余听力的患儿恢复情况好, 故高频残余听力对人工耳蜗术后言语恢复更加有利.Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of multi-frequency steady state potential of high frequency and low frequency residual hearing on speech recovery after cochlear implantation.Methods We retrospectively analyzed 102 cases of children with severe or extremely severe sensorineural deafness and Residual hearing found in preoperative ASSR in Kunming children's Hospital from January 2014 to January 2016.Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) was used to evaluate the effects of preoperative high frequency and low frequency residual hearing on SIR after 1 years of cochlear implant training.Results The ASSR high-frequency group (1.0, 2.0 kHz) after 1 years of language training speech intelligibility rating score was (3.93±0.8) , and low frequency group (0.5, 1.0 kHz) after 1 years of language training speech intelligibility rating score was (3.20±0.94) and between the high frequency group and low frequency group was statistically significant (P<0.05) .Conclusions Children with high frequency residual hearing before surgery have better postoperative speech recovery than those with low frequency residual hearing before operation.Therefore, it can be concluded that high frequency residual hearing is more favorable for speech recovery after cochlear implantation.
-
[1]王铮, 谷佳, 姜学钧.语前聋人工耳蜗植入患儿多频稳态诱发反应与主观阈值的相关性研究[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2017, 8 (31) :605-607. [2] [2]HEHAR S S, NIKOLOPOULOS T P, GIBBIN K P, et al.Surgery and functional outcomes in deaf children receiving cochlear implants before age 2 year[J].Archives of Otolarngology Head Neck Surg, 2002, 128 (1) :11-14. [3]郗昕, 洪梦迪, 韩东一, 等.人工耳蜗植入后聋儿听力培建效果的评价[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2002, 10 (3) :143-145. [4]陈泉东, 高映勤, 马静, 等.听性稳态反应对人工耳蜗植入者术前残余听力评估的意义[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2012, 20 (4) :364-365. [5] [5]O'NEILL C, ARCHBOLD S M, O'DONOGHUE G M, et al.Indirect costs, cost-utiliy variations and the funding of paediatric cochlear implantation[J].Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2001, 58 (1) :53-57. [6]张斯斯, 林有辉, 张榕, 等.语前聋患者人工耳蜗植入术后听觉言语康复相关影响因素的研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2013, (5) :335-338. [7] [7]RANCE G, DOWELL R C, RICKARDS F W, et al.Steady-state evoked pote nitial and behavioural hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent click-evoked auditory brainstem response[J].Ear Hear, 1998, 19 (1) :48-61. [8]乔晓峰, 白伟红, 王东, 等.人工耳蜗植入术儿童多频稳态诱发反应与NRT值和T值的相关性研究术[J].中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2015, 23 (5) :321-332. [9] [9]KIEFER J, GSTOETTNER W, BAUMGARTNER W, et al.Conservation of lowfrequency hearing in cochlear implantantion[J].Acta Otolaryngol, 2004, 124 (3) :272-280. [10] [10]GANTZ B J, TURNER C W.Combining acoustic and electric hearing[J].Laryngoscope, 2003, 113 (10) :1726-1730. [11]李昌亚, 师国军, 赵厚育.影响语前聋患儿人工耳蜗植入术后前语言交流能力的因素分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2017, 25 (4) :415-418.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1554
- HTML全文浏览量: 550
- PDF下载量: 57
- 被引次数: 0