尾侧入路与中间入路行腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术临床对比

舒若; 刘童蕾; 田衍; 方仕旭; 罗华友

尾侧入路与中间入路行腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术临床对比

昆明医科大学第一附属医院胃肠与疝外科

基金项目:

基金：云南省科技厅-昆明医科大学应用基础研究联合专项基金资助项目 (2015FB024);

计量
- 文章访问数: 2448
- HTML全文浏览量: 718
- PDF下载量: 81
- 被引次数: 2
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-03-10

Clinical Contrastive Study between Caudal-to-crainal and Medial-to-lateral Approaches for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy

Funds:

基金：云南省科技厅-昆明医科大学应用基础研究联合专项基金资助项目 (2015FB024);

摘要

摘要: 目的比较尾侧入路法腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术与中间入路法腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术的近期临床疗效.方法回顾性分析2014年6月至2017年6月昆明医科大学第一附属医院胃肠外科行腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术的124例患者的临床资料, 其中, 尾侧入路组48例, 中间入路组76例, 比较2组患者的基本资料、手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目、中转开腹率、术后恢复流质饮食时间、术后排气时间、术后住院时间、并发症等, 比较2种入路方法的近期临床效果.结果 2组患者的性别、年龄、BMI等基本资料比较, 差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05) ;尾侧入路组与中间入路组手术时间[ (123.29 14.19) min vs (140.57 25.40) min]、术中出血量[ (60.63 24.00) m L vs (77.24 36.90) m L]比较, 差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05) ;2组患者淋巴结清扫数目、中转开腹率、术后恢复流质饮食时间、术后排气时间、术后住院时间及并发症发生情况比较, 差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05) .结论尾侧入路法腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术具有简单易行、失血量少、安全有效的优点, 值得临床推广应用.
- 右半结肠癌根治术 /
- 腹腔镜 /
- 尾侧入路法 /
- 中间入路法
Abstract: Objective To compare the short-term therapeutic effects of the caudal-to-crainal and medial-to-lateral approaches for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Me thod The clinical data of 124 patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in the department of gastrointestinal surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical Universitiy from, June 2014 to June 2016, were analyzed retrospectively. According the surgical operation, the patients were divided into two groups, caudal-to-crainal group with 48 patients, and medial-to-lateral group with 76 patients. The characteristics, opertation time, volum of blood loss during operation, the number of lymph node dissection, the rate of conversion to laparotomy, postoperative eating time, postoperative ventilation time, postoperative hospital stay time, postoperative complications of the two groups were analyzed to compare the short-term therapeutic effects. Re s ult No significant differences were found in the sexual distinction, age, BMI, the volume blood loss during the operation, the number of lymph node dissection, the rate of conversion to laparotomy, postoperative eating time, postoperative ventilation time, postoperative hospital stay time, postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05) .Significant differences were found in the operation time [caudal-to-crainal group vs medial-to-lateral group (123.49 ±14.19 min VS 140.57 ±25.40 min) ]and the blood loss of the operation[caudal-to-crainal group vs medial-to-lateral group (60.63±24.00 ml vs77.24±36.90 ml) ].Conclus ionThe caudal-to-crainal approach for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is more simple, practicable, with less blood loss during the operation and safer, which worth being recommended in right-hemicolectom-surgery.
- Right-hemicolectom-surgery /
- Laparoscopic /
- Caudal-to-crainal approach /
- Medial-to-lateral approach

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

[1]肖毅, 邱辉忠, 吴斌, 等.腹腔镜下根治性右半结肠切除术的手术效果和肿瘤学疗效[J].中华外科杂志, 2014, 52 (4) :249-253.
[2] 李国新, 赵丽瑛.腹腔镜中间入路扩大右半结肠癌D3根治术[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2012, 11 (3) :200-203.
[3]	[3] WEST N P, HOHENBERGER W, WEBER K, et al.Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon[J].J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28 (2) :272-278.
[4]	[4] VELDKAMP R, KUHRY E, HOP W C, et al.Colon cancer laparoscopic or open resection study group (COLOR) .Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:short-term out-comes of a randomised trial[J].Lancet Oncol, 2005, 6 (7) :477-484.
[5]	[5]LACY A M, GARCA-VALDECASAS J C, DELGADO S, et al.Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer:Arandomised trial[J].Lancet, 2002, 359 (9325) :2224-2229.
[6]	[6]WANG C L, QU G, XU H W.The short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer:a meta-analysis[J].Int J Colorectal Dis, 2014, 29 (3) :309-320.
[7]	[7] MORNEAU M, BOULANGER J, CHARLEBOIS P, et al.Laparoscopic versus open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer:A literature review and recommendations from the Comitéde l'évolution des pratiques en oncologie[J].Can J Surg, 2013, 56 (5) :297-310.
[8]	[8]THEOPHILUS M, PLATELL C, SPILSBURY K.Longterm survival following laparoscopic and open colectomy for colon cancer:A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Colorectal Dis, 2014, 16 (3) :75-81.
[9] 李国新, 赵丽瑛.结肠癌切除标准化手术-全结肠系膜切除术[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2012, 15 (1) :14-16.
[10]孙艳武, 池畔, 林惠铭, 等.腹腔镜与开腹完整结肠系膜切除术的疗效比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2012, 15 (1) :24-27.
[11]	[11] TONG D K, LAW W L.Laparoscopic versus open right hemico-lectomt for carcinoma of the colon[J].JSLS, 2007, 11 (1) :76-80.
[12]李美荣, 张锐江, 吴桂堂, 等.单切口腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术手术入路的探讨[J].腹腔镜外科杂志, 2013, 18 (9) :679-681.
[13]郝云鹤, 王连臣, 候本新, 等.腹腔镜下不同入路行右半结肠癌根治术临床疗效观察[J].海南医学, 2015, 26 (17) :2598-2599.
[14]张锐明, 江腾.腹腔镜两种中间入路在右半结肠癌根治术中的疗效比较[J].中国医药科学, 2017, 7 (4) :157-159.
[15]	[15] FEROCIF, LENZIE, GARZIA, et al.Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Int J Colorectal Dis, 2013, 28 (9) :1177-1186.
[16]王伟, 罗立杰, 郑燕生.肥胖患者腹腔镜辅助下右半结肠癌根治术不同入路效果比较[J].广东医学, 2011, 32 (23) :3106-3107.
[17]王峰, 李正平.不同入路腹腔镜根治术治疗右半结肠癌的临床效果[J].中国医药导报, 2016, 13 (25) :80-83.
[18]陈炜.腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术不同手术入路的疗效比较[J].中华临床医师杂志, 2014, 8 (14) :2619-2622.
[19]王晓斌.腹腔镜辅助下右半结肠癌根治术不同入路效果分析[J].当代医学, 2014, 20 (9) :8-9.
[20]雷晓东, 邓伟均, 李苏明, 等.入路位置对手助腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的效果影响[J].国际医药卫生导报, 2013, 18 (19) :2846-2849.
[21]韩亮, 刘磊, 王辉.腹腔镜根治性右半结肠癌切除术不同手术入路的比较[J].华中科技大学学报 (医学版) , 2015, 44 (4) :464-467.

相关文章(20)

[1]	施承民, 张同, 吴志忠, 罗华友, 曾玉剑. 单孔TEP手术腹直肌后鞘前方与后方入路的对比, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230522
[2]	张权昌, 吴乔联, 刘宇, 赵欣. 腹腔镜与开腹完全结肠系膜切除术对结肠癌患者血小板活化、并发症发生率及肿瘤复发的影响, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230919
[3]	冯子豪. 腹腔镜手术联合地塞米松术腔冲洗治疗子宫内膜异位症的疗效观察, 昆明医科大学学报.
[4]	姜云艳. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗宫颈癌的临床护理体会, 昆明医科大学学报.
[5]	罗礼君. 经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床对照研究, 昆明医科大学学报.
[6]	李文亮. 腹腔镜下腹直肌前鞘子宫固定术治疗子宫脱垂的临床分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
[7]	张川波. 综合护理干预在对腹腔镜下小儿腹股沟斜疝修补术治疗术中的应用, 昆明医科大学学报.
[8]	余韬. 腹腔镜手术联合内异消癥汤治疗子宫内膜异位症不孕疗效观察, 昆明医科大学学报.
[9]	骆聪. 腹腔镜胆道镜微创保胆取石术112例临床分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
[10]	李涓. 应用宫腹腔镜切除术治疗子宫纵隔53例妊娠临床分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
[11]	马原. 腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术治疗宫颈癌的临床分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
[12]	郭姝婧. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝无张力修补术56例临床体会, 昆明医科大学学报.
[13]	王英. 腹腔镜全子宫切除术的临床应用, 昆明医科大学学报.
[14]	肖仲贤. 腹腔镜肝切除术7 例临床体会, 昆明医科大学学报.
[15]	段元元. 输卵管妊娠腹腔镜治疗后持续性输卵管妊娠的非手术治疗, 昆明医科大学学报.
[16]	杨保祥. 采用常规器械经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术64例临床分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
[17]	张海静. 腹腔镜胃肠旁路治疗2型糖尿病的手术配合, 昆明医科大学学报.
[18]	马锦霞. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗卵巢囊肿的临床比较, 昆明医科大学学报.
[19]	. 腹腔镜直肠癌手术20例临床体会, 昆明医科大学学报.
[20]	. 胸乳入路腔镜下甲状腺切除术8例临床分析, 昆明医科大学学报.