外科学专业OSCE考试评分系统的探索
The Use of OSCE System among Students Majoring in Surgery
-
摘要: 目的 探索OSCE考试中考官年资以及考试评分表对考生考评结果的影响.方法 随机选择5年制临床医学完成外科学实习轮转的学生, 分为A、B 2组, 进行外科学OSCE考试.选择外科学教研室教师16名担任OSCE考官, 其中初级职称或中级职称考官8人, 高级职称考官8人, 比较2组学生考试结果以及两组考官的考评结果.结果 使用清单式评分表的不同年资的考官的考评分数没有显著的统计学差异;使用多维度评分表的不同年资的考官的考评分数结果有显著的统计学差异 (P<0.05) ;在80%以上的站点清单式评分表和多维度评分表显示出了显著的统计学相关性 (P<0.001) , 说明两种不同评分表均具有较高的可重复度.结论 清单式评分表的考评结果具有较高的可重复性, 在考官年资构成不同的OSCE考试中, 应尽量多采用清单式的考试评分表.评分表的评分设计还需要更多的研究, 使得其可以保持高信度, 同时兼具适当的效度以区分目标学生的学习层次.Abstract: Objective To evaluate the impact of different rating instruments used by raters with different seniority in OSCEs. Me thods Surgical interns were randomly divided into two groups to undertake a nine-station surgical OSCEs. Raters with different seniority were also divided into two groups with four senior raters and four junior raters in one group. OSCE results were compared. Re s ults There was no statistical significance when comparing results from different raters using checklist rating instrument. Results from different raters using global rating scale instrument were significantly different. Correlations between raters using checklist and global rating scale instruments showed statistical significance in 81.3% of stations. Conclus ion Checklist rating instrument showed high capability of repeating the results. Therefore, it is recommended to apply checklist as many as possible in OSCE exams with mixed rater seniorities. Research on design of rating instruments are to be investigated to insure the effectiveness as well as the credibility of the rating system.
-
Key words:
- OSCE /
- Rating instrumen /
- Rater /
- Credibility
-
[1] [1]HARDEN R M, STEVENSON M, DOWNIE WW, et al.Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination[J].British Medical Journal, 1975, 1 (5955) :447. [2] [2]HODGES B D.The Objective Structured Clinical Examination:three decades of development[J].J Vet Med Educ Winter, 2006, 33 (4) :571-577. [3] [3]HODGES B, MCILROY J H.Analytic global OSCE ratings are sensitive to level of training[J].Med Educ, 2003, 37 (11) :1012-1016. [4] [4]ADLER M D, VOZENILEK J A, TRAINOR J Let al.Comparison of checklist and anchored global rating instruments for performance rating of simulated pediatric emergencies[J].Simul Healthc, 2011, 6 (1) :18-24. [5] [5]MA IWY, ZALUNARDO N, PACHEV G, et al.Comparing the use of global rating scale with checklists for the assessment of central venous catheterization skills using simulation[J].Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2012, 17 (4) :457-470. [6] [6]REGEHR G, MACRAE H, REZNICK R K, et al.Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination[J].Acad Med, 1998, 73 (9) :993-997. [7] [7]REZNICK R, REGEHR G, MACRAE H, et al.Testing technical skill via an innovative''bench station''examination[J].American Journal of Surgery, 1997, 173 (3) :226-30. [8] [8]CROSSLEY J, JOLLY B.Making sense of work-based assessment:ask the right questions, in the right way, about the right things, of the right people[J].Medical Education, 2012, 46 (1) :28-37. [9]马春花, 贾彦彦, 周薇, 等.健康评估课程客观结构化临床考试信度和效度评价[J].现代预防医学, 2016, 43 (15) :2876-80. [10]王海平, 向良成, 张伟, 等.客观结构化临床考试信度的Meta分析[J].中国循证医学杂志, 2014, 13 (7) :878-83. [11]白纪红, 梁志清, 杨丽莎, , 等..临床医学专业本科生多重OSCE评价体系的构建、应用及思考[J].中国高等医学教育, 2015, 28 (5) :82-83. [12]何红波, 宁玉萍, 陈群, 等.精神科住院医师结业“5站式”考核评分标准的一致性分析[J].临床精神医学杂志, 2017, 36 (6) :385-87. [13]董靖竹, 张东华, 方明, 等.临床医学专业学位硕士研究生临床能力考核评估体系的建立与应用[J].中国高等医学教育, 2013, 26 (6) :115-116. [14]熊萍, 周婷, 张明珠, 等.口腔综合临床教学模式与传统临床教学模式实习效果比较[J].昆明医科大学学报, 2016, 37 (5) :144-147. [15]何玲, 张秀凤, 祝大丽, 等.临床实习儿科出科考试改革探讨J].昆明医科大学学报, 2007, 28 (s2) :113-115.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2082
- HTML全文浏览量: 724
- PDF下载量: 85
- 被引次数: 0