留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

术前空腹甘油三酯-血糖指数对颈内动脉支架置入术后对侧新发无症状缺血性脑损伤的预测价值

杨毅 申珅 万孟夏 张拥波

杨毅, 申珅, 万孟夏, 张拥波. 术前空腹甘油三酯-血糖指数对颈内动脉支架置入术后对侧新发无症状缺血性脑损伤的预测价值[J]. 昆明医科大学学报.
引用本文: 杨毅, 申珅, 万孟夏, 张拥波. 术前空腹甘油三酯-血糖指数对颈内动脉支架置入术后对侧新发无症状缺血性脑损伤的预测价值[J]. 昆明医科大学学报.
Yi YANG, Shen SHEN, Mengxia WAN, Yongbo ZHANG. Preoperative Fasting Triglyceride-glucose Index as a Predictor of Contralateral New Silent Ischemic Brain Lesions after Carotid Artery Stenting[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University.
Citation: Yi YANG, Shen SHEN, Mengxia WAN, Yongbo ZHANG. Preoperative Fasting Triglyceride-glucose Index as a Predictor of Contralateral New Silent Ischemic Brain Lesions after Carotid Artery Stenting[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University.

术前空腹甘油三酯-血糖指数对颈内动脉支架置入术后对侧新发无症状缺血性脑损伤的预测价值

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81671191)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    杨毅(1985~),女,山东济南人,医学博士,副主任医师,主要从事脑血管病的相关临床及基础研究工作

    通讯作者:

    张拥波,E-mail:yongbozhang2022@126.com

  • 中图分类号: R743.32

Preoperative Fasting Triglyceride-glucose Index as a Predictor of Contralateral New Silent Ischemic Brain Lesions after Carotid Artery Stenting

  • 摘要:   目的  探讨术前空腹甘油三酯-血糖指数(triglyceride-glucose index,TyG)对颈内动脉支架置入术(carotid artery stenting,CAS)后对侧新发无症状缺血性脑损伤(contralateral new silence ischemic brain lesions,CNSIBL)的预测价值。  方法  回顾性分析行颈内动脉支架置入术患者183例,根据是否存在CNSIBL发生的情况分为CNSIBL组50例和non- CNSIBL组133例,收集患者基线资料、实验室检查及影像学检查指标,计算TyG。以是否发生CNSIBL为因变量,控制混杂因素后,以TyG为自变量进行多因素Logistic回归分析和受试者工作特征曲线评价TyG对CAS后CNSIBL的预测价值。  结果  (1)CNSIBL组患者糖尿病病史例数、入院时收缩压及舒张压高于non-CNSIBL组(P < 0.05);(2)CNSIBL组甘油三酯高于non-CNSIBL组(P < 0.05);CNSIBL组TyG高于non-CNSIBL组(P < 0.05);(3)多因素Logistic回归分析结果提示TyG [矫正OR = 1.125,95% CI (1.042−1.214),P < 0.001]是颈内动脉支架置入术后对侧新发无症状缺血性脑损伤的独立影响因素;(4)ROC曲线提示,TyG预测颈内动脉支架置入术后对侧新发无症状缺血性脑损伤的AUC为0.77[95%CI (0.71−0.84),P < 0.001],cut-off值为1.93,灵敏度86.0%,特异度63.9%。  结论  TyG是颈内动脉支架置入术后对侧新发无症状缺血性脑损伤的独立影响因素。
  • 图  1  67岁男性右侧颈内动脉起始段重度狭窄行颈动脉起始段支架置入术

    A:为术前头MRI-DWI,无脑梗死病灶;B:数字减影血管造影,右侧颈内动脉起始段重度狭窄(蓝色箭头所示);C:数字减影血管造影,右侧颈内动脉起始段支架置入术后(蓝色箭头所示);E、术后头MRI-DWI,左侧颞叶新发DWI高信号(橘色箭头所示);F:术后头MRI-DWI,左侧半卵圆中心新发DWI高信号(橘色箭头所示)。

    Figure  1.  A 67-year-old male with severe stenosis in the right internal carotid artery origin (C1) undergoing stenting of the carotid artery origin

    图  2  TyG预测颈内动脉支架置入术后对侧新发无症状缺血性脑损伤的ROC曲线

    Figure  2.  ROC curve of TyG predicting contralateral new silent ischemic brain lesions after carotid artery stenting

    表  1  行颈内动脉支架置入术患者基线资料和实验室检查数据[$ \bar x \pm s $/M(P25,P75)/n(%)]

    Table  1.   Baseline data and laboratory test results of patients undergoing carotid artery stenting [$ \bar x \pm s $/M(P25,P75)/n(%)]

    基线信息 non-CNSIBL组
    n = 133
    CNSIBL组
    n = 50
    t/χ2/z P
    年龄(岁) 65.9 ± 12.7 67.7 ± 13.6 0.683 0.495
     男性 99(74.4) 38(76.0) 0.047 0.828
    高血压病史 95(71.4) 37(74.0) 0.120 0.730
    糖尿病病史 62(46.6) 32(64.0) 4.396 0.036*
    高脂血症病史 60(45.1) 22(44.0) 0.018 0.893
    缺血性脑卒中病史 25(18.8) 11(22.0) 0.236 0.627
    吸烟史 58(43.6) 18(36.0) 0.866 0.352
    饮酒史 61(45.9) 24(48.0) 0.067 0.796
    冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病病史 22(16.5) 12(24.0) 1.336 0.248
    入院时收缩压(mmHg) 137.9 ± 23.1 146.8 ± 22.2 5.094 0.031*
    入院时舒张压(mmHg) 85.4 ± 15.3 88.6 ± 16.4 3.741 0.049*
    入院时NIHSS评分 4[2,7] 4[2,8] 0.496 0.506
    静脉rt-PA治疗 27(20.3) 10(20.0) 0.002 0.964
    颈内动脉颅内段 78(58.6) 32(64.0) 0.434 0.510
    右侧颈内动脉 65(48.9) 23(46.0) 0.120 0.729
    开环支架 87(65.4) 34(68.0) 0.109 0.742
    空腹血糖(mmol/L) 4.94[4.29−8.11] 6.81[5.29−9.01] 3.734 0.068
    甘油三酯 (mmol/L) 1.20[0.57−2.21] 1.94[1.14−3.06] 8.864 0.004*
    TyG 1.11[0.36−2.23] 1.87[1.06−2.44] 12.241 0.001*
      缩写:CAS,颈内动脉支架置入术; CNSIBL,对侧新发无症状缺血性脑损伤;NIHSS:美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表; rt-PA:重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂;TyG,甘油三酯-血糖指数*P < 0.05具有统计学差异。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Ryu J C,Bae J H,Ha S H,et al. In-stent restenosis and stented-territory infarction after carotid and vertebrobasilar artery stenting[J]. BMC Neurol,2023,23(1):79-88. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03110-z
    [2] Gensicke H,Worp HB,Nederkoorn PJ,et al. Ischemic brain lesions after carotid artery stenting increase future cerebrovascular risk[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2015,65(6):521-529. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.038
    [3] Feng Y,Bai X,Zhang X,et al. Risk factors for new ischemic cerebral lesions after carotid artery stenting: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ann Vasc Surg,2021,77(1):296-305.
    [4] Kim M K,Ahn C W,Kang S,et al. Relationship between the triglyceride glucose index and coronary artery calcification in Korean adults[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol,2017,16(1):108-115. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0589-4
    [5] Tahapary DL,Pratisthita LB,Fitri NA,et al. Challenges in the diagnosis of insulin resistance: Focusing on the role of HOMA-IR and Triglyceride/glucose index[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr,2022,16(8):102581-102586. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102581
    [6] Alessandra da Silva,Ana Paula Silva Caldas,Helen Hermana Miranda Hermsdorff,et al. Triglyceride-glucose index is associated with symptomatic coronary artery disease in patients in secondary care[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol,2019,18(1):1-8. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0806-4
    [7] A Bouthillier,H R van Loveren,J T Keller. Segments of the internal carotid artery: A new classification[J]. Neurosurgery,1996,38(3):432-433.
    [8] Brott TG,Hobson RW,Howard G,et al. CREST Investigators: Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis[J]. N Engl J Med,2010,363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321
    [9] Setacci C,Chisci E,Setacci F,et al. Siena carotid artery stenting score: Arisk modeling study for individual patients[J]. Stroke,2010,41(6):1259-1265. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.578583
    [10] Elqasass A,Hobeika LE,Al-Dawoud Y,et al. Bilateral internal carotid artery agenesis coexisting with bovine aortic arch: case report and literature review[J]. Anat Sci Int,2024,9(4):1-10.
    [11] Faggioli G,Ferri M,Rapezzi C,et al. Atherosclerotic aortic lesions increase the risk of cerebral embolism during carotid stenting in patients with complex aortic arch anatomy[J]. J Vasc Surg,2009,49(1):80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.014
    [12] Miccichè E,Condello F,Cao D,et al. Procedural embolic protection strategies for carotid artery stenting: current status and future prospects[J]. Expert Rev Med Devices,2023,20(5):373-391. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2198124
    [13] Wang S,Shi J,Peng Y,et al. Stronger association of triglyceride glucose index than the HOMA-IR with arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes: A real-world single-center study[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol,2021,20(1):1-10. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01183-5
    [14] Lee SH,Kwon HS,Park YM,et al. Predicting the development of diabetes using the product of triglycerides and glucose: the Chung ju Metabolic Disease Cohort (CMC) study[J]. PLoS ONE,2014,9(2):e90430-e90430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090430
    [15] Wang F,Han L,Hu D. Fasting insulin,insulin resistance and risk of hypertension in the general population: a meta-analysis[J]. Clin Chim Acta,2017,464(3):57-63.
    [16] Joshua K Beverly,Matthew J Budoff. Atherosclerosis: Pathophysiology of insulin resistance,hyperglycemia,hyperlipidemia,and inflammation[J]. J Diabetes,2020,12(2):102-104. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12970
    [17] Reardon CA,Lingaraju A,Schoenfelt KQ,et al. Obesity and insulin resistance promote atherosclerosis through an IFNγ-regulated macrophage protein network[J]. Cell Rep,2018,23(10):3021-3030. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.010
    [18] Kim GR,Choi DW,Nam CM,et al. Synergistic association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and body mass index with insulin resistance in non-diabetic adults[J]. Sci Rep,2020,10(1):18417-18425. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75390-1
    [19] Jeong S,Lee JH. The verification of the reliability of a triglyceride glucose index and its availability as an advanced tool[J]. Metabolomics,2021,17(11):97-109. doi: 10.1007/s11306-021-01837-9
    [20] Yu HX,Tao LY,Li YG,et al. Association between triglyceride-glucose index trajectories and carotid atherosclerosis progression[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol,2023,22(1):130-139. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01847-y
    [21] Luo E,Wang D,Yan G,et al. High triglyceride–glucose index is associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol,2019,18(1):150-162. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0957-3
    [22] Su WY,Chen SC,Huang YT,et al. Comparison of the effects of fasting glucose,hemoglobin A1C,and triglyceride glucose index on cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. Nutrients,2019,11(11):2838-2851. doi: 10.3390/nu11112838
    [23] Won KB,Kim YS,Lee BK,et al. The relationship of insulin resistance estimated by triglyceride glucose index and coronary plaque characteristics[J]. Medicine,2018,97(21):e10726-e10726 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010726
    [24] Lee SB,Ahn CW,Lee BK,et al. Association between triglyceride glucose index and arterial stiffness in Korean adults[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol,2018,17(1):41-47. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0692-1
    [25] Wang A,Tian X,Zuo Y,et al. Association of triglyceride-glucose index with intra- and extra-cranial arterial stenosis: A combined cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis[J]. Endocrine,2021,74(2):308-317. doi: 10.1007/s12020-021-02794-y
    [26] Liu F,Ling Q,Xie S,et al. Association between triglyceride glucose index and arterial stiffness and coronary artery calcification: A systematic review and exposure-effect meta-analysis[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol,2023,22(1):111-130. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01819-2
    [27] Li J,Dong Z,Wu H,et al. The triglyceride-glucose index is associated with atherosclerosis in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease,regardless of diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol,2023,22(1):224-239. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01919-z
    [28] Chen T,Qian Y,Deng X. Triglyceride glucose index is a significant predictor of severe disturbance of consciousness and all-cause mortality in critical cerebrovascular disease patients[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol,2023,22(1):156-169. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01893-6
    [29] Ma XT,Dong LS,Shao QY,et al. Triglyceride glucose index for predicting cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with type2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol,2020,19(1):31-45. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01006-7
  • [1] 王艾云, 王雨婷, 蔡静, 倪若妍, 罗彩莹, 喻卓, 陈鹏.  肠道菌群及其代谢产物在动脉粥样硬化发生发展中的作用, 昆明医科大学学报. 2024, 45(12): 1-7.
    [2] 陶代菊, 陈鹏, 李雨晴, 陈临宜, 杨仁华, 何波, 沈志强.  Corilagin对OX-LDL诱导的HUVECs细胞损伤的保护作用及对MyD88信号通路表达的影响, 昆明医科大学学报. 2023, 44(10): 18-25. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20231019
    [3] 张莉, 王雨婷, 石佳宁, 余丹, 杨仁华, 沈志强, 龙江, 陈鹏.  基于网络药理学分析灯盏乙素治疗动脉粥样硬化的分子机制和体内验证, 昆明医科大学学报. 2022, 43(8): 17-27. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220804
    [4] 刘演龙, 光雪峰, 尹小龙, 戴海龙.  miR-125a-3p对动脉粥样硬化斑块及M1/M2巨噬细胞、MMP-9和VEGF的影响, 昆明医科大学学报. 2022, 43(9): 1-6. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220915
    [5] 戴海龙, 王南, 陈晓晴, 何臻一, 冯晓岚, 光雪峰.  冠心病患者肠道菌群的特征, 昆明医科大学学报. 2020, 41(12): 36-41. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20201213
    [6] 兰丹凤.  Klotho基因G-395A多态性与2型糖尿病患者并发动脉粥样硬化的相关性, 昆明医科大学学报. 2015, 36(09): -1.
    [7] 曹蕊.  瘦素对动脉粥样硬化血管内皮细胞中IL-6表达的影响, 昆明医科大学学报. 2014, 35(08): -1.
    [8] 庞兴美.  彩色多普勒超声对高血压患者颈动脉粥样硬化的诊断分析, 昆明医科大学学报. 2014, 35(04): -.
    [9] 官兵.  三七总皂苷减少高脂血症兔动脉壁损害作用的实验研究, 昆明医科大学学报. 2014, 35(06): -.
    [10] 陈丽玲.  NPC1L1在树鼩AS造模中小肠和肝的表达及意义, 昆明医科大学学报. 2013, 34(03): -.
    [11] 沈志强.  LOX-1与动脉粥样硬化, 昆明医科大学学报. 2013, 34(08): -.
    [12] 沈志强.  LOX-1与动脉粥样硬化, 昆明医科大学学报. 2013, 34(08): -.
    [13] 朱娅娟.  实时超声弹性成像技术对颈总动脉粥样硬化斑块稳定性的评估, 昆明医科大学学报. 2013, 34(01): -.
    [14] 张涛.  彩色多普勒超声检测颈动脉粥样硬化与老年缺血性脑血管病的分析, 昆明医科大学学报. 2013, 34(03): -.
    [15] 呼延婕.  白藜芦醇在治疗动脉粥样硬化中关键信号通路mTOR和STAT3转导机制的研究进展, 昆明医科大学学报. 2013, 34(01): -.
    [16] 王玲.  2型糖尿病患者下肢动脉粥样硬化与骨密度改变的研究, 昆明医科大学学报. 2012, 33(02): -.
    [17] 普罗布考治疗动脉粥样硬化40例临床疗效观察, 昆明医科大学学报. 2011, 32(09): -.
    [18] 高血脂类风湿关节炎动脉粥样硬化患者超声分析, 昆明医科大学学报. 2011, 32(03): -.
    [19] 邓紫玉.  老年高血压颈动脉硬化与血尿酸的相关性研究, 昆明医科大学学报. 2009, 30(01): -.
    [20] 丘红梅.  代谢综合征与颈动脉内膜中层厚度关系的研究, 昆明医科大学学报. 2009, 30(01): -.
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回