Construction and Application of PBL Combined with Scenario Simulation in GTCS Nursing Emergency Training
-
摘要:
目的 研究PBL教学模式结合情景模拟教学法在癫痫全面强直阵挛(generalized tonic-clonic seizure,GTCS)发作护理急救培训中构建与应用效果。 方法 采用SPSS软件对2022年10月至2024年3月进入云南省肿瘤医院神经外科护理实习和轮转的120名护生为研究对象,根据调查时间选取相同批次护生随机分为观察组(n = 60)和对照组(n = 60),观察组采用PBL教学法分组讨论培训前、PBL集中教学后和情景模拟结束后3个时间段,使用《SET-M修订版情景模拟效果评价表》对每个时间段护生对模拟前介绍、学习、自信和引导性反馈四维度的感受进行统计对比分析。对照组采用传统PPT讲解结合基本护理操作常规练习的方式进行培训。 结果 观察组护生接受培训过程中,不同阶段各个维度的得分均有所提高,且培训前后的对比在统计学上具有显著意义(P < 0.05)。观察组在理论考试得分、操作考试得分及课程满意度均高于对照组(P < 0.05)。 结论 构建的PBL教学模式结合情景模拟培训法在癫痫全面强直阵挛(GTCS)发作护理急救课程在护生中的应用有显著的培训效果,护生对本课程能够有效提高学生的理论知识和临床实践能力认同度高。 -
关键词:
- 癫痫GTCS发作急培训 /
- PBL教学 /
- 情景模拟教学 /
- 护理应急培训课程
Abstract:Objective To study the construction and application effect of PBL teaching model combined with the scenario simulation teaching method in the nursing first aid course for generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) attacks. Methods A total of 120 nursing students who entered the Neurosurgery Department of Yunnan Cancer Hospital for nursing practice and rotation from October 2022 to March 2024 were selected as the research objects. The SPSS software was used to randomly divide the same batch of nursing students into an observation group and a control group according to the investigation time. PBL teaching method was used in the observation group for group discussions respectively before the training, after the PBL centralized teaching, and after the scenario simulation. The "SET-M Revised Version of the Scenario Simulation Effect Evaluation Form" was used to statistically compare and analyze the feelings of nursing students towards the four dimensions of pre-simulation introduction, learning, confidence, and guided feedback at each time period. The control group was trained using the traditional PPT explanation combined with basic nursing operation routine exercises. Results During the training process of the observation group, the scores of each dimension in different stages were improved, and the comparison before and after the training was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The observation group had the higher scores in the theoretical exam, practical exam, and course satisfaction than the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion The PBL teaching model combined with the scenario simulation teaching method constructed in this study has a significant teaching effect in the application of the nursing first aid course for generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) attacks among nursing students. Nursing students have a high degree of recognition that this course can effectively improve their theoretical knowledge and clinical practice ability. -
表 1 2组护生学历和性别比较情况
Table 1. Comparison of educational background and gender of two groups of nursing students
组别 n 本科 专科 男 女 观察组 60 6 54 17 43 对照组 60 7 53 16 44 χ2 − 0.086 0.42 P − 0.769 0.838 表 2 被调查临床工作人员癫痫GTCS发作急救经验分布(n = 30)
Table 2. Distribution of emergency experience in treating generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) among the surveyed clinical staff (n = 30)
经验 0~5例 5~10例 大于10例 人数(n) 3 7 20 比例(%) 10 23.33 66.57 表 3 SET-M评价量表各维度的平均值(x)和标准差(s)(n = 60)
Table 3. The average values (x) and standard deviations (s) of each dimension on the SET-M evaluation scale (n = 60)
维度 模拟前介绍(x/s) 学习(x/s) 自信(x/s) 引导性反馈(x/s) PBL分组讨论前 1.433/0.571 1.440/0.607 1.357/0.522 1.383/0.588 PBL集中教学后 2.325/0.440 2.283/0.312 2.269/0.299 2.473/0.304 情景模拟后 2.892/0.333 2.917/0.190 2.885/0.191 2.893/0.210 培训前-培训后 1.458 1.478 1.528 1.510 表 4 配对样本t检验比较培训前后各维度变化情况(n = 60)
Table 4. Comparison of changes in each dimension before and after the experiment using paired sample t-test (n = 60)
维度 t P 模拟前介绍 16.072 <0.001* 学习 16.861 <0.001* 自信 18.792 <0.001* 引导性反馈 16.459 <0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 5 2组护理实习生的教学模式满意度比较情况[n(%)]
Table 5. Comparison of teaching mode satisfaction between two groups of nursing interns [n(%)]
组别 n 协作能力 沟通能力 解决问题能力 学习兴趣探索能力 理论结合实际能力 观察组 60 45(75.0) 36(60) 48(80.0) 46(76.6) 54(90.0) 对照组 60 32(53.3) 23(38.3) 33(55.0) 27(45.0) 42(70.0) χ2 − 6.125 5.635 8.547 12.626 7.500 P − 0.013* 0.018* 0.003* 0.000* 0.006* *P < 0.05。 表 6 2组护生理论考试得分、操作考试得分情况[($\bar x \pm s $),分]
Table 6. Scores of theoretical examination and operation examination of two groups of nursing students [($\bar x \pm s $),points]
组别 n 理论考试得分 操作考试得分 观察组 60 72.93±6.59 87.83±4.39 对照组 60 64.30±5.05 78.31±6.68 t − 9.274 10.968 P − 0.048* 0.013* *P < 0.05。 -
[1] 赖晓波,英嵩崧,梁培智,等. 案例整合情景模拟教学模式在急性上消化道出血见习教学中的应用[J]. 现代医院,2024,24(8):1306-1308,1312. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-332X.2024.08.042 [2] 郑嵘炅,毛雨婷,韩丹,等. 依据疾病谱进行传染病教学改革的思路与探讨[J]. 新疆医学,2023,53(6):763-766. [3] 赵洁茹,陈素玲. 传染病教学现状分析及应对策略探讨[J]. 中国卫生产业,2021,18(1):150-152. [4] 陈秋艳,李梦云,张庆. 原发全面强直阵挛型癫痫合并睡眠障碍患者的脑血流灌注特点[J]. 中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志,2024,31(1):8-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2963.2024.01.002 [5] 曾纪超,李爱民,李莲英,等. 加味清心汤联合左乙拉西坦治疗成人癫痫全面强直-阵挛性发作气血两虚证的疗效及对患者脑电图痫性活动的影响[J]. 中医药导报,2023,29(8):44-47. [6] 高欢玲,张红,李红梅,等. 基于PBL教学的形成性评价方案的制订及初步应用[J]. 中华护理教育,2022,19(12):1096-1100. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2022.12.008 [7] 王聪,曲昊. 情景模拟结合PBL教学法对医学生教学效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国继续医学教育,2019,11(28):25-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2019.28.011 [8] 王艺蓉,张君娜. 关于护理专业情境模拟教学的探讨[J]. 医学食疗与健康,2020,18(1):177-179. [9] 王曼,张梦,刘春锋,等. 基于BOPPPS模型的情景模拟教学法在护士急救培训中的应用[J]. 护理学杂志,2023,38(11):77-79,83. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2023.11.077 [10] 李长娣,李湘萍,杨冰香,等. 修订版情景模拟效果评价表的汉化及信度效度研究[J]. 中国护理管理,2019,19(11):1631-1636. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2019.11.008 [11] Peng WS,Wang L,Zhang H,et al. Application of virtual scenario simulation combined with problem-based learning for paediatric medical students[J]. The Journal of International Medical Research,2021,49(2): 300060520979210. [12] 张文玲. 情景模拟联合PBL健康宣教在提高子宫肌瘤切除手术患者自我护理能力中的应用效果研究[J]. 中国医药指南,2024,22(20):126-128. [13] 高恩泽,李化玲. 基于教育供给侧改革理念的中医药慕课建设与使用策略[J]. 中国医学教育技术,2019,33(3):306-309. [14] Ding D,Zhou D,Sander JW,et al. Epilepsy in China: Major progress in the past two decades[J]. Lancet Neurol,2021,20(4):316-326. [15] 陈海丽,肖志田,叶敬花,等. 癫痫患者从青少年到成人过渡期护理的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志,2022,57(1):118-123. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.01.018