Clinical Evaluation of Simplified Biofunctional Prosthetic Denture in Edentulous Patients
-
摘要:
目的 评价使用简化生物功能性义齿(simplified biofunctional prosthetic denture,SBPD)修复牙列缺失的疗效及患者满意度。 方法 收集深圳大学总医院牙列缺失拟行全口义齿修复的患者26例,随机分为两组,分别采用传统全口义齿(conventional complete denture,CCD)修复方法(n = 13)和SBPD修复方法(n = 13)制作全口义齿,于戴牙后即刻、戴牙后1个月和戴牙后3个月填写义齿满意度视觉模拟评分量表(Visual analogue scale,VAS)进行满意度调查。 结果 戴牙后即刻、戴牙后1个月和戴牙后3个月,在咀嚼功能、舒适性及固位功能方面应用SBPD修复方法制作的全口义齿满意度显著高于CCD方法制作的全口义齿(P < 0.05)。 结论 应用SBPD修复方法制作全口义齿能够取得比较好的临床效果,值得进一步实践和推广。 -
关键词:
- 生物功能性义齿修复系统 /
- 全口义齿 /
- 牙列缺失 /
- 满意度
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and satisfaction of the edentulous patients with the simplified biofunctional prosthetic denture (SBPD). Methods 26 patients with complete denture restoration were randomly divided into two groups: conventional complete denture (CCD) group (n = 13) andSBPD group (n = 13). The satisfaction degree was investigated by filling in the visual analoguescale (VAS) at baseline, 1 month and 3 months following the denture delivery. Results In terms of masticatory function, comfort and retention, the VAS score on SBPD group was higher than that of CCD group, (P < 0.05). Conclusion The SBPD method has the good precision and it is worthy of clinical promotion. -
Key words:
- Biofunctional prosthetic system /
- Complete denture /
- Edentulous /
- Satisfaction survey
-
图 1 简化生物功能性义齿制作部分过程及术前术后面像
A、B:牙列缺失患者口内牙合面像;C、D:硅橡胶制取上下颌初印模;E、F:个别托盘及硅橡胶制取上下颌闭口式终印模;G:正中托盘制取初步正中关系;H:口内试戴牙合托;I:放置哥特式弓描计针和描计板;J:哥特式弓记录下颌边缘运动轨迹,确定水平颌位关系;K:咬合记录;L:完成全口义齿制作;M:术前正面微笑像;N:术前侧面微笑像;O:术后正面微笑像;P:术后侧面微笑像。
Figure 1. Partial process of simplified biofunctional prosthetic denture and pre-and post-treatment facial image
表 1 两组病例术后即刻主观满意度评分表(
$\bar x \pm s$ )Table 1. Immediate subjective satisfaction score of two groups (
$\bar x \pm s$ )组别 例数(n) 美观度 语音功能 咀嚼功能 舒适性 固位功能 CCD组 13 91.2 ± 6.3 81.0 ± 12.3 70.2 ± 9.8 68.1 ± 9.0 71.5 ± 9.9 SBPD组 13 90.6 ± 6.5 84.1 ± 7.8 78.3 ± 5.5 75.2 ± 7.9 78.9 ± 6.8 t 0.307 0.761 2.592 2.280 2.196 P 0.734 0.733 0.034* 0.032* 0.038* 两组比较,*P < 0.05。 表 2 两组病例术后一个月主观满意度评分表(
$\bar x \pm s$ )Table 2. Subjective satisfaction score of two groups after 1 month (
$ \bar x \pm s $ )组别 例数(n) 美观度 语音功能 咀嚼功能 舒适性 固位功能 CCD组 13 92.0 ± 5.4 89.7 ± 5.8 81.2 ± 5.8 82.4 ± 6.6 78.8 ± 7.1 SBPD组 13 91.2 ± 5.7 88.9 ± 5.7 85.5 ± 5.5 87.9 ± 4.2 85.9 ± 6.0 t 0.352 0.340 2.193 2.500 2.788 P 0.712 0.711 0.038* 0.020* 0.010* 两组比较,*P < 0.05。 表 3 两组病例术后三个月主观满意度评分表(
$\bar x \pm s$ )Table 3. Subjective satisfaction score of two groups after 3 month (
$\bar x \pm s$ )组别 例数(n) 美观度 语音功能 咀嚼功能 舒适性 固位功能 CCD组 13 92.8 ± 5.8 91.8 ± 6.1 82.2 ± 4.6 85.0 ± 5.8 83.5 ± 6.2 SBPD组 13 92.0 ± 6.2 91.5 ± 7.2 87.9 ± 5.9 91.4 ± 6.9 89.5 ± 6.3 t 0.329 0.386 2.770 2.549 2.452 P 0.747 0.895 0.011* 0.018* 0.022* 两组比较,*P < 0.05。 -
[1] Kršek H,Dulčić N. Functional impressions in complete denture and overdenture treatment[J]. Acta Stomatol Croat,2015,49(1):45-53. doi: 10.15644/asc49/1/6 [2] Roessler D M. Complete denture success for patients and dentists[J]. Int Dent J,2003,53(5 Suppl):340-345. [3] 王兴. 第四次全国口腔健康流行病学调查报告[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 115-116. [4] Nogueira T E,Schimmel M,Leles C R. Changes in masticatory performance of edentulous patients treated with single-implant mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures[J]. J Oral Rehabil,2019,46(3):268-273. doi: 10.1111/joor.12744 [5] Kanazawa M,Tanoue M,Miyayasu A,et al. The patient general satisfaction of mandibular single-implant overdentures and conventional complete dentures:Study protocol for a randomized crossover trial[J]. Medicine,2018,97(20):e10721. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010721 [6] Kamalakidis S N,Anastassiadou V,Sofou A,et al. Comparative study of acceptance and adaptation to new complete dentures,using two construction protocols[J]. J Prosthodont,2016,25(7):536-543. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12466 [7] Kawai Y,Muarakami H,Feine J S. Do traditional techniques produce better conventional complete dentures than simplified techniques? A 10-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Dent,2018,74 (7):30-36. [8] Moradpoor H,Arabzade H M,Savabi O,et al. Patient satisfaction with occlusal scheme of conventional complete dentures:A randomised clinical trial (part I)[J]. J Oral Rehabil,2018,45(1):41-49. doi: 10.1111/joor.12579 [9] Kawai Y,Ikeguchi N,Suzuki A,et al. A double blind randomized clinical trial comparing lingualized and fully bilateral balanced posterior occlusion for conventional complete dentures[J]. J Prosthodont Res,2017,61(2):113-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.003 [10] Schierz O,Reissmann D. Influence of guidance concept in complete dentures on oral health related quality of life - Canine guidance vs. bilateral balanced occlusion[J]. J Prosthodont Res,2016,60(4):315-320. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.03.005 [日]阿部二郎, [日]小久保京子, [日]佐藤幸司. 骆小平, 译. 下颌吸附性义齿和BPS临床指南[M]. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2014: 8-15. [12] Matsuda K,Kurushima Y,Ikebe K,et al. A combination impression technique by Accu-Dent(®) System broadly extends the surface area of primary casts[J]. J ProsthodontRes,2013,57(2):149-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2013.01.007 [13] De Villa Camargos G,Armenine T E,Paleari A G,et al. Teaching complete denture procedures to dental students by conventional or simplified methods:A randomized clinical trial[J]. J Dent Educ,2019,83(3):303-313. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.023 [14] Ceruti P,Mobilio N,Bellia E,et al. Simplified edentulous treatment:A multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the timing and clinical outcomes of the technique[J]. J Prosthet Dent,2017,118(4):462-467. [15] 魏菱,邹东,陈虎,等. 一种数字化全口义齿的临床疗效评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版),2020,52(4):762-770. [16] 吕晓强,丁福. 老年人口腔健康研究进展[J]. 中国老年保健医学,2020,18(5):98-101. [17] 刘瑞瑞,牛林,王方,等. 生物功能性义齿修复系统在全口义齿中 应用的疗效评定[J]. 中华老年口腔医学杂志,2018,16(3):165-168. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2973.2018.03.010 [18] Miyayasu A,Kanazawa M,Jo A,et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of two impression methods for the fabrication of mandibular complete dentures[J]. J Dent,2018,68 (1):98-103. [19] Wang M Q,Xue F,Chen J,et al. Evaluation of the use of and attitudes towards a face-bow in complete denture fabrication:A pilot questionnaire investigation in Chinese prosthodontists[J]. J Oral Rehabil,2008,35(9):677-681. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01835.x [20] Nascimento DFF,Patto RBL,Marchini L,et al. Double-blind study for evaluation of complete dentures made by two techniques with and without face-bow[J]. Braz JOral Sci,2004,3 (9):439-445. [21] Omar R,Al-Tarakemah Y,Akbar J,et al. Influence of procedural variations duringthe laboratory phase of complete denture fabrication on patientsatisfaction and denture quality[J]. J Dent,2013,41(10):852-860. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.013