Clinical Effect of MHI on Kiaphragm Movement and Lung Function in Stroke Patients
-
摘要:
目的 观察人工膨肺(manual hyperinflation,MHI)对脑卒中患者膈肌运动和肺功能状态的影响。 方法 选取脑卒中患者67名,随机分为治疗组(n = 35)和对照组(n = 32)。治疗组采用MHI联合常规康复治疗,对照组采用常规康复治疗,共8周,分别于治疗前,治疗后4周、8周采用进行B超下观察膈肌运动幅度观察、FVC、FEV1评估肺功能、Barthel指数评估日常生活能力。 结果 FVC(L)、FEV1(L)、膈肌运动幅度及Barthel指数程度的组内比较:从干预前、干预4周后至干预8周后,治疗组指标是不断改善的(P < 0.05),组间比较:干预8周后,治疗组各项指标均优于对照组(P < 0.05)。 结论 MH技术可改善脑卒中患者的膈肌活动度、肺功能以及日常生活能力。 Abstract:Objective To observe the effect of MHI (Manual Hyperinflation) on diaphragmatic movement and pulmonary function in stroke patients. Methods 67 stroke patients were randomly divided into treatment group (n = 35) and control group (n = 32). The treatment group received MHI combined with conventional rehabilitation therapy, and the control group received conventional rehabilitation therapy for 8 weeks. All the patients were assessed with diaphragmatic motion with ultrasound, lung function (FEV1, FVC) and Barthel Index (BI) before, four weeks and eight weeks after treatment. Results Intra-group comparison of FVC (L), FEV1 (L), phrenic motion amplitude and Barthel index: Indicators in the treatment group were continuously improved from before intervention, 4 weeks after intervention, to 8 weeks after intervention (P < 0.05). comparison among groups: After intervention for 8 weeks, all indexes in the treatment group were better than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion MH technique can improve the activity of diaphragm, lung function and daily living ability of stroke patients. -
Key words:
- Stroke /
- MHI /
- Chest physiotherapy; Lung function /
- Diaphragmatic muscle
-
表 1 2组一般资料比较(
$\bar x \pm s $ )Table 1. Comparison of two groups of general data (
$\bar x \pm s$ )组别 n 年龄(岁) 性别(男/女,n) 病变性质脑出血/脑梗死(n) 吸烟(n) 吞咽困难(n) 对照组 32 67.1 ± 7.14 12/20 8/24 7 12 治疗组 35 68.2 ± 6.72 19/16 10/25 6 10 t/χ2 0.649 1.895 0.109 0.2394 0.6043 P 0.5182 0.1687 0.7418 0.6247 0.437 表 2 两组治疗前后FVC比较(
$ \bar x \pm s$ )Table 2. Comparison of FVC before and after treatment between of two groups (
$\bar x \pm s $ )组别 n FVC(L) 治疗前 4周后 8周后 F P 对照组 32 2.63 ± 0.32 2.67 ± 0.33 2.85 ± 0.28 4.551 0.013 治疗组 35 2.60 ± 0.31 2.79 ± 0.31 3.12 ± 0.29 26.31 < 0.0001 t 0.3833 1.535 3.870 P 0.7027 0.1297 0.0003 表 3 两组治疗前后FEV1比较(
$\bar x \pm s $ )Table 3. Comparison of FEV1(L)before and after treatment between of two groups (
$\bar x \pm s $ )组别 n FEV1(L) 治疗前 4周后 8周后 F P 对照组 32 1.83 ± 0.22 1.88 ± 0.28 2.11 ± 0.32 9.340 0.0002 治疗组 35 1.82 ± 0.23 2.07 ± 0.25 2.52 ± 0.30 64.33 < 0.0001 t 0.1815 2.934 5.413 P 0.8566 0.0046 < 0.0001 表 4 两组治疗前后膈肌运动幅度比较(
$\bar x \pm s $ )Table 4. Comparison of Diaphragm motion range before and after treatment between of two groups (
$\bar x \pm s $ )组别 n 膈肌运动幅度(cm) 治疗前 4周后 8周后 F P 对照组 32 1.19 ± 0.41 1.36 ± 0.37 1.55 ± 0.32 7.643 0.0008 治疗组 35 1.17 ± 0.39 1.52 ± 0.43 1.81 ± 0.39 22.05 < 0.0001 t 0.2046 1.625 2.967 P 0.8385 0.1089 0.0042 表 5 两组治疗前后BI评分比较(
$\bar x \pm s $ )Table 5. Comparison of BI before and after treatment between of two groups (
$\bar x \pm s $ )组别 n BI 治疗前 4周后 8周后 F P 对照组 32 22.5 ± 7.69 31.50 ± 6.90 41.75 ± 5.20 66.57 < 0.0001 治疗组 35 24.25 ± 6.93 40.75 ± 6.12 56.75 ± 6.34 220.6 < 0.0001 t 0.9798 5.815 10.52 P 0.3308 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 -
[1] Bettger J P,Zhao X,Bushnell C,et al. The association between socioeconomic status and disability after stoke:findings from the Adherence eValuation After Ischemic stroke Longitudinal(AVAIL)registry[J]. BMC Public Health,2014,14(1):1-8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-18 [2] Brogan E,Langdon C,Brookes K,et al. Respiratory infections in acute stroke:nasogastric tubes and immobility are stronger predictors than dysphagia[J]. Dysphagia,2014,29(3):340-345. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9514-5 [3] 朱伟新,丘卫红,武惠香,等. 早期呼吸功能训练对脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者吞咽功能的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2015,37(3):187-189. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2015.03.007 [4] 何庆权,刘畅,张志强. 脑卒中后心肺适应性的研究进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2017,23(11):1290-1293. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.11.010 [5] Kiran M S,Kumari V S,Madhavi K. Effectiveness of supervised fitness and mobility exercise program on fitness,mobility and muscle strength in young adults with stroke[J]. Int J Physiother,2014,1(3):158-168. [6] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国各类主要脑血管病诊断要点2019[J]. 中华神经科杂志,2019,52(9):710-715. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2019.09.003 [7] 吕连. 不同呼吸训练方式在脑卒中患者中的应用[J]. 中国卫生标准管理,2017,8(6):55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2017.06.032 [8] 孙瑞,李洁,周芳,等. 不同呼吸训练方式对患者脑卒中后疲劳程度及膈肌功能的影响[J]. 华中科技大学学报(医学版),2016,45(5):543-546. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1672-0741.2016.05.014 [9] 李明秋,郭瑞君,张谱,等. M型超声观察膈肌运动与肺功能的相关性研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报,2014,35(2):189-193. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2014.02.010 [10] 张黎娟,朱晓萍. 超声评估慢阻肺患者膈肌移动度与肺功能和BODE指数的关系[J]. 宁夏医科大学学报,2017,39(5):534-536. [11] Crowe J,Reid W D,Geddes E L,et al. Inspiratory muscle training compared with other rehabilitation interventions in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease:A systematic literature review and meta-analysis[J]. Copd-journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease,2005,2(3):319-329. doi: 10.1080/15412550500218072 [12] Almeida I C L D,Rocha E H T,Brandão D C,et al. Effects of hemiplegy on pulmonary function and diaphragmatic dome displacement[J]. Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology,2011,178(2):196-201. [13] 黄岳,崔利华,刘丽旭,等. 脑卒中患者的呼吸功能障碍及其康复[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2015,21(9):1055-1057. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2015.09.015 [14] Voyvoda N,Yücel C,Karataş G,et al. An evaluation of diaphragmatic movements in hemiplegic patients[J]. British Journal of Radiology,2012,85(1012):411. doi: 10.1259/bjr/71968119 [15] Annoni J M,Ackermann D,Kesselring J. Respiratory function in chronic hemiplegia[J]. International Disability Studies,1990,12(2):78-80. doi: 10.3109/03790799009166256 [16] 时惠,刘玲,祖菲娅·吐尔迪. 阈值压力负荷呼吸肌训练对脑卒中患者康复疗效的 Meta 分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2016,22(9):1069-1074. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2016.09.019 [17] 陈彦,吴霜. 肺康复训练对脑卒中患者肺功能影响的 Meta 分析[J]. 华西医学,2018,33(10):1277-1286. [18] 苏国栋,刘惠林,黄梦洁,等. 呼吸肌训练对急性脑卒中患者运动功能的效果[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2016,22(9):1008-1010. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2016.09.004 [19] 鹿跟涛,付海燕. 呼吸肌训练对脑梗死后静态平衡和步行功能的影响[J]. 按摩与康复医学.,2017,8(18):12-14. [20] Kim N S,Jung J H. The effects of breathing retraining onasymmetry of diaphragm thickness in stroke patients[J]. JKoreanSocPhys Med,2013,8(2):271-286. [21] 程康耀,吕伟波,胡丽,等. 人工膨肺用于机械通气患者开放式吸痰护理效果的Meta分析[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2018,35(6):1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2018.06.001 [22] 张玮凇,邢艳丽,范星月. 脑卒中患者吸气肌力量训练理论依据及临床研究进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2017,32(11):1317-1320. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.11.016 [23] 张锐,李清红,陈立. 膨肺吸痰法在机械通气治疗中的应用价值[J]. 临床肺科杂志,2015,20(1):183.