Application of Innovative Teaching of “TBL,Workshop” in the Teaching of Speech Therapy
-
摘要:
目的 探究在言语治疗学教学课程中开展以团队为基础的教学模式(team-based learning,TBL)与工作坊教学模式(Workshop)的应用效果。 方法 选取大理大学2017届康复治疗学同一班级60名学生为客观分析对象。开展常规式教学、TBL教学及Workshop教学3种方法分为3组,每组随机选取同学各20名。 结果 研究组学生经由TBL、Workshop教学法干预,学生理论知识及课堂满意度调查等方面评估均高于对照组学生,组内差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 结论 言语治疗学课程教学中开展Workshop、TBL教学法,有利于提升学生理论学习成绩,同时新的教学法更容易被学生所接受,可为今后的语言治疗学新教学模式探究提供参考。 -
关键词:
- 言语治疗学 /
- 创新式教学 /
- TBL模式 /
- Workshop模式
Abstract:Objective To explore the application effects of team-based learning (TBL) and workshop teaching models (Workshop) in speech therapy teaching courses. Methods Sixty students in the same class of 2017 Rehabilitation Therapy in Dali University were divided into 3 groups. Three methods of conventional teaching, TBL teaching and Workshop teaching were carried out respectively in the 3 groups, and an average of 20 male and female students were randomly selected in each group. Results The students in the study group were intervened by TBL and Workshop teaching methods, and the evaluations of students’ theoretical knowledge and classroom satisfaction survey were higher than those of the control group, with significant differences within the group (P < 0.05). Conclusions The workshop and TBL teaching methods in the teaching of speech therapy courses are helpful to improve students’ theoretical academic performance. At the same time, the new teaching methods are more easily accepted by students, which can provide references for future exploration of new teaching models of speech therapy. -
Key words:
- Speech therapy /
- Innovative teaching /
- TBL model /
- Workshop model
-
表 1 3组学生课堂成绩比较(
$\bar x \pm s$ )Table 1. Comparison of classroom performance among three groups (
$\bar x \pm s$ )组别 学生课堂成绩(分) 传统组 89.8 ± 3.83 TBL组 91.6 ± 4.06 Workshop组 94.0 ± 3.52* F 6.113 P 0.004 注:与传统组比较,*P < 0.05。 表 2 3组实际操作比较(
$\bar x \pm s$ )Table 2. Comparison of practical operation performance among three groups (
$\bar x \pm s$ )组别 学生实际操作成绩(分) 传统组 89.65 ± 4.08 TBL组 92.2 ± 2.76* Workshop组 92.95 ± 2.89* F 5.496 P 0.007 注:与传统组比较,*P < 0.05。 表 3 3组学生反馈满意度成绩比较(
$\bar x \pm s$ )Table 3. Comparison of Students’ feedback satisfaction among three groups (
$\bar x \pm s$ )组别 学生对老师评价(分) 传统组 91.15±1.09 TBL组 94.7±1.45* Workshop组 97±1.78*# F 80.667 P 0.000 注:与传统组比较,*P < 0.05;与TBL组比较,#P < 0.05。 -
[1] 付丽,郭彦,石淑霞,等. 互联网+背景下高职高专言语治疗课程教学的探索[J]. 安徽卫生职业技术学院学报,2020,19(6):113-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8054.2020.06.050 [2] 吴建红,张亚军,董梁,等. 康复治疗学的专业建设与发展研究[J]. 绍兴文理学院学报(教育版),2017,37(3):26-31. [3] 王芗斌,何坚,陶静,等. 美国物理治疗教育对临床推理能力培养的启示[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2017,23(12):1486-1488. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.12.022 [4] Burgess A,van Diggele C,Roberts C,et al. Team-based learning:design,facilitation and participation[J]. BMC Med Educ,2020,20(Suppl 2):461. [5] Burgess A,Haq I,Bleasel J,et al. Team-based learning(TBL):a community of practice[J]. BMC Med Educ,2019,19(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1795-4 [6] Kibble J D,Bellew C,Asmar A,Barkley L. Team-based learning in large enrollment classes[J]. Adv Physiol Educ,2016,40(4):435-442. doi: 10.1152/advan.00095.2016 [7] Reimschisel T,Herring AL,Huang J,Minor TJ. A systematic review of the published literature on team-based learning in health professions education[J]. Med Teach,2017,39(12):1227-1237. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1340636 [8] 姜文君,吴勤峰,马颖,等. Workshop实习教学法在康复治疗本科专业的应用研究[J]. 按摩与康复医学,2020,11(4):91-93. [9] Lamm A G,Babu A,Zafonte R,et al. Using a workshop format for physiatry trainees in the management of acute sports-related concussion[J]. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation,2019,98(4):319-324. [10] Wu W T,Chang K V,Han D S,et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound workshops in postgraduate physician training:pre- and post-workshop survey of 156 participants[J]. BMC medical education,2019,19(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1769-6 [11] 韩冰莎,冯光,李娇,等. 血管介入模拟器workshop联合案例教学法在神经介入教学实践中的效果评价[J]. 介入放射学杂志,2021,30(3):304-307. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2021.03.019 [12] Koh YYJ,Schmidt HG,Low-Beer N,Rotgans JI. Team-Based Learning Analytics:An Empirical Case Study[J]. Acad Med,2020,95(6):872-878. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003157 [13] 徐麟皓,毕艳丽,陈健. TBL教学法对医学生交流恐惧影响的研究[J]. 中国高等医学教育,2021(2):101-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2021.02.052 [14] 黄炯周,谢燕清,江梅. 应用PBL与TBL结合的教学模式培养医学生的循证素质的探索与实践[J]. 才智,2021(1):137-139. [15] 孙丽敏,陶贵周,贺欣. 导师制结合TBL教学法在医学本科教学中的应用[J]. 中国高等医学教育,2020(11):117-118. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2020.11.059 [16] 季卫锋. Workshop教学模式在骨伤科实践技能培训课程中的应用[J]. 中国高等医学教育,2020(2):98-99. [17] 胡娟娟,高兴莲,赵晶,等. 工作坊教学模式在手术室新护士侧卧位安置培训中的应用[J]. 护理学报,2020,27(1):9-11. [18] 辛宇,胡杰,韩波. PBL结合TBL教学模式在神经外科带教中的应用观察[J]. 继续医学教育,2021,35(1):15-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2021.01.009 [19] 杨一,方伟珊,康康,等. TBL教学在医学生物化学实验教学中的实践[J]. 中国当代医药,2020,27(33):197-200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4721.2020.33.058 [20] 王冉,吴冰,李燕. “雨课堂”软件在护理教学中的应用[J]. 中国临床护理,2019,11(1):76-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3768.2019.01.023 [21] 谭洁,张泓,祁芳,等. Workshop模式在康复治疗学专业言语治疗学实践教学中的应用[J]. 中国中医药现代远程教育,2017,15(16):11-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2779.2017.16.006 -