The Clinical Study of Bronchial Artery Infusion Chemotherapy via Radial Artery
-
摘要:
目的 对比经桡动脉途径（TRA）和股动脉途径（TFA）对肺鳞癌患者行支气管动脉介入的可行性。 方法 选取122例肺鳞癌患者，采取经左侧桡动脉入路行支气管动脉介入治疗58例（行BAI患者47例，行BAE患者5例，行BACE患者6例），经股动脉入路行支气管动脉介入治疗64例（行BAI患者51例，行BAE患者10例，行BACE患者3例）。 结果 2种入路均成功实施经支气管动脉介入治疗，术后无明显并发症。经左侧桡动脉入路手术时间少于经股动脉入路。 结论 经桡动脉途径（TRA）行支气管动脉介入治疗是安全、快速和可行的，为肺部肿瘤介入提供更多可选择的介入路径。 Abstract:Objective To compare the feasibility of the bronchial artery intervention through the radial artery and femoral artery in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma. Methods 58 patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma were treated with the bronchial artery intervention via left radial artery approach （47 patients with BAI, 5 patients with BAE, 6 patients with BACE） and 64 patients with bronchial artery intervention via femoral artery approach （51 patients with BAI, 10 patients with BAE and 3 patients with BACE）. Results Transbronchial artery interventional therapy was successfully performed in both approaches, and there were no obvious postoperative complications. The operation time of the left radial artery approach was less than that of the femoral artery approach. Conclusion The bronchial artery interventional therapy via radial artery is safe, rapid and feasible, which provides the more alternative interventional pathways for lung tumor intervention. -
Key words:
- Radial artery /
- Femoral artery /
- Lung cancer /
- Bronchial artery
-
图 1 经左侧桡动脉行支气管动脉造影
Figure 1. Bronchial arteriography performed through the left radial artery
表 1 不同入路手术时间[（
${{\bar x}} \pm s$ ），min]Table 1. Operation time of different access [（
${{\bar x}} \pm s$ ），min]分组 手术时间 TAI TAE TACE TRA 20.5 ± 2.3* 25.5 ± 3.1* 33.1 ± 4.8* TFA 30.6 ± 3.6 40.8 ± 5.3 50.4 ± 3.9 与TFA相比，*P < 0.05。 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 陈峰,吴宁,李斯锐,等. 经桡动脉途径行肝动脉灌注栓塞术治疗15例肝癌[J]. 介入放射学杂志,2014,23(5):435-437. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2014.05.017 [2] Kiemeneij F,Laarman G J,E d M. Transradial artery coronary angioplasty[J]. Am Heart J,1995,129(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90034-9 [3] Agostoni P,Biondi-Zoccai G. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures:Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,44(2):349-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.034 [4] 周玉杰,杨士伟. 经桡动脉冠心病介入治疗现状与未来发展趋势[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2011,3(2):82-98. [5] 曹俊雄,陈翔,吴丹宁,等. 冠状动脉造影经鼻烟壶区动脉和经桡动脉穿刺途径的对比研究[J]. 心电与循环,2019,28(3):197-199. [6] Van der Heijden D J,van Leeuwen M A H,Ritt M J P F,et al. Chronic radial artery occlusion does not cause exercise induced hand ischemia[J]. J Interv Cardiol,2018,31(6):949-956. doi: 10.1111/joic.12552 [7] Yoo B S,Lee S H,Ko J Y,et al. Procedural outcomes of repeated transradial coronary procedure[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2003,58(3):301-304. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10400 [8] Buturak A,Tekturk B. M,Degirmencioglu A,et al. Transradial catheterization may decrease the radial artery luminal diameter and impair the vasodilatation response in the access site at late term:An observational study[J]. Heart Vessels,2016,31(4):482-489. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0640-x [9] 闫振娴,周玉杰,赵迎新,等. 应用血管内超声探讨经桡动脉介入术对桡动脉结构和功能的影响[J]. 临床心血管病杂志,2010,26(12):19-22. [10] 吴万里,潘朝锌,王庆高,等. 缺血预处理预防经桡动脉冠状动脉造影对桡动脉的损伤[J]. 临床心血管病杂志,2018,8(34):356-358. [11] 张英,刘佟,刘静怡,等. 探讨经桡动脉介入治疗术后桡动脉急性闭塞的危险因素研究[J]. 中国循环杂志,2019,34(6):552-556. [12] 洪衡,王明生,李明昌,等. 经桡动脉穿刺冠状动脉介入操作并发症[J]. 中国心血管杂志,2008,13(1):57-59. [13] Saleh A,Makhamreh H,Qoussoos T,et al. Prevalence of previously unrecognized peripheral arterial disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2018,97(29):e11519. [14] 李萍,温切木,沙迪克,等. 经桡动脉穿刺冠状动脉介入术后患者腕部绷带首次减压最佳时间的研究[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(4):497-500. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.04.014 [15] 毕希乐,樊延明,汪雁博,等. 光学相干断层成像观察经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后硝酸甘油对桡动脉结构的影响[J]. 中国循环杂志,2018,33(1):36-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2018.01.006 [16] 李亚威,曹家玮,张晓武,等. 经桡动脉途径行外周血管介入的临床研究[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志,2021,43(1):143-146. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20191018-00673 -
点击查看大图
图(1) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 3001
- HTML全文浏览量: 1936
- PDF下载量: 15
- 被引次数: 0
