Effect of Comfort Care on Patients with Complications of Laparoscopic CO2 Pneumoperitoneum
-
摘要:
目的 探讨舒适护理在妇科腹腔镜术后患者CO2气腹并发症的干预效果。 方法 选取云南省第三人民医院妇科从2019年6月至2020年12月间收治的 204例腹腔镜手术后CO2气腹并发症的患者,采用非随机方便抽样的方法,将其分为对照组和实验组,每组各102例。对照组给予常规护理,实验组在常规护理的基础上给予舒适护理。 结果 2组患者在术后焦虑得分、舒适度、术后疼痛、术后排便时间上,实验组优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 结论 舒适护理可减轻患者的术后疼痛、加快患者术后排便时间、缓解腹胀、缓解患者的焦虑情绪、增加患者的舒适度,可在临床中推广应用。 Abstract:Objective To explore the effect of comfort care on patients with complications after gynecological laparoscopic CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Methods A total of 204 patients with CO2 pneumoperitoneum complications after laparoscopic surgery in The Department of Gynecology of the Third People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province from June 2019 to December 2020 were selected, and they were divided into control group and experimental group by non-random convenient sampling method, with 102 cases in each group. The control group was given routine nursing care, and the experimental group was given comfort care on the basis of routine nursing care. Results The scores of postoperative anxiety, comfort, postoperative pain and postoperative defecation time in the experimental group were better than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant. Conclusion Comfort care can reduce postoperative pain, accelerate postoperative defecation time, relieve abdominal distension, relieve anxiety and increase patient comfort, so it is widely applied in clinical practice. -
Key words:
- Comfort care /
- Laparoscope /
- CO2 /
- Pneumoperitoneum complications
-
表 1 2组患者术后焦虑得分比较[(
$\bar x \pm s $ ),分]Table 1. Comparison of postoperative anxiety scores between two groups [(
$ \bar x \pm s$ ),scores]项目 对照组(n = 102) 实验组(n = 102) t P 焦虑得分 8.51 ± 4.49 6.28 ± 3.03 4.142 0.000* *P < 0.05。 表 2 2组患者术后舒适度各维度得分比较[(
$\bar x \pm s $ ),分]Table 2. Comparison of scores of various dimensions of postoperative comfort between two groups [(
$\bar x \pm s $ ),scores]舒适度评分 对照组
(n = 102)实验组
(n = 102)t P 环境 3.90 ± 0.87 4.81 ± 1.37 5.669 0.000* 生理 13.55 ± 1.63 13.39 ± 2.57 −0.519 0.604 精神 3.26 ± 0.93 3.40 ± 0.66 1.211 0.227 心理 1.99 ± 0.65 2.05 ± 0.70 0.617 0.538 总分 32.00 ± 5.68 34.58 ± 6.40 3.042 0.003* *P < 0.05。 表 3 2组患者术后疼痛评分比较[(
$\bar x \pm s $ ),分]Table 3. Comparison of postoperative pain scores between two groups [(
$\bar x \pm s $ ),scores]术后疼痛情况 对照组
(n = 102)实验组
(n = 102)t P 手术当日 5.18 ± 2.43 4.22 ± 2.32 2.883 0.004* 术后第1天 3.59 ± 2.08 3.27 ± 2.16 1.055 0.293 术后第2天 2.16 ± 1.88 1.80 ± 1.82 1.360 0.175 *P < 0.05。 表 4 2组患者术后排气、排便时间比较[(
$\bar x \pm s $ ),h]Table 4. Comparison of postoperative exhaust and defecation time between two groups [(
$\bar x \pm s $ ),h]术后(h) 对照组
(n = 102)实验组
(n = 102)t P 排气时间 23.67 ± 3.77 19.29 ± 2.69 0.888 0.375 排便时间 39.39 ± 14.34 29.01 ± 12.39 5.516 0.000* *P < 0.05。 -
[1] 郭晓青,陆雯,万小平. 加速康复外科理念在妇科手术中的应用专题讨论[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2021,37(2):81-83. [2] 张萍. 腹腔镜气腹常见并发症分析[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,19(21):36-38. [3] 李少玩,周笋,李思江. 妇科腹腔镜术后针对性护理对患者气腹症状的改善效果分析[J]. 系统医学,2020,5(13):178-180. [4] 李光仪. 实用妇科腹腔镜手术学[M]. 北京 : 人民卫生出版社, 2015: 147-153. [5] Kolcaba K Y. The art of comfort care[J]. Image Journal of Nursing Scholarship,1995,27(4):287-289. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1995.tb00889.x [6] 毛智慧,张欢,孙晓婷,等. 舒适护理及其影响因素的研究进展[J]. 护理研究,2017,31(5):513-517. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2017.05.001 [7] 杜娟,高汉文. 舒适护理对腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除术患者术后康复和心理健康的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复,2018,25(11):123-125. [8] 张志文,邓桂娟,李源丰. 舒适护理在单孔腹腔镜下妇科手术中的应用效果[J]. 中国当代医药,2020,27(9):230-233. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4721.2020.09.069 [9] 陶红艳. 腹腔镜术后非切口疼痛的护理研究进展[J]. 养生保健指南,2019,17(30):45. [10] 王利娟,刘冬梅,李侠,等. 舒适护理评价指标的应用及研究进展[J]. 全科护理,2020,18(36):5073-5076. doi: 10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2020.36.013 [11] 吴明娥. 团队合作舒适护理对子宫肌瘤腹腔镜手术患者术后疼痛及预后的影响[J]. 护理与临床,2020,24(11):1609-1610. [12] 毛惠娟,朱璐莎,李金燕. 围术期舒适护理对妇科腹腔镜手术患者的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2019,25(22):92-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2019.22.032 [13] 郑柳榕,王玲. 早期体位干预对妇科腹腔镜术后患者舒适度的影响[J]. 福建医药杂志,2018,40(3):167-169. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2600.2018.03.063