Diagnostic Value of Guidewire Localization of Breast Mass Based on High-frequency Ultrasound Guidance in Breast Lesions
-
摘要:
目的 探讨基于高频超声引导的乳腺包块导丝定位在乳腺病变患者中的诊断价值。 方法 采用随机抽样方法选择2020年5月至2021年8月云南省中医医院疑似乳腺包块病变患者90例作为对象,患者入院后行高频超声引导的乳腺包块导丝定位诊断,并以病理组织检查结果作为“金标准”;计算并分析基于高频超声引导的乳腺包块导丝定位在乳腺病变患者中诊断价值。 结果 90例疑似乳腺包块病变患者均具有完整的病理结果,结果表明:57例良性病灶;恶性病灶27例。超声引导的乳腺包块导丝定位在纤维腺瘤、乳腺腺病、导管内乳头状瘤、浸润性导管癌和浸润性小叶癌中检出率与病理检查结果差异无统计意义(P > 0.05);超声引导的乳腺良性包块导丝定位在乳腺良性病变患者中确诊57例,与金标准诊断符合率为86.67%[(53+25)/90]差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);诊断灵敏度为86.89%(53/61)、特异度为86.21%(25/29);超声引导的乳腺良性包块导丝定位在乳腺恶性病变患者中确诊27例,与金标准诊断符合率为88.89%[(57+23)/90]差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);诊断灵敏度79.31%(23/29)、特异度为93.44%(57/61)。 结论 基于高频超声引导的乳腺包块导丝定位用于乳腺病变患者中能获得较高的确诊率,诊断灵敏度和特异度较高,可指导临床诊疗,值得推广应用。 Abstract:Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of high-frequency ultrasound-guided guide wire localization of breast mass in patients with breast lesions. Methods Ninety patients with suspected breast mass lesions in Yunnan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from May 2020 to August 2021 were selected as subjects by random sampling method. After admission, the patients received high-frequency ultrasound-guided guide wire localization diagnosis of breast mass, and the pathological tissue examination results were used as the "gold standard". The diagnostic value of high-frequency ultrasound-guided guide wire localization of breast mass in patients with breast lesions was calculated and analyzed. Results All 90 patients with suspected breast mass lesions had complete pathological results. The results showed that 61 patients had benign lesions. 29 cases were malignant lesions. There was no significant difference in the detection rate of ultrasound-guided guide wire localization in fibroadenoma, breast adenosis, intraductal papilloma, invasive ductal carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma compared with pathological examination (P > 0.05). 57 cases of patients with benign breast lesions were diagnosed by ultrasonic-guided guide wire localization of benign breast masses, and the coincidence rate with gold standard diagnosis was 86.67%[(53+25) /90], the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 86.89% (53/61) and 86.21% (25/29). Ultrasound guided guide wire localization of benign breast mass was confirmed in 27 cases of breast malignant lesions, and the coincidence rate with gold standard diagnosis was 88.89%[(57+23) /90] (P < 0.05). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 79.31% (23/29) and 93.44% (57/61) respectively. Conclusion High frequency ultrasound-guided guide wire localization of breast mass for patients with breast lesions can obtain a high diagnostic rate, high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, which can guide clinical diagnosis and treatment, and is worthy of promotion and application. -
表 1 超声引导的乳腺包块导丝定位在乳腺病变患者中的检出率[n(%)]
Table 1. The detection rate of ultrasound-guided guide wire localization of breast mass in patients with breast lesions [n(%)]
检查方法 n 良性病灶 恶性病灶 纤维腺瘤 乳腺腺病 导管内乳头状瘤 浸润性导管癌 浸润性小叶癌 超声引导 90 30(33.33) 26(28.89) 1(1.11) 22(24.44) 5(5.56) 病理检查 90 32(35.56) 27(30.00) 2(2.22) 23(25.56) 6(6.67) χ2 / 0.098 0.027 0.339 0.030 0.097 P / 0.754 0.870 0.560 0.863 0.756 表 2 超声引导的乳腺良性包块导丝定位在乳腺良性病变患者中的诊断效能(n)
Table 2. Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound-guided guide wire positioning of benign breast masses in patients with benign breast lesions (n)
超声引导的乳腺包块导丝定位 病理检查 χ2 P 阳性 阴性 合计 阳性 53 4 57** 42.123 0.001 阴性 8 25 33 合计 61 29 90 **P < 0.01。 表 3 超声引导的乳腺包块导丝定位在乳腺恶性病变患者中的诊断效能(n)
Table 3. Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound-guided breast mass guide wire positioning in patients with malignant breast lesions (n)
超声引导的乳腺包块导丝定位 病理检查 χ2 P 阳性 阴性 合计 阳性 23 4 27** 46.137 0.001 阴性 6 57 63 合计 29 61 90 **P < 0.01。 -
[1] 刘晶焰,彭玉兰,苟泽辉,等. 超声引导导丝定位术对乳腺不可触及肿块的精准切除[J]. 西部医学,2021,33(4):561-566. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3511.2021.04.019 [2] 刘明敏,王丽春,梁喜,杨蕊. 超声引导下乳腺微小病变活检应用于乳腺癌早期诊断[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2018,39(7):37-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4706.2018.07.008 [3] 马佳琪,梁秀芬,王茵,等. MRI导丝定位术对仅MRI显示的乳腺病变的诊断价值[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2019,27(11):1995-2000. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2019.11.035 [4] 车树楠,李静,薛梅,等. 集成磁共振成像对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志,2021,43(8):872-877. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20210322-00254 [5] 陈绍华,杨娜,李国明,等. 旋切取芯活检针在乳腺癌与乳腺微小肿物中的鉴别价值及诊断效能研究[J]. 实用癌症杂志,2020,35(5):753-755,759. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2020.05.015 [6] J Mei,Hu Y ,Jiang X ,et al. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy versus surgical resection in patients with breast desmoid tumor[J]. Journal of Surgical Research,2021,261(Suppl 10):400-406. [7] 于腾飞,何文,甘从贵,等. 基于深度学习超声在乳腺肿块四分类中的应用价值[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2020,29(4):337-342. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131148-20190828-00519 [8] 陈红,肖祎,赵巧玲. 自动乳腺全容积超声成像与常规超声诊断乳腺癌价值的对比研究[J]. 临床超声医学杂志,2019,21(5):381-384. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-6978.2019.05.021 [9] 戴继宏,赵宏,林竹. 超声弹性成像技术在乳腺良恶性肿块中的诊断价值分析[J]. 中国医师杂志,2020,22(9):1419-1422. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20190413-00429 [10] Sheng D,Chan S M,Lin C W,et al. 32-Channel transmit beamformer with high timing resolution for high-frequency ultrasound imaging systems[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments,2020,91(5):054701. doi: 10.1063/1.5144933 [11] 闫虹,李响,程慧芳,等. S-Detect技术应用于超声诊断乳腺包块的影响因素及与超声医师联合诊断的分析[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志,2020,31(1):24-29. [12] 郭文凤,王永琪,马亚,等. 超声引导下穿刺活检在非肿块型乳腺癌中的临床应用价值[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2020,35(11):2124-2126. [13] 张岳宇,孔繁云,陈成辉. 超声征象对超声引导下穿刺活检在早期乳腺癌中诊断价值的影响[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2019,28(9):1165-1170. doi: 10.7659/j.issn.10056947.2019.09.021 [14] Va Vadi H,Mostafa A,Zhou F,et al. Compact ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography system for breast cancer imaging[J]. Journal of biomedical optics,2019,24(2):1-9. [15] 郭荣荣,王宇翔,薛改琴. 导丝定位不能触及的乳腺良恶性结节超声特征及超声与钼靶检查诊断价值分析[J]. 肿瘤研究与临床,2020,32(2):119-122. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-9801.2020.02.010 [16] 牛微,罗娅红,于韬,等. 基于动态对比增强MRI的肿瘤血流动力学及形态学特征预测乳腺癌术后复发时间的价值[J]. 中华放射学杂志,2020,54(3):209-214. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2020.03.007 [17] 邢静,王一清,沈加君. 超声引导经皮穿刺活检诊断乳腺占位性病变的可行性及有效性分析[J]. 中国中西医结合外科杂志,2020,26(2):304-307. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6948.2020.02.020 [18] 滕颖,赵令强. 高频彩色多普勒超声在乳腺癌患者中的早期诊断效果及效能研究[J]. 系统医学,2021,6(12):127-129,138.