PBL教学方式对普外科实习生评判性思维的影响

王滔; 邱岚茜; 王连敏; 苏琨; 胡晟; 吴涛

doi:10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220314

PBL教学方式对普外科实习生评判性思维的影响

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220314

王滔¹,
邱岚茜²,
王连敏¹,
苏琨¹,
胡晟³,
吴涛^1, ,

1.
昆明医科大学第二附属医院肝胆胰外科四病区，云南昆明　650101
2.
昆明医科大学第三附属医院微创介入科，云南昆明　650118
3.
昆明医科大学第二附属医院肝胆胰外科二病区，云南昆明　650101

基金项目: 遗传资源与进化国家重点实验室开放课题（GREKF21-11）；云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目（2022Y209）；昆明医科大学教研教改课题（2020JY-Y-113）

详细信息

作者简介:
王滔（1983～），男，云南临沧人，医学博士，讲师，主要从事肝胆胰外科疾病的临床与基础研究工作

通讯作者:
吴涛，E-mail： kmwt@163.com

中图分类号: G424.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 2850
- HTML全文浏览量: 1846
- PDF下载量: 36
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-01-08
- 刊出日期: 2022-03-25

Influence of PBL Teaching Method on Critical Thinking of General Surgery Interns

Tao WANG¹,
Lanxi QIU²,
Lianmin WANG¹,
Kun SU¹,
Sheng HU³,
Tao WU^{1
, ,}

1.
The Fourth Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery，The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University，Kunming Yunnan 650101
2.
Dept. of Minimally-Invasive Interventional Therapy，Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University，Yunnan Provincial Tumor Hospital Kunming Yunnan 650118
3.
The Second Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery，The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University，Kunming Yunnan 650101，China

摘要

摘要: 目的评价基于PBL教学法对临床医学专业外科实习生评判性思维能力的影响，以提高临床专业本科生评判性思维能力。方法将2020年3月至12月参加肝胆胰外科四病区实习的大四临床医学专业本科实习生190名纳入本研究，随机法分成对照组和实验祖，实验组接纳PBL讲习方式，对照组则接纳传统讲习方式。利用评判性思维能力问卷评价2组实习生干预前后评判性思维能力的变化。结果干预后实验组评判性思维得分总分高于对照组（P < 0.001），实验组在分析能力、评判性思维自信心、求知欲和认知成熟度4个维度均优于对照组（ P < 0.05）；干预后实验组外科操作成绩为（91.04±3.51）分，高于对照组（85.72±3.94）分（ P < 0.05）；干预后实验组学生对课程满意度的各项量化指标均高于对照组（ P < 0.05）。结论 PBL教学方式可显著提高临床专业普外科实习生评判性思维能力。
- PBL教学法 /
- 外科实习生 /
- 评判性思维
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of PBL teaching method on the critical thinking ability of surgical interns majoring in clinical medicine, so as to improve the critical thinking ability of undergraduates majoring in clinical medicine. Methods A total of 190 clinical medicine undergraduate interns who participated in the laboratory practice from March to December 2020 were included in this study. They were randomly divided into control group and experiment pilot. The experimental group received PBL teaching mode, while the control group received traditional teaching mode. Critical thinking ability questionnaire was used to evaluate the change of critical thinking ability before and after intervention. Results After intervention, the total score of critical thinking in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group （P < 0.001）, and the experimental group was better than the control group in the four dimensions of analytical ability, critical thinking confidence, curiosity and cognitive maturity （ P < 0.05）. After intervention, the surgical operation score of experimental group （91.04±3.51） was significantly higher than that of control group （85.72±3.94）（ P < 0.05）. After intervention, the quantitative indexes of course satisfaction of the experimental group were significantly higher than that of the control group （ P < 0.05）. Conclusion PBL teaching method can significantly improve the critical thinking ability of clinical general surgery interns
- PBL teaching method /
- Surgical intern /
- Critical thinking

HTML全文

表 1 2组普外科实习生评判性思维能力总分和各维度分数评价[（ $ \bar x \pm s $），分]

Table 1. Evaluation of total score of critical thinking ability and each dimension score of 2 groups of general surgery interns [（ $ \bar x \pm s $），score]

指标	对照组	实验组	t	P
n	95	95
寻找真相
干预前	28.96 ± 6.56	28.08 ± 5.49	0.514	0.609
干预后	36.08 ± 4.63	38.36 ± 6.65	−1.407	0.166
t	−4.434	−5.959
P	< 0.001^*	< 0.001^*
开放思想
干预前	30.84 ± 3.39	30.24 ± 3.90	0.581	0.564
干预后	37.02 ± 3.50	38.76 ± 3.46	−1.586	0.199
t	−6.529	−8.179
P	< 0.001^*	< 0.001^*
分析能力
干预前	28.68 ± 6.47	27.76 ± 5.57	0.539	0.592
干预后	36.12 ± 3.47	38.64 ± 4.11	−2.342	0.023^*
t	−5.070	−7.858
P	< 0.001^*	< 0.001^*
系统化能力
干预前	29.16 ± 5.54	26.36 ± 7.02	1.565	0.124
干预后	35.76 ± 3.13	35.12 ± 3.97	−1.334	0.101
t	−5.191	−6.283
P	< 0.001^*	< 0.001^*
评判性思维自信心
干预前	28.96 ± 8.23	28.04 ± 7.57	0.411	0.683
干预后	33.72 ± 5.42	37.20 ± 6.16	−2.120	0.039^*
t	−2.414	−4.690
P	0.02^*	< 0.001^*
求知欲
干预前	26.26 ± 8.05	22.84 ± 6.56	0.566	0.166
干预后	33.60 ± 5.22	39.52 ± 5.53	−3.892	< 0.001^*
t	−3.086	−9.724
P	< 0.001^*	< 0.001^*
认知成熟度
干预前	28.14 ± 6.22	27.84 ± 7.35	−0.104	0.918
干预后	34.20 ± 5.43	38.44 ± 5.09	−2.848	0.006^*
t	−4.071	−5.926
P	< 0.001^*	< 0.001^*
总分
干预前	201.00 ± 31.33	191.16 ± 26.85	1.071	0.289
干预后	246.68 ± 13.80	266.04 ± 22.32	−4.260	< 0.001^*
t	−6.818	−11.152
P	< 0.001^*	< 0.001^*
^*P < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 干预后两组实习生外科操作考核成绩比较（ $ \bar x \pm s $，分）

Table 2. Comparison of surgical operation assessment results between the two groups of interns after intervention （ $ \bar x \pm s $，score）

组别	n	操作成绩	t	P
对照组	95	86.72 ± 4.94	−5.042	< 0.001^*
实验组	95	91.04 ± 3.51	−5.042	< 0.001^*
^*P < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 干预后2组实习生满意度调查情况[n = 95，n（%）]

Table 3. Satisfaction survey of interns in the two groups after intervention [n = 95，n（%）]

组别	激发学生学习兴趣	培养自学能力	促进对理论知识的掌握	提高语言表达和沟通能力	提高临床思维能力
对照组	41（43）	43（45）	47（49）	38（40）	34（36）
实验组	58（61）	62（65）	70（73）	58（61）	63（66）
χ²	6.095	7.685	11.768	8.422	17.713
P	0.014^*	0.006^*	0.001^*	0.004^*	< 0.001^*
^*P < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(13)

[1]	Nawabi S,Javed M Q,Bilal R. Problem-based learning and team-based learning as a novel package approach[J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak,2021,30(6):710-715.
[2]	Tan H,Huang E,Deng X,et al. Application of 3D printing technology combined with PBL teaching model in teaching clinical nursing in congenital heart surgery:A case-control study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2021,100(20):25918-25924.
[3]	Dring J C. Problem-Based Learning - Experiencing and understanding the prominence during Medical School:Perspective[J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond),2019,47(9):27-28.
[4]	Turan S,Konan A,Kılıç Y A,et al. The effect of problem-based learning with cooperative-learning strategies in surgery clerkships[J]. J Surg Educ,2012,69(2):226-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.07.010
[5]	Bai X,Zhang X,Wang X,et al. Follow-up assessment of problem-based learning in dental alveolar surgery education:a pilot trial[J]. Int Dent J,2017,67(3):180-185. doi: 10.1111/idj.12275
[6]	Zia A,Dar U F. Critical Thinking:Perception and disposition of students in a Medical College of Pakistan[J]. J Pak Med Assoc,2019,69(7):968-972.
[7]	Futami A,Noguchi W M,Mikoshiba N,et al. Critical thinking disposition among hospital nurses in Japan:Impact of organizational versus personal factors[J]. Jpn J Nurs Sci,2020,17(2):1-9.
[8]	Zhao W,He L,Deng W,et al. The effectiveness of the combined problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) teaching method in the clinical practical teaching of thyroid disease[J]. BMC Med Educ,2020,20(1):381-390. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02306-y
[9]	O'Neill P A,Willis S C,Jones A. A model of how students link problem-based learning with clinical experience through "elaboration"[J]. Acad Med,2002,77(6):552-561. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200206000-00015
[10]	Tsigarides J,Wingfield L R,Kulendran M. Does a PBL-based medical curriculum predispose training in specific career paths? A systematic review of the literature[J]. BMC Res Notes,2017,10(1):24-33. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2348-0
[11]	Yadav R L,Piryani R M,Deo G P,et al. Attitude and perception of undergraduate medical students toward the problem-based learning in Chitwan Medical College,Nepal[J]. Adv Med Educ Pract,2018,9(3):317-322.
[12]	Liu C X,Ouyang W W,Wang X W,et al. Comparing hybrid problem-based and lecture learning (PBL + LBL) with LBL pedagogy on clinical curriculum learning for medical students in China:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2020,99(16):19687-19696.
[13]	Alduraywish A A,Mohager M O,Alenezi M J,et al. Evaluation of students’ experience with Problem-based Learning (PBL) applied at the College of Medicine,Al-Jouf University,Saudi Arabia[J]. J Pak Med Assoc,2017,67(12):1870-1873.

相关文章(20)

[1]	卫林, 王克振. 基于RBL教学法的本科生科研创新能力培养的实践与探索, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20231230
[2]	冯蕊, 徐世莲, 杨海龙, 杨哲, 杨媛, 李凡, 张筱敏. RBL教学法对医学研究生批判性思维的影响, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20231008
[3]	周继萍, 张俊玲, 刘青, 李兴梅, 范沛友, 姜和玲. “模块化教学法”在肾内科本科实习护生带教中的实践与优化, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220523
[4]	张江, 杨秉坤, 平文波, 赵喜娟, 苏艳, 吴江. 基于目标教学理论的雨课堂联合情景模拟在放射治疗科实习护生带教中的应用, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221123
[5]	王赟, 王慧, 黄海潇, 李茹婴, 沙瑞芹, 田莹. PBL+循证护理教学法在急诊科护生批判性思维能力培养中的应用, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220827
[6]	崔德花, 王所荣, 庄丽娟, 武星君. PBL教学法在护理综合技能训练课上提高护生的批判性思维能力, 昆明医科大学学报.
[7]	李瑞乾, 雷玉洁, 白宇, 赵斌, 张国颖, 杨宏, 毕城伟, 张漾杰. 移动PBL教学联合微课在外科实习教学中运用, 昆明医科大学学报.
[8]	王娟, 陶永生, 沈居丽, 叶吉云, 屈燕, 赵珍. PBL教学法与翻转课堂相结合的教学模式在大学英语读写教学中的应用, 昆明医科大学学报.
[9]	吴雪松. PBL与LBL教学法在外科手术学技能操作教学中的对比研究, 昆明医科大学学报.
[10]	罗丹. 护生自身培养评判性思维能力的调查, 昆明医科大学学报.
[11]	龙茹华. 可视化教学法与传统教学法应用于麻醉学本科实习生学习气管插管术, 昆明医科大学学报.
[12]	陈蜀. 案例教学法在本科护生《护理管理学》教学中应用效果评价, 昆明医科大学学报.
[13]	王蕾. TBL教学法在呼吸内科临床实习教学中应用的探讨, 昆明医科大学学报.
[14]	罗丹. 护理本科生临床实习前评判性思维能力调查与分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
[15]	于浩飞. PBL教学法在天然药物化学实验教学中的应用, 昆明医科大学学报.
[16]	官兵. 案例教学法在内科临床实习中的运用体会, 昆明医科大学学报.
[17]	. PBL教学法在急救技能教学中的应用探讨, 昆明医科大学学报.
[18]	. PBL教学法在《临床肿瘤内科学》场景教学中的应用, 昆明医科大学学报.
[19]	. 创新思维教学法在口腔内科实验课双语教学中的应用研究, 昆明医科大学学报.
[20]	. 医学信息素质教育中参与性教学法与传统教学法的效果评价, 昆明医科大学学报.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计

点击查看大图

指标	对照组	实验组	t	P
n	95	95
寻找真相
干预前	28.96 ± 6.56	28.08 ± 5.49	0.514	0.609
干预后	36.08 ± 4.63	38.36 ± 6.65	−1.407	0.166
t	−4.434	−5.959
P	< 0.001^*	< 0.001^*
开放思想
干预前	30.84 ± 3.39	30.24 ± 3.90	0.581	0.564
干预后	37.02 ± 3.50	38.76 ± 3.46	−1.586	0.199
t	−6.529	−8.179
P	< 0.001^*	< 0.001^*
分析能力
干预前	28.68 ± 6.47	27.76 ± 5.57	0.539	0.592
干预后	36.12 ± 3.47	38.64 ± 4.11	−2.342	0.023^*
t	−5.070	−7.858
P	< 0.001^*	< 0.001^*
系统化能力
干预前	29.16 ± 5.54	26.36 ± 7.02	1.565	0.124
干预后	35.76 ± 3.13	35.12 ± 3.97	−1.334	0.101
t	−5.191	−6.283
P	< 0.001^*	< 0.001^*
评判性思维自信心
干预前	28.96 ± 8.23	28.04 ± 7.57	0.411	0.683
干预后	33.72 ± 5.42	37.20 ± 6.16	−2.120	0.039^*
t	−2.414	−4.690
P	0.02^*	< 0.001^*
求知欲
干预前	26.26 ± 8.05	22.84 ± 6.56	0.566	0.166
干预后	33.60 ± 5.22	39.52 ± 5.53	−3.892	< 0.001^*
t	−3.086	−9.724
P	< 0.001^*	< 0.001^*
认知成熟度
干预前	28.14 ± 6.22	27.84 ± 7.35	−0.104	0.918
干预后	34.20 ± 5.43	38.44 ± 5.09	−2.848	0.006^*
t	−4.071	−5.926
P	< 0.001^*	< 0.001^*
总分
干预前	201.00 ± 31.33	191.16 ± 26.85	1.071	0.289
干预后	246.68 ± 13.80	266.04 ± 22.32	−4.260	< 0.001^*
t	−6.818	−11.152
P	< 0.001^*	< 0.001^*
^*P < 0.05。

表(3)

计量

文章访问数: 2850
HTML全文浏览量: 1846
PDF下载量: 36
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板

PBL教学方式对普外科实习生评判性思维的影响

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220314

作者简介:
王滔（1983～），男，云南临沧人，医学博士，讲师，主要从事肝胆胰外科疾病的临床与基础研究工作

通讯作者:
吴涛，E-mail： kmwt@163.com

计量

Influence of PBL Teaching Method on Critical Thinking of General Surgery Interns

计量

目录

留言板

PBL教学方式对普外科实习生评判性思维的影响

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220314

作者简介: 王滔（1983～ ），男，云南临沧人，医学博士，讲师，主要从事肝胆胰外科疾病的临床与基础研究工作

通讯作者: 吴涛，E-mail： kmwt@163.com

计量

出版历程

Influence of PBL Teaching Method on Critical Thinking of General Surgery Interns

计量

出版历程

目录

作者简介:
王滔（1983～），男，云南临沧人，医学博士，讲师，主要从事肝胆胰外科疾病的临床与基础研究工作

通讯作者:
吴涛，E-mail： kmwt@163.com