Efficacy of Targeted Nursing Mode in Patients with High Altitude Pulmonary Edema
-
摘要:
目的 研究高原性肺水肿患者应用针对性的护理模式的效果。 方法 将2019年6~12月云南省迪庆香格里拉人民医院急诊留观室收治的100例急性高原性肺水肿患者作为研究对象,根据入院次序分成2个组:对照组(50例)和研究组(50例)。对照组患者采取常规护理干预措施,研究组实施针对性的护理模式。对比2者患者的护理满意度、症状改善时间,通过SAS与SDS量表对他们的心理状态进行评价。 结果 实施护理干预措施之后,研究组患者的满意度为97%,高于对照组患者的满意率74%,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 采取护理干预措施之后,研究组与对照组患者的SAS评分分别为(43.64±2.45)分、(51.02±2.67)分,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);2组的SDS评分分别为(43.48±1.82)分、(51.90±1.88)分,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);研究组患者的症状改善时间少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 结论 高原地区医院应用针对性护理模式能够减轻高原性肺水肿患者的负面情绪,缩短临床症状的改善时间,提升患者对护理工作的满意度。 Abstract:Objective To study the efficacy of targeted model of nursing care for patients with high altitude pulmonary edema. Method A total of 100 patients with acute high altitude pulmonary edema admitted to the emergency department of Shangri-La People’ s Hospital, Diqing, Yunnan Province from June 2019 to December 2019 were selected as the study subjects. According to the order of admission, they were divided into two groups: control group (50 cases) and study group (50 cases). The control group received routine nursing intervention measures, the study group received targeted nursing mode. The nursing satisfaction and symptom improvement time of the two groups were compared, and their psychological status was evaluated by SAS and SDS scales. Result The satisfaction rate of patients in the study group was 97%, which was significantly higher than the satisfaction rate of patients in the control group of 74% (P < 0.05). The SAS score of the study group and the control group was (43.64±2.45) points and (51.02±2.67) points, respectively, with was statistically significant difference (P < 0.05); SDS scores of the two groups were (43.48±1.82) points and (51.90±1.88) points, respectively, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). The symptom improvement time of the study group was shorter than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion The application of the targeted nursing care model in hospitals in high altitude region was able to reduce the negative emotions of patients with pulmonary edema, shorten the improvement time of clinical symptoms, and significantly improve patients’ satisfaction. -
Key words:
- Targeted care /
- Plateau pulmonary edema /
- Value .
-
表 1 2组护理满意度情况比较 [n(%)]
Table 1. Comparison of satisfaction degree between two groups [n(%)]
组别 n 很满意 满意 一般满意 不满意 满意度(%) 研究组 50 40(40) 8(8) 2(2) 0 96 对照组 50 20(20) 17(17) 6(6) 7(7) 74 χ2 18.907 P < 0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 2 2组护理后症状改善情况比较 [(
$\bar x \pm s $ ),d]Table 2. Comparison oftwo groups after the improvement of symptoms [(
$\bar x \pm s $ ),d]组别 n 咳嗽消失
时间气促消失
时间肺部湿罗音
消失时间研究组 50 6.12 ± 0.80 3.00 ± 0.64 5.92 ± 0.83 对照组 50 8.04 ± 0.61 4.80 ± 0.64 7.34 ± 0.66 t 13.594 14.087 9.486 P < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 3 2组患者护理前后负面情绪比较 [(
$\bar x \pm s $ ),分]Table 3. Comparison of negative emotion between two groups before and after nursing [(
$\bar x \pm s $ ),score]组别 n SAS SDS 护理前 护理后 t P 护理前 护理后 t P 研究组 50 52.74 ± 2.75 43.64 ± 2.45 17.491 < 0.001* 52.56 ± 1.81 43.48 ± 1.82 25.015 < 0.001* 对照组 50 52.10 ± 3.00 51.02 ± 2.67 1.903 0.060 52.64 ± 1.96 51.90 ± 1.88 1.930 0.056 t -1.113 14.411 0.212 22.771 P 0.268 < 0.001* 0.832 < 0.001* *P < 0.05。 -
[1] 李光宗,陈锋,刘英富,等. 高原肺水肿发病分子机制研究进展[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2017,40(2):123-126. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2017.02.009 [2] 刘海军. 琥珀酸氢化可的松和氨茶碱联合治疗高原性肺水肿的应用效果研究[J]. 糖尿病天地,2019,16(1):83-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7851.2019.01.097 [3] 中华医学会第三次全国高原医学学术讨论会. 我国高原病命名、分型及诊断标准[J]. 高原医学杂志,2010,20(1):9-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3809.2010.01.004 [4] 韩颖,郭松奇,王楠,等. 心理护理对冠心病患者焦虑抑郁情绪的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2017,23(9):1253-1255. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2017.09.017 [5] 冯国琴,吴健,马丽丽,等. 基于创新门诊服务管理视角推动医院品牌提升[J]. 广西医学,2018,40(16):1916-1918. [6] 盛东芹,王凯悦,焦兴爱. 针对性个案护理结合细节护理在首次使用无创呼吸机患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(7):21-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2021.07.007 [7] 陈英. 护理层级管理对临床护理服务质量的提高效果研究[J]. 基层医学论坛,2019,23(3):413-414. [8] 张欣,李文欢. 针对性护理对缺血性卒中合并重症肺炎患者的干预效果[J]. 慢性病学杂志,2020,21(3):377-379. [9] 杨伟英,施欢欢,陈建萍,孙美萍. 急诊患者留观病房滞留时间影响因素及分析[J]. 医院管理论坛,2014,31(8):28-31. [10] 陈莉,赵红梅,黄小英,等. ICU机械通气患者呼吸机相关性肺炎危险因素与护理对策[J]. 护理实践与研究,2020,17(9):28-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2020.09.011 [11] 周红琴. 改良口腔护理在预防婴幼儿呼吸机相关性肺炎中的应用[J]. 护理研究,2020,34(4):708-710. doi: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.04.032 [12] 吴萌,吴萍,徐维. 优质精细护理干预对无创呼吸机治疗AECOPD患者的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2020,26(7):110-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2020.07.040 [13] 刘静,张林,冯英凯. 高原肺水肿患者焦虑评估与护理干预效果[J]. 重庆医学,2012,41(19):2001-2002. [14] 李丽文,蔡福临. 针对性护理干预对系统性红斑狼疮患者心理状态、疾病不确定感和家庭功能的影响[J]. 中国医药导报,2021,18(22):180-184. [15] 蒋怀滨,张斌,陈颖,等. 音乐治疗的一般模式及其发展取向[J]. 医学与哲学,2015,36(3A):39-43. [16] 蔡婷婷,王亚婷,曹梅娟. 音乐疗法在机械通气患者中的应用进展[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(20):2953-2955. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.20.036