Analgesia of Ultrasound-guided Single-dose Adductor Canal Block with Dexmedetomidine Combined with Ropivacaine after Patella Fracture Surgery in Adults
-
摘要:
目的 对比超声引导下右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因的单次收肌管阻滞与单纯罗哌卡因的连续股神经阻滞在髌骨骨折手术术后镇痛的效果。 方法 择期全麻下髌骨骨折患者31例,年龄21~69岁,BMI≤35 kg/m2,ASA 分级Ⅰ级~Ⅲ级,随机分为2组, 100 μg右美复合0.25%罗哌卡因50 mg的单次收肌管组(A组,n = 21),单纯0.25%罗哌卡因250 mg的连续股神经阻滞组(F组,n = 10)。观察比较2组患者术后6、8、12、24、36、48 h的镇痛、镇静、肌力评分,记录术后追加镇痛和不良反应的发生情况。 结果 2组患者术后各个时间点的VAS、Raymay和Lovett评分比较无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。 结论 右美托咪定作为佐剂的罗哌卡因的单次收肌管阻滞可以为髌骨骨折提供良好的术后镇痛。 Abstract:Objective To compare the analgesic effect between ultrasound-guided single-dose adductor canal block with dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine and continuous femoral nerve block with ropivacaine after patella fracture surgery. Methods 31 patients with patella fractures who underwent elective general anesthesia, with age ranging from 21 to 69, BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2, ASA grading Ⅰ~Ⅲ, were randomly divided into two groups. Single-dose adductor canal block group who received 100 μg dexmedetomidine combined with 0.25% ropivacaine 50 mg (A group, n = 21), and continuous femoral nerve block group who received 0.25% ropivacaine 250 mg (F group, n = 10). The scores regarding analgesia, sedation, and muscle strength at 6, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after surgery were observed and compared between the two groups and the additional postoperative analgesia and adverse reactions were recorded. Results The analgesic effect, postoperative scores based on sedation and muscle strength were not statistically different between the two groups at various points during the observation period (P > 0.05). Conclusion Single-dose adductor canal block with dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine can provide good analgesia after patella fracture surgery. -
Key words:
- Adductor canal nerve block /
- Dexmedetomidine /
- Ropivacaine /
- Patellar fracture /
- Analgesia /
- Ultralsound guidance
-
表 1 2 组患者一般情况的比较(
$\bar x \pm s $ )Table 1. Comparison of general conditions between two groups of patients (
$\bar x \pm s $ )组别 n 男/女(n) 年龄(岁) ASAⅠ/Ⅱ/Ⅲ(n) BMI(kg/m2) A 21 10/11 41.9 ± 18.75 8/10/3 37.38 ± 5.54 F 10 5/5 46.6 ± 19.68 3/5/2 40.7 ± 4.52 t/卡方值 −0.64 0.47 −1.63 P 1.000 0.53 1.00 0.11 表 2 2组患者不同时间点VAS评分的比较 [ (
$ \bar x \pm s $ ),分]Table 2. Comparison of VAS scores between two groups at different time points [(
$ \bar x \pm s $ ),分]指标 组别 T1 T2 T3 VAS A 1.57 ± 2.27 1.38 ± 1.88 1.86 ± 2.31 F 0.7 ± 1.55 0.7 ± 1.55 1.00 ± 2.10 T4 T5 T6 A 2.24 ± 2.49 2.00 ± 1.95 2.00 ± 2.14 F 2.80 ± 2.89 2.20 ± 1.72 1.80 ± 1.08 表 3 2组患者不同时间点镇静、肌力评分的比较[(
$ \bar x \pm s $ ),分]Table 3. Comparison of sedation, muscle strength scores between two groups at different time points [(
$ \bar x \pm s $ ),分]指标 组别 T1 T2 T3 Ramsay A 1.81 ± 0.40 1.90 ± 0.30 1.90 ± 0.30 F 1.90 ± 0.30 1.90 ± 0.30 1.80 ± 0.40 T4 T5 T6 A 1.95 ± 0.38 1.95 ± 0.22 2.00 ± 0.00 F 1.70 ± 0.46 2.00 ± 0.00 1.90 ± 0.30 T1 T2 T3 lovett A 1.81 ± 1.21 1.95 ± 1.20 2.00 ± 1.14 F 2.00 ± 0.63 2.10 ± 0.54 2.10 ± 0.54 T4 T5 T6 A 2.33 ± 1.02 2.24 ± 1.04 2.33 ± 1.11 F 2.20 ± 0.75 2.40 ± 0.66 2.40 ± 0.66 表 4 2组患者术后各时间点的其他情况[n(%)]
Table 4. Other conditions of the two groups at each postoperative time points [n(%)]
事件 组别 n T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 追加镇痛药 A 21 2(9.52) 0 2(9.52) 3(14.28) 0 0 F 10 2(20.00) 1(10.00) 2(20.00) 3(30.00) 2(20.00) 1(10.00) 恶心、呕吐 A 21 0 1(4.76) 1(4.76) 1(4.76) 2(9.52) 0 F 10 1(10.0) 1(10.00) 0 0 0 0 肢体异感 A 21 3(14.29) 3(14.29) 3(14.29) 4(19.05) 4(19.05) 4(19.05) F 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 头痛 A 21 1(4.76) 1(4.76) 1(4.76) 0 0 0 F 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 其他 A 21 无 无 无 无 无 无 F 10 无 无 无 脱管2例 无 无 -
[1] Marino J,Scuderi G,Dowling O,et al. Periarticular knee injection with liposomal bupivacaine and continuous femoral nerve block for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty:A randomized controlled trial.[J]. J Arthroplasty,2019,34(3):495-500. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.025 [2] Yan Y L,Xiang R,Zhang L,et al. Application of continuous femoral nerve block in postoperative analgesia of the patellar fractures.[J]. Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine,2014,120(2):383-389. [3] Ilfeld B M,Duke K B,Donohue M C. The association between lower extremity continuous peripheral nerve blocks and patient falls after knee and hip arthroplasty.[J]. AnesthAnalg,2010,111(6):1552-1554. [4] Kwofie M K,Shastri U D,Gadsden J C,et al. The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk:a blinded,randomized trial of volunteers.[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2013,38(4):321-325. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295df80 [5] Lund J,Jenstrup M T,Jaeger P,et al. Continuous adductor-canal-blockade for adjuvant post-operative analgesia after major knee surgery:preliminary results.[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2011,55(1):14-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02333.x [6] Esmaoglu A,Yegenoglu F,Akin A,et al. Dexmedetomidine added to levobupivacaine prolongs axillary brachial plexus block[J]. AnesthAnalg,2010,111(6):1548-1551. [7] Fritsch G,Danninger T,Allerberger K,et al. Dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine extends the duration of interscalene brachial plexus blocks for elective shoulder surgery when compared with ropivacaine alone:a single-center,prospective,triple-blind,randomized controlled trial.[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2014,39(1):37-47. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000033 [8] Chen J Y,Li N,Xu Y Q. Single shot adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia of pediatric patellar dislocation surgery:A case-series report[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2015,94(48):2217. [9] Ilfeld Brian M. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks:An update of the published evidence and comparison with novel,alternative analgesic modalities[J]. AnesthAnalg,2017,124(1):308-335. [10] Olive D J,Barrington M J,Simone S A,et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing three analgesia regimens following total knee joint replacement:continuous femoral nerve block,intrathecal morphine or both.[J]. Anaesth Intensive Care,2015,43(4):454-460. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1504300406 [11] Swank K R,Di Bartola A C,Everhart J S,et al. The effect of femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:A systematic review[J]. Arthroscopy,2017,33(5):1082-1091. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.034 [12] Smith J H,Belk J W,Kraeutler M J,et al. Adductor Canal Versus Femoral Nerve Block after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction:A Systematic Review of Level I Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Early Postoperative Pain,Opioid Requirements,and Quadriceps Strength.[J]. Arthroscopy,2020,36(7):1973-1980. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.03.040 [13] Wasserstein D,Farlinger C,Brull R,et al. Advanced age,obesity and continuous femoral nerve blockade are independent risk factors for inpatient falls after primary total knee arthroplasty.[J]. J Arthroplasty.,2013,28(7):1121-1124. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.018 [14] Pelt C E,Anderson A W,Anderson M B,et al. Postoperative falls after total knee arthroplasty in patients with a femoral nerve catheter:can we reduce the incidence?[J]. Arthroplasty.,2014,29(6):1154-1157. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.006 [15] Wiegel M,Gottschaldt U,Hennebach R,et al. Complications and adverse effects associated with continuous peripheral nerve blocks in orthopedic patients[J]. Anesth Analg,2007,104(6):1578-1582. [16] Edwards M D,Bethea J P,Hunnicutt J L,et al. Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength,function,and postoperative pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:A systematic review of level 1 studies[J]. Am J Sports Med,2020,48(9):2305-2313. doi: 10.1177/0363546519883589 [17] Kim D H,Lin Y,Goytizolo E A,et al. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty:a prospective,randomized,controlled trial.[J]. Anesthesiology,2014,120(3):540-550. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000119 [18] Elkassabany N M,Antosh S,Ahmed M,et al. The Risk of Falls After Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Use of a Femoral Nerve Block Versus an Adductor Canal Block:A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.[J]. Anesth Analg,2016,122(5):1696-1703. [19] Li S,Zhou J,Li X,Teng X,et al. Analgesic Impact of Single-Shot Versus Continuous Femoral Nerve Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.[J]. Adv Ther,2020,37(2):671-685. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01194-z [20] Wang C,Chen Z,Ma X. Continuous adductor canal block is a better choice compared to single shot after primary total knee arthroplasty:A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Int J Surg,2019,72(3):16-24. [21] Canbek U,Akgun U,Aydogan N H,et al. Continuous adductor canal block following total knee arthroplasty provides a better analgesia compared to single shot:A prospective randomized controlled trial.[J]. Acta OrthopTraumatolTurc,2019,53(5):334-339. [22] Hussain N,Grzywacz V P,Ferreri C A,et al. Investigating the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthesia in Brachial Plexus Block:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 18 Randomized Controlled Trials.[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2017,42(2):184-196. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000564 [23] Marhofer P,Brummett C M. Safety and efficiency of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to local anesthetics.[J]. CurrOpinAnaesthesiol,2016,29(5):632-637. [24] Suresh S,Ecoffey C,Bosenberg A,et al. The european society of regional anaesthesia and pain therapy/american society of regional anesthesia and pain medicine recommendations on local anesthetics and adjuvants dosage in pediatric regional anesthesia[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2018,43(2):211-216. [25] von Wulffen H,Heesemann J,BützowG H,et al. Detection of Campylobacter pyloridis in patients with antrum gastritis and peptic ulcers by culture,complement fixation test,and immunoblot.[J]. J Clin Microbiol,1986,24(5):716-720. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.5.716-720.1986 [26] Jaeger P,ZaricD,Fomsgaard J S,et al. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty:a randomized,double-blind study.[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2013,38(6):526-532. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000015 [27] Abdallah F W,Whelan D B,Chan V W,et al. Adductor canal block provides noninferior analgesia and superior quadriceps strength compared with femoral nerve block in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. Anesthesiology,2016,124(5):1053-1064. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001045 [28] Kim H Y,Williamson J M,Lyles C M. Sample-size calculations for studies with correlated ordinal outcomes.[J]. Stat Med,2005,24(19):2977-2987. doi: 10.1002/sim.2162