Effects of Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Plus Open Operation in Hemodialysis Patients with Type I and II Upper Limb Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis
-
摘要:
目的 探讨开放手术辅助经皮腔内血管成形术(percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, PTA)治疗血液透析患者上肢动静脉内瘘Ⅰ型合并Ⅱ型狭窄的临床疗效。 方法 90例已建立上肢自体动静脉内瘘(autogenous arteriovenous fistulas,AVF)并出现Ⅰ型合并Ⅱ型狭窄接受血透治疗患者,随机分为3组,每组30例,A组:超声引导下PTA,B组:数字减影血管造影(digital subtraction angiography, DSA)引导下PTA,C组:开放手术辅助PTA。比较3组手术成功率、手术前后血管内径、肱动脉血流量、AVF通畅率及术后并发症情况。 结果 C组患者手术成功率分别高于A、B组,并发症分别低于A、B组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);术前3组患者的血管内径、肱动脉血流量比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),术后即刻和术后1周C组分别大于A、B 2组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);C组术后6、12月时的AVF通畅率及稳定性分别高于A、B 2组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 结论 开放手术辅助经皮腔内血管成形术治疗血液透析患者上肢动静脉内瘘Ⅰ型合并Ⅱ型狭窄的临床疗效显著,能恢复内瘘功能,保证患者有效透析,且操作简单,创伤小,并发症少,可作为部分病例的首选治疗方案。 Abstract:Objective To discuss the effects of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) plus open operation in hemodialysis patients with type I and II upper limb arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis. Methods Ninty hemodialysis patients who had type I and II AVF stenosis were randomly divided into three groups, 30 cases in each group, group A received the ultrasound-guided PTA, group B received the DSA (digital subtraction angiography)-guided PTA, group C received the PTA and open operation. The successful operation rate, blood vessel diameter, brachial artery blood flow and postoperative complications were compared. Results The successful operation rate in group C was significantly higher than group A and group B (P < 0.05), and the postoperative complication rate in group C was significantly lower than group A and group B (P < 0.05). Before surgery, the blood vessel diameter and brachial artery blood flow among groups showed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05), after surgery and after one week of surgery, the blood vessel diameter and brachial artery blood flow values in group C were significantly higher than group A and group B (P < 0.05), after 6m and 12m of surgery, AVF patency rate in group C was significantly higher than group A and group B. Conclusions PTA combined with open operation is proven to be effective, which can recover the arteriovenous fistula function, guarantee the effective hemodialysis, and reduce the clinical trauma and complications. The easy method shall be primarily recommended for hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula stenosis. -
Key words:
- Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty /
- Open operation /
- Hemodialysis /
- Upper limb /
- Arteriovenous fistula /
- Stenosis /
- Complications
-
表 1 3组术前一般资料比较(
$\bar x \pm s $ )Table 1. Comparison of general data between three groups (
$\bar x \pm s $ )项目 A组 B组 C组 男/女 (n) 17/13 16/14 18/12 年龄(岁) 52.35 ± 7.85(41~71) 52.80 ± 8.03(39~72) 51.98 ± 8.01(39~70) 病程(a) 5.13 ± 1.27(2~8) 5.19 ± 1.31(2~9) 5.26 ± 1.15(2~8) 表 2 3组手术成功率比较[n(%)]
Table 2. Comparison of the success rate and incidence of postoperative complications between the three groups [n(%)]
组别 n 手术成功率 术后并发症发生率 P A组 30 26(86.67)* 9(30)* < 0.05 B组 30 24(80)* 9(30)* < 0.05 C组 30 30(100.) 2(6.6) 与C组比较,*P < 0.05。 表 3 3组手术前后血管内径、肱动脉血流量比较
Table 3. Vascular inner diameter and brachial blood flow were compared between the three groups before and after operation
组别 n 血管内径(mm) 肱动脉血流量(mL/min) 术前 术后即刻 术后1周 术前 术后即刻 术后1周 A组 30 1.21 ± 0.39 2.15 ± 0.28* 2.34 ± 0.41* 230.42 ± 65.32 537.45 ± 60.45* 559.32 ± 69.26* B组 30 1.64 ± 0.46 2.96 ± 0.26* 2.27 ± 0.39* 241.68 ± 61.29 527.51 ± 0.46* 566.35 ± 70.36* C组 30 1.48 ± 0.45 3.84 ± 0.24 3.56 ± 0.42 235.15 ± 60.34 597.51 ± 0.46 636.35 ± 0.36 与C组比较,*P < 0.05。 表 4 3组不同时段的AVF通畅率比较[n(%)]
Table 4. Comparison of AVF patency rate at different time periods between the three groups [n(%)]
组别 n 3月 6月 12月 A组 30 27(90) 24(80)* 21(70)* B组 30 25(83.33) 23(76.67)* 22(73.33)* C组 30 28(93.33) 27(90) 27(90) 与C组比较,*P < 0.05。 -
[1] 陆明晰,李华,叶有新,等. 介入超声在移植血管动静脉内瘘血栓复合手术中的应用[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2017,26(1):38-42. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2017.01.010 [2] 陆明晰,叶有新,蒋欣欣,等. 超声介入治疗血液透析移植血管动静脉内瘘狭窄的应用研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2012,21(10):913-914. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2012.10.028 [3] 徐佳波,刘旻,王伟,等. 超声引导下腔内血管成形术治疗动静脉内瘘狭窄早期疗效评估[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学,2019,16(11):653-656. [4] 倪茂杰,刘学. 超声引导下经皮腔内血管成形术治疗右侧无名静脉狭窄1例[J]. 中国医学影像技术,2020,36(10):1479. [5] 吴隘红,黄晓玲. 超声在动静脉内瘘并发症中的应用进展[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学,2019,16(4):242-245. [6] 苑欣,菅梅,陈琼. 彩色多普勒超声在血液透析患者动静脉内瘘并发症防治中的价值[J]. 中国医学影像技术,2018,34(10):1490-1493. [7] 黄小妹,王银,肖伟,等. 头静脉转位联合缩窄术治疗高流量肱动脉-头静脉内瘘患者头静脉弓狭窄的临床疗效[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2019,28(6):725-730. doi: 10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.2019.06.012 [8] 丁红,顾奇澜,朱宇莉,等. 高频超声监测稳定血透患者动静脉内瘘并发症的临床价值再评价[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志,2015,26(2):118-121. [9] 牛国浩,钱俊甫,李书旺. 经皮血管腔内支架成形术联合溶栓治疗对主髂动脉狭窄或闭塞患者踝肱指数的影响[J]. 中国循环杂志,2018,33(4):351-354. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2018.04.009 [10] 邹中辉,周小平. 经皮血管腔内血管成形术治疗股浅动脉长段闭塞症的临床疗效及安全性[J]. 河北医药,2018,40(6):837-840. [11] 黄亮. 经皮血管腔内成形术为主治疗动静脉内瘘狭窄闭塞的效果观察[J]. 贵州医药,2019,43(3):423-424.