A Retrospective Study of 64-row 128-slice Spiral CT Digital Imaging Data of Normal Adult Coracoid Process
-
摘要:
目的 探讨正常成人喙突的64排128层螺旋CT影像学特征,为临床喙突安全手术提供参考。 方法 随机抽取于2019年 01月至 2022年05月在云南省中医医院就诊的成年患者行肩关节64排128层螺旋CT扫描的影像 CT片121例资料作为样本,以肩关节矢状面为测量对象,测量喙突、喙突膝部的长度,测量喙突尖至喙突膝部中点的距离及喙突基底部、喙突尖的高度,再以肩关节矢状面为测量对象,测量喙突尖基底部、喙突膝部、喙突基底部的宽度;测量结果采用SPSS27.0统计学软件包进行统计学分析,基本描述正态分布计量资料采用平均值、中位数、标准差、最大值、最小值、 $\bar x \pm s $ 表示,正态分布计量资料2组间比较采用两独立样本t检验,相关性分析采用Pearson相关性分析。结果 喙突长度为(59.92±6.11)mm;喙突膝部长度为(14.05±2.26)mm;喙突尖至喙突膝部中点的距离为(22.59±3.65)mm;喙突尖基底部的高度为(9.86±1.71)mm;喙突尖高度为(7.22±1.79)mm;喙突尖的宽度为(9.14±2.08)mm;喙突膝部的宽度为(13.79±2.70)mm;喙突基底部的宽度为(21.10±4.18)mm;经两独立样本t检验,除了喙突尖的高度,男性与女性患者组间的喙突影像测量距离均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);左侧与右侧患者组间的喙突长度、喙突尖至喙突膝部中点的距离及喙突膝部的宽度均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);经Pearson相关性分析男性和女性喙突长度与喙突尖至喙突膝部中点的距离、喙突尖的宽度与喙突膝部的宽度均有相关性(P < 0.05)。 结论 喙突长度、宽度均与男女性别、左右侧有差异,其中无论是男性还是女性喙突长度与喙突尖至喙突膝部中点的距离、喙突尖的宽度与喙突膝部的宽度均有一定的关联;因此在临床喙突手术过程中或者相关器械耗材设计的时候应注意性别、左右侧以及它们之间的关联性。 -
关键词:
- 喙突 /
- 成年人 /
- 64排128层螺旋CT /
- 影像学 /
- 回顾性研究
Abstract:Objective To explore the imaging features of 64-row, 128-slice spiral CT of the normal adult coracoid process to provide a reference for clinical coracoid process safety surgery. Methods The data of 121 adult patients who underwent 64-row 128 slice spiral CT scanning of shoulder joints from January 2019 to May 2022 in Yunnan Provincial Hospital of traditional Chinese medicine were randomly selected as samples. The sagittal plane of the shoulder joint was taken as the measurement object to measure the length of the coracoid process and coracoid process knee, the distance from the coracoid process tip to the midpoint of coracoid process knee, and the height of the coracoid process base and coracoid process tip, and then the sagittal plane of the shoulder joint was taken as the measurement object to measure the base of coracoid process tip Width of coracoid process knee and coracoid process base; The measurement results were statistically analyzed by spss27.0 statistical software package. The basic description of normal distribution measurement data was expressed by mean, median, standard deviation, maximum value, minimum value and $\bar x \pm s $ . the normal distribution measurement data were compared by two independent sample t-test. Pearson correlation analysis was used for correlation analysis.Results The length of the coracoid process is 59.92±6.11 mm; the length of the coracoid knee is 14.05±2.26 mm; the distance from the coracoid tip to the midpoint of the coracoid knee is 22.59±3.65 mm; the height of the base of the coracoid tip is 9.86±1.71 mm; the height of the coracoid tip is 7.22±1.79 mm; the width of the coracoid tip is 9.14±2.08 mm; the width of the coracoid knee is 13.79±2.70 mm; the width of the coracoid base is 21.10±4.18 mm; Sample t-test, in addition to the height of the coracoid process tip, the coracoid image measurement distance between male and female patient groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05); the coracoid process length, coracoid process tip between left and right patient groups The distance to the midpoint of the coracoid knee and the width of the coracoid knee were statistically significant (P < 0.05); the length of the coracoid process in males and females and the length of the coracoid process to the midpoint of the coracoid knee were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The distance, the width of the coracoid tip and the width of the coracoid knee were all correlated (P < 0.05). Conclusion The length and width of the coracoid process are different from male and, gender and left and right, among which, the length of the coracoid process and the distance from the tip of the coracoid process to the midpoint of the knee of the coracoid process, the width of the tip of the coracoid process and the width of the knee of the coracoid process are different in both male and female. There are certain correlations; therefore, attention should be paid to gender, left and right, and the correlation between them during clinical coracoid surgery or the design of related equipment and consumables. -
Key words:
- Coracoid process /
- Adult /
- 64-slice 128-slice spiral CT /
- Imaging /
- Retrospective study
-
表 1 基本资料描述
Table 1. Description of basic data
指标 平均值 中位数 SD 最大值 最小值 a 59.92 59.08 6.11 75.76 42.99 b 14.05 14.07 2.26 18.87 8.55 c 22.59 22.52 3.65 31.33 14.74 d 9.86 9.85 1.71 14.36 5.84 e 7.22 7.17 1.79 11.39 3.48 f 9.14 8.66 2.08 17.38 4.56 g 13.79 13.69 2.70 21.29 6.98 h 21.10 21.21 4.18 11.49 30.00 总年龄 49.40 51.00 15.42 80.00 18.00 男性年龄 44.17 41.50 16.14 80.00 18.00 女性年龄 53.35 57.00 13.70 79.00 24.00 表 2 男性和女性情况比较(
$\bar x \pm s $ )Table 2. Comparison of male and female situations (
$\bar x \pm s $ )指标 男性 女性 t P a 63.59 ± 4.92 57.15 ± 5.44 6.714 < 0.001* b 15.52 ± 2.00 12.94 ± 1.77 7.488 < 0.001* c 25.01 ± 3.22 20.76 ± 2.80 7.763 < 0.001* d 10.46 ± 1.83 9.41 ± 1.48 3.502 0.001* e 7.54 ± 1.83 6.97 ± 1.73 1.740 0.085 f 9.69 ± 1.70 8.72 ± 2.26 2.599 0.011* g 14.69 ± 2.31 13.11 ± 2.79 3.319 0.001* h 23.13 ± 3.71 19.57 ± 3.86 5.108 < 0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 3 左侧和右侧情况比较(
$\bar x \pm s $ )Table 3. Comparison of left and right cases (
$\bar x \pm s$ )指标 左侧 右侧 t P a 61.22 ± 5.93 58.76 ± 6.07 2.241 0.027* b 14.39 ± 2.19 13.75 ± 2.29 1.574 0.118 c 23.47 ± 3.85 21.80 ± 3.30 2.562 0.012* d 10.15 ± 1.83 9.60 ± 1.58 1.768 0.080 e 7.49 ± 1.86 6.97 ± 1.69 1.607 0.111 f 9.40 ± 2.20 8.90 ± 1.97 1.320 0.189 g 14.50 ± 2.63 13.16 ± 2.63 2.782 0.006 h 20.68 ± 4.00 21.48 ± 4.33 −1.049 0.296 *P < 0.05。 表 4 a和c相关性分析
Table 4. Correlation analysis of a and c
指标 r P 男性 0.405 0.003* 女性 0.524 < 0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 5 f和g相关性分析
Table 5. Correlation analysis of f and g
指标 r P 男性 0.378 0.006 女性 0.745 < 0.001* *P < 0.05。 -
[1] Murugesan G A,Mohideen S,Kamal K U. An isolated displaced coracoid fracture treated with open reduction internal fixation with 4 mm cannulated cancellous screw[J]. J Orthop Case Rep,2022,12(1):38-40. [2] Li C H,Skalski M R,Matcuk G R Jr,et al. Coracoid process fractures:anatomy,injury patterns,multimodality imaging,and approach to management[J]. Emerg Radiol,2019,26(4):449-458. doi: 10.1007/s10140-019-01683-2 [3] Hsu K L,Yeh M L,Kuan F C,et all. Biomechanical comparison between various screw fixation angles for Latarjet procedure:a cadaveric biomechanical study [published online ahead of print,2022 Apr 6][J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2022,22:S1058-1064. [4] Galvin J W,Kang J,Ma R,Li X. Fractures of the coracoid process:Evaluation,management,and outcomes[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2020,28(16):e706-e715. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00148 [5] 顾晓清,董芹,沈卫忠,等. 肩关节MRI喙-肱间距与喙突下撞击综合征的相关性[J]. 放射学实践,2021,36(4):520-523. doi: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2021.04.019 [6] Chahla J,Marchetti D C,Moatshe G,et al. Quantitative assessment of the coracoacromial and the coracoclavicular ligaments with 3-dimensional mapping of the coracoid process anatomy:A cadaveric study of surgically relevant Structures[J]. Arthroscopy,2018,34(5):1403-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.033 [7] 俞佳凤,孙岩,张静,等. 喙突下撞击综合征的磁共振成像测量研究[J]. 实用放射学杂志,2020,36(8):1281-1285. [8] Ogawa K,Matsumura N,Yoshida A. Nonunion of the coracoid process:a systematic review[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2021,141(11):1877-1888. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03657-3 [9] 齐欣. 128层螺旋CT三维重建技术在骨盆骨折中的临床价值[J]. 中国医疗器械信息,2022,28(8):93-95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6586.2022.08.032 [10] 陈俊. CT三维重建在骨关节创伤疾病诊断中的价值[J]. 影像研究与医学应用,2017,1(4):170-171. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2017.04.111 [11] 翁泽生,袁丹,林黛英. 64排螺旋CT三维重建成像在髋关节外伤中的应用[J]. 影像研究与医学应用,2021,5(16):195-196. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2021.16.092 [12] 黄炎,刘川,张振东,等. 基于三维CT重建影像评估Latarjet术后喙突骨块高低的一种方法[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2022,37(2):156-158. doi: 10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2022.02.011 [13] 任中楷,汪建,于腾波. 喙突解剖学测量及相关性研究[J]. 青岛大学学报(医学版),2020,56(5):513-515. [14] Xin L,Luo J,Chen M,et al. Anatomy and correlation of the coracoid process and coracoclavicular ligament based on three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction and magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Med Sci Monit,2021,27:e930435. [15] Jia Y,He N,Liu J,et al. Morphometric analysis of the coracoid process and glenoid width:a 3D-CT study[J]. J Orthop Surg Res,2020,15(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01600-1 [16] Nagar M,Tiwari V,Joshi A,et al. A cadaveric morphometric analysis of coracoid process with reference to the Latarjet procedure using the "congruent arc technique"[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2020,140(12):1993-2001. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03579-0 [17] 保超宇,潘斯学,何光雄,等. MRI测量正常成人距骨关节面软骨的厚度[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2022,43(5):140-143. 期刊类型引用(21)
1. 陈智红,王静,岳玲,孙素真,马贵林,白冰,陈翠英. 任务导向性训练辅以悬吊训练治疗痉挛性脑瘫的临床研究. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志. 2024(12): 2280-2284 . 百度学术
2. 谢丽娟. 感觉统合结合语言训练治疗痉挛型脑瘫患儿的疗效及对智力水平、语言功能的影响. 黑龙江医学. 2024(14): 1744-1747 . 百度学术
3. 顾秋燕,倪钰飞,葛晓云,王飞英,陆梅娟,徐小晶. 气动式手康复设备对痉挛型偏瘫脑性瘫痪儿童手功能的效果. 中国康复理论与实践. 2023(01): 93-97 . 百度学术
4. 谢丽娟. 感觉统合结合语言训练治疗痉挛型脑瘫患儿的疗效及对智力水平、语言功能的影响. 黑龙江医学. 2023(14): 1746-1749 . 百度学术
5. 王静,岳玲,陈智红,孙素真,马贵林,白冰,陈翠英. 神经肌肉激活技术联合任务导向训练对学龄前痉挛型脑性瘫痪患儿肌张力恢复的影响. 中国康复. 2022(01): 21-24 . 百度学术
6. 彭秋婷,叶鑫璇,王安森. 任务导向性训练对上肢周围神经损伤患者的手功能及肌电图的影响. 按摩与康复医学. 2022(08): 7-9 . 百度学术
7. 毛正欢,王慧,尹宏伟,杜瑜,阮雯聪. 任务导向性训练联合水疗对痉挛型脑瘫患儿运动功能的影响. 浙江中西医结合杂志. 2022(03): 248-252 . 百度学术
8. 邓浩荣,单敏瑜,崔文瑞,杨杰文. 基于ICF理念下的家庭式手工训练对痉挛型偏瘫脑瘫患儿功能独立性的影响. 国际医药卫生导报. 2022(24): 3531-3534 . 百度学术
9. 张晓莉. 家属参与联合任务导向性训练在痉挛性脑瘫患儿中的应用. 实用中西医结合临床. 2021(08): 154-155 . 百度学术
10. 张红霞,刘正阳,刘尉叶. 任务导向性训练对痉挛型脑瘫患儿运动功能及肌张力的影响. 中国疗养医学. 2021(09): 968-970 . 百度学术
11. 郭晓华,郭伟. 作业疗法在痉挛型偏瘫脑瘫患儿中的应用分析. 名医. 2020(10): 192-193 . 百度学术
12. 赵秀英,阙利双,廖锋,林斌,武湛波,潘文娇. 镜像反馈疗法结合任务导向训练在偏瘫型脑瘫患儿中的实践效果. 中国医药导报. 2020(17): 101-104+108 . 百度学术
13. 张九菊,梁丽霞,袁志忠,刘义粉,李洋,崔彦存,杜桂梅,杜晓宁,孙海英,刘燕,刘金和. 全身运动评估与Peabody运动发育量表在早产高危患儿精神运动发育迟缓及脑瘫发生中预测价值. 临床军医杂志. 2020(07): 834-835 . 百度学术
14. 朱如乔,莫昊风,姜积华,陈小芳,项喜兵. 数字OT训练系统对痉挛型偏瘫脑瘫儿童精细运动功能的疗效观察. 中国康复. 2020(09): 480-483 . 百度学术
15. 李欣欣,时庆红,栾玲玲,贾飞勇,李洪华. 任务导向性训练对痉挛型脑性瘫痪患儿上肢功能及功能独立性的效果研究. 发育医学电子杂志. 2020(03): 257-261 . 百度学术
16. 李莹. 任务导向性训练联合传统物理康复训练对脑瘫患儿粗大运动功能的影响. 中国疗养医学. 2019(08): 849-851 . 百度学术
17. 郑桂欣,孔勉. 任务导向性训练在脑瘫患儿治疗中的研究进展. 现代临床医学. 2019(04): 310-312 . 百度学术
18. 刘毅梅,何小辉,张娜,章丽丽. 改良强制性运动疗法联合任务导向性训练对痉挛型偏瘫患儿的临床疗效观察. 中国医药. 2019(10): 1506-1510 . 百度学术
19. 刘西君. 引导式健康教育联合任务导向性训练对脑瘫患儿运动功能以及步行功能的影响. 内科. 2019(05): 606-608 . 百度学术
20. 黄金容,张峰,温芳芳,陈福建,易彩英,廖姣艳. 以任务导向的生物反馈刺激对脑性瘫痪儿童上肢功能障碍研究. 当代医学. 2019(34): 30-32 . 百度学术
21. 吕延宝. 观察任务导向性训练结合强制性运动疗法对痉挛型偏瘫脑瘫患儿上肢运动功能的影响. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志. 2018(14): 171+173 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(0)
-