Application of Different Sealing Materials and Adhedive Systems in Pit and Fissure Sealing of Deciduous Molars
-
摘要:
目的 比较树脂型窝沟封闭剂与树脂加强型玻璃离子结合不同粘接系统应用于乳磨牙窝沟封闭的操作时长、接受度及封闭效果，为口腔医疗资源匮乏地区的儿童提供更适宜的口腔医疗保健措施。 方法 将符合条件的第2乳磨牙随机分为3组：树脂型窝沟封闭剂 + 全酸蚀组（SO组，对照组），树脂型窝沟封闭剂 + 自酸蚀粘结剂组（SE组），树脂加强型玻璃离子 + 自酸蚀粘结剂组（SS组）。进行窝沟封闭并记录操作时间与治疗感受度，3、6、12个月复查封闭剂保存情况及患龋情况。 结果 （1） SO组62人共纳入228颗牙，SS组63人共纳入234颗，VS组56人共纳入221颗牙；（2）SE组操作时间（181.88±12.37）s及SS组（103.07±11.37）s与对照组SO组操作时间（108.56±8.65）s，差异具有统计学意义（Z = 460.163，P < 0.001）；（3）与另外2组相比，SO组的治疗感受度较差（ Z = 20.232，P < 0.001）；（4）3 m复查时，SO组封闭剂保存率和龋发病率分别为100%、0%，SS组保存率和龋发病率为62.1%、2.2%，VS组保存率和龋发病率为93.1%、1.8%；6 m复查时，SO组封闭剂保存率和龋发病率分别为98.2%、1.8%，SS组保存率和龋发病率为52.3%、4.2%，VS组保存率和龋发病率为89.2%、3.3%；12 m复查时，SO组封闭剂保存率和龋发病率分别为95.0%、5.0%，SS组保存率和龋发病率为42.8%、7.2%，VS组保存率和龋发病率为78.9%、6.2%。3次复查中，SO组的保存率最高，3组封闭剂保存差异均具有统计学意义（3 m复查 χ2 = 144.286，P < 0.001；6 m复查 χ2 = 159.703，P < 0.001；12 m复查 χ2 = 152.945，P < 0.001）但3组的防龋效果相似（3 m复查 χ2 = 4.842，P = 0.089；6 m复查χ2 = 2.153，P = 0.341；12 m复查χ2 = 0.915，P = 0.613）。 结论 自酸蚀粘接剂结合树脂加强型玻璃离子可简化操作步骤、提高患儿的舒适度且封闭效果较好，对口腔医疗资源匮乏地区封闭技术的推广来说是一种切实有效的选择。 Abstract:Objective To compare the operation time, acceptability and sealing effect of resin-based sealant and resin-reinforced glass ionomer combined with certain adhesive systems applied to seal deciduous molar teeth, so as to provide a more appropriate oral health promotion activity for children in areas with insufficient oral medical resources. Methods The qualified second deciduous molars were randomly divided into three groups: ClinproTM Sealant + phosphoric acid etching （the control group）, ClinproTM Sealant + Single bond Universal, ClinproTM XT Vanish + Single bond Universal.The pit and fissure sealant were applied, operation time and treatment sensitivity were recorded. After 3, 6, and 12 months, preservation conditions and caries incidence were reviewed. Results （1）A total of 62 people in SO group included 228 teeth, 63 people in SS group included 234 teeth, and 56 people in VS group included 221 teeth. （2）The operating time of SE group （181.88±12.37） s and SS group （103.07±11.37） s was significantly different from that of SO group （108.56±8.65） in control group （Z = 460.163, P < 0.001）. （3） Compared with the other two groups, the treatment sensitivity of SO group was worse （Z = 20.232, P < 0.001）. （4） At reexamination 3 months after operation, the preservation rate of sealant and the incidence rate of caries were 100% and 0% in SO group, 62.1% and 2.2% in SS group, and 93.1% and 1.8% in VS group, respectively; At reexamination 6 months after operation, the preservation rate of sealant and incidence rate of caries in SO group were 98.2% and 1.8% respectively, the preservation rate and incidence rate of caries in SS group were 52.3% and 4.2%, and the preservation rate and incidence rate of caries in VS group were 89.2% and 3.3% respectively; At reexamination 12 months after operation, the preservation rate of sealant and the incidence rate of caries in SO group were 95.0% and 5.0% respectively; the preservation rate and the incidence rate of caries in SS group were 42.8% and 7.2%, and the preservation rate and the incidence rate of caries in VS group were 78.9% and 6.2%. Among the three reexaminations, the preservation rate of SO group was the highest, and the difference in the preservation of sealants among the three groups was statistically significant （ χ2 = 144.286, P < 0.001; χ2 = 159.703, P = < 0.001; χ2 = 152.945, P < 0.001）, but the caries prevention effect of the three groups was similar （ χ2 = 24.842, P = 0.089;χ2 = 2.153, P = 0.341; χ2 = 0.915, P = 0.613） Conclusion The self-etching adhesive combined with resin-reinforced glass ionomer can simplify the operation procedure, improve the comfort of children, and achieve good sealing effect, which is a practical and effective choice for the promotion of sealing technology in economically underdeveloped areas. -
图 1 实验进展流程图（n为人数，N为牙数）
Figure 1. Flow chart of the study process（n- number of included participants，N- number of the study tooth）
图 2 不同封闭材料的封闭效果
A：ClinproTM Sealant封闭后（上颌）；B：ClinproTM Sealant复查（上颌）；C：ClinproTM Sealant封闭后（下颌）；D：ClinproTM Sealant复查（下颌）；E：ClinproTM XT Vanish封闭后（上颌）；F：ClinproTM XT Vanish复查（上颌）；G：ClinproTM XT Vanish封闭后（下颌）；H：ClinproTM XT Vanish复查（下颌）。
Figure 2. Effect of different pit and fissure sealing materials
表 1 儿童治疗感受度评分
Table 1. The score of children’s treatment feeling
评分 表情 表现 1 不紧张 能迅速、准确回答医生的问题，表情淡定自然。 2 有点紧张 愿意并能准确回答医生问题，但面部表情不自然，手脚不自然放置，不自觉举手、抬脚。 3 比较紧张 能够回答问题，但声调和语速受紧张影响而改变，身体不自然扭动，举手、
抬脚等动作增加，但比较受控，有时叫停，不影响医生的操作。4 恐惧 想要拒绝治疗，哭叫，手常抬起，想要阻止医生操作，需要强硬的语气命令才能配合，操作受到影响。 5 特别恐惧 持续哭闹，身体不停扭动，需要助手辅助控制身体才能继续治疗，治疗非常困难。 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 3组操作时间的比较
Table 2. Comparison of operation time among three groups
组别 牙数 操作时间（s） SO组 228 181.88 ± 12.37 SS组 234 103.07 ± 11.37△ VS组 221 108.56 ± 8.65△& Z 460.163 P < 0.001 * *P < 0.05；与SO组比较， △P < 0.05；与SS组比较， &P < 0.05。
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 3组儿童治疗感受情况[n（%）]
Table 3. The children’s treatment feeling among three groups [n（%）]
组别 评分 合计 1 2 3 4 5 SO组 20（32.3） 10（16.1） 8（12.9） 15（24.2） 9（14.5） 62（100.0） SS组 34（54.0） 15（23.8） 5（7.9） 4（6.4） 5（7.9） 63（100.0） VS组 40（71.4） 3（5.4） 7（12.5） 4（7.1） 2（3.6） 56（100.0） Z 20.232 P < 0.001 * *P < 0.05 *。
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 3种方法封闭剂保存率及龋齿发病率（%）
Table 4. The rate of sealant reservation and incidence of tooth decay among three groups （%）
复查时间 组别 复查牙数 保存牙数 保存率 患龋牙数 龋发病率 3个月 SO组 228 228 100.0 0 0.0 SS组 224 139 62.1△ 5 2.2 VS组 217 202 93.1△# 4 1.8 χ2 144.286 4.842 P < 0.001 * 0.089 6个月 SO组 224 220 98.2 4 1.8 SS组 216 113 52.3△ 9 4.2 VS组 213 189 89.2△# 7 3.3 χ2 159.703 2.153 P < 0.001 * 0.341 12个月 SO组 220 209 95.0 11 5.0 SS组 208 89 42.8△ 15 7.2 VS组 209 165 78.9△# 13 6.2 χ2 152.945 0.915 P < 0.001 * 0.613 *P < 0.05；与SO组比较， △P < 0.05；与SS组比较， #P < 0.05。
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Durhan M A,Ozsalih S,Gokkaya B,et al. Caries preventive effects of theobromine containing toothpaste on early childhood caries: Preliminary results[J]. Acta Stomatol Croat,2021,55(1):18-27. doi: 10.15644/asc55/1/3 [2] Lu H X,Tao D Y,Lo E C M,et al. The 4th National Oral Health Survey in the mainland of China: Background and methodology[J]. Chin J Dent Res,2018,21(3):161-166. [3] Zhang S,Liu J,Lo E C,et al. Dental caries status of Bulang preschool children in Southwest China[J]. BMC Oral Health,2014,14(1):16-22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-16 [4] Zhang S,Liu J,Lo E C,et al. Dental caries status of Dai preschool children in Yunnan Province,China[J]. Bmc Oral Health,2013,13(1):68-73. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-68 [5] N Reem,E H Azza,A Najlaa. The use of pit and fissure sealants-a literature review[J]. Dent J(Basel),2017,5(4):34. [6] Chabadel O,Véronneau J,Montal S,et al. Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants on primary molars: A 2-yr split-mouth randomized clinical trial[J]. Eur J Oral Sci,2021,129(1):1-10. [7] Alirezaei M,Bagherian A,Sarraf Shirazi A. Glass ionomer cements as fissure sealing materials: yes or not?[J]. J Am Dent Assoc,2018,149(7):640-649. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.02.001 [8] Alsabek L,Al-Nerabieah Z,Bshara N,et al. Retention and remineralization effect of moisture tolerant resinbased sealant and glass ionomer sealant on non-cavitated pit and fissure caries: randomized controlled clinicaltrial[J]. J Dent,2019,86:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.027 [9] 周妮,刘娟,吕长海. 不同粘接系统及封闭材料应用于体外窝沟封闭[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2021,42(3):61-66. [10] 胡轶,苏丽萍,王胜朝. 国际龋病检测与评估系统(ICDAZ)的介绍[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2016,26(9):554-548. [11] 王兴. 第四次全国口腔健康流行病学调查报告[M]. 北京, 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 4-5. [12] 张珑,李芳萍. 心理干预在儿童牙科畏惧症的临床应用[J]. 中国医学伦理学,2010,23(5):59-60. [13] 曹婷婷,步捷. 心理诱导在儿童牙科畏惧症中的临床应用[J]. 济宁医学院学报,2010,33(2):107-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9760.2010.02.012 [14] Ozer F,Blatz M B. Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry[J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent,2013,34(1):12-14. [15] Santos K T D,Sundfeld R H,Garbin C A S,et al. Length of resin tags in pitandfissure sealants: all-in-one self-etching adhesivevs phosphoric acid etching[J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent,2008,29(3):186-192. [16] Alex G. Universal adhesives: The next evolution in adhesive dentistry? [J] Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2015, 36（1）: 15-26. [17] 陈央兰,武 洁,刘 茜,等. 一项新型窝沟封闭剂自酸蚀系统其物理性能的研究[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志,2020,36(3):139-142. [18] 王万峰,徐正一,李家硕,等. 不同酸蚀模式对新型窝沟封闭剂在牙釉质表面粘接耐久性的影响[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版),2021,15(5):284-291. [19] 李文敏. 自酸蚀粘接剂在乳磨牙窝沟封闭中的应用[J]. 口腔医学研究,2016,32(7):757-759. [20] 郑媛媛,刘会梅,李艳萍,等. 2种自酸蚀粘接剂开封启用后的时间对粘接界面微渗漏的影响[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志,2019,35(1):11-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2019.01.002 [21] Hesse D,Guglielmi C D A B,Raggio D P,et al. Atraumatic restorative treatment-sealed versus nonsealed first permanent molars: A 3-year split-mouth clinical trial[J]. Caries Res,2021,55(1):1-9. doi: 10.1159/000512483 [22] Wu S,Zhang T,Liu Q,et al. Effectiveness of fluoride varnish on caries in the first molars of primary schoolchildren: a 3‐year longitudinal study in Guangxi Province,China[J]. Int Dent J,2020,70(2):108-115. doi: 10.1111/idj.12528 -
点击查看大图
图(2) / 表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 3386
- HTML全文浏览量: 1867
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0
