Oral Exercise Intervention on Feeding Effect,Growth and Development in Low Birth Weight Infants
-
摘要:
目的 分析应用口腔运动干预在低出生体重儿喂养效果及生长发育方面的影响。 方法 选取云南省第三人民医院儿科新生儿病房2020年12月至2022年12月的低出生体重儿86例,按数字表随机分为试验组和对照组各43例,对照组采用常规护理,试验组在对照组的基础上采用口腔运动干预。比较2组低出生体重儿的喂养不耐受发生情况、口腔感染情况、完全经口喂养时间、恢复至出生体重时间、体重增长速度、每日增加奶量及住院时间等结局指标。 结果 试验组低出生体重儿的喂养不耐受发生率、口腔感染率对比对照组明显降低(P < 0.05);试验组低出生体重儿的完全经口喂养时间、恢复至出生体重时间及住院时间较对照组明显缩短(P < 0.05);试验组体重增长速度、每日增加奶量明显大于对照组(P < 0.05)。 结论 口腔运动干预能有效减少低出生体重儿喂养不耐受及并发症的发生,缩短完全经口喂养时间,促进低出生体重儿生长发育,推荐应用到低出生体重儿喂养管理中。 Abstract:Objective To analyze the effect of oral exercise intervention on feeding, growth and development in low birth weight infants. Methods A total of 86 of low birth weight infants from December 2020 to December 2022 admitted in the neonatal ward of a hospital in Yunnan Province were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, 43 cases in each group. The control group received routine care, while the experimental group received oral exercise intervention and routine care. The incidence of feeding intolerance, oral infection, total oral feeding time, time of return to birth weight, body weight growth rate, daily increase in milk and hospital stay of low birth weight infants between the two groups were compared. Results The incidence of feeding intolerance and oral infection rate of low birth weight infants in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The time of complete oral feeding, the time to recover to birth weight and the hospital stay of low birth weight infants in the experimental group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The body weight increasing speed and daily milk increasing amount in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Oral exercise intervention can effectively reduce feeding intolerance and complications of low birth weight infants, shorten the time of complete oral feeding, and promote the growth and development of low birth weight infants. It is recommended to be applied to the feeding management of low birth weight infants. -
Key words:
- Oral exercise intervention /
- Low birth weight infants /
- Feeding /
- Growth and development
-
表 1 低出生体重儿一般资料比较[n(%)/M(P25,P75)]
Table 1. Comparison of general information of low birth weight infants [n(%)/M(P25,P75)]
组别 试验组(n = 43) 对照组(n = 43) χ2/Z P 性别 −1.290 0.197 男 26(60.5) 20(46.5) 女 17(39.5) 23(53.5) 胎龄(周) 34.00(32.00,35.00) 34.00(32.00,35.00) 10.460 0.315 出生体质量(g) 2100.00(1800.00,2350.00) 1880.00(1550.00,2250.00) 58.533 0.280 出生方式 −0.661 0.508 顺产 18(41.9) 15(34.9) 剖宫产 25(58.1) 28(65.1) 1minApgar评分 9.00(7.00,9.00) 9.00(7.00,9.00) 4.688 0.698 表 2 喂养不耐受发生率及口腔感染率比较
Table 2. Comparison of the incidence of feeding intolerance and oral infection rate
组别 喂养不耐受 口腔感染 发生例数(n) 发生率(%) 发生例数(n) 发生率(%) 试验组(n=43) 10 23.2 7 16.3 对照组(n=43) 21 48.8 19 44.2 χ2 6.103 7.938 P 0.013* 0.005* 与对照组比较,*P < 0.05。 表 3 生长发育情况及住院时间比较(
$\bar x \pm s $ )Table 3. Comparison of growth and hospitalization time (
$\bar x \pm s $ )组别 完全经口喂养时间(d) 恢复至出生体重时间(d) 体重增长速度(g/d) 每日增加奶量(mL) 住院时间(d) 试验组(n = 43) 5.42 ± 2.75 7.81 ± 2.28 18.56 ± 2.55 20.16 ± 3.16 14.30 ± 7.84 对照组(n = 43) 10.51 ± 10.35 9.86 ± 3.34 16.95 ± 2.27 17.70 ± 3.60 21.42 ± 12.94 t −3.118 −3.317 3.085 3.376 −3.084 P 0.003* 0.001* 0.003* 0.001* 0.003* * P < 0.05。 -
[1] 刘芳,王军陵,姚宝珍. 早产低出生体重儿的追赶生长研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志,2019,27(7):741-744. [2] 胡姚佳. 口腔运动干预对早产儿神经行为的效果观察[D]. 长沙: 湖南中医药大学硕士学位论文, 2021. [3] 高莉莉,周雪姣,李佳,等. 应用初乳进行口腔按摩对早产儿经口喂养状况的影响[J]. 上海护理,2019,19(6):38-40. [4] 张海霞. 母亲声音刺激联合安抚奶嘴非营养性吸吮在管饲喂养早产儿中的应用观察[J]. 黑龙江医学,2022,46(8):1015-1017. [5] 王菊,张冉,王钦,等. 改良口腔运动干预对早产儿经口喂养能力及结局的影响[J]. 中华全科医学,2022,20(12):2063-2067. [6] 何幼鸣,谢映梅,肖惠玉,等. 一体化连续护理模式联合综合护理干预对喂养不耐受低体重新生儿价值[J]. 智慧健康,2022,8(11):166-169. [7] 崔焱, 仰曙芬. 儿科护理学[M]. 第6版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017: 169. [8] 钟莉芳. 集束化喂养支持策略对早产儿喂养耐受性及生长发育的影响[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学硕士学位论文, 2021. [9] 章容. 口腔运动干预对早产儿脑功能发育的影响研究[D]. 泸州: 西南医科大学硕士学位论文, 2019. [10] Chernikova D A,Madan J C,Housman M L,et al. The premature infant gut microbiome during the first 6 weeks of life differs based on gestational maturity at birth[J]. Pediatr Res,2018,84(1):71-79. doi: 10.1038/s41390-018-0022-z [11] Lubbe W,Ten H W. When is the use of pacifiers justifiable in the baby-friendlyhospital initiative context? A clinician’s guide[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2017,17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1306-8 [12] Barlow S M. Oral and respiratory control for preterm feeding[J]. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2009,17(3):179-186. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32832b36fe [13] Estep M,Barlow S M,Vantipalli R,et al. Non-nutritive suck parameter in preterm infants with RDS[J]. Neonatal Nurs,2008,14(1):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jnn.2007.12.005 [14] 胡玉萍,吴万云,周芳芳,等. 口腔运动干预对低出生体重儿喂养不耐受的作用[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2016,33(13):50-52. [15] 张丹丹,崔慧敏,李胜玲,等. 综合口腔运动干预对早产儿神经行为的影响[J]. 护理学杂志,2019,34(14):5-7. [16] Kiselev S Y, Lvova O A, Gliga T, et al. The assessment of neurocognitivefunctions in premature infants in the first year of life using bayley scales[J]. ZhNevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova, 2016, 116(4 Pt2): 62-67. [17] 廖爱玲,江斓燕,方利娟,等. 口腔功能训练联合腹部按摩在早产儿经口喂养中的应用效果评价[J]. 名医,2021,109(10):66-67. [18] 谢春莲. 非营养性吸吮训练联合口腔刺激在早产儿喂养中的效果观察[J]. 江西医药,2018,53(10):1130-1131. [19] Lau C,Smith E O. Interventions to improve the oral feeding performance of preterm infants[J]. Acta paediatrica (Oslo,Norway:1992),2012,101(7):269-274. [20] 郭洁婷,杨春凤. 口腔按摩治疗极低出生体重儿的效果分析[J]. 广西医学,2014,36(12):1833-1835. [21] Li L,Wang L,Niu C,et al. Early skin contact combined with mother's breastfeeding to shorten the process of premature infants ≤ 30 weeks of gestation to achieve full oral feeding: the study protocol of a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials,2021,22(1):637. [22] 林丽妮,王丽. 口腔运动干预对早产儿经口喂养效果的影响[J]. 护理实践与研究,2016,13(3):73-74. [23] Thabet A M,Sayed Z A. Effectiveness of the premature infant oral motor intervention on feeding performance, duration of hospital stay, and weight of preterm neonates in neonatal intensive care unit: Results from a randomized controlled trial[J]. Dimens Crit Care Nurs,2021,40(4):257-265. [24] 郑芳明,方丽华,刘莉,等. 口腔运动干预在促进早产儿经口喂养中的效果[J]. 中国当代医药,2020,27(17):109-111.