Preventive Effect of Adenosine for No-reflow Phenomenon in Patients with Acute Non-ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
-
摘要:
目的 研究在球囊扩张和支架释放前通过指引导管向梗死相关的冠状动脉内预防性注射腺苷对于急性非ST段抬高心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)时无复流现象(NRP)的防治效果。 方法 采用前瞻随机对照设计,选择2020年1月至2022年6月在昆明市延安医院心内科行PPCI的NSTEMI患者196例,采用随机数字表法分为预防性腺苷给药组(在第1次球囊预扩张后和后续每次球囊预扩张和每次支架置入前经指引导管冠状动脉内注射腺苷)和补救性腺苷给药组(发生NRP后再经指引导管冠状动脉内注射腺苷)。PPCI结束时观察梗死相关血管的心肌梗死溶栓试验(TIMI)血流分级、心肌TIMI灌注分级(TMPG)、心肌染色分级(MBG)及NRP的发生率。 结果 支架置入完成后,预防性给药组的梗死相关血管血流 TIMI、TMPG和MBG分级均达到3级的患者比例为89.6%,补救性给药组的比例为73.4%,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);冠状动脉罪犯血管NRP的发生率,预防性给药组为8.2%,补救性给药组为23.6%,差异有统计学意义( P < 0.05);所有发生NRP的患者,经指引导管冠状动脉内注射腺苷后,均恢复TIMI、TMPG、MBG 分级 3 级。 结论 对于适宜的 NSTEMI 患者行PPCI时,在第1次球囊预扩张后和后续每次球囊预扩张和每次支架置入前经指引导管冠状动脉内预防性注射腺苷能够明显降低NRP的发生率。 -
关键词:
- 急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死 /
- 无复流现象 /
- 腺苷 /
- 直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 /
- 指引导管 /
- 应用时机
Abstract:Objective To study the effect of intracoronary injection of adenosine for the prevention of no-reflow phenomenon (NRP) before balloon dilation and stent placement during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Methods A prospective randomized controlled design was used to select 196 NSTEMI patients who received PPCI in the Department of Cardiology, Yan’an Hospital, from January 2020 to June 2022. Randomized number table method was used to divide the patients into two groups, with 98 patients in each group. Patients in one group were treated with intracoronary injection of 100 μg adenosine prophylactically before stent placement or balloon dilation; while patents in another group were given 100 ug adenosine after stent placement if NRP happened. At the end of PPCI, the incidence of myocardial infarction thrombolysis test (TIMI) blood grading, myocardial TIMI perfusion grading (TMPG), myocardial staining grading (MBG) and NRP were examined. Results After stent placement, 89.6% of patients in the prophylactic administration group had blood flow TIMI, TMPG and MBG grades of infarct-related vessels reaching grade 3, and 73.4% in the remedial administration group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). The incidence of NRP was 8.2% in the prophylactic group and the incidence was 23.6% in the remedial administration group, with statistical significance ( P < 0.05). TIMI, TMPG and MBG grade 3 blood flow were restored in all patients presented with NRP after intracoronary injection of adenosine. Conclusion For indicated patients with NSTEMI, prophylactical intracoronary injection of adenosine before stent implantation can reduce the incidence of NRP significantly after stent placement. -
表 1 2组患者的临床资料[(
$\bar x \pm s $ )/n(%)]Table 1. Clinical data of two groups of patients with NSTEMI [(
$\bar x \pm s $ )/n(%)]组别 n 性别 年龄(岁) 高血压 糖尿病 梗死相关血管 男 女 前降支 回旋支 右冠脉 预防性给药组 98 67(68.4) 31(31.6) 58.4±23.6 60(61.2) 38(38.8) 43(43.9) 23(23.5) 32(32.6) 补救性给药组 98 70(71.4) 28(28.6) 60.1±24.8 52(53.1) 41(41.8) 45(45.9) 24(24.5) 29(29.6) χ2/t − 0.097 0.043 1.499 1.06 0.075 p − 0.83 0.867 0.221 0.372 0.784 表 2 2 组患者 TIMI、 MBG、 TMPG 分级和无复流现象发生率的比较 [n(%)]
Table 2. Comparison of TIMI,MBG,TMPG grade and incidence of no reflow between the two groups [n(%)]
组别 n TIMI3 级 TMPG3级 MBG3 级 无复流 慢血流 无复流现象 预防性给药组 98 88(89.7)* 88(89.7)* 88(89.7)* 0(0.0)* 10(10.2)* 10(10.2)* 补救性给药组 98 69(70.4) 69(70.4) 69(70.4) 10(10.2) 19(19.4) 29(29.6) χ2 - 10.37 104.2 3.74 10.37 P - 0.026* 0.005* 0.037* 0.026* 与补救性给药组比较,*P < 0.05。 -
[1] Mehta R H,Harjai K J,Cox D,et al. Clinical and angiographic correlates and outcomes of suboptimal coronary flow inpatients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2003,42(10):1739-1746. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.07.012 [2] Rezkalla S H,Dharmashankar K C,Abdalrahman I B,et al. No-reflow phenomenon following percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: incidence,outcome,and effect of pharmacologic therapy[J]. J Interv Cardiol,2010,23(5):429-436. [3] CHEN C,FU X,LI W,et al. Intracoronary administration of anisodamine and nicorandil in individuals undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute inferior myocardial infarction: A randomized factorial trial[J]. Exp Ther Med,2015,10(3):1059-1065. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2623 [4] Quintana M,Hjemdahl P,Sollevi A,et al. Left ventricular function and cardiovascular events following adjuvant therapy with adenosine in acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis.[J]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol,2003,59(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00228-003-0564-8 [5] 中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合症诊断和治疗指南(2016)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志,2017,3(5):359-376. [6] 中国医师协会急诊医师分会,中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华医学会检验医学分会. 急性冠脉综合征急诊快速诊疗指南[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志,2016,25(4):397-403. [7] The TIMI Study Group. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial[J]. N Engl Med,1985,31(2):932-941. [8] Gibson C M,Cannon C P,Murphy S A. Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs[J]. Circulation,2000,10(1):125-130. [9] Vant Hof A W,Liem A,Suryapranata H. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction[J]. Circulation,1998,9(7):2302-2306. [10] 何奔,卜军. 冠状动脉无复流: 识别、预防和处理[J]. 内科理论与实践杂志,2009,3(4):233-234. [11] 曹进富. 冠状动脉内预防性注射硝普钠对 STEMI 患者 PCI 预防无复流现象的影响[J] 中外医疗, 2022, 1: 56-59 [12] Jaffe R,Charruon T,Puley G,et al. Microvascular obstruction and no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Circulation,2008,117(24):3152-3156. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742312 [13] Ito H,Maruyama A,Iwakura K,et al. Clinical implications of the ‘no reflow’ phenomenon. A predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction[J]. Circulation,1996,93(2):223-228. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.93.2.223 [14] Hamada S,Nishiue T,Nakamura S,et al. TIMI frame count immediately after primary coronary angioplasty as a predictor of function recovery in patients with TIMI3 reperfused acute myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardio,2001,38(3):666-671. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01424-3 [15] Bin J P,Le D E,Jayaweera A R,et al. Direct effects of dobutamine on the coronary microcirculation: comparison with adenosine using myocardial contrast echocardiography[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2003,4(16):871-879. [16] Ely S W,Wentzer R M,Laslay R D,et al. Functional and metabolic evidence of enhanced myocardial tolerance to ischemia and reperfusion with adenosine[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,1985,90:549-556. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(19)38568-X [17] Fredholm B B,Abbracchio M P,Burnstock G,et al. Nomenclature and classification of purinoceptors[J]. Pharmacol Revs,1994,46(2):143-156. [18] 李为民,韩薇,王岚峰. 心房颤动患者血栓形成与腺苷、血小板P选择素表达的关系[J]. 中华心血管病杂志,2000,28:367-370. [19] Lessar M A,Stoddard M,Ahmed M,et al. Preconditional of human myocardium with adenosine during coronary angioplasty[J]. Circulation,1997,95(11):2500-2507. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.95.11.2500 [20] 陈怡,余成新,李博. 腺苷负荷心肌灌注显像在冠心病中的研究进展[J]. 巴楚医学,2022,5(2):105-108.