留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

小儿消化性溃疡治疗期间血清6-Keto-PGF1α、TGF-α、TXB2水平变化及对预后的影响

蔡丽 杨华英 程建红 曹佳 魏娜

蔡丽, 杨华英, 程建红, 曹佳, 魏娜. 小儿消化性溃疡治疗期间血清6-Keto-PGF1α、TGF-α、TXB2水平变化及对预后的影响[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2023, 44(9): 136-142. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230928
引用本文: 蔡丽, 杨华英, 程建红, 曹佳, 魏娜. 小儿消化性溃疡治疗期间血清6-Keto-PGF1α、TGF-α、TXB2水平变化及对预后的影响[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2023, 44(9): 136-142. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230928
Li CAI, Huaying YANG, Jianhong CHENG, Jia CAO, Na WEI. Changes of Serum Levels of 6-Keto-PGF1α,TGF-α and TXB2 during the Treatment of Peptic Ulcer in Children and Their Influence on Prognosis[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(9): 136-142. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230928
Citation: Li CAI, Huaying YANG, Jianhong CHENG, Jia CAO, Na WEI. Changes of Serum Levels of 6-Keto-PGF1α,TGF-α and TXB2 during the Treatment of Peptic Ulcer in Children and Their Influence on Prognosis[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(9): 136-142. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230928

小儿消化性溃疡治疗期间血清6-Keto-PGF1α、TGF-α、TXB2水平变化及对预后的影响

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230928
基金项目: 四川省医学青年创新科研基金资助项目(S20068)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    蔡丽(1974~),女,四川自贡人,医学学士,副主任医师,主要从事儿科消化、呼吸临床诊疗工作

  • 中图分类号: R57

Changes of Serum Levels of 6-Keto-PGF1α,TGF-α and TXB2 during the Treatment of Peptic Ulcer in Children and Their Influence on Prognosis

  • 摘要:   目的  探讨小儿消化性溃疡治疗期间血清6-酮前列腺素(6-Keto-PGF1α)、转化生长因子α(TGF-α)、血栓素B2(TXB2)水平变化,并分析其对预后的预测价值。  方法  选取2019年1月至2022年6月消化性溃疡患儿108例为研究对象,根据奥美拉唑三联疗法治疗效果分为预后良好组(86例)与预后不良组(22例)。比较2组临床资料、治疗期间血清6-Keto-PGF1α、TGF-α、TXB2水平。分析各血清指标对治疗预后的影响及预测预后价值。  结果  预后不良组治疗6周后血清6-Keto-PGF1α、TGF-α水平高于预后良好组,TXB2水平低于预后良好组,治疗前后各血清指标变化差值小于预后良好组(P < 0.05);血清6-Keto-PGF1α、TGF-α、TXB2变化差值与预后独立相关,且各血清指标变化差值阳性者发生预后不良风险分别为阴性者的5.804、4.014、3.241倍(P < 0.05);各血清指标变化差值联合预测预后的AUC大于单项指标预测(P < 0.05)。  结论  小儿消化性溃疡治疗期间血清6-Keto-PGF1α、TGF-α水平升高,而TXB2水平降低,治疗前后各血清指标水平变化与预后不良密切相关,联合检测其水平变化对预后不良具有一定预测价值。
  • 图  1  血清6-Keto-PGF1α、TGF-α、TXB2变化差值预测预后价值

    Figure  1.  Prognostic value of the difference of serum 6-Keto-PGF1α,TGF-α and TXB2

    图  2  联合预测预后价值

    Figure  2.  Combined prognostic value

    表  1  2组临床资料比较[n(%)/($\bar x \pm s $)]

    Table  1.   Comparison of clinical data between the two groups [n(%)/($\bar x \pm s $)]

    资料预后不良组(n = 22)
    预后良好组(n = 86)
    t/χ2P
    性别 0.163 0.686
     男 12(54.55) 51(59.30)
     女 10(45.45) 35(40.70)
    年龄(岁) 8.14 ± 1.71 8.23 ± 1.55 0.238 0.812
    病程(月)
    6.07 ± 1.23 5.89 ± 1.14 0.650 0.517
    溃疡直径(cm)
    2.16 ± 0.52 1.75 ± 0.39 4.096 0.000*
    疾病类型
    0.183 0.913
     十二指肠溃疡
    7(31.82) 29(33.72)
     胃溃疡
    12(54.55) 48(55.81)
     复合型溃疡
    3(13.64) 9(10.47)
    Hp阳性
    12.806 0.000*
     否
    5(22.73) 56(65.12)
     是
    17(77.27) 30(34.88)
    溃疡分期
    7.120 0.008*
     非活动期
    8(36.36) 58(67.44)
     活动期
    14(63.64) 28(32.56)
      *P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  2组治疗期间血清6-Keto-PGF1α、TGF-α、TXB2水平及变化差值比较($\bar x \pm s $

    Table  2.   Comparison of serum levels of 6-Keto-PGF1α,TGF-α and TXB2 and their differences between the two groups during treatment ($\bar x \pm s $

    指标
    预后不良组(n = 22)预后良好组(n = 86)tP
    治疗前
     6-Keto-PGF1α(pg/mL) 30.06 ± 6.48 29.73 ± 5.81 0.232 0.817
     TGF-α(μg/L) 11.38 ± 3.04 11.09 ± 1.87 0.564 0.574
     TXB2(pg/mL) 86.92 ± 18.27 88.14 ± 20.03 0.259 0.796
    治疗6周后
     6-Keto-PGF1α(pg/mL) 25.67 ± 4.22 18.46 ± 3.36 8.508 0.000*
     TGF-α(μg/L) 9.22 ± 2.17 6.28 ± 1.23 8.400 0.000*
     TXB2(pg/mL) 113.58 ± 17.60 136.21 ± 22.57 4.370 0.000*
    治疗前与治疗6周后差值
     6-Keto-PGF1α(pg/mL) 4.38 ± 1.15 11.27 ± 2.89 10.932 0.000*
     TGF-α(μg/L) 2.16 ± 0.70 4.81 ± 1.26 9.476 0.000*
     TXB2(pg/mL) 26.66 ± 8.23 48.07 ± 12.75 7.473 0.000*
      *P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  血清6-Keto-PGF1α、TGF-α、TXB2变化差值与预后的关系

    Table  3.   Relationship between the difference of serum 6-Keto-PGF1α,TGF-α and TXB2 and prognosis

    自变量
    校正前
    校正后
    OR95%CIP OR95%CIP
    6-Keto-PGF1α差值 0.510 0.424~0.613 < 0.001* 0.331 0.239~0.458 < 0.001*
    TGF-α差值
    0.499 0.315~0.791 < 0.001* 0.439 0.301~0.639 < 0.001*
    TXB2差值
    0.617 0.437~0.870 < 0.001* 0.395 0.280~0.557 < 0.001*
      *P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  血清6-Keto-PGF1α、TGF-α、TXB2变化差值预测预后价值

    Table  4.   Prognostic value of serum difference of 6-Keto-PGF1α,TGF-α and TXB2

    指标AUC95%CI截断值
    敏感度(%)特异度(%)P
    6-Keto-PGF1α差值 0.786 0.696~0.859 6.57 pg/mL 72.73 79.07 < 0.001*
    TGF-α差值
    0.834 0.750~0.898 2.84 μg/L 90.91 62.79 < 0.001*
    TXB2差值
    0.742 0.649~0.821 30.30 pg/mL 68.18 73.26 < 0.001*
      *P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  以最佳截断值为界分析血清6-Keto-PGF1α、TGF-α、TXB2对预后的影响

    Table  5.   The effects of serum 6-Keto-PGF1α,TGF-α and TXB2 on prognosis were analyzed with the optimal cut-off value as the boundary

    指标预后不良组(n = 22)
    预后良好组(n = 86)RR(95%CIUP
    6-Keto-PGF1α差值 阳性 16 18 5.804(2.491~13.523) 4.165 < 0.001*
    阴性 6 68
    TGF-α差值 阳性 20 32 10.769(2.646~43.833) 4.014 < 0.001*
    阴性 2 54
    TXB2差值 阳性 15 23 3.947(1.764~8.834) 3.241 0.001*
    阴性 7 63
      *P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Lee E J,Lee Y J,Park J H. Usefulness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease in children[J]. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr,2019,22(1):57-62. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2019.22.1.57
    [2] Zhou B,Chen X,Huang B,et al. Changes in serum pepsinogen levels and their value as a predictor of treatment outcomes in children with peptic ulcer[J]. J Paediatr Child Health,2019,55(9):1103-1106. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14365
    [3] 吕丹丹,孙海青. 奥美拉唑联合凝血酶治疗对慢性胃炎并消化性溃疡出血患者6-Keto-PGF1α及TXB2水平的影响[J]. 贵州医药,2021,45(12):1901-1902. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2021.12.029
    [4] Shi L,An Y,Cheng L,et al. Qingwei San treats oral ulcer subjected to stomach heat syndrome in db/db mice by targeting TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway[J]. Chin Med,2022,17(1):1-10. doi: 10.1186/s13020-021-00565-5
    [5] 辛铭,孟高乐,王琦,等. Hp感染消化性溃疡患者血清GAS、hs-CRP及TGF-α水平检测及其临床意义[J]. 中国实验诊断学,2020,24(10):1671-1672. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2020.10.027
    [6] 崔旭辉. 雷贝拉唑联合磷酸铝凝胶对消化性溃疡的临床价值[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2020,48(9):1063-1065. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-8552.2020.09.020
    [7] 刘文忠,谢勇,成虹,等. 第四次全国幽门螺杆菌感染处理共识报告[J]. 胃肠病学,2012,17(10):618-625. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7125.2012.10.010
    [8] 《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会,中华医学会儿科学分会感染消化学组. 小儿慢性胃炎、消化性溃疡胃镜诊断标准[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2003,41(3):189-189. doi: 10.3760/j.issn:0578-1310.2003.03.011
    [9] 谢代彬,王梅,贾雁平,等. 消化性溃疡合并幽门螺杆菌感染患儿奥美拉唑四联疗法治疗效果分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2016,26(5):1146-1148.
    [10] Li R,Wang W,Ma Y,et al. Analysis of risk factors for ulcer recurrence and upper gastrointestinal bleeding in children with peptic ulcer treated with Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy[J]. Transl Pediatr,2023,12(4):618-630. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-155
    [11] Sochet A A,Son S,Ryan K S,et al. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in children with status asthmaticus receiving systemic corticosteroids: A descriptive study assessing frequency of clinically important bleeding[J]. J Asthma,2020,57(8):858-865. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1614617
    [12] Munoz Abraham A S,Osei H,Martino A,et al. Incidence and outcomes of perforated peptic ulcers in children: Analysis of the kid's inpatient database and report of two cases treated by laparoscopic omental patch repair[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2019,29(2):248-255. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0186
    [13] Kupczyk D,Bilski R,Przewięźlikowski A,et al. Concentration of proinflammatory cytokines in patients with ulcers as a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. Postepy Dermatol Alergol,2021,38(5):767-772. doi: 10.5114/ada.2020.96702
    [14] Yang X,Fan W,Huang R,et al. β-acetoxyisovaleryl alkannin (AAN-II) from Alkanna tinctoria promotes the healing of pressure-induced venous ulcers in a rabbit model through the activation of TGF-β/Smad3 signaling[J]. Cell Mol Biol Lett,2021,26(1):35-45. doi: 10.1186/s11658-021-00278-5
    [15] Ek W E,Karlsson T,Höglund J,et al. Causal effects of inflammatory protein biomarkers on inflammatory diseases[J]. Sci Adv,2021,7(50):l4359-14369. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abl4359
    [16] Sun Q,Shi P,Lin C,et al. Effects of Astragalus polysaccharides nanoparticles on cerebral thrombosis in SD rats[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol,2020,8(1):616759-616769.
    [17] Tang Y,Huang S,Lin W,et al. Arachidonic acid-dependent pathway inhibition in platelets: Its role in multiple injury-induced coagulopathy and the potential mechanisms[J]. Shock,2021,55(1):121-127. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001563
    [18] 闫黎娜,李彩虹,周晓燕,等. 降气止血汤辅助法莫替丁对消化性溃疡急性出血患儿TXB2、6-Keto-PGF1α水平的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2019,19(23):4487-4490. doi: 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2019.23.020
    [19] Wang W,Yang L,Song L,et al. Combination of Panax notoginseng saponins and aspirin potentiates platelet inhibition with alleviated gastric injury via modulating arachidonic acid metabolism[J]. Biomed Pharmacother,2021,134(1):111165-11175.
    [20] Chiang C Y,Chien C Y,Qiou W Y,et al. Genetic depletion of thromboxane A2/thromboxane-prostanoid receptor signalling prevents microvascular dysfunction in ischaemia/reperfusion injury[J]. Thromb Haemost,2018,118(11):1982-1996. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1672206
    [21] 赵军利,张利君. 降气止血汤联合西药对消化性溃疡急性出血患儿的疗效及对凝血功能的影响[J]. 血栓与止血学,2022,28(2):214-215. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6213.2022.02.015
    [22] Ebrahiminaseri A,Sadeghizadeh M,Moshaii A,et al. Combination treatment of dendrosomal nanocurcumin and low-level laser therapy develops proliferation and migration of mouse embryonic fibroblasts and alter TGF-β,VEGF,TNF-α and IL-6 expressions involved in wound healing process[J]. PLoS One,2021,16(5):e0247098-e0247108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247098
    [23] Cirac A,Tsaktanis T,Beyer T,et al. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent TGF-α/VEGF-B ratio correlates with disease subtype and prognosis in multiple sclerosis[J]. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm,2021,8(5):e1043-e1053. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000001043
    [24] Zhang S,Bai J,Li M,et al. Predictive value of transforming growth factor-α and Ki-67 for the prognosis of skull Base chordoma[J]. World Neurosurg,2019,129(1):199-206.
    [25] Yang Q Q,Fang M S,Tu J,et al. Guanxinning tablet inhibits the interaction between leukocyte integrin Mac-1 and platelet GPIbα for antithrombosis without increased bleeding risk[J]. Chin J Nat Med,2022,20(8):589-600.
    [26] Yamane S,Amano H,Ito Y,et al. The role of thromboxane prostanoid receptor signaling in gastric ulcer healing[J]. Int J Exp Pathol,2022,103(1):4-12. doi: 10.1111/iep.12410
    [27] 高成超,程永波. 血小板异常与溃疡性结肠炎关系的研究进展[J]. 山东医药,2020,60(35):109-111. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2020.35.030
  • [1] 闫兰竹, 乔顺义, 张艳丽, 赵二强, 杨虎, 林静, 付海艳.  免疫球蛋白在肝癌TACE治疗过程中的变化及预测疗效的价值, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240418
    [2] 刘春艳, 常炳庆, 李超, 任欣, 刘小琴.  T淋巴细胞亚群与急性髓系白血病病理特征的关系及预测化疗预后的价值分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [3] 陆小华, 袁洪新.  BTLA、CTLA-4基因多态性与肝癌TACE联合靶向治疗疗效及预后相关性, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230927
    [4] 郑倩文, 马晓燕, 刘继红, 郭珊珊, 知诗卓玛.  子宫宫颈角与子宫颈长度的早产预测分析, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230515
    [5] 李鸿.  老年晚期恶性梗阻性黄疸患者实时超声弹性成像定量分析对PTCD预后的预测价值, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230123
    [6] 邹垚, 王梓瑜, 李皎, 李兴欣, 申亚琼, 徐敬, 金焰.  LOXL2及Snail蛋白表达水平与胆管癌患者术后生存率的关系, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221215
    [7] 陈红兰, 吴怡, 胡滔, 王玉明.  外周血G6PD活性检测对于感染高危型人乳头瘤病毒宫颈癌患者的诊断预后价值, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220203
    [8] 朱中山, 杨洲, 江承川, 李小兵, 任斗, 黄橙, 张维薇, 李湘军, 赵顺利.  肺腺癌患者PLA2G1B表达情况与预后的相关性, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220912
    [9] 李刚, 李金凇, 谢楠, 李春满, 魏雷, 曹凡, 苏莹珍.  B7-H4在肝内胆管癌的表达及临床意义, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210415
    [10] 方中, 徐晓东, 王丽华, 张颖, 马超.  eGFR和NT-proBNP对慢性心力衰竭合并房颤患者预后的预测价值, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20211120
    [11] 袁华苑.  慢性心力衰竭2 106例药物治疗分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [12] 许静.  宫颈长度测量对先兆早产孕妇分娩时间的预测分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [13] 艾毅钦.  Smac蛋白表达水平对预测直肠癌术前放化疗敏感性的临床意义, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [14] 刘巨鹏.  陈旧心肌梗死患者胱抑素C水平及预后相关性研究, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [15] 沈红.  前列腺特异性膜抗原、α-甲基酰基辅酶A消旋酶在前列腺癌中的表达及其临床意义, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [16] 艾毅钦.  Caspase-9蛋白表达水平对预测直肠癌术前放化疗敏感性的临床意义, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [17] 庞明杰.  NT-proBNP对ST段抬高的急性心梗患者急诊PCI术后临床结果的预测价值, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [18] 万蓉.  ARIMA乘积季节模型在食源性疾病月发病率预测中的应用, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [19] 刘健刚.  趋化因子受体CXCR4在颅咽管瘤中的表达及其与预后的关系, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [20] 胡万芹.  血清Th1/Th2细胞因子联合β-HCG预测先兆流产结局的价值, 昆明医科大学学报.
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  862
  • HTML全文浏览量:  603
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-04-08
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-10-16
  • 刊出日期:  2023-09-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回