Liver,Kidney and Immunologic Function and Drug Resistance in Patients with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infection
-
摘要:
目的 分析非结核分枝杆菌感染者肝肾功能、免疫功能及耐药情况与结核分枝杆菌感染者和健康者的差异。 方法 选取2021年5月至2022年3月在昆明市第三人民医院确诊为非结核分枝杆菌感染者122例和结核分枝杆菌感染者130例,分别设为非结核组和结核组,另选同期健康体检者150例为健康对照组。分析3组性别、年龄、肝肾功能指标、外周血T淋巴细胞亚群和药敏实验结果。 结果 非结核组、结核组和健康对照组在不同年龄和性别间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。非结核组的TBIL、ALT、AST、GGT、CR、UA与结核组和健康组相比均较高( P < 0.05)。非结核组的TBIL、ALT、AST和GGT高于结核组( P < 0.05)。非结核组和结核组的CD3 +T、CD4+T、CD8+T淋巴细胞计数与健康组相比均较低(P < 0.05)。非结核组CD8 +T淋巴细胞计数高于结核组(P < 0.05)。非结核组前3位耐药分别是亚胺/西司、多西环素和米诺环素,耐药率分别为99.18%,78.69%和72.95%;结核组前3位耐药分别是异烟肼、利福平和利福喷丁,耐药率分别为22.32%、17.69%和16.15%。 结论 非结核分枝杆菌感染者与结核分枝杆菌感染者相比肝功能损伤更为严重,免疫功能易出现紊乱和受损。非结核分枝杆菌对抗生素的耐药种类更多,耐药性更强,临床应加强非结核分枝杆菌和结核分枝杆菌感染的鉴别并合理使用用药方案。 Abstract:Objective To analyze the differences in liver and kidney function, immune function, and drug resistance between nontuberculous mycobacteria-infected people and healthy people. Methods We collected 122 cases of Nontuberculous Mycobacterium infected people and 130 cases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected people in The Third People’ s Hospital of Kunming from May 2021 to March 2022, which were divided into non-Mycobacterium tuberculosis group and tuberculosis group respectively. And 150 cases of healthy people in the same period were selected as a healthy control group. We analyzed the difference in sex, age, liver and kidney function, peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets and drug sensitivity tests between three groups. Results There was no significant difference between the non-tuberculosis group, tuberculosis group, and healthy group in different ages and sexes(P > 0.05). The TBIL, ALT, AST, GGT, CR and UA of the non-tuberculosis group were significantly higher than those in the tuberculosis group and healthy group( P < 0.05). TBIL, ALT, AST and GGT in the non-tuberculosis group were significantly higher than those in the tuberculosis group( P < 0.05). The CD3 +T, CD4+T and CD8+T lymphocyte count in the non-tuberculosis group and tuberculosis group were significantly lower than those in the healthy group(P < 0.05). The CD8 +T lymphocyte count in the non-tuberculosis group was significantly higher than that in the tuberculosis group(P < 0.05). The top three drug-resistance medicines in the non-tuberculosis group were imine/doxycycline, doxycycline and minocycline, and the drug resistance rates were 99.18%, 78.69% and 72.95% respectively. The top three drug resistance medicine in the tuberculosis group were isoniazid, rifampicin, and rifapentine, and the drug resistance rates were 22.32%, 17.69% and 16.15% respectively. Conclusion Compared with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a non-Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected person has more serious liver function damage, and the immune function is prone to disorder and damage. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria are more resistant to antibiotics, and the drug resistance is stronger. We should strengthen the identification of non-tuberculous mycobacteria and mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in a clinic and use the drug regimen reasonably. -
表 1 非结核和结核分枝杆菌感染者年龄、性别比较[n(%)]
Table 1. Comparison of age and sex between non-tuberculosis and mycobacterium tuberculosis infected people[n(%)]
组别 非结核 (n = 122) 结核 (n = 130) 健康对照(n = 150) χ2 P 年龄(岁) < 45 45(36.9) 56(58.5) 79(52.7) 45~60 49(40.2) 44(26.2) 45(30.0) 7.322 0.120 > 60 28(23.0) 20(15.4) 26(17.3) 性别 男 55(45.1) 71(54.6) 68(36.7) 3.111 0.211 女 67(54.9) 59(45.4) 82(63.3) 表 2 非结核分枝杆菌感染者肝肾功能指标分析[M(P25,P75)]
Table 2. Analysis of liver and kidney function indexes of non-tuberculosis mycobacterium infected patients [M(P25,P75)]
项目 非结核 (n = 122) 结核 (n = 130) 健康组(n = 150) χ2 P TBIL(μmol/L) 9.0 (6.9,12,6) 7.95(5.3,11.4) 7.9(5.9,11.5) 6.178 0.046* DBIL(μmol/L) 2.40 (1.7,3.8) 2.8(1.9,4.7) 2.8(1.9,4.7) 4.378 0.112 IBIL(μmol/L) 6.55 (3.7,9.7) 5.2(3.5,7.3) 5.2(2.6,8.3) 5.302 0.071 ALT(U/L) 14 (11,20) 12(7,19) 12(8,20) 8.649 0.013* AST(U/L) 21 (16,27) 18(16,22) 18(16,21) 9.262 0.010* ALP(U/L) 68 (58,87) 74(59,89) 68(56,85) 3.537 0.171 GGT(U/L) 23.6 (16.9,41.1) 29.9(20.1,53.7) 17.8(12.5,26.7) 56.708 < 0.001 * BUN(mmol/L) 4.2(3.4,5.4) 3.9(2.9,5.5) 4.2(3.3,5.1) 1.208 0.546 CR(μmol/L) 63(53,73) 60(47,75) 56(50,66) 11.634 0.003* UA(μmol/L) 375(300,478) 404(292,526) 293(254,340) 60.095 < 0.001 * *P < 0.05。 表 3 非结核和结核分枝杆菌感染者肝肾功能指标比较[M(P25,P75)]
Table 3. Comparison of liver and kidney function indexes between non-tuberculosis and mycobacterium tuberculosis infected patients [M(P25,P75)]
项目 非结核 (n = 122) 结核 (n = 130) Z P TBIL(μmol/L) 9.0 (6.9,12,6) 7.95(5.3,11.4) 2.029 0.042* DBIL(μmol/L) 2.40 (1.7,3.8) 2.8(1.9,4.7) 1.679 0.093 IBIL(μmol/L) 6.55 (3.7,9.7) 5.2(3.5,7.3) 1.921 0.055 ALT(U/L) 14 (11,20) 12(7,19) 2.743 0.006* AST(U/L) 21 (16,27) 18(16,22) 2.134 0.033* ALP(U/L) 68 (58,87) 74(59,89) 0.898 0.369 GGT(U/L) 23.6 (16.9,41.1) 29.9(20.1,53.7) 2.398 0.016* BUN(mmol/L) 4.2(3.4,5.4) 3.9(2.9,5.5) 0.961 0.337 CR(μmol/L) 63(53,73) 60(47,75) 1.198 0.231 UA(μmol/L) 375(300,478) 404(292,526) 1.213 0.225 *P < 0.05。 表 4 非结核和结核分枝杆菌感染患者免疫功能比较( $ \bar x \pm s $)
Table 4. Comparison of immune function between non-tuberculosis and mycobacterium tuberculosis infected patients( $ \bar x \pm s $)
相关指标 非结核(n = 122) 结核(n = 130) 健康组(n = 150) χ2 P CD3+T(个/μL) 1047.26 ± 41.20#991.59 ± 41.57# 1367.33 ± 31.2867.682 < 0.001 * CD4+T(个/μL) 600.16 ± 24.66# 578.48 ± 23.75# 788.86 ± 18.40 55.966 < 0.001 * CD8+T(个/μL) 458.81 ± 22.61#Δ 403.81 ± 23.70# 536.99 ± 14.67 45.159 < 0.001 * CD4+/CD8+ 1.49 ± 0.07 1.67 ± 0.09 1.54 ± 0.03 5.260 0.072 3组间差异的显著性用非参数Kruskal-Wallis检验,*P < 0.05。3组间两两比较采用非参数Mann-Whitney检验,与健康组比较 #P < 0.05;与结核比较, ΔP < 0.05。 表 5 非结核和结核分枝杆菌感染患者耐药性比较(n)
Table 5. Comparison of drug resistance between non-tuberculosis and mycobacterium tuberculosis infected patients(n)
抗生素 结核(n = 130) 抗生素 非结核(n = 122) 耐药 中介 敏感 耐药率(%) 耐药 中介 敏感 耐药率(%) 异烟肼 29 0 101 22.31 利福平 46 6 70 37.70 利福平 23 1 106 17.69 乙胺丁醇 68 0 54 55.74 链霉素 14 3 113 10.77 阿米卡星 5 17 100 4.10 乙胺丁醇 5 4 121 3.85 莫西沙星 5 0 117 4.10 左氧氟沙星 4 9 117 3.08 克拉霉素 9 10 103 7.38 利福喷丁 21 3 106 16.15 利福喷丁 44 0 78 36.07 利福布丁 11 7 112 8.46 米诺环素 89 13 20 72.95 丙硫乙酰胺 0 2 128 0 利奈唑胺 22 34 66 18.03 力克肺疾 11 11 108 8.46 多西环素 96 15 11 78.69 对氨基水杨酸 1 8 121 0.77 妥布霉素 44 36 42 36.07 莫西沙星 8 5 117 6.15 亚胺/西司 121 0 1 99.18 氯法齐明 0 5 125 0 加替沙星 52 18 52 42.62 卡那霉素 0 11 119 0 磺胺甲唑 61 6 55 50.00 卷曲霉素 0 9 121 0 头孢西丁 38 0 84 31.15 克拉霉素 0 18 112 0 阿奇霉素 46 33 43 37.70 阿米卡星 0 0 130 0 表 6 非结核和结核分枝杆菌感染患者对同种抗结核药物耐药性比较n(%)
Table 6. Comparison of drug resistance with the same anti-tuberculosis drugs between non-tuberculosis and mycobacterium tuberculosis infected patients n(%)
抗生素 非结核(n = 122) 结核(n = 130) χ2 P 利福平 46(37.70) 23(17.69) 12.677 < 0.001 * 乙胺丁醇 68(55.74) 5(3.85) 82.361 < 0.001 * 阿米卡星 5(4.10) 0(0) 5.436 0.020* 莫西沙星 5(4.10) 8(6.15) 0.543 0.461 克拉霉素 9(7.38) 0(0) 7.919 < 0.001 * 利福喷丁 44(36.07) 21(16.15) 13.037 < 0.001 * *P < 0.05。 -
[1] Gopalaswmy R,Shanmugam S,Mondal R,et al. Of tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections - a comparative analysis of epidemiology,diagnosis and treatment[J]. J Biomed Sci,2020,27(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12929-020-00667-6 [2] Mbeha B,Mine M,Motswaledi M S,et al. Nontuberculous mycobacteria,botswana,2011–2014[J]. Emerging Infectious Diseases,2019,25(7):1401-1403. doi: 10.3201/eid2507.181440 [3] Han S A, Ko Y, Shin S J, et al. Characteristics of Circulating CD4+ T Cell Subsets in Patients with Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease [J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2020;9 (5): 1331页码Han S A,Ko Y,Shin S J,et al. Characteristics of circulating CD4+ T cell subsets in patients with mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine,2020,9(5):1331. [4] 中华医学会结核病学分会, 《中华结核和呼吸杂志》编辑委员会. 非结核分枝杆菌病诊断与治疗专家共识. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2012, 35(8): 572-580. [5] 中华医学会, 中华医学会杂志社, 中华医学会全科医学分会, 等. 肺结核基层诊疗指南(2018年). 中华全科医师杂志, 2019, 18(8): 709-717. [6] Yang C,Luo X,Fan L,et al. Performance of interferon-gamma release assays in the diagnosis of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases-A retrospective survey from 2011 to 2019[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol,2020,10:571230. [7] Tan Y,Su B,Shu W,et al. Epidemiology of pulmonary disease due to nontuberculous mycobacteria in Southern China,2013-2016[J]. BMC Pulm Med,2018,18(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0728-z [8] Hussain Z,Zhu J,Ma X. Metabolism and hepatotoxicity of pyrazinamide,an antituberculosis drug[J]. Drug Metabolism and Disposition,2021,49(8):679-682. doi: 10.1124/dmd.121.000389 [9] Xu N,Yang J X,Yang J. Incidence and associated risk factors of antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity among hospitalised patients in Wuhan,China[J]. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy,2022,29(4):217-221. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002433 [10] Liu L,Li X,Huang C,et al. Bile acids,lipid and purine metabolism involved in hepatotoxicity of first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs[J]. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology,2020,16(6):527-537. [11] 欧阳国泉,陈盛松,肖祖克. 非结核分枝杆菌肺病和肺结核患者的临床特征分析中国呼吸与危重监护杂志[J]. 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志,2021,20(11):774-779. [12] Cruz‐Aguilar M,Castillo‐Rodal A I,Arredondo‐HernÁndez R,et al. Non‐tuberculous mycobacteria immunopathogenesis: Closer than they appear. a prime of innate immunity trade‐off and NTM ways into virulence[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology,2021,94(2):e13035. doi: 10.1111/sji.13035 [13] Abebe F. Is interferon-gamma the right marker for bacille Calmette–Guérin-induced immune protection? The missing link in our understanding of tuberculosis immunology[J]. Clinical and Experimental Immunology,2012,169(3):213-219. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2012.04614.x [14] Daley C L,Iaccarino J M,Lange C,et al. Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: An official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guideline[J]. Clin Infect Dis,2020,71(4):e1-e36. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa241 [15] Parish I A,Heath W R. Too dangerous to ignore: Self-tolerance and the control of ignorant autoreactive T cells[J]. Immunol Cell Biol,2008,86(2):146-152. doi: 10.1038/sj.icb.7100161 [16] 杨燕,曾谊. 非结核分枝杆菌肺病170例回顾性分析[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2021,41(7):1058-1062. [17] Mvubu N E,Pillay B,Pillay M. Infection of pulmonary epithelial cells by clinical strains of M. tuberculosis induces alternate splicing events[J]. Gene,2020,750:144755. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144755 [18] 宋育明,杨映晖,董春萍. 分枝杆菌感染的特征和耐药性分析[J]. 中国药物滥用防治杂志,2022,28(2):240-244,259.