留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

困难静脉通路评分在儿科外周静脉穿刺中的应用研究

刘晓通 罗放灵 蒋玲 代侧香 彭秋 蔡丽芝 陆卫群

刘晓通, 罗放灵, 蒋玲, 代侧香, 彭秋, 蔡丽芝, 陆卫群. 困难静脉通路评分在儿科外周静脉穿刺中的应用研究[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2023, 44(11): 183-187. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20231128
引用本文: 刘晓通, 罗放灵, 蒋玲, 代侧香, 彭秋, 蔡丽芝, 陆卫群. 困难静脉通路评分在儿科外周静脉穿刺中的应用研究[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2023, 44(11): 183-187. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20231128
Xiaotong LIU, Fangling LUO, Ling JIANG, Cexiang DAI, Qiu PENG, Lizhi CAI, Weiqun LU. Application of Difficult Intravenous Access Score in Paediatric Peripheral Venepuncture[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(11): 183-187. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20231128
Citation: Xiaotong LIU, Fangling LUO, Ling JIANG, Cexiang DAI, Qiu PENG, Lizhi CAI, Weiqun LU. Application of Difficult Intravenous Access Score in Paediatric Peripheral Venepuncture[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(11): 183-187. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20231128

困难静脉通路评分在儿科外周静脉穿刺中的应用研究

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20231128
基金项目: 昆明市延安医院院内项目 (yyky-019-005)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘晓通 (1986 ~),女,云南腾冲人,护理学硕士,主管护师,主要从事儿科护理工作

    通讯作者:

    陆卫群,E-mail:723322877@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: R473.72

Application of Difficult Intravenous Access Score in Paediatric Peripheral Venepuncture

  • 摘要:   目的  验证困难静脉通路评分在儿科外周静脉穿刺中的有效性,探讨其在儿科静脉通路留置策略中的适用性。  方法  采用便利抽样法选取云南昆明一家三级甲等医院儿科的住院患儿作为研究对象。使用Riker的三变量儿童困难静脉通路评估工具(DIVA评分)对374名接受静脉穿刺置管的患儿进行评估。采用ROC曲线下面积、灵敏度、特异度和约登指数等指标对该工具的预测价值进行评价。  结果  DIVA评分与国外常模比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。研究中穿刺失败组与穿刺成功组患儿DIVA评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。随着DIVA评分由0递增至6,对应患儿的首次静脉穿刺成功率逐渐由92.9%下降至54.5%。DIVA评分ROC曲线下面积为0.648。当总分为3分时,量表预测价值最大。  结论  儿童三变量DIVA评分对儿童困难静脉通路有一定的识别能力且预测准确度较好,可用于儿科外周静脉穿刺前的评估。
  • 图  1  DIVA评分及Riker原评分的ROC曲线

    Figure  1.  ROC curve of DIVA score and Riker’ s original score

    表  1  患儿DIVA评分与首次穿刺成功情况[(n=374),n(%)]

    Table  1.   DIVA scores and success rate of first attempt at IV cannulation [(n=374),n(%)]

    DIVA总分n穿刺失败穿刺成功
    0 84(22.5) 6(7.1) 78(92.9)
    1 36(9.6) 4(11.1) 32(88.9)
    2 95(25.4) 10(10.5) 85(89.5)
    3 61(16.3) 12(19.7) 49(80.3)
    4 71(19.0) 19(26.8) 52(73.2)
    5 11(2.9) 5(45.5) 6(54.5)
    6 16(4.3) 6(37.5) 10(62.5)
    合计 374(100)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  DIVA评分与Riker原评分比较[n(%)]

    Table  2.   Comparison between DIVA score and Riker’ s original score [n(%)]

    组别n效果
    有效无效
    国外常模 366 260(71.0) 106(29.0)
    DIVA评分 372 274(73.1) 98(26.3)
    χ² 0.632
    P 0.427
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  穿刺失败组和成功组患儿的DIVA评分比较[($\bar x \pm s $),n=374]

    Table  3.   Comparison of DIVA scores among children in the failed puncture group and the successful group [($\bar x \pm s $),n=374]

    穿刺结果DIVA评分
    失败(n=62) 3.18±1.675
    成功(n=312) 2.07±1.617
    t 4.880
    P <0.001*
      *P < 0.05
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  Hosmer-Lemeshow检验结果

    Table  4.   Hosmer-Lemeshow test results of DIVA score and Riker’s original score

    项目χ²dfP
    DIVA评分0.94840.918
    Riker原评分1.40350.924
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] House D R,Cheptinga P,Rusyniak D E,et al. Qualitative study of healthcare providers’ current practice patterns and barriers to successful rehydration for pediatric diarrheal illnesses in Kenya[J]. Peer J,2017,6(5):e3829.
    [2] Parker S I A,Benzies K M,Hayden K A. A systematic review: effectiveness of pediatric peripheral intravenous catheterization strategies[J]. J Adv Nurs,2017,73(7):1570-1582. doi: 10.1111/jan.13211
    [3] Petroski A,Frisch A,Joseph N,et al. Predictors of difficult pediatric intravenous access in a community Emergency Department[J]. J Vasc Access,2015,16(6):521-526. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000411
    [4] 闫亚敏,龚梅,李爱求,等. 儿科外周静脉留置针穿刺成功率的调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2016,32(20):1558-1561.
    [5] Kim M J,Park J M,Rhee N,et al. Efficacy of vein viewer in pediatric peripheral intravenous access: A randomized controlled trial[J]. European Journal of Pediatrics,2012,171(7):1121-1125. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1713-9
    [6] 钱海兴,闫亚敏. 困难静脉通路评估工具的研究进展[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2017,33(31):2477-2480.
    [7] Schults J,Rickard C,Kleidon T,et al. Difficult peripheral venous access in children: An international survey and critical appraisal of assessment tools and escalation pathways[J]. J Nurs Scholarship,2019,51(5):537-546. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12505
    [8] Yen K,Riegert A,Gorelick M H. Derivation of the DIVA score: A clinical prediction rule for the identification of children with difficult intravenous access[J]. Pediatr Emerg Care,2008,24(3):143-147. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181666f32
    [9] Riker M W,Kennedy C,Winfrey B S,et al. Validation and refinement of the difficult intravenous access score: A clinical prediction rule for identifying children with difficult intravenous access[J]. Acad Emerg Med,2011,18(11):1129-1134. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01205.x
    [10] Gregg S C,Murthi S B,Sisley A C,et al. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access in the intensive care unit[J]. J Crit Care,2010,25(3):514-519. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.09.003
    [11] Kuensting L L,DeBoer S,Holleran R,et al. Difficult venous access in children: Taking control[J]. J Emerg Nurs,2009,35(5):419-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2009.01.014
    [12] Fields J M,Dean A J,Todman R W,et al. The effect of vessel depth,diameter,and location on ultrasound- guided peripheral intravenous catheter longevity[J]. Am J Emerg Med,2012,30(7):1134-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.07.027
    [13] Schoenfeld E,Boniface K,Shokoohi H. ED technicians can successfully place ultrasound-guided intravenous catheters in patients with poor vascular access[J]. Am J Emerg Med,2011,29(5):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.11.021
    [14] Au A K,Rotte M J,Grzybowski R J,et al. Decrease in central venous catheter placement due to use of ultrasound guidance for peripheral intravenous catheters[J]. Am J Emerg Med,2012,30(9):1950-1954. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.04.016
    [15] 儿童静脉输液治疗临床实践循证指南工作组. 儿童静脉输液治疗临床实践循证指南[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志,2021,16(1):1-42.
    [16] Lee S U,Jung J Y,Ham E M,et al. Factors associated with difficult intravenous access in the pediatric emergency department[J]. The Journal of Vascular Access,2020,21(2):180-185. doi: 10.1177/1129729819865709
    [17] Reigart J R,Chamberlain K H,Eldridge D,et al. Peripheral intravenous access in pediatric inpatients[J]. Clinical Pediatrics,2012,51(5):468-472. doi: 10.1177/0009922811435164
    [18] 王俊峰,章仲恒,周支瑞,等. 临床预测模型: 模型的验证[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志,2019,11(2):141-144.
    [19] Alba A C,Agoritsas T,Walsh M,et al. Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: Users’ guides to the medical literature[J]. JAMA,2017,318(14):1377-1384. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12126
    [20] Demir D,Inal S. Does the Use of a vein visualization device for peripheral venous catheter placement increase success rate in pediatric patients?[J]. Pediatr Emerg Care,2019,35(7):474-479. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001007
    [21] Hartman J H,Bena J F,Morrison S L,et al. Effect of adding a pediatric vascular access team component to a pediatric peripheral vascular access algorithm[J]. J Pediatr Health Care,2020,34(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2019.06.004
    [22] Shaukat H,Neway B,Breslin K,et al. Utility of the DIVA score for experienced emergency department technicians[J]. Br J Nurs,2020,29(2):S35-S40. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.2.S35
    [23] 杨艳,杨葵英,徐健华. 静脉血管评估分级配合输液信息卡在儿科门急诊中的应用[J]. 护理研究,2012,26(28):2662-2663. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2012.28.032
    [24] 余忠祥,邓毅书,董燕鸿,等. 外周静脉评估及静脉穿刺的层级管理[J]. 护理管理杂志,2011,11(10):749-751.
    [25] Paterson R S, Chopra V, Brown E, et al. Selection and insertion of vascular access devices in pediatrics: A systematic review[J]. Pediatrics, 2020, 145(Supplement 3): S243-S268.
    [26] Ballard H A,Hajduk J,Cheon E C,et al. Clinical and demographic factors associated with pediatric difficult intravenous access in the operating room[J]. Pediatric Anesthesia,2022,32(7):792-800. doi: 10.1111/pan.14438
    [27] Larsen P, Eldridge D, Brinkley J, et al. Pediatric peripheral intravenous access: Does nursing experience and competence really make a difference? J Infus Nurs, 2010, 33(4): 226-235.
  • [1] 徐艺铭, 钟剑锋, 李斌, 周欣颜, 朱红丽, 梁靖, 廖承德.  头颈4D- CTA 结合SDF-1a/CXCR4 信号通路评估颅内后交通动脉瘤破裂风险的价值, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240309
    [2] 何思锦, 陈小霞, 陈奇刚, 赵荣, 刘朵, 廖映迪, 李黛颖, 顾力华.  基于“中枢-外周-中枢”闭环康复理论运用头针联合吞咽治疗仪治疗脑卒中后吞咽困难的临床疗效研究, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230802
    [3] 刘晓雪, 李美菊, 夏婧.  下腔静脉变异度在脓毒性休克患者容量反应性评估中的价值, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230816
    [4] 李团, 周玉娥, 李月.  白噪声在新生儿外周静脉穿刺疼痛中的应用研究, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230310
    [5] 朱丽波, 许艳花, 李金粉, 胡雪, 鲁春燕, 陆昆, 段留艳, 李焕义.  超声引导下经外周置入中心静脉导管在新生儿血管通路穿刺困难中的临床应用, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230415
    [6] 沈居丽, 贾惠芳, 郜玫, 段金梅, 刘萍, 孙祖燕, 林惠仙.  基于风险评估的集束化护理在预防全子宫切除术后下肢深静脉血栓中的应用, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220212
    [7] 向培正, 李孟丽, 傅燕.  多种评分系统在肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张出血预后评估中的价值, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220316
    [8] 武彧, 杨德兴, 王虹, 王强, 周维钰, 唐杰夫, 王振方, 付凯, 刘荣.  脓毒性休克患者早期动、静脉血乳酸相关性及乳酸、乳酸清除率的预后评估价值, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210927
    [9] 张浒, 彭安睿, 钟佳冀, 黄波.  动脉旁路移植术后静脉桥再狭窄通路的机制, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210704
    [10] 李志玲, 王新文.  不同血管通路血液透析患者透析充分性评估及并发症发生率的比较, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [11] 刘天云, 周玉娥.  老年患者浅静脉置管拔管后按压时间与穿刺点出血情况, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [12] 周玉娥.  新生儿腋静脉留置针穿刺效果探讨, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [13] 丁海燕.  体重百分数对颈外静脉置入PICC准确性的影响研究, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [14] 梁咏雪.  彩超引导经皮肺穿刺活检对肺外周病灶诊断的临床分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [15] 胡霄.  静脉留置针在大鼠尾静脉注射中的方法和技巧, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [16] 蔡红波.  放置下腔静脉临时滤器的临床效果评价, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [17] 陈昱云.  颅内静脉窦血栓的血管内介入治疗, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [18] 卜锐.  下肢深静脉联合腹部大血管彩超诊断深静脉血栓的价值, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [19] 外周置入中心静脉导管相关性感染的原因分析及对策, 昆明医科大学学报.
    [20] 孔祥珍.  小儿静脉输液失败的原因分析与对策, 昆明医科大学学报.
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  981
  • HTML全文浏览量:  647
  • PDF下载量:  11
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-06-21
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-11-02
  • 刊出日期:  2023-11-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回