The Effects of the Laparoscopic and Open Surgery on the Postoperative Intestinal Function Recovery Time in Elderly Patients with Colorectal Cancer
-
摘要:
目的 探讨腹腔镜手术和开腹手术对老年结直肠癌(coloretal cancer,CRC)患者术后肠功能恢复时间的影响。 方法 选取2021年1月至2022年7月昆明市第二人民医院收治的老年CRC患者66例,依据不同手术方式进行分组,对照组(n=33)采用开腹手术,研究组(n=33)采用腹腔镜手术。观察比较2组术后肠功能恢复时间、根治性、并发症及手术指标。 结果 研究组患者术后肠功能恢复时间明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),但2组在根治性指标上,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);研究组患者并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);研究组手术时间长于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05),而出血量少于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 结论 与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术在老年CRC患者中能够更有效地缩短术后肠功能恢复时间,降低并发症发生率和术中出血量。尽管在根治性方面2种手术方式没有显著差异,但在具体应用时需考虑手术时间等因素。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of the laparoscopic surgery and open surgery on the postoperative intestinal function recovery time in elderly patients with colorectal cancer(CRC). Methods 66 elderly patients with CRC and treated in the 2nd People’ s Hospital of Kunming from January 2021to July 2022 were chosen and divided into the control group(n = 33) and the study group(n = 33) according to different operation ways. And the postoperative bowel function recovery time, radical, complications and surgical index were compared between the two groups. Results The recovery time of intestinal function in the study group was significantly shorter than that in the control group(P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in radical indicators between the two groups(P > 0.05).The incidence of complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). The operation time of the study group was longer than that of the control group and there was the statistically significant difference(P < 0.05), while the bleeding was less than that of the control group and there was the statistically significant difference(P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with the open surgery, laparoscopic surgery can more effectively shorten the recovery time of postoperative intestinal function, reduce the incidence of complications and intraoperative blood loss in elderly patients with CRC. Although there is no significant difference between two kinds of operation mode in terms of radical, it should be considered when it is applied in the specific operation time and other factors. -
表 1 2组一般资料比较[$\bar x \pm s $/(n)(%)](1)
Table 1. Comparison of general data between the two groups [$(\bar x \pm s )$/n(%)](1)
组别 n 平均年龄(岁) ASA分级 肿瘤位置 Ⅰ级 Ⅱ级 Ⅲ级 左半结肠 右半结肠 乙状结肠 中高位直肠 对照组 33 71.4±1.6 0(0.00) 13(39.39) 20(60.61) 4(12.12) 7(21.21) 8(24.24) 14(42.42) 研究组 33 71.3±1.8 1(3.03) 13(39.39) 19(57.58) 4(12.12) 8(24.24) 9(27.27) 12(36.36) t/χ2 / 0.145 0.257 0.585 P / 0.885 0.851 0.621 表 1 2组一般资料比较[$\bar x \pm s $/(n)(%)](2)
Table 1. Comparison of general data between the two groups [$(\bar x \pm s) $/n(%)](2)
组别 n BMI(kg/m2) TNM分期 组织类型 Ⅰ级 Ⅱ级 Ⅲ级 中低分化腺癌 中分化腺癌 高中分化腺癌 粘液腺癌 对照组 33 22.5±2.6 5(12.12) 13(42.42) 15(45.45) 1(3.03) 30(90.91) 1(3.03) 1(3.03) 研究组 33 22.7±2.4 3(9.09) 14(39.39) 16(48.48) 1(3.03) 28(84.85) 2(6.06) 2(6.06) t/χ2 / 0.490 1.231 1.010 P / 0.631 0.795 0.799 表 2 2组肠功能恢复时间对比[$(\bar x \pm s )$,h]
Table 2. Comparison of intestinal function recovery time between the two groups[$(\bar x \pm s )$,h]
组别 n 恢复肠鸣音时间 排气时间 排便时间 对照组 33 38.4±4.9 74.1±12.8 202.3±37.4 研究组 33 19.1±2.7 30.3±4.7 114.2±25.9 t / 2.651 6.591 7.689 P / 0.001* 0.001* 0.001* *P<0.05。 表 3 2组根治性指标对比[$(\bar x \pm s) $/n(%)]
Table 3. Comparison of radical indicators between the two groups [$(\bar x \pm s) $/n(%)]
组别 n 平均标本切除
长度(cm)标本切缘残留
肿瘤组织清扫淋巴结
数量(个)对照组 33 26.3±12.4 2(6.06) 11.1±4.6 研究组 33 24.2±11.7 3(9.09) 10.3±4.2 t 0.950 0.153 0.945 P / 0.367 0.636 0.337 表 4 2组并发症对比[n(%)]
Table 4. Comparison of complications between the two groups[n(%)]
组别 n 感染类 非感染类 发生率 对照组 33 6(18.18) 8(24.24) 14(42.42) 研究组 33 1(3.03) 1(3.03) 2(6.06) χ2 / / / 17.392 P / / / 0.001* *P<0.05。 表 5 2组手术指标对比($ \bar{x} \pm s $)
Table 5. Comparison of surgical indicators between the two groups($ \bar{x} \pm s $)
组别 n 手术时长(min) 出血量(mL) 对照组 33 156.2±54.1 154.8±24.7 研究组 33 214.3±67.3 101.6±12.9 t / 4.944 7.062 P / 0.001* 0.001* *P<0.05。 -
[1] 赵敏,张强,马永慈,等. 云南省肿瘤医院1000例结直肠癌患者临床特征[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2018,39(5):90-93. [2] 张晓,余先昊. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术对老年结直肠癌患者术后胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2021,41(11):2283-2286. [3] Li Q,Du L,Lu L,et al. Clinical application of enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative period of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery[J]. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques,2019,29(2):178-183. [4] 车河龙,李志晋,王克强,等. 结直肠癌切除术后吻合口出血急诊内镜治疗的疗效分析[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2022,43(10):122-126. [5] Palomba G,Dinuzzi V P,Capuano M,et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients in terms of recovery time: A monocentric experience[J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery,2021,16(4):981-987. [6] 杨锡运,付敏烽,张永广,等. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术与开腹手术临床安全性的对比[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2019,40(5):112-116. [7] 安琦,马福海,崔健,等. 80岁及以上结直肠癌患者腹腔镜手术的短期和长期疗效观察[J]. 中华老年医学杂志,2022,41(8):970-974. [8] Sueda T,Tei M,Nishida K,et al. Evaluation of short-and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 80 years old: A propensity score-matched analysis[J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease,2021,36(2):365-375. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03770-0 [9] 柳冉冉,于航娜,董蓓,等. 腹腔镜治疗结直肠癌老年患者术后肠梗阻发生率及影响因素研究[J]. 实用癌症杂志,2021,36(1):112-115. [10] 区栋财. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术治疗老年结直肠癌患者对胃肠功能及创伤的影响[J]. 吉林医学,2020,41(10):2369-2370. [11] 王琪,王家启,松涛,等. 腹腔镜微创技术在急诊普外手术中的应用效果[J]. 中国内镜杂志,2019,25(1):26-30. [12] 龙攀,罗斌,陈名明,等. 腹腔镜与开放手术对结直肠癌患者远期预后的效果比较[J]. 实用医院临床杂志,2020,17(2):109-111. [13] Gu C,Wu Q,Zhang X,et al. Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies[J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease,2021,36(7):1407-1419. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03918-6 [14] 李旭杰,徐永强. 腹腔镜对老年结直肠癌患者根治术的临床疗效和并发症的影响[J]. 浙江创伤外科,2022,27(1):28-29. [15] 赵建辉,孙东方,余乐. 腹腔镜手术对结直肠癌患者免疫功能及预后的影响[J]. 癌症进展,2023,21(7):746-749. [16] 王锐,尚静,李雪石. 腹腔镜根治术对老年结直肠癌患者凝血因子、胃肠道功能及肿瘤标志物的影响[J]. 血栓与止血学,2022,28(3):822-824. [17] Hettiarachchi T S,Askari A,Rudge E,et al. Comparison of robotic vs laparoscopic left-sided colorectal cancer resections[J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery,2023,17(1):205-213. [18] 郭俊杰. 腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术对老年结直肠癌患者临床疗效和并发症的影响[J]. 基层医学论坛,2023,27(5):43-45. [19] 郑民华,马君俊,潘睿俊,等. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治手术质量控制要点[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2022,42(11):1209-1212. [20] Tominaga T,Nagasaki T,Akiyoshi T,et al. Prognostic nutritional index and postoperative outcomes in patients with colon cancer after laparoscopic surgery[J]. Surgery Today,2020,50(12):1633-1643. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02050-2 [21] 赵其炯,何永越,王道笃,等. 腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗中老年结直肠癌的效果分析[J]. 吉林医学,2021,42(7):1707-1708. [22] Miguel L,E Silva J C R,Neto O B P,et al. A propensity score-matched case-control study of laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer[J]. Rev Assoc Med Bras,2021,67(5):753-758. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20210194 [23] 江滨. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治手术治疗老年结直肠癌患者的效果分析[J]. 中国实用医药,2020,15(35):72-73. [24] 司红军,闫齐森,李纲,等. 腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌的临床效果评价[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展,2023,26(9):725-726,744. [25] 毛争强,杜波涛,孙航,等. 80岁以上高龄结直肠癌患者腹腔镜与开腹手术的近期疗效与远期生存结局分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究,2023,50(11):1121-1126.