Effect of PCV-VG Mode Combined with Dexmedetomidine on Intraoperative Respiratory Mechanics and Blood Gas Indicators in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
-
摘要:
目的 探析在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中,使用PCV-VG通气模式联合右美托咪定镇静对肥胖患者术中呼吸力学和血气指标的影响。 方法 选取2022年7月至2023年12月在昆明市第一人民医院行腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的患者132例,随机分为VCV机械通气模式组(V组),PCV-VG机械通气模式组(P组),VCV模式联合静脉泵注右美托咪定组 (D组),PCV-VG模式联合静脉泵注右美托咪定组 (PD组),每组33例。对比4组患者麻醉诱导前20 min (T0),气管插管后10 min (T1),建立CO2气腹后40 min (T2),放气腹后10 min (T3)的氧分压 (PaO2),二氧化碳分压 (PaCO2),气道峰压 (Ppeak),气道平均压 (Pmean),肺动态顺应性 (Cdyn)。 结果 (1)血气指标:在T2、T3时点,P、D、PD组的PaO2均高于V组,差异有统计学意义 (P < 0.01),其中PD组高于其他3组,差异有统计学意义 (P < 0.01);PaCO2均低于V组,差异有统计学意义 (P < 0.01),其中PD组低于其他3组,差异有统计学意义 (P < 0.01)。 (2)呼吸力学指标:在T1时点4组的Ppeak无明显统计学差异,P﹥0.05。PD组的Ppeak在T2、T3时点均低于V、P、D组,差异有统计学意义 (P < 0.01);Cdyn均高于其他3组,差异有统计学意义 (P < 0.01);Pmean在T1、T2、T3时点PD组均低于P组,差异有统计学意义 (P < 0.01)。 结论 PCV-VG通气模式联合静脉泵注右美托咪定在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中可改善肥胖患者术中的氧和功能,降低气道峰压,提高肺顺应性,减少机械性肺损伤。 Abstract:Objective To explore the effects of PCV-VG ventilation mode combined with dexmedetomidine sedation on intraoperative respiratory mechanics and blood gas indicators in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Methods 132 patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at Kunming First People's Hospital from July 2022 to December 2023 were randomly divided into VCV mode group (Group V), PCV-VG mode group (Group P), VCV mode combined with dexmedetomidine pump group (Group D), and PCV-VG mode combined with dexmedetomidine pump group (Group PD), with 33 patients in each group. Then we compared the oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2), peak airway pressure (Ppeak), mean airway pressure (Pmean), and lung dynamic compliance (Cdyn) of four groups of patients 20 minutes before anesthesia induction (T0), 10 minutes after tracheal intubation (T1), 40 minutes after CO2 pneumoperitoneum establishment (T2), and 10 minutes after deflation (T3). Results (1) Blood gas indicators: At time points T2 and T3, the PaO2 levels in the P, D, and PD groups were higher than those in the V group, with P < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant difference, Among them, the PD group was higher than the other three groups, with P < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant difference; And PaCO2 was lower than that of Group V, P < 0.01, with statistically significant differences, Among them, the PD group was lower than the other three groups, P < 0.01, with statistically significant differences. (2) Respiratory mechanics indicators: At T1, there was no significant statistical difference in Ppeak among the four groups, with P > 0.05. The Ppeak of the PD group was lower than that of the V, P, and D groups at time points T2 and T3, with P < 0.01, and the difference was statistically significant; And Cdyn was higher than the other three groups, with P < 0.01, and the difference was statistically significant; At T1, T2, and T3, Pmean was lower in the PD group than in the P group, with P < 0.01, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion PCV-VG ventilation mode combined with intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine can improve oxygen and function during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients, reduce airway peak pressure, improve lung compliance, and reduce mechanical lung injury. -
Key words:
- PCV-VG /
- Dexmedetomidine /
- Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy /
- Blood gas /
- Respiratory mechanics
-
表 1 不同治疗组基础信息比较[$\bar x \pm s $/n(%),n = 33]
Table 1. Comparison of basic information among different treatment groups [$\bar x \pm s $/n(%),n = 33]
变量 分组 总计 χ2/F P V组 P组 D组 PD组 性别 0.158 0.984 女 25(75.76) 24(72.73) 25(75.76) 24(72.73) 98(74.24) 男 8(24.24) 9(27.27) 8(24.24) 9(27.27) 34(25.76) ASA 0.624 0.891 Ⅱ 32(96.97) 31(93.94) 32(96.97) 32(96.97) 127(96.21) Ⅲ 1(3.03) 2(6.06) 1(3.03) 1(3.03) 5(3.79) 年龄(岁) 31.97±9.22 34.45±10.89 31.51±8.98 33.09±9.73 32.76±9.68 0.599 0.617 BMI(kg/m2) 36.23±4.68 35.93±4.94 35.46±4.80 35.91±4.77 35.88±4.75 0.413 0.934 PaO2(mmHg) 231.85±29.54 231.67±31.01 231.67±30.30 232.27±29.43 231.86±29.73 0.003 1.000 PaCO2(mmHg) 35.20±2.38 35.13±2.11 35.45±2.09 34.84±2.24 35.15±2.19 0.416 0.742 表 2 不同治疗组药物使用及手术时长比较($\bar x \pm s $,n = 33)
Table 2. Comparison of drug use and surgical duration among different treatment groups($\bar x \pm s $,n = 33)
变量 分组 F P V组 P组 D组 PD组 麻醉药物 舒芬太尼(µg) 38.39±6.95 37.68±6.01 39.55±4.74 41.55±7.33 2.074 0.108 依托咪酯(mg) 16.71±2.89 16.50±2.30 17.79±2.63 18.17±3.24 2.466 0.066 维库溴铵(mg) 6.00±1.25 5.86±1.08 6.18±1.01 6.31±1.07 0.941 0.423 丙泊酚(mg/h) 112.50±21.45 112.50±17.45 118.18±19.11 121.03±22.73 1.278 0.285 地氟烷(%) 6.46±0.74 6.32±0.61 6.55±0.71 6.59±0.82 0.743 0.529 瑞芬太尼(µg/h) 361.07±27.93 356.07±25.14 364.24±29.58 366.90±30.48 0.769 0.514 手术时长(min) 133.79±6.76 133.46±6.26 131.55±7.92 131.93±7.48 0.712 0.547 表 3 不同组各时间点动脉血气的比较($\bar x \pm s $,n = 33)
Table 3. Comparison of arterial blood gas at different time points in different groups ($\bar x \pm s $,n = 33)
指标 分组 时间 T1 T2 T3 PaO2 V组 191.73±23.83△# 163.58±16.00# 197.15±24.07△# P组 199.03±23.56△# 176.85±23.11# 213.67±27.68△# D组 197.79±23.88△# 175.39±20.19# 212.27±25.93△# PD组 212.73±26.91△ 195.42±24.09 228.21±29.94△ F 4.292 12.668 7.299 P 0.006* <0.001* <0.001* PaCO2 V组 37.73±2.66△# 43.46±2.31# 40.25±2.67△# P组 37.30±2.17△# 41.38±2.67# 38.46±2.18△# D组 36.59±2.59△ 41.52±2.48# 38.51±2.70△# PD组 35.66±2.53△ 37.64±2.77 35.66±2.81△ F 4.354 29.685 17.51 P 0.006* <0.001* <0.001* *P < 0.05;与T2比较,△P < 0.05;与PD组比较,#P < 0.05。 表 4 不同组各时间点呼吸力学的比较($\bar x \pm s $,n = 33)
Table 4. Comparison of respiratory mechanics at different time points in different groups ($\bar x \pm s $,n = 33)
指标 分组 时间 T1 T2 T3 Ppeak V组 19.24±3.18△ 27.24±2.80# 20.39±3.04△# P组 17.94±2.71△ 23.70±2.91# 18.30±2.94△# D组 18.36±2.52△ 24.52±2.61# 19.55±1.99△# PD组 17.39±2.55△ 21.58±2.94 16.73±2.68△ F 2.647 22.856 11.551 P 0.052 <0.001* <0.001* Pmean V组 8.82±1.45△ 10.55±1.28# 8.58±1.46△ P组 9.52±1.18△# 11.55±1.12# 9.24±1.48△# D组 8.06±1.37△ 9.39±1.25 8.03±1.26△ PD组 8.48±1.00△ 9.88±0.99 8.30±1.05△ F 7.841 21.093 5.094 P <0.001* <0.001* 0.002* Cdyn V组 41.82±5.78△# 27.48±3.04# 38.73±5.02△# P组 45.61±6.34△ 32.64±4.07# 44.70±6.66△# D组 42.33±4.26△ 30.12±2.90# 39.24±5.77△# PD组 46.21±5.85△ 35.67±3.88 48.70±7.65△ F 5.245 32.748 18.432 P 0.002* <0.001* <0.001* *P < 0.05;与T2比较,△P < 0.05;与PD组比较,#P < 0.05。 -
[1] 熊利泽,邓小明. 2017版中国麻醉学指南与专家共识[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2017: 104. [2] 中国疾病预防控制中心,国家癌症中心,国家心血管病中心. 中国居民营养与慢性病状况报告(2020年)[J]. 营养学报,2020,42(6):521. [3] 大中华减重与代谢手术数据库研究者团队. 大中华减重与代谢手术数据库2020年度报告[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2021,41(5):533-542. [4] 杨华,陈缘,董志勇,等. 中国肥胖代谢外科数据库: 2020年度报告[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志,2021,7(1):1-7. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9605.2021.01.001 [5] English W J,DeMaria E J,Hutter M M,et al. American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery 2018 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis,2020,16(4):457-463. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.12.022 [6] 王跃东. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖症[J]. 浙江医学,2018,40(24):2621-2623. doi: 10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2018.40.24.2018-1310 [7] Lamaia,Sillva P L,Pelosi P,et al. Controlled invasive me-chanical ventilation strategies in obese patients undergoing sur-gery[J]. Expert Rev Respir Med,2017,11(6):443-452. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2017.1322510 [8] 曾渊,剻建科,毛延坤,等. 右美托咪定对肺癌根治术患者围术期脑功能、肺功能保护及应激相关指标的影响[J]. 临床肺科杂志,2018,23(12):2268-2272. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2018.12.034 [9] 中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和糖尿病外科医师委员会. 中国肥胖及2型糖尿病外科治疗指南(2019)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2019,39(4):301-306. [10] Janmahasatian S,Dffull S B,Ash S,et al. Quantification of lean bodyweight[J]. Clin Pharmacokinet,2005,44(10):1051-1065. [11] Kirov M Y,Kuzkov V V. Protective ventilation from ICU to operating room: State of art and new horizons[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol,2020,73(3):179-193. [12] 钟海莲,刘余钱,郝伟,等. 基于肺超声评分评估压力控制容量保证通气模式对腹腔镜胃癌根治术患者肺通气的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志,2022,38(10):1041-1046. doi: 10.12089/jca.2022.10.006 [13] 俞贝贝,赵国庆,宋知遥,等. 右美托咪定在病态肥胖患者减重手术中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国实验诊断学,2021,25(1):147-150. [14] Sugasawa Y,Yamaguchi K,Kumakura S,et al. The effect of onelung ventilation upon pulmonary inflammatory responses during lung resection[J]. J Anesth,2011,25(2):170-177. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1100-0 [15] Liu Z,Wang Y,Wang Y,et al. Dexmedetomidine attenuates inflammatory reaction in the lung tissues of septic mice by activating cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway[J]. Int Immunopharmacol,2016,35(3):210-216. [16] Lee S H,Kim N,Lee C Y,et al. Effects of dexmedetomidine on oxygenation and lung mechanics in patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing lung cancer surgery: A randomised double-blinded trial[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol,2016,33(4): 275.