A Two Sample Mendelian Randomization Study on Nut Intake and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
-
摘要:
目的 以两样本孟德尔随机化方法探讨坚果摄入量和慢性阻塞性肺疾病之间的因果关系。 方法 从汇总的欧洲大样本openGWAS数据库提取与坚果摄入量紧密关联的SNP位点作为工具变量,分别运用MR-Egger回归、加权中位数及逆方差加权、Simple mode、Weighted mode 5种方法进行孟德尔随机化分析,以OR值及95%CI评价坚果摄入量与慢性阻塞性肺疾病是否存在因果关系。采用mr_pleiotropy_test法检验水平多效性,leave-one-out法进行敏感性分析。 结果 从ukb-b- 16576 数据集共提取49个SNPS作为工具变量,MR-Egger回归、加权中位数、逆方差加权法、Simple mode、Weighted mode计算得OR值和95%可信区间分别为[0.91,95%CI (0.82~1.01),P = 0.084],[0.92,95%CI (0.89~0.95),P = 0.001],[0.94,95%CI (0.92~0.96),P = 0.001],[0.91,95%CI (0.85~0.95),P = 0.001],[0.91,95%CI (0.86~0.96),P = 0.001],所有b值结果方向均小于0,由于存在异质性(Q=67.36,P=0.012),故关注随机效应IVW模型。mr_pleiotropy_test检验显示MR-Egger截距为3.50E-04,截距接近于0,P = 0.591,所选的工具变量不存在水平多效性。leave-one-out敏感性分析未发现对结果有显著影响的SNP位点,提示结果稳定可靠。结论 两样本孟德尔随机化分析表明坚果摄入量与慢性阻塞性肺疾病的发病风险呈负向因果关系,但需要更大样本量和不同种族背景的人的数据来进一步验证。 Abstract:Objective To explore the causal relationship between nut intake and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by two-sample Mendelian randomization method. Methods SNP loci closely related to nut intake was extracted from the summarized large sample open GWAS database as instrumental variables, and Mendelian randomization analysis was performed using MR-Egger regression, weighted median, inverse variance weighting, Simple mode and Weighted mode respectively. OR value and 95%CI were used to evaluate whether there was a causal relationship between nut intake and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The mr_pleiotropy_test method was used to test the level of pleiotropy, and the leave-one-out method was used for sensitivity analysis. Results A total of 49 SNPS were extracted from the ukb-b- 16576 data set as instrumental variables. The OR values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by MR-Egger regression, weighted median, inverse variance weighting method, Simple mode, and Weighted mode, respectively [0.91, 95%CI (0.82~1.01), P = 0.084], [0.92, 95%CI (0.89~0.95), P = 0.001], [0.94, 95%CI (0.92~0.96), P = 0.001], [0.91, 95%CI (0.85~0.95), P = 0.001], [0.91, 95%CI (0.86~0.96), P = 0.001]. All b values were less than 0. Due to the heterogeneity (Q = 67.36, P = 0.012 ), the random effect IVW model was concerned. The mr_pleiotropy_test showed that the MR-Egger intercept was 3.50E-04, the intercept was close to 0, P = 0.591, and the selected instrumental variables did not have horizontal pleiotropy. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis did not find SNP loci that had a significant effect on the results, suggesting that the results were stable and reliable.Conclusion The two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis shows a negative causal relationship between nut intake and the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, but larger sample size and data of people with different ethnic backgrounds are needed for further verification. -
Key words:
- Nuts /
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease /
- Mendel randomization /
- Causal inference
-
表 1 工具变量SNP信息表
Table 1. Instrumental variable SNP information table
SNPs CHR EA OA EAF β SE P F rs1413952 1 T C 0.48 9.83E-03 1.67E-03 4.30E-09 34.46 rs75641275 1 C A 0.14 −1.42E-02 2.39E-03 2.90E-09 35.25 rs261809 1 G A 0.54 −9.63E-03 1.68E-03 9.80E-09 32.88 rs11586016 1 C G 0.37 9.88E-03 1.73E-03 1.10E-08 32.59 rs72720396 1 G A 0.22 1.14E-02 1.99E-03 8.70E-09 33.12 rs11811826 1 A T 0.22 1.32E-02 2.01E-03 4.40E-11 43.42 rs7599488 2 T C 0.42 −1.04E-02 1.69E-03 6.70E-10 38.12 rs7582086 2 T G 0.46 −9.63E-03 1.67E-03 8.80E-09 33.08 rs4149513 2 A G 0.49 1.17E-02 1.67E-03 2.20E-12 49.25 ............................................. ............................................. rs1622515 11 G A 0.48 9.92E-03 1.67E-03 2.90E-09 35.23 rs3764002 12 T C 0.26 1.31E-02 1.90E-03 5.10E-12 47.65 rs61937394 12 G T 0.19 −1.30E-02 2.20E-03 3.20E-09 35.04 rs12890531 14 G A 0.21 1.12E-02 2.04E-03 4.50E-08 29.91 rs4140799 14 A G 0.53 9.46E-03 1.68E-03 1.80E-08 31.74 rs10129747 14 G A 0.53 9.36E-03 1.68E-03 2.60E-08 30.98 rs34162196 14 T C 0.1 −2.24E-02 2.77E-03 7.10E-16 65.09 rs270816 15 T A 0.12 −1.40E-02 2.51E-03 2.80E-08 30.83 rs1797235 15 C G 0.37 −1.00E-02 1.74E-03 8.90E-09 33.07 rs1582322 16 G A 0.6 9.94E-03 1.72E-03 6.80E-09 33.58 rs862227 16 G A 0.45 −9.16E-03 1.67E-03 4.30E-08 30.03 表 2 5种MR分析方法OR估计值及95%CI
Table 2. OR estimates and 95% CI of five MR analysis methods
方法 β SE P OR(95%CI) Q Q_pval MR Egger −0.09 0.05 0.084 0.91(0.82,1.01) 66.81 0 加权中位数法 −0.08 0.01 0.001 0.92(0.89,0.95) 67.36 0 逆方差加权 −0.06 0.01 0.001 0.94(0.92,0.95) 简单众数法 −0.1 0.03 0.001 0.90(0.85,0.95) 加权众数法 −0.09 0.03 0.001 0.91(0.86,0.95) -
[1] 王凤燕,张冬莹,梁振宇,等. 面向全科医生的《慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2021年修订版)》解读[J]. 中国全科医学,2021,24(29):3660-3663. [2] 曹清明,王蔚婕,张琳,等. 中国居民平衡膳食模式的践行——《中国居民膳食指南(2022)》解读[J]. 食品与机械,2022,38(6):22-29. [3] Olas Beata. The cardioprotective properties of selected nuts: Their functional ingredients and molecular mechanisms[J]. Foods,2024,13(2):1-19 [4] Macan T P,Magenis M L,Damiani A P,et al. Brazil nut consumption reduces DNA damage in overweight type 2 diabetes mellitus patients[J]. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen,2024,895(4):503739. [5] 满福通·阿不都色麦提. 某干果坚果组合改善阿尔兹海默病的作用及机制实验研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆医科大学,2019. [6] Tucker L A. Consumption of nuts and seeds and telomere length in 5,582 men and women of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)[J]. J Nutr Health Aging,2017,21(3):233-240. doi: 10.1007/s12603-017-0876-5 [7] 开比努尔·再比布力,姑丽切克然·艾斯克,韩加. 坚果营养成分及保健功效的研究[J]. 粮食与食品工业,2022,29(3):32-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5026.2022.03.009 [8] Lee J T,Lai G Y,Liao L M,et al. Nut consumption and lung cancer risk: Results from two large observational studies[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,2017,26(6):826-836. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0806 [9] Li T,He X,Chen Y. Mechanism of lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban,2017,42(10):1212-1216. [10] Hemani G,Zheng J,Elsworth B,et al. The MR-base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome[J]. Elife,2018,11(1):1-14 [11] Rasooly D,Patel C J. Conducting a reproducible mendelian randomization analysis using the R analytic statistical environment.[J]. Current Protocols in Human Genetics,2019,101(1):e82. doi: 10.1002/cphg.82 [12] Gaffney A,Himmelstein D U,Woolhandler S. Population-level trends in Asthma and COPD emergency department visits and hospitalizations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US[J]. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol,2023,131(6):737-744. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.08.016 [13] Hye S S ,Ok S K ,Victor K ,et al. Association of body mass index and COPD exacerbation among patients with chronic bronchitis[J]. Respiratory Research,2022,23(1): 52-52. [14] Guo P,Li R,Piao T H,et al. Pathological mechanism and targeted drugs of COPD[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis,2022,17(37):1565-1575. [15] Xie W,You J,Zhi C,et al. The toxicity of ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) to vascular endothelial cells[J]. J Appl Toxicol,2021,41(5):713-723. doi: 10.1002/jat.4138 [16] Sriram J,Adetona O,Orchard T,et al. Mitigation of particulate matter-induced inflammation and vasoactivity in human vascular endothelial cells by omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health,2018,15(10):2293. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102293 [17] Papsdorf K,Miklas J W,Hosseini A,et al. Lipid droplets and peroxisomes are co-regulated to drive lifespan extension in response to mono-unsaturated fatty acids[J]. Nat Cell Biol,2023,25(5):672-684. doi: 10.1038/s41556-023-01136-6 [18] Fekete M,Szollosi G,Nemeth A N,et al. Clinical value of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Orv Hetil,2021,162(1):23-30. doi: 10.1556/650.2021.31973 [19] Liu X,Ali M K,Dua K,et al. The role of zinc in the pathogenesis of lung disease[J]. Nutrients,2022,14(10):2115. doi: 10.3390/nu14102115 [20] Kunutsor S K,Voutilainen A,Laukkanen J A. Serum copper-to-zinc ratio and risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cohort study[J]. Lung,2023,201(1):79-84. doi: 10.1007/s00408-022-00591-6 [21] 俞文英,张欢欢,吴月国,等. 黄酮类化合物的构效关系及其在肺部炎症疾病中的应用[J]. 中草药,2018,49(20):4912-4918. [22] Bondonno N P,Parmenter B H,Dalgaard F,et al. Flavonoid intakes inversely associate with COPD in smokers[J]. Eur Respir J,2022,60(2):2102604 doi: 10.1183/13993003.02604-2021 [23] Baer Benjamin R,Strawderman Robert L,Ertefaie Ashkan,et al. Discussion on instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio[J]. Biometrics,2023,79(2):554-558. doi: 10.1111/biom.13790 [24] Wan F,Small D,Bekelman J E,et al. Bias in estimating the causal hazard ratio when using two-stage instrumental variable methods[J]. Stat Med,2015,34(14):2235-2265. doi: 10.1002/sim.6470 [25] 欧阳一非,王惠君,王志宏,等. 2015年中国十五省(自治区、直辖市)老年居民坚果摄入状况[J]. 卫生研究,2019,48(4):526-530.