Mu Yun Zhen , Wu Xi Nan , Zhang Ai , Lin Hua , Wu Hui Xin , Xiong Qing . “The Window Effect” of 1800 MHz Electromagnetic Radiation on Oxidative Stress in Skin of SD Rats[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2018, 39(06): 22-25.
Citation: Chuan HE, Yong-de SHU, Teng-yun YANG, Yan-lin LI, Fu-ke WANG, Ren-jie HE, Rui-ying ZHONG, Guang-chao CHEN. The Analysis of the Efficacy of Ankle Arthroscopic Microfracture in the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus in Different MRI Classifications.[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(5): 70-75. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210513

The Analysis of the Efficacy of Ankle Arthroscopic Microfracture in the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus in Different MRI Classifications.

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210513
  • Received Date: 2021-01-14
    Available Online: 2021-06-03
  • Publish Date: 2021-05-20
  •   Objective  To explore the clinical effects of ankle arthroscopic microfracture used in different MRI classifications of osteochondral lesions of the talus.  Methods  48 cases with osteochondral lesions of the talus and treated with microfracture under the ankle arthroscopy were divided into 4 groups according to MRI classification. The functional recovery and pain relief of ankle joint were observed after the follow-up, and the curative effects of each group were compared.  Results  The average follow-up of 48 cases was 23.7 months. For MRI grade Ⅱ° , Ⅲ° , Ⅳ° , Ⅴ° injury patients, microfracture could bring good functional results (P < 0.05). The total excellent and good rate of postoperative AOFAS function score was 40 cases (83.33%), of which Ⅱ° 13 (100%) and Ⅲ° 16(100%) were much higher than Ⅳ° 7(63.64%), Ⅴ° 4(50%). There was no significant difference in the improvement of AOFAS score among the four groups (P > 0.05). And the improvement of VAS score in patients with Ⅱ° and Ⅲ° injuries was significantly better than that in patients with Ⅳ° and Ⅴ° injuries (P < 0.05).  Conclusion  The clinical effects of ankle arthroscopic microfracture are different in different MRI classifications of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Pain relief and postoperative function in patients with Ⅱor Ⅲ grade are significantly better than those with Ⅳ or Ⅴ grade.
  • [1]
    Yang H Y,Lee K B. Arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus:Second-look arthroscopic and magnetic resonance analysis of cartilage repair tissue outcomes[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2020,102(1):10-20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00208
    [2]
    Choi S W,Lee G W,Lee K B. Arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus:Functional outcomes at a mean of 6.7 years in 165 consecutive ankles[J]. Am J Sports Med,2020,48(1):153-158. doi: 10.1177/0363546519887957
    [3]
    Tol J L,Struijs P A,Bossuyt P M,et al. Treatment strategies in osteochondral defects of the talar dome:A systematic review[J]. Foot Ankle Int,2000,21(2):119-126. doi: 10.1177/107110070002100205
    [4]
    杨腾云,李彦林,刘德健,等. 外周血源性间充质干细胞修复骨关节炎软骨损伤的应用前景与问题[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2021,25(19):3071-3076. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.3520
    [5]
    Dekker T J,Dekker P K,Tainter D M,et al. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus:A critical analysis review[J]. JBJS Rev,2017,5(3):1-10.
    [6]
    Younger A,Wing K,Penner M,et al. A study to evaluate the safety of platelet-derived growth factor for treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2016,24(4):1250-1258. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3549-0
    [7]
    Dahmen J,Lambers K T A,Reilingh M L,et al. No superior treatment for primary osteochondral defects of the talus[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2018,26(7):2142-2157. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4616-5
    [8]
    Polat G,Erşen A,Erdil M E,et al. Long-term results of microfracture in the treatment of talus osteochondral lesions[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2016,24(4):1299-1303. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-3990-8
    [9]
    Hunt S A,Sherman O. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with correlation of outcome scoring systems[J]. Arthroscopy,2003,19(4):360-367. doi: 10.1053/jars.2003.50047
    [10]
    Schuman L,Struijs P A,van Dijk C N. Arthroscopic treatment for osteochondral defects of the talus. Results at follow-up at 2 to 11 years[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2002,84(3):364-368. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B3.0840364
    [11]
    D’ Ambrosi R,Maccario C,Serra N,et al. Osteochondral lesions of the talus and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis:is age a negative predictor outcome?[J]. Arthroscopy,2017,33(2):428-435. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.030
    [12]
    Ramponi L,Yasui Y,Murawski C D,et al. Lesion size is a predictor of clinical outcomes after bone marrow stimulation for osteochondral lesions of the talus:A systemic review[J]. Am J Sports Med,2017,45(7):1698-1705. doi: 10.1177/0363546516668292
    [13]
    Yoshimura I,Kanazawa K,Takeyama A,et al. Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation techniques for osteochondral lesions of the talus:Prognostic factors for small lesions[J]. Am J Sports Med,2013,41(3):528-534. doi: 10.1177/0363546512472979
    [14]
    Zengerink M,Struijs P A,Tol J L,et al. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus:A systemic review[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2010,18(2):238-246. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0942-6
    [15]
    Posadzy M,Desimpel J,Vanhoenacker F. Staging of osteochondral lesions of the talus:MRI and cone beam CT[J]. J Belg Soc Radiol,2017,101(Suppl 2):1.
    [16]
    Deng E,Gao L,Shi W,et al. Both magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography are reliable and valid in evaluating cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus[J]. Orthop J Sports Med,2020,8(9):2325967120946697.
    [17]
    Mintz D N,Tashjian G S,Connell D A,et al. Osteochondral lesions of the talus:A new magnetic resonance grading system with arthroscopic correlation[J]. Arthroscopy,2003,19(4):353-359. doi: 10.1053/jars.2003.50041
    [18]
    Dipaola J D,Nelson D W,Colville M R. Characterizing osteochondral lesions by magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Arthroscopy,1991,7(1):101-104. doi: 10.1016/0749-8063(91)90087-E
    [19]
    Hepple S,Winson I G,Glew D. Osteochondral lesions of the talus:A revised classification[J]. Foot Ankle Int,1999,20(12):789-793. doi: 10.1177/107110079902001206
    [20]
    Grambart S T. Arthroscopic management of osteochondral lesions of the talus[J]. Clin Podiatr Med Surg,2016,33(4):521-530. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2016.06.008
    [21]
    Van Bergen C J,Kox L S,Maas M,et al. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus:outcomes at eight to twenty years of follow-up[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2013,95(6):519-525. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00675
    [22]
    Lee K B,Bai L B,Chung J Y,et al. Arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2010,18(2):247-253. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0914-x
    [23]
    李春宝,刘玉杰,魏民,李众利,王志刚,蔡谞,朱娟丽. 关节镜清理与微骨折术治疗距骨骨软骨损伤的疗效[J]. 军医进修学院学报,2011,32(8):786-787,790.
    [24]
    曹晋,张常贵,林杨景,等. 镜下微骨折治疗距骨骨软骨损伤[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(4):364-366.
    [25]
    Ferkel R D,Zanotti R M,Komenda G A,et al. Arthroscopic treatment of chronic osteochondral lesions of the talus:Long-term results[J]. Am J Sports Med,2008,36(9):1750-1762. doi: 10.1177/0363546508316773
  • Relative Articles

    [1] Zhuoqian DONG, Dun LIU, Shuiyan SHAO, Xingkang CHEN, Jisheng SHAN, Tao CHEN. Efficacy of Physio Space Balance Board Motor Control Training in Rehabilitation of Ankle Injuries. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2025, 46(1): 1-7.
    [2] Jindian TAN, Huaming HU, Song YANG, Jianping LIN, Jufeng WU. Analysis of Factors Affecting Knee Joint Function Recovery Time after Platelet-rich Plasma and Arthroscopy for III Degree Meniscus Injury. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(5): 111-116.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230507
    [3] Qipeng WANG, Kaiyu HOU, Chuan HE, Qinggang ZHAO. Advances in Arthroscopic Suture Techniques for Meniscal Injuries. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(12): 177-183.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20231228
    [4] Chaoyu BAO, Sixue PAN, Guangxiong HE, Jiliang XIA, Shuai CHEN, Junyi XIANG. Measurement of Articular Cartilage Thickness of Talus in Normal Adults by MRI. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(5): 140-143.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220502
    [5] Xinyu LIAO, Yaozhang ZHANG, Ruiying ZHONG, Dengjun YANG, Qiai ZHANG, Lu HE, Hong ZHANG, Yaxing ZHENG, Fuke WANG. Treatment of Avulsion Fracture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Insertion with Double Row Suture under Arthroscopy. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(9): 107-113.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220906
    [6] Jing ZHANG, Hui-song WANG, Lei WANG. Effect of Independent Breakthrough Rehabilitation Method on Postoperative Rehabilitation Effect and Quality of Life in Patients with Complicated Ankle Fracture and Dislocation. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(11): 117-121.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20211121
    [7] Shu-fa WEI, Jia-hui CHEN, Yi-ming LIANG, Jun-hong LIU, Yi YANG, Biao LI. Comparative Analysis of Early Efficacy of Arthroscopy Combined with Open High Tibial Osteotomy in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(12): 83-88.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20211224
    [8] Lu-ping LIU, Lan-ran ZHU, Wei ZHANG, Lei-jie CHEN, Chao-ran WANG, Jing-wu LIAO. Comparison of Two Surgical Managements for the Delayed Ankles Fracture Combined with Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injuries. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(10): 106-111.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20211017
    [9] Yao Zi Hong , Wang Fu Ke , Wu Zhi Xiong , Pang Jia Ning . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(05): 120-124.
    [10] Yan Li Xiang , Zhang Zheng , Zhang De Zhi , Song Meng , Qi Hui , Liu Dan Ping . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(03): 50-56.
    [11] Ran Qi Guo , Wang Jian Wei , Na Rui , Deng Yun Qin , Zhong Ling , Li Yan Lin . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(04): 172-176.
    [12] Li Qin Xue , Li Chuan Jing , Wang Feng . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2019, 40(06): 33-38.
    [13] Zhang Zhen Guang , Peng Run Mei , Li Yu Dan , He Chuan , Wang Fu Ke , Jiang Yuan Ming , He Bo . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2019, 40(05): 53-58.
    [14] Feng Yong Quan , Wang Jian Long , Liu Yang , Rao Lei . A Treatment Effect Study of Arthroscope Combined Proximal Humerus Osteotomy in Knee Inversion Osteoarthritis. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2018, 39(05): 115-119.
    [15] Yang Yong Qiang , Fu Chang Hong , Li Fu Bing , Yao Ling , Wan Zhi Ying , Li Jun . Application of Ilizarov External Fixator in the Arthrodesis of End-stage Complex Ankle Arthritis. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2017, 38(07): 60-63.
    [16] Zheng Yun Jiang . Comparative Analysis of Two Different Fixation Methods for Treatment of the Intercondylar Eminence Fractures of Tibia. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [17] Liu Guo Hong . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [18] Xie Xiao 晞. . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [19] . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [20] Ding Jing . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(26)

    1. 江愿丽,陈凌云,蔡冰琳,崔晔,黄渊,郁艳艳,吴琼. 基于问题驱动的情景模拟教学法在《老年护理学》《康复护理学》中的应用研究. 护士进修杂志. 2025(02): 179-184 .
    2. 马翠萍,谢劲波,郑少兵,司文. 建构主义理论教考联动模式用于机器人辅助手术护理带教对教学质量的影响. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文). 2025(02): 300-304 .
    3. 左霞,陈月莉,钱宏梅,吴玲莉,赵霞. PBL教学法在急诊科实习护生带教中的应用研究. 中华养生保健. 2024(01): 81-84 .
    4. 杨丹,张艳,赵应珍,王杨,赵茹,张小妹. 微视频反例教学法结合微格教学法对实习护士临床思维及核心能力的影响. 临床医学研究与实践. 2024(10): 177-180 .
    5. 夏蕊,余璐,孙迟,肖遥. 基于BOPPPS模式的同伴教学法在神经外科规培护士培训中的效果研究. 医学理论与实践. 2024(08): 1428-1430+1417 .
    6. 周燕华,赵姝姝,李方超. 肿瘤内科护理带教中微格教学结合PBL教学的应用效果. 中国医药科学. 2024(14): 46-49 .
    7. 宋红权,闫嘉群,米娜,吕艳超. PBL联合翻转课堂对口腔专业医学生临床思维能力的影响. 中国继续医学教育. 2024(15): 82-87 .
    8. 麦建玲,马淑娥,吴翠翠,桂屏,张文超,杨敏,方坤洋. 客观结构化临床考试模式在血液净化进修护士培训中的效果分析. 国际医药卫生导报. 2024(15): 2632-2636 .
    9. 邵清春,张小珍,李永慧. CBL结合病例演练评估应用于妇产科教学中的效果及对学生临床思维能力的影响研究. 中国医药科学. 2024(15): 89-92 .
    10. 陈玲燕. 循证护理结合PBL教学法在中医护理带教中的应用. 中医药管理杂志. 2024(16): 124-126 .
    11. 赵英梅. 循证医学思维基础上PBL教学法在助理全科医师规范化培训中的应用效果研究. 中国卫生产业. 2024(05): 164-167 .
    12. 秦玉婷,穆耶赛尔·玉苏普,郝建萍. PBL教学法在血液内科教学实践中的应用研究. 中国卫生产业. 2024(06): 161-164 .
    13. 袁颖,阮婷婷,叶书玲,唐雪. 循证护理在临床本科实习护生教学实践中的应用效果. 黑龙江中医药. 2024(03): 172-174 .
    14. 朱燕萍,郑婷,李文娟,张燕,蔡宏斌,李斌,白豆,张一,刘金妹. 基于STEAM理念的问题探究式教学在神经内科临床实习教学中的应用研究. 中华医学教育探索杂志. 2024(12): 1676-1679 .
    15. 方红丽,邓苙,高慧芳,田莹,吴小佳. OBE理念在护理临床实践教学中的应用效果. 昆明医科大学学报. 2023(04): 165-169 . 本站查看
    16. 董世攀,梁小英,黄兰怡,赵玉玲,黄沂. 护理本科生科研能力现状调查与分析——基于混合研究视角. 卫生职业教育. 2023(09): 128-131 .
    17. 殷玲玲,施长丽,洪立立. 微课联合PBL教学法在消化内科中医护理教学中的应用. 中医药管理杂志. 2023(07): 187-190 .
    18. 杨静,金蓬勃,张蕊丽,张永梅. 标准化病人联合问题为中心的教学模式对实习护生SCL-90评分的影响. 临床研究. 2023(06): 187-189 .
    19. 苏颖,杨琴,叶梦鸽,陈卓,顾欣欣. 循问教学结合基于思维导图的微课教学模式在人体解剖学带教中的应用价值研究. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报. 2023(10): 984-988 .
    20. 罗晶. 急诊护理实习教学中采取精细化阶段式带教方法的效果. 婚育与健康. 2023(12): 175-177 .
    21. 李骏,张延霞. PBL在护理教学中的应用分析. 科技风. 2023(20): 122-124 .
    22. 范智博,孙倩,张倩,魏方圆. PBL联合循证护理教学法在消化内科实习护生带教中的应用效果. 河南医学研究. 2023(13): 2419-2422 .
    23. 陈颖,周冬娜,黄佩玉,乔何钰,廖意芬,王天秀,潘晓. 基于转化理念融合的混合式教学在急诊护理实习生中的应用. 中国继续医学教育. 2023(14): 82-85 .
    24. 周佳敏,王晶,臧彬. 工作坊联合PBL教学法在实习护生临床急救技能带教中的应用. 中国继续医学教育. 2023(14): 112-116 .
    25. 陈艳云,彭雯平,赵蓉,高颖,张莹燕. 基于批判性思维的持续性改进护理联合中医坐浴对痔疮术后患者健康行为、疼痛应激和病耻感的影响. 中国医药指南. 2023(22): 162-164 .
    26. 罗年年. 护理程序在提升心外科护士批判性思维中的应用效果. 中国医药指南. 2023(25): 147-149 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • 加载中
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 38.8 %FULLTEXT: 38.8 %META: 60.9 %META: 60.9 %PDF: 0.2 %PDF: 0.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.9 %其他: 8.9 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %Austell: 0.1 %Austell: 0.1 %Austin: 0.0 %Austin: 0.0 %Baden: 0.1 %Baden: 0.1 %Bruderheim: 0.0 %Bruderheim: 0.0 %China: 4.6 %China: 4.6 %Edinburg: 0.0 %Edinburg: 0.0 %Elizabeth City: 0.0 %Elizabeth City: 0.0 %Fairfield: 0.0 %Fairfield: 0.0 %Falkenstein: 0.0 %Falkenstein: 0.0 %Great Falls: 0.0 %Great Falls: 0.0 %Grove City: 0.1 %Grove City: 0.1 %Gwynn Oak: 0.1 %Gwynn Oak: 0.1 %Hamilton: 0.0 %Hamilton: 0.0 %Jamaica: 0.0 %Jamaica: 0.0 %Lee's Summit: 0.0 %Lee's Summit: 0.0 %Malvern: 0.1 %Malvern: 0.1 %Norman: 0.2 %Norman: 0.2 %Northfield: 0.0 %Northfield: 0.0 %Perth Amboy: 0.1 %Perth Amboy: 0.1 %Reynoldsburg: 0.0 %Reynoldsburg: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.2 %Rochester: 0.2 %San Lorenzo: 0.0 %San Lorenzo: 0.0 %Swainsboro: 0.0 %Swainsboro: 0.0 %Ta'if: 0.0 %Ta'if: 0.0 %Westbury: 0.0 %Westbury: 0.0 %Wharton: 0.0 %Wharton: 0.0 %Wixom: 0.1 %Wixom: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 6.5 %上海: 6.5 %九江: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %休斯敦: 0.6 %休斯敦: 0.6 %休斯顿: 0.0 %休斯顿: 0.0 %伯利恒: 0.0 %伯利恒: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %六盘水: 0.0 %六盘水: 0.0 %内华达: 0.0 %内华达: 0.0 %剑桥: 0.0 %剑桥: 0.0 %加利福尼亚: 0.0 %加利福尼亚: 0.0 %加利福尼亚州: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.1 %北京: 15.6 %北京: 15.6 %十堰: 0.0 %十堰: 0.0 %华沙: 0.0 %华沙: 0.0 %南京: 0.0 %南京: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %吉列: 0.0 %吉列: 0.0 %吉达: 0.0 %吉达: 0.0 %吉隆坡: 0.0 %吉隆坡: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %哈利法克斯: 0.1 %哈利法克斯: 0.1 %哥伦比亚: 0.1 %哥伦比亚: 0.1 %圣保罗: 0.0 %圣保罗: 0.0 %圣约瑟夫: 0.0 %圣约瑟夫: 0.0 %圣路易斯: 0.0 %圣路易斯: 0.0 %坦帕: 0.0 %坦帕: 0.0 %埃克塞特: 0.1 %埃克塞特: 0.1 %埃德蒙顿: 0.1 %埃德蒙顿: 0.1 %多伦多: 0.0 %多伦多: 0.0 %大连: 0.0 %大连: 0.0 %天津: 0.0 %天津: 0.0 %太原: 0.0 %太原: 0.0 %安康: 0.0 %安康: 0.0 %宜宾: 0.0 %宜宾: 0.0 %宜春: 0.0 %宜春: 0.0 %宣城: 0.0 %宣城: 0.0 %宿州: 0.0 %宿州: 0.0 %密蘇里城: 0.9 %密蘇里城: 0.9 %密西西比州: 0.0 %密西西比州: 0.0 %小石城: 0.0 %小石城: 0.0 %巴吞鲁日: 0.1 %巴吞鲁日: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.0 %巴黎: 0.0 %布劳利: 0.0 %布劳利: 0.0 %布雷登顿: 0.1 %布雷登顿: 0.1 %布鲁克林区: 0.1 %布鲁克林区: 0.1 %常德: 0.0 %常德: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %庆阳: 0.0 %庆阳: 0.0 %延边: 0.0 %延边: 0.0 %张家口: 0.1 %张家口: 0.1 %徐州: 0.0 %徐州: 0.0 %成都: 0.0 %成都: 0.0 %扬州: 0.0 %扬州: 0.0 %拜仁: 0.1 %拜仁: 0.1 %文图拉: 0.1 %文图拉: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %昌吉: 0.0 %昌吉: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %普若佛: 0.0 %普若佛: 0.0 %曲靖: 0.0 %曲靖: 0.0 %杭州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %格拉沃利讷: 0.1 %格拉沃利讷: 0.1 %格里利: 0.0 %格里利: 0.0 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %檀香山: 0.0 %檀香山: 0.0 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %氹仔: 0.0 %氹仔: 0.0 %汉诺威: 0.1 %汉诺威: 0.1 %法拉盛: 0.0 %法拉盛: 0.0 %洛杉矶: 0.1 %洛杉矶: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.0 %深圳: 0.0 %深圳: 0.0 %温州: 0.0 %温州: 0.0 %湖州: 0.0 %湖州: 0.0 %漯河: 0.0 %漯河: 0.0 %瑟普赖斯: 0.0 %瑟普赖斯: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %纽瓦克: 0.2 %纽瓦克: 0.2 %纽约: 0.2 %纽约: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.0 %绍兴: 0.0 %艾肯: 0.0 %艾肯: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 3.4 %芒廷维尤: 3.4 %芒特艾里: 0.0 %芒特艾里: 0.0 %芝加哥: 0.0 %芝加哥: 0.0 %苏州: 0.0 %苏州: 0.0 %莫斯科: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.1 %萨斯卡通: 0.0 %萨斯卡通: 0.0 %萨默维尔: 0.1 %萨默维尔: 0.1 %蒙克斯科纳: 0.1 %蒙克斯科纳: 0.1 %蒙特利尔: 0.0 %蒙特利尔: 0.0 %西宁: 1.5 %西宁: 1.5 %贝克斯菲尔德: 0.1 %贝克斯菲尔德: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %费尔菲尔德: 0.1 %费尔菲尔德: 0.1 %赣州: 0.0 %赣州: 0.0 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %郑州: 0.0 %郑州: 0.0 %都伯林: 0.0 %都伯林: 0.0 %铜仁: 0.0 %铜仁: 0.0 %锡拉丘兹: 0.0 %锡拉丘兹: 0.0 %长沙: 0.1 %长沙: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阿伦敦: 0.0 %阿伦敦: 0.0 %阿布奎基: 0.1 %阿布奎基: 0.1 %阿灵顿: 0.0 %阿灵顿: 0.0 %青岛: 0.0 %青岛: 0.0 %驻马店: 49.9 %驻马店: 49.9 %麦迪逊: 0.1 %麦迪逊: 0.1 %其他其他AustellAustinBadenBruderheimChinaEdinburgElizabeth CityFairfieldFalkensteinGreat FallsGrove CityGwynn OakHamiltonJamaicaLee's SummitMalvernNormanNorthfieldPerth AmboyReynoldsburgRochesterSan LorenzoSwainsboroTa'ifWestburyWhartonWixom[]上海九江休斯敦休斯顿伯利恒保定六盘水内华达剑桥加利福尼亚加利福尼亚州北京十堰华沙南京台州吉列吉达吉隆坡呼和浩特咸阳哈利法克斯哥伦比亚圣保罗圣约瑟夫圣路易斯坦帕埃克塞特埃德蒙顿多伦多大连天津太原安康宜宾宜春宣城宿州密蘇里城密西西比州小石城巴吞鲁日巴黎布劳利布雷登顿布鲁克林区常德广州庆阳延边张家口徐州成都扬州拜仁文图拉无锡昆明昌吉晋城普若佛曲靖杭州格拉沃利讷格里利森尼韦尔檀香山武汉氹仔汉诺威法拉盛洛杉矶洛阳深圳温州湖州漯河瑟普赖斯石家庄纽瓦克纽约绍兴艾肯芒廷维尤芒特艾里芝加哥苏州莫斯科萨斯卡通萨默维尔蒙克斯科纳蒙特利尔西宁贝克斯菲尔德贵阳费尔菲尔德赣州运城郑州都伯林铜仁锡拉丘兹长沙长治阿伦敦阿布奎基阿灵顿青岛驻马店麦迪逊

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3377) PDF downloads(15) Cited by(31)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return