Li ZHANG, Yuting WANG, Jianing SHI, Dan YU, Renhua YANG, Zhiqiang SHEN, Jiang LONG, Peng CHEN. Network Pharmacology-based Analysis of the Anti-atherosclerosis Mechanism of Scutellarin and Experimental Validation in Vivo[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(8): 17-27. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220804
Citation: Meng-yao AO, Yan-ling HUANG, Yong-ping LU, Xin-guo WANG, Xiang-bi LI. Ultrasonographic Observation of Factors Related to Abnormal Insertion of Umbilical Cord Placenta and It’s Correlation with Pregnancy Outcome[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(12): 112-116. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20211229

Ultrasonographic Observation of Factors Related to Abnormal Insertion of Umbilical Cord Placenta and It’s Correlation with Pregnancy Outcome

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20211229
  • Received Date: 2021-09-07
    Available Online: 2021-12-15
  • Publish Date: 2021-12-15
  •   Objective  To investigate the factors causing abnormal insertion of umbilical cord placenta during pregnancy, and to analyze the influence of abnormal insertion of umbilical cord placenta on pregnancy outcome.   Methods  A total of 15,771 pregnant women who were examined in the Ultrasound Department of The Second People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province from January 1, 2016 to January 31, 2021 were included in the observation. 879 cases of abnormal insertion ports were pathologically confirmed after delivery and were selected as the study group, and 1000 cases of normal insertion ports were randomly selected as the control group.   Results  Logistic regression analysis suggested multiple pregnancy history (OR = 3.34, P < 0.001), scarred uterus (OR = 3.54, P < = 0.003), twin pregnancy (OR = 5.25, P < 0.001), abnormal placental position (OR = 3.47, P < 0.001), abnormal placental morphology (OR = 8.52, P = 0.007), in vitro embryo transfer (OR = 5.06, P < 0.001), uterine fibroids (OR = 4.86, P < 0.001) were the risk factors for abnormal umbilical cord insertion. In terms of pregnancy outcomes, there was no significant difference between normal umbilical insertion and marginal umbilical insertion( P >0.05), but there was significant difference between normal umbilical insertion and velamentous umbilical insertion (P < 0.001).   Conclusion  Multiple pregnancy history, scar uterus, twin pregnancy, abnormal placenta position, abnormal placenta morphology, in vitro embryo transfer, uterine fibroids are the high risk factors for abnormal umbilical cord insertion. For pregnancy with high-risk factors, doctors should be alert to the insertion location during prenatal ultrasound, so as to improve the prenatal diagnosis rate of abnormal insertion of the insertion mouth, especially the velamentous-like umbilical cord insertion, and improve clinical pregnancy and perinatal outcomes.
  • [1]
    Nakamura M,Umehara N,Ishii K,et al. A poor long-term neurological prognosis is associated with abnormal cord insertion in severe growth-restricted fetuses[J]. J Perinat Med,2018,46(9):1040-1047. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2017-0240
    [2]
    韩小青. 彩色多普勒超声对帆状胎盘的诊断价值[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2013,21(7):92-93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5971.2013.07.049
    [3]
    Ismail K I,Hannigan A,Kelehan P,et al. Antenatal detection of abnormal placental cord insertion across different trimesters:A prospective cohort study[J]. Am J Perinatol,2020,37(1):104-111. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400309
    [4]
    Robinson L K,Jones K L,Benirschke K. The nature of structural defects associated with velamentous and marginal insertion of the umbilical cord[J]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,1983,146(1):191-194.
    [5]
    Schachter M,Tovbin Y,Arieli S,et al. In vitro fertilization is a risk factor for vasa previa[J]. Fertil Steril,2002,78(3):642-643. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03253-3
    [6]
    韩晴, 颜建英.帆状胎盘发生相关因素和围生儿结局的临床分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2013, 29(9): 694-697.
    [7]
    Oyelese K O,Turner M,Lees C,et al. Vasa previa:An avoidable obstetric tragedy[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv,1999,54(2):138-145. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199902000-00024
    [8]
    Heinonen S,Ryynanen M,Kirkinen P,et al. Perinatal diagnostic evaluation of velamentous umbilical cord insertion:Clinical,doppler,and ultrasonic findings[J]. Obstet Gynecol,1996,87(1):112-117. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00339-8
    [9]
    Ismail K I,Hannigan A,Kelehan P,et al. Abnormal placental cord insertion and adverse pregnancy outcomes:Results from a prospective cohort study[J]. Am J Perinato,2017,34(11):1152-1159. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604413
    [10]
    Ranzini A C,Oyelese Y. How to screen for vasa previa[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2021,57(5):720-725. doi: 10.1002/uog.23520
    [11]
    Wan Masliza W D,Bajuri M Y,Hassan M R,et al. Sonographically abnormal placenta:An association with an increased risk poor pregnancy outcomes[J]. Clin Ter,2017,168(5):283-289.
    [12]
    De Los Reyes S,Henderson J,Eke A C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of velamentous cord insertion among singleton pregnancies and the risk of preterm delivery[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2018,142(1):9-14. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12489
    [13]
    Zahedi Spung L D,Stout M J,Carter E B,et al. Obstetric Outcomes in Singleton Pregnancies with Abnormal Placental Cord Insertions[J]. Am J Perinatol,2021,21(2):231-236.
    [14]
    庄依亮主编.现代产科学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009: 1120-1123.
    [15]
    Sutera M, Garofalo A, Pilloni E,et al. Vasa previa:When antenatal diagnosis can change fetal prognosis[J]. J Perinat Med,2021,20(3):112-118.
    [16]
    李胜利,陈秀兰,文华轩. 血管前置的产前超声筛查与诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志,2011,4(8):719-729.
    [17]
    Derisbourg S,Boulay A,Lamy C,et al. First trimester ultrasound prediction of velamentous cord insertions:A prospective study[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2019,21(5):1-7.
  • Relative Articles

    [1] Lin WEI, Mei ZHU, Hailin ZHANG, Yuran FENG, Xi CHEN, Bailing WU, Yang YANG. Value of Binary Logit Regression Model Based on FNA-Tg and Serum Tg for Determining Lymph Node Metastasis or Recurrence of Thyroid Cancer. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(2): 102-107.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230219
    [2] Libo ZHU, Yanhua XU, Jinfen LI, Xue HU, Chunyan LU, Kun LU, Liuyan DUAN, Huanyi LI. Clinical Application of Ultrasound-guided Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter in Neonates with Vascular Access Difficulties. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(4): 117-122.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230415
    [3] Chunmei MENG, Kefan YE, Yunyu HE, Dongyan REN, Xiaomei WU, Yifeng ZHANG. Evaluation of Therapeutic Effect of Transabdominal and Transvaginal Ultrasound on Cesarean Scar Pregnancy. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(1): 65-69.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230113
    [4] Yuxin WEI, Shuwen LIANG, Chun CHEN, Xiuling LI, Shu ZHU, Fang YAN. Prediction of Delivery Mode by Transperineal Ultrasound during the Active Phase of the First Stage Labor. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(9): 38-42.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220908
    [5] Huiming WEI, Zhigui LI, Lingling WANG, Lin CAO, Yi YAN. Effect of Position on Ultrasonographic Measurement of Ligamentum Flavum Length of Lumbar Intervertebral Space in the Elderly Patients. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(4): 107-111.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220422
    [6] Jianfei LU, Rui BU, Xiaoyan LIU, Xing ZHANG, Yu DING, Ran ZHANG. Efficacy of Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Preoperative Diagnosis of Lateral Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis from Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(12): 75-80.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221214
    [7] Wang Xin Guo , Huang Yan Ling , Ta Lin Kun . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(02): 59-63.
    [8] Zhang Jian , Ding Yun Chuan . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2019, 40(01): 128-131.
    [9] Hai Sai Ping , Yang Li Chun . A Retrospective Analysis of Ultrasonographic Misdiagnosis of Thyroid Multiple Nodules With Thyroid Carcinoma. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2016, 37(11): 89-92.
    [10] Wang Guang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [11] Feng Jun . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [12] He Wei Yao Zhen . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [13] Yang Yang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [14] Huang Yan Ling . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [15] Chen Jian . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [16] Xia Yao You . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [17] Lu Jian Fei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [18] Gao Hong . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [19] Zhao Xing Yuan . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [20] . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 黄飞,祝丹,陈启兰. 基于数据挖掘和网络药理学分析国家专利复方治疗动脉粥样硬化的作用机制. 中国中医药图书情报杂志. 2023(06): 37-44 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04020406080100
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 38.4 %FULLTEXT: 38.4 %META: 61.4 %META: 61.4 %PDF: 0.2 %PDF: 0.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.3 %其他: 4.3 %其他: 0.0 %其他: 0.0 %China: 4.6 %China: 4.6 %Rochester: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.0 %Seattle: 0.0 %Seattle: 0.0 %上海: 10.4 %上海: 10.4 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %丽水: 0.0 %丽水: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %凉山: 0.0 %凉山: 0.0 %北京: 16.9 %北京: 16.9 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南昌: 0.0 %南昌: 0.0 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %博阿努瓦: 0.0 %博阿努瓦: 0.0 %台北: 0.0 %台北: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %合肥: 0.0 %合肥: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %天津: 0.2 %天津: 0.2 %太原: 0.0 %太原: 0.0 %安那罕: 0.1 %安那罕: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %张家口: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %悉尼: 0.1 %悉尼: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %拉斯维加斯: 0.0 %拉斯维加斯: 0.0 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %晋城: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %杭州: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.0 %格兰特县: 0.0 %武汉: 0.0 %武汉: 0.0 %沈阳: 0.0 %沈阳: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %海得拉巴: 0.1 %海得拉巴: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %深圳: 0.0 %深圳: 0.0 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %滨州: 0.0 %滨州: 0.0 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %珠海: 0.0 %珠海: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %纽约: 0.0 %纽约: 0.0 %绥化: 0.0 %绥化: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 3.3 %芒廷维尤: 3.3 %芝加哥: 0.0 %芝加哥: 0.0 %茂名: 0.0 %茂名: 0.0 %衢州: 0.0 %衢州: 0.0 %西宁: 1.2 %西宁: 1.2 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.0 %郑州: 0.0 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %马赛: 0.0 %马赛: 0.0 %驻马店: 54.4 %驻马店: 54.4 %其他其他ChinaRochesterSeattle上海东莞丽水保定凉山北京十堰南京南昌南通博阿努瓦台北台州合肥呼和浩特咸阳嘉兴天津太原安那罕宣城常州广州张家口悉尼成都扬州拉斯维加斯昆明晋城杭州格兰特县武汉沈阳洛阳海得拉巴淄博深圳温州湖州滨州漯河珠海石家庄秦皇岛纽约绥化芒廷维尤芝加哥茂名衢州西宁西安诺沃克贵阳赤峰运城邯郸郑州长沙青岛马赛驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3599) PDF downloads(11) Cited by(4)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return