Dosimetric Differences between Tomo and Monaco Planning Systems and Comparison of Gamma Pass Rates in Preoperative Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer Patients

Hao YAN; Qi YUE; Dan GU; Hui TIAN; Hui LI; Rongqing LI

doi:10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220132

Volume 43 Issue 1

Jan. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Kunming Medical University > 2022 > 43(1): 67-72

Hao YAN, Qi YUE, Dan GU, Hui TIAN, Hui LI, Rongqing LI. Dosimetric Differences between Tomo and Monaco Planning Systems and Comparison of Gamma Pass Rates in Preoperative Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer Patients[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(1): 67-72. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220132

Citation:

Hao YAN, Qi YUE, Dan GU, Hui TIAN, Hui LI, Rongqing LI. Dosimetric Differences between Tomo and Monaco Planning Systems and Comparison of Gamma Pass Rates in Preoperative Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer Patients[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(1): 67-72. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220132

Citation:

Hao YAN, Qi YUE, Dan GU, Hui TIAN, Hui LI, Rongqing LI. Dosimetric Differences between Tomo and Monaco Planning Systems and Comparison of Gamma Pass Rates in Preoperative Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer Patients[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(1): 67-72. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220132

PDF( 609 KB)

Dosimetric Differences between Tomo and Monaco Planning Systems and Comparison of Gamma Pass Rates in Preoperative Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer Patients

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220132

Dept. of Oncology and Radiotherapy，The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University，Kunming Yunnan 650032，China

Received Date: 2021-12-20
Available Online: 2021-12-20
Publish Date: 2022-01-15

Abstract

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the dosimetric differences between TOMO and Monaco planning systems in preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer and the comparison of Gamma pass rate, so as to provide a reference for the selection of clinical treatment. Methods A total of 20 patients with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer admitted from December 2019 to January 2021 were selected, TOMO and Monaco planning were performed for these 20 patients respectively. The dose-volume histogram was used to evaluate the dose distribution of the target area and the radiation dose of the organs at risk. The differences between the two planning systems in the dosimetry of the planned target area and endangering organs were analyzed and compared, and the gamma pass rates of the two schemes were compared. Results Both TOMO and Monaco plans could meet the prescription dose requirement of target area. The HI and CI of PGTV target of Tomo plan were better than those of Monaco planning system, and the CI of PCTV target area was also superior to that of Monaco plan system （P < 0.001）. In terms of organs at risk, compared with Monaco planning system, the mean values of Dmean, V50, V40, V30 of bladder, Dmean, V30, V20, V15 of bilateral femoral head, and pelvic V50 indicators in TOMO plan were lower （P < 0.05）. The execution time of Tomo’ s planning machine was 4.3 times that of Monaco’ s, and the execution time of Tomo’ s planning machine was 1.31 times that of Monaco’ s （P < 0.05）. The mean Gamma pass rate of Tomo plan was higher than that of Monaco plan （P < 0.05）. Conclusion The TOMO plan system design for preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients can significantly improve the target uniformity and conformal degree, and can also reduce the dose of normal tissues. The plan Gamma has a higher pass rate, but the treatment time is longer. The treatment time of Monaco planning system is significantly shortened.
- Rectal tumor,
- Tomo plan,
- Monaco plan,
- Dosimetric,
- Gamma passing rate

FullText(HTML)

References(18)

References

[1]	Luna R B,De Torres Olombrada M V. mARC preoperative rectal cancer treatments vs 3D conformal radiotherapy. A dose distribution comparative study[J]. PLos ONE,2019,14(8):1-16.
[2]	Hanna C R,Slevin F,Appelt A,et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for rectal cancer in the UK in 2020[J]. R Coll Radiol,2021,33(4):214-223. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.12.011
[3]	曹毛毛,陈万青. GLOBOCAN 2020全球癌症统计数据解读[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志,2021,13(3):63-69.
[4]	Keller D S,Berho M,Perez R O,et al. The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol,2020,17(7):414-429. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0275-y
[5]	Kane C,Glynne-Jones R. Controversy “Should we favour the use of 5×5 preoperative radiation in rectal cancer. ”[J]. Cancer Treat Rev,2019,81(9):101908.
[6]	Wo J Y,Anker C J,Ashman J B,et al. Radiation therapy for rectal cancer:Executive summary of an ASTRO clinical practice guideline[J]. Practical Radiation Oncology,2021,11(1):13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.08.004
[7]	梁惠,沈笑飞,周锐. 射线能量和均整特性对直肠癌容积旋转调强计划质量的影响[J]. 实用临床药物杂志,2017,21(13):95-99.
[8]	王宇,吴文,许敬辉,等. 脑胶质瘤共面、非共面容积旋转调强及螺旋断层放射治疗技术的剂量学比较研究[J]. 中国医学装备,2018,15(2):47-50. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2018.02.013
[9]	柏晗,陈飞虎,李文辉,等. Monaco与Pinnacle计划系统在宫颈癌容积旋转调强计划中的剂量比较及分析[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(6):654-658. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.06.007
[10]	Baglan K L,Frazier R C,Yan D,et al. The dose-volume relationship of acute small bowel toxicity from concurrent 5-FU-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy for rectal cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,52(1):176-183. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01820-X
[11]	Hale M F. Radiation enteritis:From diagnosis to management[J]. Curr Opin Gastroenterol,2020,36(3):208-214. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000632
[12]	Isohashi F,Yoshioka Y,Mabuchi S,et a1. Dose volume histogram predictors of chronic gastrointestinal complications afterradical hysterectomy and postoperative concurrent nedaplati”based chem. radiation therapy for early-stage cervical cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Bio1 Phys,2013,85(3):728-734. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.05.021
[13]	Klopp A H,Yeung A R,Deshmukh S,et al. Patient-reported toxicity during pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy:NRG oncology-RTOG12[J]. Clin Oncol,2018,36(24):2538-2544.
[14]	Rombouts A,Hugen N,van Beek J,et al. Does pelvic radiation in- crease rectal cancer incidence?A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Cancer Treat Rev,2018,68(7):136-144.
[15]	崔彦莉,王晓贞. 宫颈癌调强放疗不良反应物理性影响因素分析[J]. 河北医科大学学报,2017,38(11):1340-1344. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2017.11.024
[16]	荣玲,周获,戴立言,等. 膀胱及小肠受量对直肠癌术后放疗副反应的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2016,16(27):5313-5316.
[17]	曹午飞,黄晓延,孙文钊,等. 剂量分布验证中分辨率对Gamma通过率的影响[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2012,21(2):172-175. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2012.02.023
[18]	Miften M,Olch A,Mihailidis D,et al. Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA:Recommendations of AAPM Task Group No. 218[J]. Med Phys,2018,45(4):e53-e83. doi: 10.1002/mp.12810

Relative Articles(20)

Relative Articles

[1]	Yiyin QU, Siyuan ZHENG, Chunyu DAI, Yi ZHANG. Impact of Acute Non-normovolemic Hemodilution on Perioperative NK Cell, NKT cell and Th1/Th2 in Elderly Patients Undergoing Rectal Carcinoma Radical Resection. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(2): 128-133. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220225
[2]	Chang-xian CHEN, Li-ju ZHANG, Xiao-ming JIANG, Zhen-yong ZHANG, Wei-jun LIU. Advances in Treatment of Colorectal Neuroendocrine Tumors. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(12): 155-159. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20201242
[3]	Bai Lu Lu , Liao Rui , Li Ben Yan , Deng Rui . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(09): 38-44.
[4]	Zhao Xi Juan , Yang Ming Ying , He Yin , Qian Yang Feng , Tao Shi Qi , Zhang Jiang , Su Yan . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(03): 174-178.
[5]	Wang Ye Jing , Liu Huai Lei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2019, 40(08): 52-56.
[6]	Zhao Min , Zhang Qiang , Ma Yong Ci , Long Fei , Lin Yan Ping , Xu Xue Bin , Zhang Jin Ping . A Clinical Features Analysis of 1 000 Cases of Colorectal Cancer in Yunnan Tumor Hospital. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2018, 39(05): 90-93.
[7]	Feng Xu Dong , Yue Qi , Xiao Bin , Zhang Yong , Li Rong Qing . The Changes of the Volume and the CT Number of Parotid Gland to Replan during Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2018, 39(01): 55-58.
[8]	Yang Yi Fu , Wang Hua , Ma Jun , Luo Hai Bo , Yang Yan Long , Wang Ying Hua , Jiang Long , Zhang Yue . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2017, 38(02): 66-69.
[9]	Duan Bao Feng , Zhang Rui Zhi , Li Xiong Ju , Song Ping , Wen Wen , Du Rui , Zhang Li Li . Application of QCC in Reducing the Rate of Unplanned Extubation in the Department of Neurology with Indwelling Gastric Tube. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2017, 38(10): 141-144.
[10]	Zhao Fei , Jiang Yan Ling , Zhang Shou Xun , Xia Sheng , Bao Jian Jun , Zhang Nin , Yang Xiao Pei , Zhong Shu Rong . Pyrosequencing Detection Pass Ratio for DNA Methylation. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2017, 38(10): 27-31.
[11]	Lv Yan Ling . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[12]	Jiang Mei Ping . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[13]	Dan Ji Wen . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[14]	Sun Lan Xu . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[15]	Rui Qiao An . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[16]	Fang Chao . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[17]	Huang Qin . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[18]	Ai Yi Qin . Focal Nodular Hyperplasia of Liver:A Report of 12 Cases. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[19]	. Application of Artificially Amnion Membrane Rupture Combined with Oxytocin in Planned Delivery(A Report of 124 Cases). Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[20]	Wang Qing Hua . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,