Chaojie ZOU, Yikai TANG, Shuwen DU, Yuqi CHENG. Effects of Modulation of CDC42 Activity in Hippocampal Neurons on Memory and Anxiety Behaviors of Mice[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(11): 1-8. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221105
Citation: Wei WANG, Jing ZHANG, Yonghui ZHANG, Dengai DUAN, Xinju LIAO, Fang WANG, Jingling SONG. A Randomized Single Blind Study on the Improvement of Social Disability and Self-efficacy in Depressive Disorder by Solution Focused Group Therapy[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(7): 68-73. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220722

A Randomized Single Blind Study on the Improvement of Social Disability and Self-efficacy in Depressive Disorder by Solution Focused Group Therapy

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220722
  • Received Date: 2022-01-01
    Available Online: 2022-06-16
  • Publish Date: 2022-07-14
  •   Objective  To focus on the difference between solution focused group therapy (SFGT) combined with Escitalopram and only use Escitalopram in the treatment of depression group, and evaluate the efficacy of focus resolution short-course group psychotherapy (SFGT) combined with Escitalopram in the treatment of depressive disorders.   Methods  Eithty-four patients who met the diagnostic criteria of ICD-10 depression in Yunnan Psychiatric Hospital were randomly divided into combined treatment group (42 patients) and simple drug group (42 patients). The period of this treatment was 8 weeks. A total of 84 patients who met the diagnostic criteria of ICD-10 depressive disorder in our hospital were randomly divided into combination therapy group and single drug group for 8 weeks of treatment. The effect was evaluated by Social Disability Screening Schedule (SDSS) and Genera Self-efficacy Scale (GSES), and SPSS22.0 was used for statistical analysis.   Results  After 8 weeks of treatment, 18 cases fell from the two groups, including 8 cases from the combined treatment group and 10 cases from the control group. There was no difference in the subscales and total scores of SDSS and GSES between the two groups before treatment. The total scores and subscales scores of SDSS were lower than those in the control group at the 4th and 8th weeks of treatment (P < 0.05) . Compared with the control group, the GSES scores of the combined treatment group were higher than those of the control group at the 4th and 8th week in the course of treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).   Conclusions  Solution focused group therapy (SFGT) combined with Escitalopram is better than drug therapy alone in the treatment of depression. Solution focused group therapy (SFGT) combined with Ecitalopram is more effective than monotherapy for depressive disorders.
  • [1]
    李凌江, 马辛. 中国抑郁障碍防治指南(第2版)[M]. 北京: 中华医学电子音像出版社, 2015: 87-90.
    [2]
    Cipriani A,Furukawa T A,Salanti G,et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder:a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Lancet,2018,391(10128):1357-1366. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7
    [3]
    刘强,李洪超,马爱霞. 一线抗抑郁药临床疗效的网状Meta分析[J]. 中国药物评价,2016,2(33):106-110.
    [4]
    葛祥丽,李慧敬,崔明湖,等. 艾司西酞普兰联合奥氮平治疗抑郁症的效果及安全性的Meta分析[J]. 四川精神卫生,2019,6(32):523-530.
    [5]
    梁明明,李晓敏,曾超超. 焦点解决团体治疗的应用与展望[J]. 重庆医学,2017,9(46):3872-3874.
    [6]
    世界卫生组织. 疾病和有关健康问题的国际统计分类(ICD-10)[M]. 2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1997: 287.
    [7]
    刘联琦,周平,郝军锋,等. 精神分裂症抑郁症状的识别与诊断:四种抑郁量表的比较[J]. 神经疾病与精神卫生,2012,12(1):30-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6574.2012.01.010
    [8]
    张作记. 行为医学量表手册[M]. 北京: 中华医学电子音像出版社, 2005: 137-140, 187-188.
    [9]
    Sharry J. Solution focused group work[M]. London: Sage, 2001: 50-53.
    [10]
    王红椿,曾保春. 焦点解决短期咨询在团体咨询中的应用[J]. 惠州学院学报(社会科学版),2008,28(2):84-87.
    [11]
    戴艳,高翔,郑日昌. 焦点解决短期治疗(SFBT)的理论述评[J]. 心理科学,2004,27(6):1442-1445. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2004.06.043
    [12]
    殷鹏,齐金蕾,刘韫宁. 2005-2017年中国疾病负担研究报告[J]. 中国循环杂志,2019,12(258):1145-1154.
    [13]
    Smith K. Mental health:a world of depression[J]. Nature,2014,515(7526):181.
    [14]
    Yue qin Huang,Yu Wang,Hong Wang. Prevalence of mental disorders in China:A cross-sectional epidemiological study[J]. Lancet Psychiatry,2019,2(10):1-13.
    [15]
    Aminnasaba,Mohammadis,Zarein-Ezhadm. Effectiveness of solution-focused brief therapy on depression and perceived stress in patients with breast cancer[J]. Tanaffos,2018,17(4):272-279.
    [16]
    朱冬冬,李丽,杨永杰,等. 焦点解决治疗技术联合常规药物对青少年抑郁症患者的疗效[J]. 临床精神医学杂志,2021,31(4):291. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3220.2021.04.011
    [17]
    周勤,赵后锋,耿德勤,等. 焦点解决治疗技术联合常规药物与心理治疗对青少年重度抑郁症的效果研究[J]. 重庆医学,2021,16(50):2712-2720.
    [18]
    史可,张桂芹,柳韦华. 焦点解决团体治疗的研究进展[J]. 循证护理,2021,7(58):1034-1040.
  • Relative Articles

    [1] Yuanjia TAO, Yuqi CHENG, Hezhi YAN, Xiangyu SU, Xianyu CHEN, Hongyan JIANG. Study on Influencing Factors of Cognitive Impairment in Late-life Depression Patients. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(6): 94-99.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240612
    [2] Ningli ZHANG, Chen ZHOU, Yongyu SI, Jie OUYANG, Lan LIN, Ying CHEN, Qin NIU, Hong LI. Clinical Application of Esketamine Combined with Propofol in Painless Abortion. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(5): 102-106.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230514
    [3] Dongyang ZHANG, Zheng LI, Yahong WANG, Guangshun LIU, Yuhang QUAN, Xiang MA. Analysis of Subanesthetic Doses of Esketamine and Propofol in Three-dimensional Afterloading Treatment of Cervical Cancer. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(7): 113-118.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230721
    [4] Xiaopei LV, Shuai YUAN. The Effect of Butylphthalide on Cognitive Dysfunction after the Stroke Caused by Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Its Effect on Cerebral Blood Perfusion. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(9): 143-147.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230922
    [5] Xing LIU, Chunhong YU, Weixian LI, Bing OUYANG, Lingjun SHEN. A Randomized Controlled Study on the Treatment of Multidrugresistant Tuberculosis with a Regimen Containing Bedaquiline Fumarate Tablets. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(12): 150-158.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20231224
    [6] Ding Zhen Bo , Lu Ping , Huang Yong Kun , Zhao Ya Ling , Luo Yan , Duan Jing . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(03): 86-90.
    [7] Liu Chang , Shen Zong Lin , Cheng Yu Qi , Xu Xiu Feng . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2019, 40(10): 160-164.
    [8] Yang Jie , Yi Zhi Kai , Li Na . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2018, 39(09): 22-26.
    [9] Zhou Jian Ying , Chen Qi Gang , Gu Li Hua , Chen Xiao Xia , Cui Ting . Effects of Hand Function Brace Combined with Operation on Upper Limb and Hand Dysfunction after Stroke. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2017, 38(08): 110-112.
    [10] Li Ming . Curative Effect of Computer Assisted Cognitive Rehabilitation System for Cognitive Impairment after Stroke. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [11] Tang Ling Ling . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [12] Li Hong Fei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [13] Wang Ji Cai . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [14] Wei La Mei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [15] Tan Yun Ling . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [16] Huang Xiao Lan . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [17] Huang Jing Qiong . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [18] Cai Ying . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [19] Wang Hui Ming . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [20] Wang Ji Cai . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 庞亚倩,张凯,冯大军. 三维有限元法在口腔医学应用中的研究进展. 河北医科大学学报. 2021(01): 121-124 .
    2. 张莉,岳万远,杨鹴,张善勇. 正畸前患者颞下颌关节结构异常175例分析. 昆明医科大学学报. 2021(04): 57-60 . 本站查看
    3. 张莉,岳梨蓉,王睿,陈涌,岳万远,丁昱. 磁共振成像在无髁突骨折的颞颌关节即刻损伤中的诊断价值. 昆明医科大学学报. 2021(12): 106-111 . 本站查看
    4. 黄君杰,徐帅,季艳丹,张纲,谭颖徽. 人下颌角撞击伤造成颞下颌关节间接损伤的有限元模拟及生物力学分析. 第三军医大学学报. 2020(15): 1511-1518 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 26.3 %FULLTEXT: 26.3 %META: 73.5 %META: 73.5 %PDF: 0.2 %PDF: 0.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.2 %其他: 5.2 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %China: 4.4 %China: 4.4 %Falkenstein: 0.1 %Falkenstein: 0.1 %Westbury: 0.0 %Westbury: 0.0 %上海: 10.3 %上海: 10.3 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %丽水: 0.0 %丽水: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %保山: 0.0 %保山: 0.0 %信阳: 0.0 %信阳: 0.0 %六安: 0.0 %六安: 0.0 %北京: 26.5 %北京: 26.5 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 0.0 %南京: 0.0 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南阳: 0.0 %南阳: 0.0 %博阿努瓦: 0.1 %博阿努瓦: 0.1 %合肥: 0.0 %合肥: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %圣安东尼奥: 0.0 %圣安东尼奥: 0.0 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 0.2 %天津: 0.2 %宁德: 0.0 %宁德: 0.0 %安德拉: 0.0 %安德拉: 0.0 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %密蘇里城: 0.1 %密蘇里城: 0.1 %常州: 0.0 %常州: 0.0 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %张家口: 0.3 %张家口: 0.3 %德里: 0.0 %德里: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %揭阳: 0.0 %揭阳: 0.0 %新乡: 0.0 %新乡: 0.0 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋中: 0.0 %晋中: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %杭州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.0 %沈阳: 0.0 %泰州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %浦项: 0.0 %浦项: 0.0 %海得拉巴: 0.0 %海得拉巴: 0.0 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.3 %漯河: 0.3 %白银: 0.0 %白银: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %红河: 0.0 %红河: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 1.8 %芒廷维尤: 1.8 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %西宁: 3.2 %西宁: 3.2 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %重庆: 0.0 %重庆: 0.0 %金奈: 0.0 %金奈: 0.0 %锦州: 0.0 %锦州: 0.0 %长沙: 0.2 %长沙: 0.2 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %青岛: 0.0 %青岛: 0.0 %马尼拉: 0.1 %马尼拉: 0.1 %驻马店: 43.0 %驻马店: 43.0 %其他其他ChinaFalkensteinWestbury上海东莞丽水九江保定保山信阳六安北京十堰南京南宁南昌南阳博阿努瓦合肥呼和浩特嘉兴圣安东尼奥大连天津宁德安德拉宣城密蘇里城常州广州张家口德里惠州扬州揭阳新乡无锡昆明晋中朝阳杭州格兰特县武汉沈阳泰州洛阳济南浦项海得拉巴深圳温州湖州漯河白银石家庄福州红河芒廷维尤芝加哥西宁西安诺沃克贵阳赤峰运城邯郸郑州重庆金奈锦州长沙长治青岛马尼拉驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2216) PDF downloads(32) Cited by(6)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return