Volume 43 Issue 12
Dec.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Relative Articles
Article Navigation >  Journal of Kunming Medical University  > 2022  >  43(12): 142-146
Li ZHANG, Yuting WANG, Jianing SHI, Dan YU, Renhua YANG, Zhiqiang SHEN, Jiang LONG, Peng CHEN. Network Pharmacology-based Analysis of the Anti-atherosclerosis Mechanism of Scutellarin and Experimental Validation in Vivo[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(8): 17-27. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220804
Citation: Xiansong LU, Dongyan GUO, Fei QIAO. Comparison of Analgesic Level of Ultrasound-guided Paravertebral，Erector Spinae and Serratus Anterior Plane Blocks in Thoracic Surgery[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(12): 142-146. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221226
shu

Comparison of Analgesic Level of Ultrasound-guided Paravertebral，Erector Spinae and Serratus Anterior Plane Blocks in Thoracic Surgery

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221226

  • Dept. of Anesthesia，The 1st School of Clinical Medicine，Kunming Medical University，Kunming Yunnan 650032，China

  • Received Date: 2022-03-17
    Available Online: 2022-11-24
  • Publish Date: 2022-12-25
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To compare the difference of cutaneous nociceptive block plane of three commonly used nerve blocks （thoracic paravertebral block, erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block） in thoracic surgery, and to identify the optimal nerve block combined with postoperative analgesia for thoracic surgery patients.   Methods  A total of 75 thoracic patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgery in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into three groups: Thoracic paravertebral nerve block group （T group）, erector spinae plane block group （E group） and serratus anterior plane block group （S group）. Group T: local anesthesia was injected into T7 paravertebral space; Group E: local anesthesia was injected into the fascia layer between the lateral erector spinae muscle and the intercostal muscle of the transverse process of T6 and T7. Group S: local anesthesia was injected into the fascial spaces of the latissimus dorsi and serratus anterior at ribs 6 and 7 in the posterior axillary line. All patients in the three groups were injected with 0.5% ropivacaine hydrochloride （15±3） mL under the guidance of ultrasound to ensure the correct position of the needle tip. After 20 minutes of local anesthetic injection, the anesthetic block effect and plane were measured by needle pricking.   Results  The block plane of the chest wall （midclavicular line and anterior axillary line） in group T was more extensive than that in group E and group S, the mean values of T group were 12.04 （P < 0.05）, 9.76 （P < 0.05）; while the block range of the thoracic wall （midaxillary line and posterior axillary line） in group S was more extensive, the mean values of S group were 9.8 （P < 0.05）, 10.48 （P < 0.05）.   Conclusion  For patients undergoing thoracic surgery, especially thoracoscopic surgery, it is more reasonable to use thoracic paravertebral nerve block as an auxiliary method for intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Serratus anterior plane block may be more suitable for breast surgery.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(15)
  • [1]
    袁青,崔旭蕾,徐仲煌,等. 超声引导下躯干阻滞的临床应用进展[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志,2017,33(10):1029-1032. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5805.2017.10.024
    [2]
    Kim D H,Oh Y J,Lee J G,et al. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided serratus plane block on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery:A randomized,triple-blind,placebo-controlled study[J]. Anesthesia and Analgesia:Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society,2018,126(4):1353-1361.
    [3]
    Blanco R,Parras T,McDonnell J G,et al. Serratus plane block:A novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block[J]. Anaesthesia,2013,68(11):1107-1113.
    [4]
    费莉,杨建兵. 超声可视下前锯肌平面阻滞在胸腔镜手术镇痛中的应用[J]. 中国医学杂志,2021,23(2):271-274.
    [5]
    张隆盛,张楷弘,杨铎,等. 老年胸腔镜术后连续前锯肌平面阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞镇痛效果比较[J]. 实用医学杂志,2021,37(5):654-659. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.05.019
    [6]
    刘福海,申东方. 胸神经阻滞、竖脊肌平面阻滞对乳腺癌患者术后疼痛程度及术后康复指标的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2022,7(5):91-93. doi: 10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.202205027
    [7]
    涂光洁,吴志林,王洁,等. 超声引导下T5椎旁神经阻滞联合竖脊肌平面阻滞应用于胸腔镜下肺叶切除术中的效果[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2020,41(11):1039-1042. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321761-20191218-00145
    [8]
    郑子豪,程静,张中军. 超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞用于单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术的镇痛效果比较[J]. 广东医学,2020,41(16):1698-1701. doi: 10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.20193556
    [9]
    单涛,谢红,张勇,等. 超声引导下小剂量局麻药外周神经阻滞现状[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志,2017,33(8):822-824. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5805.2017.08.024
    [10]
    Richardson J,Jones J,Atkinson R. The effect of thoracic paravertebral blockade on intercostal somatosensory evoked potentials[J]. Anesth Analg,1998,87(2):373-376.
    [11]
    张竞雄,杨涛,龙彦笑,等. 超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞在胸椎手术镇痛中的应用[J]. 广东医学,2020,41(24):2554-2558. doi: 10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.20201261
    [12]
    崔杰,杨立荣,张俊伟,等. 超声引导下椎旁阻滞和前锯肌平面阻滞用于肋骨骨折术后镇痛效果的观察[J]. 当代医学,2020,26(13):22-24.
    [13]
    王娇,许敏,杨静. 超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞临床应用及研究进展[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2020,41(3):278-284.
    [14]
    曾晓平,施宏,吴玮,等. 超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞的研究进展[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志,2021,37(9):991-993.
    [15]
    陈韦东,谭炜浩,钟锦涛,等. 胸椎旁阻滞技术的研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志,2021,39(1):111-114.
    • Relative Articles(20)

  • Relative Articles

    [1] Lizi ZHANG, Xinping YANG, Guangguang FANG. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2025, 46(3): 1-11.
    [2] Yunli YANG, Na LI, Changming QIU, Junjie PU, Wei NIE, Zhigui LI. Effect of Ultrasound-guided Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Patient Undergoing Hip Surgery. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(4): 88-92.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230426
    [3] Yunrui GUO, Hao YANG, Yecai ZHANG, Guoyun ZHANG, Decai WANG, Shulan JIAO, Ningli ZHANG, Chen ZHOU. Effect of Abdominal Regional Block Combined with Intravenous Analgesia on Postoperative Complications In Elderly Patients. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(12): 117-124.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221222
    [4] Wang Xing Yao , Qian Jin Qiao . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(08): 46-51.
    [5] Zhou Yin Yan , Zhang Yu , Bai Wen Ya , Shen Yan Juan , Shao Jian Lin , Zhao Guo Liang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(07): 64-70.
    [6] Wang Jiong , Zhang Xian Zheng . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2019, 40(09): 114-119.
    [7] Zhang Xi Li , Meng Wen , Li Qing Ye , Wang Guo Liang , Li Yan Lin , Zhang Xiao Mei . Prevention of Postherpetic Neuralgia by Nerve Block and Analysis of Risk Factors. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2017, 38(09): 96-99.
    [8] Sun Ying Lun , Yang Yong , Ma Zhen Huan , Yang Guo Kai , Wan Jia , Li Guo Jian . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2017, 38(03): 59-63.
    [9] Qiao Fei , Wang Jun, Zhan Xi , Yang Wen Yan . Clinical Application of Ultrasound-guided Paravertebral Nerve Block in Analgesia after Thoracotomy. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2017, 38(06): 87-91.
    [10] Pang Jia Ning , Liu Jing Song , Li Xi , Wang Li Zhu , Zhang Xi Hua . Early Analgesic Effect of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2016, 37(11): 64-69.
    [11] Kang Qing Le , Li Ya Ping . Clinical Application of Scalp Nerve Block Combined with Sevoflurane in Craniotomy. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2016, 37(12): 72-75.
    [12] Li Yi Lin . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [13] Chen Yong Lun . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [14] Li Ming . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [15] Yang Mei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [16] Liu Zai Qiang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [17] Bi Xiao Fang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [18] . A Comparison of Single and Double Injection Techniques for Axillary Brachial Plexus Block. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [19] . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [20] Shao Ju Wei . Comparison of Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Agitation and Delirium between Sevoflurane and Isoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 黄飞，祝丹，陈启兰. 基于数据挖掘和网络药理学分析国家专利复方治疗动脉粥样硬化的作用机制. 中国中医药图书情报杂志. 2023(06): 37-44 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04020406080100
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 38.4 %FULLTEXT: 38.4 %META: 61.4 %META: 61.4 %PDF: 0.2 %PDF: 0.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.3 %其他: 4.3 %其他: 0.0 %其他: 0.0 %China: 4.6 %China: 4.6 %Rochester: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.0 %Seattle: 0.0 %Seattle: 0.0 %上海: 10.4 %上海: 10.4 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %丽水: 0.0 %丽水: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %凉山: 0.0 %凉山: 0.0 %北京: 16.9 %北京: 16.9 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南昌: 0.0 %南昌: 0.0 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %博阿努瓦: 0.0 %博阿努瓦: 0.0 %台北: 0.0 %台北: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %合肥: 0.0 %合肥: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %天津: 0.2 %天津: 0.2 %太原: 0.0 %太原: 0.0 %安那罕: 0.1 %安那罕: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %张家口: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %悉尼: 0.1 %悉尼: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %拉斯维加斯: 0.0 %拉斯维加斯: 0.0 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %晋城: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %杭州: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.0 %格兰特县: 0.0 %武汉: 0.0 %武汉: 0.0 %沈阳: 0.0 %沈阳: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %海得拉巴: 0.1 %海得拉巴: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %深圳: 0.0 %深圳: 0.0 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %滨州: 0.0 %滨州: 0.0 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %珠海: 0.0 %珠海: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %纽约: 0.0 %纽约: 0.0 %绥化: 0.0 %绥化: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 3.3 %芒廷维尤: 3.3 %芝加哥: 0.0 %芝加哥: 0.0 %茂名: 0.0 %茂名: 0.0 %衢州: 0.0 %衢州: 0.0 %西宁: 1.2 %西宁: 1.2 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.0 %郑州: 0.0 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %马赛: 0.0 %马赛: 0.0 %驻马店: 54.4 %驻马店: 54.4 %其他其他ChinaRochesterSeattle上海东莞丽水保定凉山北京十堰南京南昌南通博阿努瓦台北台州合肥呼和浩特咸阳嘉兴天津太原安那罕宣城常州广州张家口悉尼成都扬州拉斯维加斯昆明晋城杭州格兰特县武汉沈阳洛阳海得拉巴淄博深圳温州湖州滨州漯河珠海石家庄秦皇岛纽约绥化芒廷维尤芝加哥茂名衢州西宁西安诺沃克贵阳赤峰运城邯郸郑州长沙青岛马赛驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(4)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2904) PDF downloads(13) Cited by(4)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © 《昆明医科大学学报》编辑部  滇ICP备00000000号-0

    Publishing: 昆明医科大学学报编辑部

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return