Jiadai TANG, Jing YANG, Hongli SONG, Jiaojiao CHEN, Zhonghui MIAO, Lin XIE. Correlation of Metastatic and Prognostic Factors in 318 Cases of Primary Gastric Cancer[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(2): 75-87. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230218
Citation: Qiang WANG, Dexing YANG, Weiyu ZHOU, Jiefu TANG, Kai FU, Zhenfang WANG, Shengzhe LIU, Min LI, Ying LUAN, Rong LIU. Analysis of Prognostic Risk Factors in Patients with Septic Shock Based on Circulatory and Cellular Immune Response Indicators[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(7): 78-87. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230716

Analysis of Prognostic Risk Factors in Patients with Septic Shock Based on Circulatory and Cellular Immune Response Indicators

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230716
  • Received Date: 2023-05-11
    Available Online: 2023-07-17
  • Publish Date: 2023-07-25
  •   Objective  To investigate the prognostic risk factors of patients with septic shock based on circulatory and cellular immune effects, to accurately regulate the noradrenaline dose, alleviate immune function suppression, and improve the success rate of septic shock treatment.   Methods  This is an observational, retrospective, cohort study. According to the inclusion and exculusion criteria, 160 patients with septic shock treated in ICU of the first affiliated hospital of Kunming medical university from May 2021 to December 2022 were collected, and all of them were given standard cluster treatment. At the same time, according to 28d survival outcome in patients with septic shock was divided into death group (n = 89) and survival group (n = 71), statistics of two groups of patients admitted to the hospital within 24h baseline data, test indicators, the weighted average dose of noradrenaline, blood gas index, microcirculation index, cellular immunity and early treatment of clinical data in 72h. Meaningful indicators were identified by single-factor analysis, and a multivariate COX proportional risk regression model was applied to screen out independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with septic shock.   Results  Multivariate COX regression model analysis results showed that: age (HR = 1.05, 95%CI: 1.09~1.12, P = 0.036), nutritional mode (HR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.56~0.90, P = 0.037), the weighted average dose of norepinephrine (HR = 6.21, 95%CI: 4.09~9.43, P < 0.001), IL-6 (HR = 1.16, 95%CI: 1.09~1.31, P = 0.012), absolute value of T lymphocytes (HR = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.24~0.91, P = 0.025), mHLA-DR (HR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.28~0.75, P = 0.002).Six factors were independent risk factors affecting the outcome of patients with septic shock to visualize the forest plots presented.   Conclusions  The age, the weighted average dose of norepinephrine and IL-6 are the dangerous factors affecting the prognosis of patients with septic shock. The hazard ratio is greater than 1. Nutrition, T-lymphocyte absolute value and mHLA-DR are the protection factors affecting the prognosis of patients with septic shock. The hazard ratio is less than 1.
  • [1]
    Napolitano L M. Sepsis 2018:Definitions and guideline changes[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt),2018,19(2):117-125. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.278
    [2]
    Uhel F,van der Poll T. Norepinephrine in septic shock: A mixed blessing[J]. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,2020,202(6):788-789. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2301ED
    [3]
    中国医师协会急诊医师分会,中国研究型医院学会休克与脓毒症专业委员会. 中国脓毒症/脓毒性休克急诊治疗指南(2018)[J]. 中国急救医学,2018,38(9):741-756. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1949.2018.09.001
    [4]
    Riley R D,Ensor J,Snell K I E,et al. Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model[J]. BMJ,2020,368(18):m441.
    [5]
    Rhodes A,Evans L E,Alhazzani W,et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016[J]. Intensive Care Med,2017,43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6
    [6]
    Evans L,Rhodes A,Alhazzani W,et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021[J]. Intensive Care Med,2021,47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y
    [7]
    Stolk R,Kox M,Pickkers P. Noradrenaline drives immunosuppression in sepsis: Clinical consequences[J]. Intensive Care Medicine,2020,46(6):1246-1248.
    [8]
    纪美玲,彭易根,杨宝成,等. 年龄对乳酸清除率预测脓毒性休克患者预后价值的影响[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2020,41(4):335-339.
    [9]
    Michels E H A,Butler J M,Reijnders T D Y,et al. Association between age and the host response in critically ill patients with sepsis[J]. Crit Care,2022,26(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04266-9
    [10]
    Basodan N,Al Mehmadi A E,Aldawood S M,et al. Septic shock: Management and outcomes[J]. Cureus,2022,14(12):e32158. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32158
    [11]
    Van Niekerk G,Meaker C,Engelbrecht A M. Nutritional support in sepsis: when less may be more[J]. Crit Care,2020,24(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2771-4
    [12]
    Kott M,Hartl W H,Elke G. Enteral vs. parenteral nutrition in septic shock: are they equivalent?[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care,2019,25(4):340-348. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000618
    [13]
    Ridley E J,Lambell K. Nutrition before,during and after critical illness[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care,2022,28(4):395-400. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000961
    [14]
    Lambell K J,Tatucu-Babet O A,Chapple L A,et al. Nutrition therapy in critical illness:A review of the literature for clinicians[J]. Crit Care,2020,24(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2739-4
    [15]
    Hamzaoui O,Scheeren T W L,Teboul J L. Norepinephrine in septic shock: when and how much?[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care,2017,23(4):342-347.
    [16]
    Auchet T,Regnier M A,Girerd N,etal. Outcome of patients with septic shock and high-dose vasopressor therapy[J]. Ann Intensive Care,2017,7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0261-x
    [17]
    范文婧,陈贵梅,苑俊,等. 去甲肾上腺素对于脓毒症/脓毒性休克患者预后的评估价值[J]. 安徽医科大学学报,2020,55(12):1950-1954.
    [18]
    Yamamura H,Kawazoe Y,Miyamoto K,et al. Effect of norepinephrine dosage on mortality in patients with septic shock[J]. Journal of Intensive Care,2018,6:12. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0280-1
    [19]
    Domizi R,Calcinaro S,Harris S,et al. Relationship between norepinephrine dose,tachycardia and outcome in septic shock: A multicentre evaluation[J]. J Crit Care,2020,57(1):185-190.
    [20]
    中国医药教育协会感染疾病专业委员会. 感染相关生物标志物临床意义解读专家共识[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2017,40(4):243-257.
    [21]
    穆艳平,杨长君,李霞. 外周血白细胞介素-6降钙素原水平对脓毒症及脓毒性休克患者预后的评估价值[J]. 实用医技杂志,2022,29(5):536-538.
    [22]
    赵琨,杨德兴,蒋国云,等. 细胞因子在诊断感染性疾病及其严重程度中的价值[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2020,41(10):101-107.
    [23]
    Thao P T N,Tra T T,Son N T,et al. Reduction in the IL-6 level at 24 h after admission to the intensive care unit is a survival predictor for Vietnamese patients with sepsis and septic shock: a prospective study[J]. BMC Emerg Med,2018,18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0191-4
    [24]
    Song J,Park D W,Moon S,et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of interleukin-6,pentraxin 3,and procalcitonin levels among sepsis and septic shock patients: a prospective controlled study according to the Sepsis-3 definitions[J]. BMC Infect Dis,2019,19(1):968. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4618-7
    [25]
    陈涛,臧彬. 脓毒症及脓毒性休克患者T淋巴细胞亚群变化研究[J]. 临床军医杂志,2017,45(1):46-48.
    [26]
    张思也,侯粲,钟燕军,等. 脓毒症T淋巴细胞亚群免疫监测的研究进展[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志,2021,07(1):48-54.
    [27]
    Liu J,Li S,Liu J,et al. Longitudinal characteristics of lymphocyteresponses and cytokine profiles in the peripheral blood of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients[J]. EBio Medicine,2020,55(5):102763.
    [28]
    Li Q,Yan W,Liu S,et al. Study on the correlation and clinical significance of T-lymphocyte Subsets,IL-6 and PCT in the severity of patients with sepsis[J]. Pak J Med Sci,2023,39(1):227-231.
    [29]
    Bourgoin P,Taspinar R,Gossez M,et al. Toward monocyte HLA-DR bedside monitoring: A proof-of-concept study[J]. Shock,2021,55(6):782-789. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001673
    [30]
    Bodinier M,Peronnet E,Brengel-Pesce K,et al. Monocyte trajectories endotypes are associated with worsening in septic patients[J]. Front Immunol,2021,12:795052. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.795052
    [31]
    Quadrini K J,Patti-Diaz L,Maghsoudlou J,et al. A flow cytometric assay for HLA-DR expression on monocytes validated as a biomarker for enrollment in sepsis clinical trials[J]. Cytometry B Clin Cytom,2021,100(1):103-114. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21987
    [32]
    Sanju S,Jain P,Priya V V,et al. Quantitation of mHLA-DR and nCD64 by flow cytometry to study dysregulated host Response: The use of quantiBRITE™ PE beads and Its stability[J]. Appl Biochem Biotechnol,2022,11(1):1-6.
    [33]
    Leijte G P,Rimmelé T,Kox M,et al. Monocytic HLA-DR expression kinetics in septic shock patients with different pathogens,sites of infection and adverse outcomes[J]. Crit Care,2020,24(1):110.
    [34]
    陈建平,李小悦,傅明. 脓毒症免疫抑制机制及免疫调理治疗新进展[J]. 医学综述,2021,27(13):2600-2605.
    [35]
    Pei F,Yao R Q,Ren C,etal. Expert consensus on the monitoring and treatment of sepsis-induced immunosuppression[J]. Mil Med Res,2022,9(1):74.
  • Relative Articles

    [1] Congxin LI, Haidong YUE, Pengxi ZHU, Guangxian HUANG, Lingjie MU, Yanan PENG, Yijie WANG, Yang YANG. Correlation Analysis between Different Vitamin D3 Levels and Immune Inflammatory Indicators in Elderly Patients with Sepsis. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2025, 46(2): 51-58.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20250208
    [2] Qi NIE, Li LIU, Yue TIAN, Xiaoyan MAO, Qulian GUO, Xin TIAN. Abnormal Clinical Features and Prognosis of ACTH in Pediatric Acute B Lymphocytic Leukemia. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(10): 75-84.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20241012
    [3] Haijin LI, Huiyuan LI, Xinmiao LIU, Yue TIAN, Na LI, Zhengcheng DUAN, Xin TIAN. Clinical Features and Prognosiss of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with Hyperleukocytosis. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(7): 105-112.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240716
    [4] Shuaiqiang WANG, Kejin TONG, Shuofeng ZHANG. Effect of Compound Probiotic Powder on Immune Function of Mice. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(10): 29-35.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20241005
    [5] Ting GAO, Sheng HUANG, Rong GUO, Dedian CHEN. Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Mucinous Breast Carcinoma. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(3): 54-60.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230306
    [6] Xiaoxue LIU, Meiju LI, Jing XIA. Value of Inferior Vena Cava Respiratory Variation in Assessing Volume Responsiveness in Patients with Septic Shock. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(8): 95-99.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230816
    [7] Jiefu TANG, Dexing YANG, Shengzhe LIU, Qiang WANG, Kai FU, Zhenfang WANG, Ying LUAN, Min LI, Rong LIU. A Study on Prognostic Value of Cellular Immunological Indicators in Omicron Variant Infected Elderly Severe Patients. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(12): 87-94.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20231214
    [8] Yan-hong LIU, Xiang-yue ZHAO, Qing-xin XIE, Meng-di PU, Wei-dong LU. Influence of DC-Chol Cationic Liposome Adjuvant on the Immune Effect of Tetravalent Influenza Vaccine. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(3): 1-4.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210302
    [9] Yu WU, De-xing YANG, Hong WANG, Qiang WANG, Wei-yu ZHOU, Jie-fu TANG, Zhen-fang YANG, Kai FU, Rong LIU. The Relationship between Arterial and Venous Blood Lactic Acid in Early Stage of Septic Shock and Prognostic Value of Lactate and Lactate Clearance Rate. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(9): 83-89.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210927
    [10] Wu Qi Yan , Bian Ge Yuan , Cheng Hui Jun, Li Jiao Xia , Wang Shu Ting , Huang Zhao Lue . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(09): 32-37.
    [11] Fan Yu Chao , Fu Wei , Pu Meng Di , Zhao Xiang Yue , Lu Wei Dong . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2019, 40(05): 14-17.
    [12] Zhao Xiao Li , Tang Shu Rong , Wang Si Chen , Qian Jing , Ren Bao Jun , Zeng Wen , Hu Da Chun . Changes of Cellular Immune Function in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients with Infection. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2019, 40(03): 49-52.
    [13] Zhang Kai Lu , Li Bing , Zhang Yu , Zhu Li Fen . An Application of Norepinephrine in Renal Transplantation Guided by Hemodynamic Monitoring. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2018, 39(08): 93-98.
    [14] Feng Zi Hao . Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Operation Combined with Dexamethasone Cavity Flushing in Endometriosis. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [15] Wang Xiao . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [16] Yang De Xing . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [17] Jiang Chao Wu . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [18] Jiang Chao Wu . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [19] Cun Xin Hua . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [20] . Long-term Prognosis and Vaginal Cellular Immunity Changes of Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis after Combined Treatments. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 王帝,宋展,孙万日. 胃癌中THBS2 mRNA表达水平与预后及免疫细胞浸润的相关性研究. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报. 2025(03): 234-238 .
    2. 张艺博,张慧中,付京,阮意丹,姚爱娜,张萍芝,尹兴斌,曲昌海,倪健,董晓旭. 重楼总皂苷的现代研究进展与展望. 中国实验方剂学杂志. 2024(01): 232-243 .
    3. 陈鑫如,韩瑞,徐锦程. 基于生物信息学分析纤维蛋白1在舌癌中的表达及临床意义. 中华全科医学. 2024(08): 1317-1320+1343 .
    4. 黄德峰,郭熔哲,张国耀. 白蛋白与碱性磷酸酶比值变化对晚期胃癌患者化疗效果及生存的评估作用. 实用癌症杂志. 2024(10): 1707-1710 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • 加载中
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 34.5 %FULLTEXT: 34.5 %META: 65.3 %META: 65.3 %PDF: 0.3 %PDF: 0.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.3 %其他: 4.3 %其他: 0.0 %其他: 0.0 %Central District: 0.0 %Central District: 0.0 %China: 4.4 %China: 4.4 %Falkenstein: 0.1 %Falkenstein: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.0 %上海: 12.4 %上海: 12.4 %东营: 0.0 %东营: 0.0 %伊瓜苏: 0.0 %伊瓜苏: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %内华达: 0.0 %内华达: 0.0 %北京: 16.4 %北京: 16.4 %南京: 0.2 %南京: 0.2 %南宁: 0.0 %南宁: 0.0 %南昌: 0.0 %南昌: 0.0 %南通: 0.0 %南通: 0.0 %博阿努瓦: 0.0 %博阿努瓦: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %哈尔滨: 0.0 %哈尔滨: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %安那罕: 0.0 %安那罕: 0.0 %宣城: 0.0 %宣城: 0.0 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常德: 0.0 %常德: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %张家口: 0.2 %张家口: 0.2 %徐州: 0.0 %徐州: 0.0 %成都: 0.0 %成都: 0.0 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %晋城: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %杭州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %汕头: 0.0 %汕头: 0.0 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %泰州: 0.0 %泰州: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.0 %济南: 0.0 %深圳: 0.0 %深圳: 0.0 %漯河: 0.3 %漯河: 0.3 %濮阳: 0.0 %濮阳: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %红河: 0.0 %红河: 0.0 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 1.7 %芒廷维尤: 1.7 %芝加哥: 0.0 %芝加哥: 0.0 %苏州: 0.0 %苏州: 0.0 %荆州: 0.0 %荆州: 0.0 %蚌埠: 0.0 %蚌埠: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %西宁: 1.1 %西宁: 1.1 %西安: 0.0 %西安: 0.0 %西雅图: 0.0 %西雅图: 0.0 %诺沃克: 0.0 %诺沃克: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %费利蒙: 0.0 %费利蒙: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.1 %赤峰: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %重庆: 0.0 %重庆: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %镇江: 0.0 %镇江: 0.0 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %驻马店: 55.0 %驻马店: 55.0 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaFalkensteinRochester上海东营伊瓜苏保定兰州内华达北京南京南宁南昌南通博阿努瓦台州呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨哥伦布天津安那罕宣城常州常德广州廊坊张家口徐州成都扬州无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉汕头沈阳泰州洛阳济南深圳漯河濮阳石家庄红河绍兴芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州蚌埠衡阳西宁西安西雅图诺沃克贵阳费利蒙赤峰运城邯郸郑州重庆金华银川镇江长沙青岛驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2681) PDF downloads(17) Cited by(4)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return