Mu Yun Zhen , Wu Xi Nan , Zhang Ai , Lin Hua , Wu Hui Xin , Xiong Qing . “The Window Effect” of 1800 MHz Electromagnetic Radiation on Oxidative Stress in Skin of SD Rats[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2018, 39(06): 22-25.
Citation: Dongyang ZHANG, Zheng LI, Yahong WANG, Guangshun LIU, Yuhang QUAN, Xiang MA. Analysis of Subanesthetic Doses of Esketamine and Propofol in Three-dimensional Afterloading Treatment of Cervical Cancer[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(7): 113-118. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230721

Analysis of Subanesthetic Doses of Esketamine and Propofol in Three-dimensional Afterloading Treatment of Cervical Cancer

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230721
  • Received Date: 2023-04-17
  • Publish Date: 2023-07-25
  •   Objective   To investigate the effects of combined subanesthetic doses of esketamine and propofol anesthesia in three-dimensional after loading treatment of cervical cancer.   Methods   One hundred patients who received three-dimensional afterloading treatment for cervical cancer in our hospital between February 2022 and January 2023 were randomly divided into two groups, with 50 cases in each group. Patients in the control S group received Sulfentany combined with propofol for anesthesia, while those in the experimental E group received esketamine together with propofol. The duration of surgery, wake-up time, the incidence of intraoperative respiratory adverse events, the incidence of postoperative adverse events, changes in vital signs at the same time point, and a self-reported satisfaction survey were recorded for both groups of patients.   Results   There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of operation time and wake-up time (P > 0.05). The effects of anesthetic and time on heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and oxygen saturation (SpO 2) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. It was found that HR was higher in the E group than in the S group (F = 12.353, P = 0.001), and the HR differed significantly at different times (F = 6.637, P = 0.002). The MAP was also significantly higher in the E group compared with the S group (F = 11.245, P = 0.001), and also differed at different times (F = 17.023, P < 0.001), although there were no interactive effects between group and time ( F = 1.861, P = 0.159). Both group and time were observed to affect the SpO2, which was higher in the E group than in the S group (F = 4.960, P = 0.027) and also differed significantly at different times (F = 183.045, P < 0.001), although no interactive effects between group and time were observed ( F = 0.054, P = 0.947). No significant differences in the visual analog scale (VAS) scores were found between the two groups at different time points (P > 0.05), and both anesthesia methods had good analgesic effects. In terms of intraoperative adverse events, the incidence of hypotension (MAP ≤65 mmHg) or a decrease in blood pressure of ≥20% and requirements for vasoactive drug administration during surgery were lower in the E group than in the S group ( P < 0.05), while the incidence of psychiatric symptoms was higher in the E group than in the S group ( P < 0.05). As shown by the self-reported anesthesia satisfaction survey, all 100 patients were satisfied with the anesthesia, with no significant difference in the satisfaction rates between the two groups ( P > 0.05).   Conclusions   The combination of subanesthetic doses of esketamine and propofol anesthesia in the three-dimensional after loading treatment of cervical cancer resulted in stable hemodynamics, good analgesic effect, and patient satisfaction. However, the incidence of postoperative psychiatric symptoms was higher compared to the control group.
  • [1]
    Zheng R,Zhang S,Zeng H,et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China,2016[J]. Journal of the National Cancer Center,2022,2(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.02.002
    [2]
    贾怡童,罗芳. “舒适化医疗”的发展与医学伦理学的关系[J]. 医学与哲学(B),2017,38(5):86-88.
    [3]
    贾涛,滕金亮. 新型麻醉镇痛药: 艾司氯胺酮[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学,2022,27(7):834-840.
    [4]
    周辉,王东雁,罗铭,等. 《FIGO 2021 妇癌报告》——子宫颈癌指南解读[J]. 中国使用妇科与产科杂志,2022,38(5):538-544.
    [5]
    Jonkman K,van Rijnsoever E,Olofsen E,et al. Esketamine counters opioid-induced respiratory depression[J]. Br J Anaesth,2018,120(5):1117-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.021
    [6]
    Lei C,Huang M,Li N,et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with intracavitary brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer with uterus didelphys[J]. Gynecol Oncol Rep,2021,36:100724. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100724
    [7]
    张维帅,高玉华,卢庆刚,等. 全身麻醉与局部麻醉在局部晚期宫颈癌腔内联合组织间插植放疗中剂量比较[J]. 临床军医杂志,2022,50(4):430-433.
    [8]
    袁静静,陈书涵,谢艳乐,等. 亚麻醉剂量艾司氯胺酮对胸腔镜手术后阿片类药物镇痛消耗量的影响[J]. 中华医学杂志,2022,102(15):1108-1113.
    [9]
    万幸,杨青青,樊迪,等. 亚麻醉剂量艾司氯胺酮复合丙泊酚应用于无痛胃肠镜检查的效果[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志,2022,38(2):144-148.
    [10]
    Eberl S,Koers L,van Hooft J E,et al. Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials,2017,18(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2197-8
    [11]
    钱夏丽,夏凡,沈晓凤,等. 艾司氯胺酮复合丙泊酚在宫腔镜检查术中的应用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志,2021,37(7):706-708.
    [12]
    陈晓红,李萌萌,解群. 右旋氯胺酮的药理学特征及其与阿片类药物联合应用的研究进展[J]. 感染、炎症、修复,2021,22(3):183-185.
    [13]
    王晓东,于明涛,刘子强,等. 苯磺酸瑞马唑仑联合艾司氯胺酮静脉麻醉在内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术中的临床应用[J]. 中国医刊,2021,56(3):274-277.
    [14]
    Zhang F,Ding J,Luo M,et al. Effects of subanesthesia dose S‐ketamine induction on postoperative psychiatric complications after gynecological surgery[J]. Ibrain,2022,8(2):165-175. doi: 10.1002/ibra.12039
    [15]
    Mihaljević S,Pavlović M,Reiner K,et al. Therapeutic mechanisms of ketamine[J]. Psychiatr Danub,2020,32(3-4):325-333. doi: 10.24869/psyd.2020.325
    [16]
    李艳丽,王振山,李晓娟,等. 艾司氯胺酮在临床麻醉中的研究进展[J]. 医学理论与实践,2023,36(5):756-758.
    [17]
    陈盛岚,朱翔,赵江峰,等. 丙泊酚联合艾司氯胺酮在无痛胃肠镜检查中的应用效果[J]. 中国医学创新,2022,19(5):74-77.
    [18]
    Trujillo K A,Heller C Y. Ketamine sensitization: Influence of dose,environment,social isolation and treatment interval[J]. Behav Brain Res,2020,378:112271. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112271
    [19]
    丁钦,解成兰,岳苏阳,等. 艾司氯胺酮临床应用研究进展[J]. 实用药物与临床,2022,25(8):754-758.
  • Relative Articles

    [1] Ying TAN, Haiyan QIN, Xiang SUN, Yanyi SU, Yingbao WANG. Propofol Regulates MPP+-induced Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis in SH-SY5Y Cells. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(3): 35-41.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240305
    [2] Ningli ZHANG, Chen ZHOU, Yongyu SI, Jie OUYANG, Lan LIN, Ying CHEN, Qin NIU, Hong LI. Clinical Application of Esketamine Combined with Propofol in Painless Abortion. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(5): 102-106.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230514
    [3] Yuan YANG, Li-jia PENG, Lan-qing PU, Jun-jie LI, Jian-lin SHAO, Xin YANG. Application of Propofol Combined with Dexmedetomidine or Midazolam in Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in the Elderly. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(2): 43-48.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210221
    [4] Dan-ni ZHANG, Xia-guang DUAN, Chun-guang HAO, Xiao-jun ZHI, Hai-feng ZHU, Zai-qing HUANG. Anesthetic Effects and Mechanism of Hydromorphone Combined with Propofol on Colorectal Dilatation Model. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(7): 25-30.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210705
    [5] Qing Qing , Liu Yang , Zhou Hong Lin . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(06): 162-166.
    [6] Zhang Ning Ping , Zhang Qiong , Zhang Ning Li , Si Yong Yu , Qu Qi Cai . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(07): 59-63.
    [7] Li Zhi Gui . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [8] Jiang Mei Ping . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [9] He Hong Fen . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [10] Wei Xing . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [11] Huang Jie . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [12] Qu Qi Cai . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [13] Fang Yu . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [14] Zhang Mei Qiong . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [15] Zhu Jian Wen . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [16] Fan Dan . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [17] Li Jian Gang . Comparative Study of the Effects of Etomidate and Propofol Anesthesia Induction on Cardiovascular Stability in Elderly Patients. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [18] Chen Xue Qiang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [19] . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [20] . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(26)

    1. 江愿丽,陈凌云,蔡冰琳,崔晔,黄渊,郁艳艳,吴琼. 基于问题驱动的情景模拟教学法在《老年护理学》《康复护理学》中的应用研究. 护士进修杂志. 2025(02): 179-184 .
    2. 马翠萍,谢劲波,郑少兵,司文. 建构主义理论教考联动模式用于机器人辅助手术护理带教对教学质量的影响. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文). 2025(02): 300-304 .
    3. 左霞,陈月莉,钱宏梅,吴玲莉,赵霞. PBL教学法在急诊科实习护生带教中的应用研究. 中华养生保健. 2024(01): 81-84 .
    4. 杨丹,张艳,赵应珍,王杨,赵茹,张小妹. 微视频反例教学法结合微格教学法对实习护士临床思维及核心能力的影响. 临床医学研究与实践. 2024(10): 177-180 .
    5. 夏蕊,余璐,孙迟,肖遥. 基于BOPPPS模式的同伴教学法在神经外科规培护士培训中的效果研究. 医学理论与实践. 2024(08): 1428-1430+1417 .
    6. 周燕华,赵姝姝,李方超. 肿瘤内科护理带教中微格教学结合PBL教学的应用效果. 中国医药科学. 2024(14): 46-49 .
    7. 宋红权,闫嘉群,米娜,吕艳超. PBL联合翻转课堂对口腔专业医学生临床思维能力的影响. 中国继续医学教育. 2024(15): 82-87 .
    8. 麦建玲,马淑娥,吴翠翠,桂屏,张文超,杨敏,方坤洋. 客观结构化临床考试模式在血液净化进修护士培训中的效果分析. 国际医药卫生导报. 2024(15): 2632-2636 .
    9. 邵清春,张小珍,李永慧. CBL结合病例演练评估应用于妇产科教学中的效果及对学生临床思维能力的影响研究. 中国医药科学. 2024(15): 89-92 .
    10. 陈玲燕. 循证护理结合PBL教学法在中医护理带教中的应用. 中医药管理杂志. 2024(16): 124-126 .
    11. 赵英梅. 循证医学思维基础上PBL教学法在助理全科医师规范化培训中的应用效果研究. 中国卫生产业. 2024(05): 164-167 .
    12. 秦玉婷,穆耶赛尔·玉苏普,郝建萍. PBL教学法在血液内科教学实践中的应用研究. 中国卫生产业. 2024(06): 161-164 .
    13. 袁颖,阮婷婷,叶书玲,唐雪. 循证护理在临床本科实习护生教学实践中的应用效果. 黑龙江中医药. 2024(03): 172-174 .
    14. 朱燕萍,郑婷,李文娟,张燕,蔡宏斌,李斌,白豆,张一,刘金妹. 基于STEAM理念的问题探究式教学在神经内科临床实习教学中的应用研究. 中华医学教育探索杂志. 2024(12): 1676-1679 .
    15. 方红丽,邓苙,高慧芳,田莹,吴小佳. OBE理念在护理临床实践教学中的应用效果. 昆明医科大学学报. 2023(04): 165-169 . 本站查看
    16. 董世攀,梁小英,黄兰怡,赵玉玲,黄沂. 护理本科生科研能力现状调查与分析——基于混合研究视角. 卫生职业教育. 2023(09): 128-131 .
    17. 殷玲玲,施长丽,洪立立. 微课联合PBL教学法在消化内科中医护理教学中的应用. 中医药管理杂志. 2023(07): 187-190 .
    18. 杨静,金蓬勃,张蕊丽,张永梅. 标准化病人联合问题为中心的教学模式对实习护生SCL-90评分的影响. 临床研究. 2023(06): 187-189 .
    19. 苏颖,杨琴,叶梦鸽,陈卓,顾欣欣. 循问教学结合基于思维导图的微课教学模式在人体解剖学带教中的应用价值研究. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报. 2023(10): 984-988 .
    20. 罗晶. 急诊护理实习教学中采取精细化阶段式带教方法的效果. 婚育与健康. 2023(12): 175-177 .
    21. 李骏,张延霞. PBL在护理教学中的应用分析. 科技风. 2023(20): 122-124 .
    22. 范智博,孙倩,张倩,魏方圆. PBL联合循证护理教学法在消化内科实习护生带教中的应用效果. 河南医学研究. 2023(13): 2419-2422 .
    23. 陈颖,周冬娜,黄佩玉,乔何钰,廖意芬,王天秀,潘晓. 基于转化理念融合的混合式教学在急诊护理实习生中的应用. 中国继续医学教育. 2023(14): 82-85 .
    24. 周佳敏,王晶,臧彬. 工作坊联合PBL教学法在实习护生临床急救技能带教中的应用. 中国继续医学教育. 2023(14): 112-116 .
    25. 陈艳云,彭雯平,赵蓉,高颖,张莹燕. 基于批判性思维的持续性改进护理联合中医坐浴对痔疮术后患者健康行为、疼痛应激和病耻感的影响. 中国医药指南. 2023(22): 162-164 .
    26. 罗年年. 护理程序在提升心外科护士批判性思维中的应用效果. 中国医药指南. 2023(25): 147-149 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 38.8 %FULLTEXT: 38.8 %META: 60.9 %META: 60.9 %PDF: 0.2 %PDF: 0.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.9 %其他: 8.9 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %Austell: 0.1 %Austell: 0.1 %Austin: 0.0 %Austin: 0.0 %Baden: 0.1 %Baden: 0.1 %Bruderheim: 0.0 %Bruderheim: 0.0 %China: 4.6 %China: 4.6 %Edinburg: 0.0 %Edinburg: 0.0 %Elizabeth City: 0.0 %Elizabeth City: 0.0 %Fairfield: 0.0 %Fairfield: 0.0 %Falkenstein: 0.0 %Falkenstein: 0.0 %Great Falls: 0.0 %Great Falls: 0.0 %Grove City: 0.1 %Grove City: 0.1 %Gwynn Oak: 0.1 %Gwynn Oak: 0.1 %Hamilton: 0.0 %Hamilton: 0.0 %Jamaica: 0.0 %Jamaica: 0.0 %Lee's Summit: 0.0 %Lee's Summit: 0.0 %Malvern: 0.1 %Malvern: 0.1 %Norman: 0.2 %Norman: 0.2 %Northfield: 0.0 %Northfield: 0.0 %Perth Amboy: 0.1 %Perth Amboy: 0.1 %Reynoldsburg: 0.0 %Reynoldsburg: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.2 %Rochester: 0.2 %San Lorenzo: 0.0 %San Lorenzo: 0.0 %Swainsboro: 0.0 %Swainsboro: 0.0 %Ta'if: 0.0 %Ta'if: 0.0 %Westbury: 0.0 %Westbury: 0.0 %Wharton: 0.0 %Wharton: 0.0 %Wixom: 0.1 %Wixom: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 6.5 %上海: 6.5 %九江: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %休斯敦: 0.6 %休斯敦: 0.6 %休斯顿: 0.0 %休斯顿: 0.0 %伯利恒: 0.0 %伯利恒: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %六盘水: 0.0 %六盘水: 0.0 %内华达: 0.0 %内华达: 0.0 %剑桥: 0.0 %剑桥: 0.0 %加利福尼亚: 0.0 %加利福尼亚: 0.0 %加利福尼亚州: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.1 %北京: 15.6 %北京: 15.6 %十堰: 0.0 %十堰: 0.0 %华沙: 0.0 %华沙: 0.0 %南京: 0.0 %南京: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %吉列: 0.0 %吉列: 0.0 %吉达: 0.0 %吉达: 0.0 %吉隆坡: 0.0 %吉隆坡: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %哈利法克斯: 0.1 %哈利法克斯: 0.1 %哥伦比亚: 0.1 %哥伦比亚: 0.1 %圣保罗: 0.0 %圣保罗: 0.0 %圣约瑟夫: 0.0 %圣约瑟夫: 0.0 %圣路易斯: 0.0 %圣路易斯: 0.0 %坦帕: 0.0 %坦帕: 0.0 %埃克塞特: 0.1 %埃克塞特: 0.1 %埃德蒙顿: 0.1 %埃德蒙顿: 0.1 %多伦多: 0.0 %多伦多: 0.0 %大连: 0.0 %大连: 0.0 %天津: 0.0 %天津: 0.0 %太原: 0.0 %太原: 0.0 %安康: 0.0 %安康: 0.0 %宜宾: 0.0 %宜宾: 0.0 %宜春: 0.0 %宜春: 0.0 %宣城: 0.0 %宣城: 0.0 %宿州: 0.0 %宿州: 0.0 %密蘇里城: 0.9 %密蘇里城: 0.9 %密西西比州: 0.0 %密西西比州: 0.0 %小石城: 0.0 %小石城: 0.0 %巴吞鲁日: 0.1 %巴吞鲁日: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.0 %巴黎: 0.0 %布劳利: 0.0 %布劳利: 0.0 %布雷登顿: 0.1 %布雷登顿: 0.1 %布鲁克林区: 0.1 %布鲁克林区: 0.1 %常德: 0.0 %常德: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %庆阳: 0.0 %庆阳: 0.0 %延边: 0.0 %延边: 0.0 %张家口: 0.1 %张家口: 0.1 %徐州: 0.0 %徐州: 0.0 %成都: 0.0 %成都: 0.0 %扬州: 0.0 %扬州: 0.0 %拜仁: 0.1 %拜仁: 0.1 %文图拉: 0.1 %文图拉: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %昌吉: 0.0 %昌吉: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %普若佛: 0.0 %普若佛: 0.0 %曲靖: 0.0 %曲靖: 0.0 %杭州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %格拉沃利讷: 0.1 %格拉沃利讷: 0.1 %格里利: 0.0 %格里利: 0.0 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %檀香山: 0.0 %檀香山: 0.0 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %氹仔: 0.0 %氹仔: 0.0 %汉诺威: 0.1 %汉诺威: 0.1 %法拉盛: 0.0 %法拉盛: 0.0 %洛杉矶: 0.1 %洛杉矶: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.0 %深圳: 0.0 %深圳: 0.0 %温州: 0.0 %温州: 0.0 %湖州: 0.0 %湖州: 0.0 %漯河: 0.0 %漯河: 0.0 %瑟普赖斯: 0.0 %瑟普赖斯: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %纽瓦克: 0.2 %纽瓦克: 0.2 %纽约: 0.2 %纽约: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.0 %绍兴: 0.0 %艾肯: 0.0 %艾肯: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 3.4 %芒廷维尤: 3.4 %芒特艾里: 0.0 %芒特艾里: 0.0 %芝加哥: 0.0 %芝加哥: 0.0 %苏州: 0.0 %苏州: 0.0 %莫斯科: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.1 %萨斯卡通: 0.0 %萨斯卡通: 0.0 %萨默维尔: 0.1 %萨默维尔: 0.1 %蒙克斯科纳: 0.1 %蒙克斯科纳: 0.1 %蒙特利尔: 0.0 %蒙特利尔: 0.0 %西宁: 1.5 %西宁: 1.5 %贝克斯菲尔德: 0.1 %贝克斯菲尔德: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %费尔菲尔德: 0.1 %费尔菲尔德: 0.1 %赣州: 0.0 %赣州: 0.0 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %郑州: 0.0 %郑州: 0.0 %都伯林: 0.0 %都伯林: 0.0 %铜仁: 0.0 %铜仁: 0.0 %锡拉丘兹: 0.0 %锡拉丘兹: 0.0 %长沙: 0.1 %长沙: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阿伦敦: 0.0 %阿伦敦: 0.0 %阿布奎基: 0.1 %阿布奎基: 0.1 %阿灵顿: 0.0 %阿灵顿: 0.0 %青岛: 0.0 %青岛: 0.0 %驻马店: 49.9 %驻马店: 49.9 %麦迪逊: 0.1 %麦迪逊: 0.1 %其他其他AustellAustinBadenBruderheimChinaEdinburgElizabeth CityFairfieldFalkensteinGreat FallsGrove CityGwynn OakHamiltonJamaicaLee's SummitMalvernNormanNorthfieldPerth AmboyReynoldsburgRochesterSan LorenzoSwainsboroTa'ifWestburyWhartonWixom[]上海九江休斯敦休斯顿伯利恒保定六盘水内华达剑桥加利福尼亚加利福尼亚州北京十堰华沙南京台州吉列吉达吉隆坡呼和浩特咸阳哈利法克斯哥伦比亚圣保罗圣约瑟夫圣路易斯坦帕埃克塞特埃德蒙顿多伦多大连天津太原安康宜宾宜春宣城宿州密蘇里城密西西比州小石城巴吞鲁日巴黎布劳利布雷登顿布鲁克林区常德广州庆阳延边张家口徐州成都扬州拜仁文图拉无锡昆明昌吉晋城普若佛曲靖杭州格拉沃利讷格里利森尼韦尔檀香山武汉氹仔汉诺威法拉盛洛杉矶洛阳深圳温州湖州漯河瑟普赖斯石家庄纽瓦克纽约绍兴艾肯芒廷维尤芒特艾里芝加哥苏州莫斯科萨斯卡通萨默维尔蒙克斯科纳蒙特利尔西宁贝克斯菲尔德贵阳费尔菲尔德赣州运城郑州都伯林铜仁锡拉丘兹长沙长治阿伦敦阿布奎基阿灵顿青岛驻马店麦迪逊

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2601) PDF downloads(4) Cited by(31)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return