Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between UBE Procedure and Conventional Open Surgery in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Heng DING; Le HU; You LI; Liang CUI; Fan ZHANG; Xingguo LI

doi:10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240910

Volume 45 Issue 9

Sep. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Relative Articles

Article Navigation > Journal of Kunming Medical University > 2024 > 45(9): 62-69

Heng DING, Le HU, You LI, Liang CUI, Fan ZHANG, Xingguo LI. Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between UBE Procedure and Conventional Open Surgery in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(9): 62-69. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240910

Citation:

Heng DING, Le HU, You LI, Liang CUI, Fan ZHANG, Xingguo LI. Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between UBE Procedure and Conventional Open Surgery in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(9): 62-69. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240910

Citation:

Heng DING, Le HU, You LI, Liang CUI, Fan ZHANG, Xingguo LI. Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between UBE Procedure and Conventional Open Surgery in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(9): 62-69. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240910

PDF( 2398 KB)

Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between UBE Procedure and Conventional Open Surgery in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240910

Dept. of Orthopedics，The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University，Kunming Yunnan 650032，China

Received Date: 2024-03-21
Available Online: 2024-09-03
Publish Date: 2024-09-25

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and imaging results of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy （UBE） with traditional open surgery for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 84 patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from January 2022 to March 2023, 44 cases in the UBE group and 40 cases in the open surgery group, and recorded the patients' age, gender, disc herniation site, operation segment, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and hospitalization days, respectively. Visual analog scale （VAS） scores were performed preoperatively, 2 days postoperatively, and at follow-up at 1 month postoperatively. Efficacy was evaluated using the modified Macnab Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation Index at 1 month of surgery. The preoperative and postoperative articular process preservation rate and disc height changes were compared between the two groups. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in terms of age, gender, operative segment and type of disc herniation （P > 0.05）. All patients completed the surgery. Compared with the open group, the UBE group had a shorter operation time, less bleeding, and a shorter postoperative hospitalization （P < 0.05）, and the perioperative complication rate was lower in the UBE group than in the open group （P < 0.05）. The VAS scores of patients in the two groups decreased significantly at preoperation and 2 days postoperation （P < 0.05）, but the difference between the two groups was not significant at 1 month postoperation （P > 0.05）; and the difference in VAS scores at preoperation, 2 days postoperation and 1 month postoperation within the groups was statistically significant （P < 0.05）. The results of the modified Macnab efficacy evaluation criteria in the UBE group were 40, 2, 2 and 0 cases in order of excellent, good, acceptable and poor at the last follow-up, and the overall excellent rate was as high as 95.4%. In the open surgery group, there were 29, 7, 4 and 0 cases of excellent, good, feasible and poor, with an overall excellent rate of 90%. The difference in disc height between the two groups was statistically significant when comparing preoperative and postoperative disc heights （P < 0.05）. For the UBE group, there was no statistically significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative disc heights within the group （P > 0.05）, while the postoperative disc height in the open group was significantly increased compared with that of the preoperative period, with a statistically significant difference （P < 0.05）.The preservation rate of the articular eminence in the UBE group was 63.6%, while the preservation rate of the articular eminence in the open surgery group was 10%. Conclusion UBE can directly reach the target point to release nerve compression, and is a new technique that is minimally invasive, flexible, less traumatic, has a gentle learning curve, has little effect on spinal mobility, and is conducive to postoperative rehabilitation, which can completely remove the protruding nucleus pulposus, and has an ideal clinical therapeutic effect.
- Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy,
- Traditional open surgery,
- Lumbar disc herniation,
- Efficacy evaluation

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	Lindbäck Y,Tropp H,Enthoven P,et al. PREPARE: Presurgery physiotherapy for patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Spine J,2018,18(8):1347-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.12.009
[2]	陈洋,赵红卫,王谦. 单侧双通道内窥镜技术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的研究进展[J]. 脊柱外科杂志,2023,21(4):284-288. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2023.04.013
[3]	Yue J J,Long W. Full endoscopic spinal surgery techniques: advancements,indications,and outcomes[J]. Int J Spine Surg,2015,9:17. doi: 10.14444/2017
[4]	Heo D H,Son S K,Eum J H,et al. Fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic technique: Technical note and preliminary clinical results[J]. Neurosurg Focus,2017,43(2):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17146
[5]	Macnab I. Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1971,53(5):891-903. doi: 10.2106/00004623-197153050-00004
[6]	Yoon W W,Koch J. Herniated discs: When is surgery necessary?[J]. EFORT Open Rev,2021,6(6):526-530. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210020
[7]	Zhang Y,Feng B,Hu P,et al. One-hole split endoscopy technique versus unilateral biportal endoscopy technique for L5-S1 lumbar disk herniation: analysis of clinical and radiologic outcomes[J]. J Orthop Surg Res,2023,18(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04159-9
[8]	杨书情,张世民,吴冠男,等. 两种不同入路经皮椎间孔镜技术治疗高位腰椎间盘突出症[J]. 中国骨伤,2020,33(7):7.
[9]	Stanuszek A,Jędrzejek A,Gancarczyk-Urlik E,et al. Preoperative paraspinal and psoas major muscle atrophy and paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration as factors influencing the results of surgical treatment of lumbar disc disease[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2022,142(7):1375-1384. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03754-x
[10]	Shim H K,Choi K C,Cha K H,et al. Interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy using a new 8.4-mm endoscope and nerve root retractor[J]. Clin Spine Surg,2020,33(7):265-270. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000878
[11]	Goudman L, Pilitsis JG, Billet B, et al. The level of agreement between the numerical rating scale and visual analogue scale for assessing pain intensity in adults with chronic pain[J]. Anaesthesia,2024,79(2):128-138.
[12]	Kambin P,Gellman H. Percutaneous lateral discectomy of the lumbar spine: A preliminary report[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,1983,174(174):127-132.
[13]	De Antoni D J,Claro M L,Poehling G G,et al. Translaminar lumbar epidural endoscopy: Anatomy,technique,and indications[J]. Arthroscopy,1996,12(3):330-334. doi: 10.1016/S0749-8063(96)90069-9
[14]	Choi K C,Shim H K,Hwang J S,et al. Comparison of surgical invasiveness between microdiscectomy and 3 different endoscopic discectomy techniques for lumbar disc herniation[J]. World Neurosurg,2018,116:e750-e758. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.085
[15]	Kinaci A,Moayeri N,van der Zwan A,et al. Effectiveness of sealants in prevention of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after spine surgery: A systematic review[J]. World Neurosurg,2019,127: 567-575. e1.
[16]	Park H J,Kim S K,Lee S C,et al. Dural tears in percutaneous biportal endoscopic spine surgery: Anatomical location and management[J]. World Neurosurg,2020,136:e578-e585. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.080
[17]	温冰涛,张西峰,王岩,等. 经皮内窥镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症的并发症及其处理[J]. 中华外科杂志,2011,49(12):5.
[18]	Wu B,Zhan G,Tian X,et al. Comparison of transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy with and without foraminoplasty for lumbar disc herniation: A 2-year follow-up[J]. Pain Research & Management,2019,2019:1-12.
[19]	Ahn Y,Lee H Y,Lee S H,et al. Dural tears in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy[J]. Eur Spine J,2011,20(1):58-64. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1493-8
[20]	Pfirrmana C W,Metzdorf A,Zanetti M,et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral discdegeneration[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2001,26(17): 1873-1878.
[21]	冯德伟,逄树婷,孙盼,等. 两种手术方式治疗不同Pfirrmann分级腰椎间盘突出症的疗效分析[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2022,37(5):458-463. doi: 10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2022.05.003

Relative Articles(20)

Relative Articles

[1]	Tinghuan HU, Zhihua WANG, Shuanglin ZHAO, Furui LIU, Liqiong CHEN, Yiwen YUAN, Fangjing CHEN, Yunshan FAN, Jianyi YANG. Clinical Efficacy of V-Shaped Double-channel Spinal Endoscopic Technique （VBE） in Patients with LDH and Lumbar Instability. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(8): 93-100. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240814
[2]	Xin DU, Chao SONG, Bing DU, Xuechang WANG, Lian DUAN. Analysis of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels in Population with Lumbar Disc Herniation in High-Altitude Areas. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(): 1-7. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230813
[3]	Xixiong SU, Wei XU, Liqi XU, Qin YANG, Yunli YANG. Effects of Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Plus Open Operation in Hemodialysis Patients with Type I and II Upper Limb Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(6): 52-55. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220626
[4]	Ying GAO, Mei-qi WAMG. Clinical Efficacy of Standardized Exercise Prescription Rehabilitation Training on Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(8): 148-151. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210826
[5]	Mao Jian Yu , Shen Han Zhang , Chen Jian Jun , Zhan Li , Li Shi Qiao , Wang Quan , Cheng Xi , Chang Xu Sheng , Bao Wen Li . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(01): 141-146.
[6]	Chen Tai Bang , Lu Sheng , Shi Jun Zhen , Shi Rong Mao , Liang Jin Long . Comparison of the Effects of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation and Conventional Open Spinal Internal Fixation on Type A3 Thoracolumbar Vertebra Fracture. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2019, 40(03): 58-62.
[7]	Guo Yue Cheng . The Strategy of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Treating 4/5 Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[8]	Zheng Jun . Comparison of Clinical Efficacy between Microendoscopic Discectomy and Open Discectomy in the Treatment of Patients with Lumber Intervertebral Disc Herniation. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[9]	Kong Li Ping . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[10]	Li Ming . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[11]	Yao Shao Ping . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[12]	Kong Li Ping . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[13]	Lu Yi Qin . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[14]	Chen Xue Song . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[15]	Chen Xue Song . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[16]	Song Chao . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[17]	. The Clinical Characteristics and Treatment of Far Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[18]	. . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[19]	. Combination of Ozone and Collagenase in the Treatment of 97 Patients with Lubar Intervertebral Disc Protrusion. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[20]	Chen Xue Song . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(26)

1.	张丽丽，冯煦苑. 2016—2022年河南省驻马店市食源性疾病暴发事件监测结果. 现代疾病预防控制. 2024(03): 231-236 .
2.	杨小玲，黄东升，钟玉娟，赵金燕，李婧，苏玮玮. 2018—2022年保山市食源性疾病暴发事件流行病学特征分析. 食品安全导刊. 2024(09): 1-5 .
3.	刘光杰，王银梦，番凤仙，陈正统，郭超. 腾冲市2012—2023年蘑菇中毒事件流行病学特征分析. 食品安全导刊. 2024(20): 60-64 .
4.	程永兵，薛波，史伟，王甜. 2018-2022年陕西省食源性疾病暴发事件流行病学特征分析. 预防医学论坛. 2024(10): 779-782 .
5.	郜明明，陆金凤，孙佳皓. 2011—2021年盐城市食源性疾病暴发事件监测结果分析. 职业与健康. 2023(09): 1206-1209 .
6.	邢超，王琦梅，任蒋磊，陈吉铭，何琴芬，蒋卓婧. 2012—2022年绍兴市食源性疾病暴发事件流行特征分析. 预防医学. 2023(06): 506-508+513 .
7.	袁蒲，韩涵，叶冰，张书芳，付鹏钰，李杉，杨丽. 2019年河南省食源性疾病事件监测分析. 预防医学情报杂志. 2022(02): 152-155+160 .
8.	刘仁泉，曹建国，杨平华，杨彦玲. 2010—2019年云南省昭通市食源性疾病暴发情况分析. 公共卫生与预防医学. 2022(02): 69-72 .
9.	刘春梅，孙玲，白俊，毛琦，朱静，何慧芝，程锦芳，牛晓文，杨晓敏，杨洪元，罗会平，何国敏. 云南省勐腊县2017—2021年食源性疾病暴发事件的流行特征分析. 上海预防医学. 2022(10): 1002-1006 .
10.	万蓉，赵江，万青青，李娟娟，彭敏，刘志涛. 2011—2019年云南省食物中毒流行特征分析及预防措施探讨. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2021(04): 1620-1624 .
11.	刘志涛，赵江，李娟娟，闵向东，阮元，苏玮玮，朱晓，陈留萍，杨彦玲，张强，董海燕. 云南省2015—2020年野生蕈中毒流行特征及趋势预测. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2021(17): 7074-7079 .
12.	袁蒲，叶冰，付鹏钰，周昇昇，李杉，杨丽，韩涵，钞凤，张书芳. 河南省2019年食源性疾病暴发事件流行病学特征分析. 医学动物防制. 2021(12): 1207-1209+1214 .
13.	袁蒲，张书芳，付鹏钰，叶冰，韩涵，李杉，杨丽，周昇昇，钞凤. 2016—2020年河南省餐饮单位食源性疾病暴发事件流行病学特征分析. 现代预防医学. 2021(23): 4240-4244 .
14.	郑艳敏，滕臣刚，张梦寒，田礼钦. 2014-2018年苏州市食源性疾病暴发事件流行特征分析. 现代预防医学. 2020(02): 215-218+232 .
15.	黄信有，张芝平，刘振江，吴春蕾，程莹婷，陈华，杨铭建. 1998—2017年南平市食源性疾病事件流行病学特征分析. 中国食品卫生杂志. 2020(02): 184-189 .
16.	刘颜，何玲玲，罗赟，孙雪梅，童菲. 2010—2018年绵阳市食源性疾病事件流行病学分析. 实用预防医学. 2020(05): 538-542 .
17.	李英菊. 2012—2018年梧州市食源性疾病暴发监测分析. 职业与健康. 2020(13): 1767-1770 .
18.	张晶晶，朱静静，金富红，杨海鑫，黄艾祥. 云南部分地区熟肉制品中食源性致病菌的污染情况及耐药性分析. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2020(18): 6552-6556 .
19.	刘志涛，张强，李娟娟，阮元，杨彦玲，苏玮玮，彭敏，万青青，赵江. 2010～2019年云南省野生蜂蜜中毒事件分析. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2020(23): 9063-9067 .
20.	田礼钦，王小龙，郑艳敏. 2001～2018年苏州市学校食源性疾病暴发事件分析. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2019(06): 1690-1694 .
21.	刘颜，何玲玲，罗赟，吴晓红. 2015—2018年绵阳市食源性疾病事件监测结果. 职业与健康. 2019(17): 2341-2345 .
22.	万蓉，刘志涛，万青青，李娟娟，彭敏，赵江. 2011-2017年云南省野生菌中毒情况分析. 卫生软科学. 2019(10): 84-86+97 .
23.	刘桂丹，范正轩，黄伟，杨万里. 2017—2018年自贡市食源性疾病暴发事件监测分析. 职业与健康. 2019(23): 3205-3208 .
24.	陆子春，蒋一，曾宏. 2013—2018年佳木斯市食源性疾病暴发事件特征分析. 中国初级卫生保健. 2019(11): 72-75 .
25.	赵江，汤钦岚，闵向东，张强，万蓉，刘志涛. 2010-2018年云南省毒蕈中毒事件分析. 首都公共卫生. 2019(06): 280-282 .
26.	李荣华. 2014～2018年济宁市食源性疾病事件流行病学特征分析. 预防医学论坛. 2019(11): 872-874 .