• Relative Articles

    [1] Xinyi MEN, Jing ZHAO, Yongchun SHEN, Hui JI, Xiuxia WANG. The Relationship between Peripheral Blood Immunoglobulin,Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate,Homocysteine and the Degree of Central Nervous System Vasculitis in Children and Their Influence on Prognosis. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(12): 122-128.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20241217
    [2] Bowen TAN, Yun LIANG, Huan CHEN, Yi LEI, Yuhan WANG, Yan TIAN. The Prognostic Value of Preoperative Peripheral Blood Inflammatory Markers Combined with Tumor Markers in Resectable Colon Cancer Patients. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(12): 94-98.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20241213
    [3] Jiadai TANG, Jing YANG, Hongli SONG, Jiaojiao CHEN, Zhonghui MIAO, Lin XIE. Correlation of Metastatic and Prognostic Factors in 318 Cases of Primary Gastric Cancer. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(2): 75-87.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230218
    [4] Ting GAO, Sheng HUANG, Rong GUO, Dedian CHEN. Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Mucinous Breast Carcinoma. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(3): 54-60.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230306
    [5] Xiaohua LU, Hongxin YUAN. The Analysis of the Correlation between BTLA,CTLA-4 Gene Polymorphisms and the Efficacy and Prognosis of TACE Combined Targeted Therapy for Liver Cancer. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(9): 126-135.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230927
    [6] Changmeng HU, Lin WU. Correlation Between Silva Type and Prognosis of Cervical HPV-associated Adenocarcinoma. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(8): 113-121.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220817
    [7] Xiaoqian YANG, Yuquan ZHANG, Huitao WANG, Tongxin YANG, Tao CHEN, Yuting WENG, Kewei FANG. Clinical Application of Doxazosin Mesylate in Female Overactive Bladder. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(9): 66-69.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220926
    [8] Kejia LI, Ang LIU, Yanyang LI, Zhihong ZHANG, Guohui SHAO, Jiayun GE. Application of Syntaneous Trioscopy Combined with Bile Duct Suture Technique in Patients with Gallbladder Stones with Dilated Cholecholithiasis. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(7): 134-139.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220707
    [9] Liu-zheng LI, Shun LU, Shi-rong ZHANG, Lei-sheng XU, Hai-rong ZHAO, Jia-wei FENG, Xue-chan GAO, Tong WU. Curative Effect of Combined Hemihepatectomy and Perihilar Hepatectomy in Treatment of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(10): 121-126.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20211014
    [10] Chang-xian CHEN, Li-ju ZHANG, Xiao-ming JIANG, Zhen-yong ZHANG, Wei-jun LIU. Advances in Treatment of Colorectal Neuroendocrine Tumors. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(12): 155-159.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20201242
    [11] Wu Wen Juan . Combination of Heart-type Fatty Acid-binding Protein and Simple Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index for the Assessment of the Short-term Prognosis in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [12] Liu Ju Peng . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [13] Yuan Hua Yuan . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [14] Li Wei Wei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [15] Wang Peng . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [16] Liu Li Li . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [17] Shi Lei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [18] Chen Xue Song . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [19] Yang Xiao Wen . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [20] Tan Jing . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(25)

    1. 张琳郁,江昕,程亚南,朱琳. ROC曲线评估超声造影对三阴性乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结的诊断价值. 现代肿瘤医学. 2021(12): 2148-2151 .
    2. 史源,胡建民. 新辅助化疗联合TNBC手术切除治疗三阴性乳腺癌的效果. 临床研究. 2020(06): 10-12 .
    3. 刘柳. 不同新辅助化疗方案对三阴性乳腺癌治疗疗效的临床分析. 中国医药指南. 2020(20): 162-163 .
    4. 高晓洁. 多西他赛联合吡柔比星序贯化疗对晚期乳腺癌的临床疗效观察. 海峡药学. 2020(11): 165-166 .
    5. 覃霄燕,李鸿章,李培培,许娜丽. 四缝穴点刺联合背俞穴挑治治疗三阴性乳腺癌化疗后消化不良临床观察. 上海针灸杂志. 2019(02): 146-150 .
    6. 张程鹏,李泉. 表柔比星联合紫杉醇治疗三阴性乳腺癌临床效果分析. 海南医学. 2019(12): 1548-1550 .
    7. 刘诗萌,高超. DC-CIK细胞免疫对晚期三阴性乳腺癌疗效及死亡率的影响. 实用癌症杂志. 2019(08): 1351-1354 .
    8. 陈晓越. 不同新辅助化疗方案治疗三阴乳腺癌临床对比研究. 中国地方病防治杂志. 2018(01): 116-117 .
    9. 贠春燕. DP化疗方案治疗晚期三阴性乳腺癌的效果观察. 河南医学研究. 2018(10): 1844-1845 .
    10. 王一,廖宏伟,宋扬. 血清VitD、FA水平与三阴乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗敏感性关系. 实用预防医学. 2018(04): 405-408 .
    11. 吕金燕,王刚,王若雨,朱金明,姜佳宁. LETM1蛋白在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及与患者临床特征和预后的关系. 癌症进展. 2018(11): 1404-1407 .
    12. 党秋红,曹静,张欢欢,曾宪旭,靳耀锋. 三阴乳腺癌患者临床病理特征及免疫组织化学指标临床意义分析. 实用癌症杂志. 2018(10): 1693-1696+1703 .
    13. 李玥婷,施鹏旭,英子伟,姜大庆. 艾愈胶囊联合ET方案治疗三阴乳腺癌的临床研究. 现代药物与临床. 2018(12): 3254-3258 .
    14. 郭玉华. 不同新辅助化疗方案治疗乳腺癌近期疗效观察. 临床医药文献电子杂志. 2018(A4): 15-16 .
    15. 张俊林. 黄芪桃红汤联合CEF方案化疗对乳腺癌术后免疫功能的影响. 国医论坛. 2017(05): 47-49 .
    16. 任云会. 3种受体阴性表达的乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗效果及预后情况分析. 世界复合医学. 2017(01): 58-60 .
    17. 薛毅,康伟明. 局部晚期乳腺癌患者TAC方案新辅助化疗的临床疗效及预后的影响. 山西医药杂志. 2017(03): 336-338 .
    18. 黎剑. 紫杉醇脂质体与传统紫杉醇治疗乳腺癌的临床对比分析. 药品评价. 2017(21): 62-64 .
    19. 冯传宝. EGFR与VEGF在三阴性乳腺癌中的表达及意义. 中国现代医生. 2017(14): 32-34+37 .
    20. 严明基,赵鹏,陈炳光. 5-HT3受体拮抗剂在乳腺癌CEF方案化疗患者中的应用价值. 中国当代医药. 2017(11): 87-89+100 .
    21. 陈红娜. 3种不同新辅助化疗方案治疗三阴性乳腺癌疗效观察. 河南医学研究. 2016(01): 122-123 .
    22. 黄迪,高艳丽,李孟圈. 新辅助化疗TAC方案治疗妊娠期乳腺癌的效果评价. 河南医学研究. 2016(03): 446-448 .
    23. 蒋丽华,刘学键. 多西他赛联合阿霉素治疗局部晚期乳腺癌的效果及安全性. 山东医药. 2016(33): 97-99 .
    24. 朴先锋. 不同新辅助化疗方案治疗乳腺癌的临床价值. 世界最新医学信息文摘. 2016(36): 107-108 .
    25. 黄喜文,吴静娜,吴国武,黎佳全. 表柔比星、环磷酰胺联合多西他赛新辅助化疗方案对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效观察. 临床医学工程. 2015(12): 1586-1588 .

    Other cited types(7)

  • 加载中
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 26.7 %FULLTEXT: 26.7 %META: 72.9 %META: 72.9 %PDF: 0.4 %PDF: 0.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.0 %其他: 4.0 %其他: 0.0 %其他: 0.0 %China: 3.7 %China: 3.7 %上海: 7.9 %上海: 7.9 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %九江: 0.1 %九江: 0.1 %北京: 20.7 %北京: 20.7 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %天津: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %太原: 0.0 %太原: 0.0 %安那罕: 0.0 %安那罕: 0.0 %宝鸡: 0.2 %宝鸡: 0.2 %张家口: 0.1 %张家口: 0.1 %昆明: 0.0 %昆明: 0.0 %杭州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %淄博: 0.0 %淄博: 0.0 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %温州: 0.0 %温州: 0.0 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 0.9 %芒廷维尤: 0.9 %苏州: 0.0 %苏州: 0.0 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %西宁: 3.1 %西宁: 3.1 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %长沙: 0.1 %长沙: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %驻马店: 57.2 %驻马店: 57.2 %其他其他China上海东莞九江北京台州哥伦布天津太原安那罕宝鸡张家口昆明杭州淄博深圳温州湖州漯河石家庄绍兴芒廷维尤苏州衢州西宁郑州重庆长沙马鞍山驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3039) PDF downloads(211) Cited by(32)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return