Application of Laparoscopic and Robotic Ileal Uureteral Replacement Feasibility and Clinical Efficacy

Ileal ureter is a suitable treatment option for patients with long ureteric strictures. Minimally invasive techniques have been shown to be as safe as open techniques but superior in terms of lesser trauma, less bleeding and less postoperative recovery time. In order to evaluate the feasibility and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic ileal ureter replacement, review of related literatures, indications, contraindications, surgical method, postoperative results combined with experience of our center has been done. Total 20 cases of laparoscopic ileal ureteral operation have been reviewed, the mean operation time was 195480 and blood loss was 50 ~ 375 ml and 7 Robotic ileal ureter replacement were reviewed median surgery time was 320720 min and bleeding is less then 10 ml100 ml. The operation complications include urinary leakage, intestinal obstruction, anastomotic site leakage, transient azotemia, urinary tract infection and so on. Postoperative renal function of all patients was improved in different degrees. Laparoscopic and Robotic ileal ureter replacement is feasible and can be used as an effective treatment for long ureteral injuries, although the curative effect is same as that of traditional open surgery, but Comparatively laparoscopic and robotic postoperative morbidity is less and have advantages such as it reduces surgical trauma, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, less surgical scar and recovery time.The cases in the reports are limited, more cases need to be studied, and long-term results need to be assessed to establish and standardize these technique.