A Comparative Study of Developmental Trajectories in Term ART and Spontaneously Conceived Infants During Infancy: A Multicenter Investigation Using the Denver Developmental Screening Test
-
摘要:
目的 经辅助生殖技术(assisted reproductive technology,ART)足月儿和正常受孕婴儿在6个月和12个月时的发育差异,为辅助生殖技术对婴儿认知发育的健康发展提供科学依据。 方法 采用巢式病例对照研究的方法,对来大连市妇女儿童医疗中心和昆明市妇幼保健院就诊的2023年10月至2024年4月试管婴儿和正常受孕婴儿进行发育情况比较。比较两组在性别、出生孕周、体重、身长、头围等基本人口特征及发育筛查结果,对丹佛发育内容登记,并根据丹佛发育筛查表(denver developmental screening test,DDST)进行综合评价。 结果 两组在基本特征方面差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),6月龄和12月龄时的精细运动、大运动、语言和社会发育评估差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。通过SPSS20.0进行统计分析,DDST总体比较显示两组在早期发育水平上相似(P = 0.957和P = 0.965)。 结论 经ART技术受孕产下的婴儿与同龄的自然受孕婴儿在丹佛发育中的精细动作、大动作、社会发育及语言发育情况基本一致。试管婴儿的早期发育潜力与正常受孕婴儿相当。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the developmental differences between full-term infants born through assisted reproductive technology (ART) and infants conceived naturally at 6 and 12 months of age, in order to provide scientific evidence for the healthy development of infants' cognitive abilities due to assisted reproductive technology. Methods A nested case-control study was conducted to compare the developmental status of infants conceived through ART and those conceived naturally who visited the Women and Children's Medical Center of Dalian and Kunming Maternal and Child Health Hospital from October 2023 to April 2024. The basic demographic characteristics such as gender, gestational age at birth, weight, height, and head circumference, as well as the developmental screening results of both groups were compared. The Denver Developmental Content Record was used for assessment, and a comprehensive evaluation was conducted based on the Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST). Results There was no statistically significant difference in basic characteristics between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in fine motor skills, gross motor skills, language, and social development assessments at 6 months and 12 months (P > 0.05). Statistical analysis using SPSS 20.0 showed that the overall comparison of DDST indicated that the early developmental levels of the two groups were similar (P = 0.957 and P = 0.965). Conclusions Infants conceived through ART and those conceived naturally at the same age have basically the same developmental status in terms of fine motor skills, gross motor skills, social development, and language development in the Denver Developmental Assessment. The early developmental potential of infants conceived through ART is comparable to that of naturally conceived infants, reflecting the effectiveness of modern assisted reproductive technologies. -
Key words:
- Assisted reproduction /
- Term infants /
- Denver development
-
表 1 一般资料比较[$\bar x \pm s $,n(%)]
Table 1. General Information Comparison [$\bar x \pm s $,n(%)]
变量 试管婴儿组 正常受孕组 χ2/t P n 32 34 出生孕周 38.4 ± 1.43 38.6 ± 1.35 −0.445 0.658 男 18(56.2) 19(55.9) 0.001 0.976 女 14(43.8) 15(44.1) − − 体重(kg) 3.1 ± 0.59 3.2 ± 0.54 −0.562 0.576 身长(cm) 46.5 ± 4.04 47.1 ± 3.84 0.643 0.522 头围(cm) 32.5 ± 1.34 33.0 ± 1.75 −1.454 0.151 Apgar评分(1 min) 8.9 ± 1.00 8.5 ± 0.99 1.780 0.080 Apgar评分(5 min) 9.6 ± 0.67 9.7 ± 0.57 −1.134 0.261 表 2 6月龄、12月龄DDST总体比较[n(%)]
Table 2. Overall comparison of DDST at 6 months and 12 months [n (%)]
组别 n 正常组(%) 可疑组(%) 异常组(%) χ2 P 6月龄 试管婴儿组 32 30(93.8) 2(6.2) 0(0.0) 0.003 0.957 正常受孕组 34 33(97.1) 1(2.9) 0(0.0) 12月龄 试管婴儿组 32 31(96.9) 1(3.1) 0(0.0) 0.002 0.965 正常受孕组 34 33(97.1) 1(2.9) 0(0.0) -
[1] Roychoudhury S, Lodha A, Synnes A, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants conceived by assisted reproductive technology[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 225(3): 276. e1-276. e9. [2] Jia Y, Sha Y, Qiu Z, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) to guide personalized embryo transfer with conventional frozen embryo transfer in 281 Chinese women with recurrent implantation failure[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2022, 28: e935634-1-9. doi: 10.12659/msm.935634 [3] Doucette S M, Kelly E N, Church P T, et al. Association of inotrope use with neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants <29 weeks gestation: A retrospective cohort study[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2022, 35(25): 6044-6052. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1904872 [4] 黄艳荣, 李明颖, 高梦莹, 等. 时差成像技术和人工智能在ART 治疗中的应用[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2024(7): 160-167. [5] Graham M E, Jelin A, Hoon A H Jr, et al. Assisted reproductive technology: Short- and long-term outcomes[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2023, 65(1): 38-49. [6] Wennerholm U B, Bergh C. Perinatal outcome in children born after assisted reproductive technologies[J]. Upsala J Med Sci, 2020, 125(2): 158-166. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1726534 [7] Zaat T, Zagers M, Mol F, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, 2021(2): CD011184-1-84. [8] 赵德才, 季成叶, 孙军玲, 等. 应用丹佛发育筛查法评价婴幼儿发育状况[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2004, 20(8): 909-910. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-0580.2004.08.005 [9] 朱钰娜. 儿童丹佛智能筛查的临床应用分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2019, 14(19): 79-81. doi: 10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2019.19.042 [10] Christovão I S, Pereira D A G, de Castro Magalhães L, et al. Predictive validity of the Denver developmental screening test (Denver-II) to detect risk of developmental coordination disorder in preterm children[J]. Early Hum Dev, 2023, 184: 105836. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2023.105836 [11] Luke B, Brown M B, Wantman E, et al. The risk of birth defects with conception by ART[J]. Hum Reprod, 2021, 36(1): 116-129. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa272 [12] Tao S, Du J, Chi X, et al. Associations between antenatal corticosteroid exposure and neurodevelopment in infants[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 227(5): 759. e1-759. e15. [13] Li X, Xie Q, Luan T, et al. Maternal and child-health outcomes in different endometrial preparation methods for frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A retrospective study[J]. Hum Fertil, 2023, 26(5): 1032-1043. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2022.2053593 [14] Liu Z, Dong F, Wang Y, et al. A comparison of the efficacy of immediate versus delayed frozen-thawed embryo transfer on the ongoing pregnancy rate after a failed IVF attempt: Study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority, parallel-group, controlled trial[J]. Front Endocrinol, 2021, 12: 603158. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.603158 [15] 郭小妮, 邓成艳, 黄学锋, 等. 中华医学会生殖医学分会: 2017—2021年辅助生殖技术数据报告[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2025, 34(5): 571-579. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2025.05.001 [16] Matsumoto N, Mitsui T, Kadowaki T, et al. In vitro fertilization and long-term child health and development: Nationwide birth cohort study in Japan[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2024, 184(1): 24. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05883-y [17] Bergh C, Wennerholm U B. Long-term health of children conceived after assisted reproductive technology[J]. Upsala J Med Sci, 2020, 125(2): 152-157. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1729904 [18] Dehghan M, Kuhi M, Rezvani S, et al. Speech and language development of children born following assisted reproductive technologies[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2020, 134: 110060. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110060 [19] Mitter V R, Håberg S E, Magnus M C. Early childhood respiratory tract infections according to parental subfertility and conception by assisted reproductive technologies[J]. Hum Reprod, 2022, 37(9): 2113-2125. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac162 [20] Ugwu H C, Onwuzu S W I, Agbo J A, et al. Sonographic prediction of successful embryonic implantation in in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer cycle procedures, using a multi-parameter approach[J]. Radiography, 2022, 28(2): 473-479. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.11.011 [21] Liu L, Sun X Y, Yang H, et al. Predictive value of anti-Mullerian hormone for pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in Southwest China[J]. Reprod Health, 2022, 19(1): 224. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01524-5 [22] 张金铃, 姜华, 杨萌婷, 等. 正常足月新生儿出生3个月内肠道菌群的定植规律分析[J]. 贵州医科大学学报, 2024, 49(1): 109-114. doi: 10.19367/j.cnki.2096-8388.2024.01.015 [23] Biagas K V, Heneghan J A, Abu-Sultaneh S, et al. Scoping review: Neurocognitive outcome assessments after critical illness in children[J]. J Intensive Care Med, 2023, 38(4): 358-367. doi: 10.1177/08850666221121567 [24] 韦霁芸, 班婷, 石德敏, 等. D—二聚体与纤维蛋白原比值与不孕症患者IVF-ET助孕结局的相关性研究[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2024, 45(12): 1409-1414. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2024.12.009 [25] Wang F F, Yu T, Chen X L, et al. Cerebral palsy in children born after assisted reproductive technology: A meta-analysis[J]. World J Pediatr, 2021, 17(4): 364-374. doi: 10.1007/s12519-021-00442-z [26] Chen W, Peng Y, Ma X, et al. Integrated multi-omics reveal epigenomic disturbance of assisted reproductive technologies in human offspring[J]. EBioMedicine, 2020, 61: 103076. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103076 [27] Adeleye A J, Zablotska L, Rinaudo P, et al. Study protocol for a developmental epidemiological study of children born through reproductive technologies (DESCRT)[J]. Hum Reprod Open, 2023, 2023(2): hoad013. [28] Ono M, Kuji N, Ueno K, et al. The long-term outcome of children conceived through assisted reproductive technology[J]. Reprod Sci, 2024, 31(3): 583-590. [29] Quintigliano M, Carone N, Speranza A M, et al. Adolescent development and the parent-adolescent relationship in diverse family forms created by assisted reproduction[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(24): 16758. -
下载: