留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

SIRT3通过FoxO3a/BNIP3介导的线粒体自噬增强结直肠癌细胞对5-氟尿嘧啶化疗敏感性的机制研究

李君 谢宗源

李君, 谢宗源. SIRT3通过FoxO3a/BNIP3介导的线粒体自噬增强结直肠癌细胞对5-氟尿嘧啶化疗敏感性的机制研究[J]. 昆明医科大学学报.
引用本文: 李君, 谢宗源. SIRT3通过FoxO3a/BNIP3介导的线粒体自噬增强结直肠癌细胞对5-氟尿嘧啶化疗敏感性的机制研究[J]. 昆明医科大学学报.
Jun LI, Zongyuan XIE. Mechanism Study of SIRT3 Enhancing Chemosensitivity of Rectal Cancer Cells to 5-Fluorouracil via FoxO3a/BNIP3-Mediated Mitophagy[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University.
Citation: Jun LI, Zongyuan XIE. Mechanism Study of SIRT3 Enhancing Chemosensitivity of Rectal Cancer Cells to 5-Fluorouracil via FoxO3a/BNIP3-Mediated Mitophagy[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University.

SIRT3通过FoxO3a/BNIP3介导的线粒体自噬增强结直肠癌细胞对5-氟尿嘧啶化疗敏感性的机制研究

基金项目: 河北省医学科学研究课题计划资助(20231273)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李君(1982~),女,河北唐山人,本科,主要从事癌细胞研究工作

    通讯作者:

    谢宗源,E-mail:93347795@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: R736.4

Mechanism Study of SIRT3 Enhancing Chemosensitivity of Rectal Cancer Cells to 5-Fluorouracil via FoxO3a/BNIP3-Mediated Mitophagy

  • 摘要:   目的  探讨沉默信息调节因子3(Sirtuin 3,SIRT3)在结直肠癌细胞5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)耐药中的作用,并阐明其是否通过调控叉头框蛋白O3a(Forkhead box O3a,FoxO3a)/Bcl-2相互作用蛋白3(BCL2 interacting protein 3,BNIP3)介导的线粒体自噬来增强肿瘤细胞对5-FU的敏感性。  方法  建立5-FU耐药CRC细胞系;构建SIRT3稳定过表达细胞系;CCK-8检测IC50值;流式检测细胞凋亡;Western Blot检测SIRT3、FoxO3a、BNIP3及线粒体自噬相关蛋白微管相关蛋白1轻链3(microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3,LC3)、死骨片1(sequestosome 1,p62)、PTEN诱导假定激酶1(PTEN-induced putative kinase 1,PINK1)、Parkin RBR E3泛素蛋白连接酶(Parkin RBR E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase,Parkin);免疫荧光观察线粒体与自噬体共定位;免疫共沉淀检测FoxO3a乙酰化水平;构建裸鼠皮下异种移植瘤模型,评估SIRT3过表达体内抗肿瘤效果。  结果  5-FU耐药CRC细胞中SIRT3、FoxO3a及BNIP3蛋白表达显著下调(P < 0.05),线粒体与自噬体共定位减少,线粒体自噬水平受抑制。过表达SIRT3后,5-FU耐药细胞IC50值显著降低,凋亡率升高(P < 0.01),LC3-II/I比值升高,p62表达下降,PINK1和Parkin表达上调(P < 0.05),降低FoxO3a乙酰化水平,上调BNIP3表达。SIRT3过表达联合5-FU组可显著抑制肿瘤生长(P < 0.01),且肿瘤组织中自噬相关蛋白表达变化与体外一致,自噬小体增加。  结论  SIRT3通过去乙酰化激活FoxO3a/BNIP3通路诱导线粒体自噬,逆转CRC 5-FU耐药,联合治疗具协同抗瘤作用。
  • 图  1  5-FU耐药的CRC细胞中SIRT3表达下调且线粒体自噬受损($ \bar x \pm s $,n = 3)

    A: CCK-8法检测细胞增殖;B: 细胞中蛋白表达水平;C.:Mito-Tracker和LC3荧光染色;*P < 0.05;**P < 0.01;***P < 0.001。

    Figure  1.  SIRT3 expression is downregulated and mitophagy is impaired in 5-FU-resistant CRC cells ($ \bar x \pm s $,n = 3)

    图  2  SIRT3过表达可逆转CRC细胞的5-FU耐药性($ \bar x \pm s $,n = 3)

    A: HCT116-R和HT-29-R细胞中稳定过表达SIRT3;B: CCK-8检测细胞增殖;C: 流式细胞术检测细胞凋亡;*P < 0.05;**P < 0.01;***P < 0.001。

    Figure  2.  SIRT3 overexpression reverses 5-FU resistance in CRC cells ($ \bar x \pm s $,n = 3)

    图  3  SIRT3通过激活线粒体自噬来增强5-FU的化疗敏感性($ \bar x \pm s $,n = 3)

    A:过表达SIRT3后自噬相关蛋白表达;B:使用自噬抑制剂Mdivi-1后自噬相关蛋白表达;C:CCK-8检测细胞增殖;D:流式细胞术检测细胞凋亡;*P < 0.05;**P < 0.01;***P < 0.001。

    Figure  3.  SIRT3 enhanceed chemosensitivity of5-FU by activating mitophagy ($ \bar x \pm s $,n = 3)

    图  4  SIRT3通过FoxO3a/BNIP3信号通路诱导线粒体自噬($ \bar x \pm s $,n = 3)

    A:乙酰化检测;B. BNIP3的蛋白表达水平;C:自噬相关蛋白表达;*P < 0.05;**P < 0.01。

    Figure  4.  SIRT3 induces mitophagy via the FoxO3a/BNIP3 signaling pathway ($ \bar x \pm s $,n = 3)

    图  5  SIRT3激动剂联合5-FU在体内协同抑制CRC肿瘤生长($ \bar x \pm s $,n = 5)

    A:肿瘤示意图;B:肿瘤生长曲线;C:肿瘤质量;D:肿瘤细胞增殖;E:肿瘤细胞凋亡;F:肿瘤细胞凋亡相关蛋白表达;*P < 0.05;**P < 0.01;***P < 0.001。

    Figure  5.  SIRT3 agonist combined with 5-FU synergistically inhibits CRC tumor growth in vivo ($ \bar x \pm s $,n = 5)

    图  6  SIRT3过表达联合5-FU在体内协同抑制CRC肿瘤生长($ \bar x \pm s $,n = 5)

    A:肿瘤组织HE染色;B:肿瘤组织FoxO3a;C:肿瘤组织BNIP3;D:肿瘤组织p62;E:TEM观察自噬小体,Mt代表线粒体、LD代表脂质体、黑色箭头代表自噬体。

    Figure  6.  SIRT3 overexpression combined with 5-FU synergistically inhibits CRC tumor growth in vivo ($ \bar x \pm s $,n = 5)

  • [1] Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R L, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA A Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. doi: 10.3410/f.739487650.793592245
    [2] Vodenkova S, Buchler T, Cervena K, et al. 5-fluorouracil and other fluoropyrimidines in colorectal cancer: Past, present and future[J]. Pharmacol Ther, 2020, 206: 107447. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.107447
    [3] Luo Q, Shen F, Zhao S, et al. LINC00460/miR-186-3p/MYC feedback loop facilitates colorectal cancer immune escape by enhancing CD47 and PD-L1 expressions[J]. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2024, 43(1): 225. doi: 10.1186/s13046-024-03145-1
    [4] Zhang J, Zou S, Fang L. Metabolic reprogramming in colorectal cancer: Regulatory networks and therapy[J]. Cell Biosci, 2023, 13(1): 25. doi: 10.1186/s13578-023-00977-w
    [5] Hu T, Liu C H, Lei M, et al. Metabolic regulation of the immune system in health and diseases: Mechanisms and interventions[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2024, 9(1): 268. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01954-6
    [6] Palikaras K, Lionaki E, Tavernarakis N. Mechanisms of mitophagy in cellular homeostasis, physiology and pathology[J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2018, 20(9): 1013-1022. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0176-2
    [7] Li N, Pal khaket T, Yang Y, et al. BNIP3L/BNIP3-mediated mitophagy contributes to the maintenance of ovarian cancer stem cells[J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2025, 29(19): e70704. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.70704
    [8] Zhao W, Yun K. Propofol enhances the sensitivity of glioblastoma cells to temozolomide by inhibiting macrophage activation in tumor microenvironment to down-regulate HIF-1α expression[J]. Exp Cell Res, 2022, 418(2): 113277. [LinkOut]
    [9] Mishra Y, Kaundal R K. Role of SIRT3 in mitochondrial biology and its therapeutic implications in neurodegenerative disorders[J]. Drug Discov Today, 2023, 28(6): 103583. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103583
    [10] Du H, Xu T, Yu S, et al. Mitochondrial metabolism and cancer therapeutic innovation[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2025, 10: 245. doi: 10.1038/s41392-025-02311-x
    [11] Gan L, Li Q, Nie W, et al. PROX1-mediated epigenetic silencing of SIRT3 contributes to proliferation and glucose metabolism in colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Biol Sci, 2023, 19(1): 50-65.
    [12] Tseng A H H, Shieh S S, Wang D L. SIRT3 deacetylates FOXO3 to protect mitochondria against oxidative damage[J]. Free Radic Biol Med, 2013, 63: 222-234. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.05.002
    [13] Zhang Y, Wen P, Luo J, et al. Sirtuin 3 regulates mitochondrial protein acetylation and metabolism in tubular epithelial cells during renal fibrosis[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2021, 12(9): 847. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-04134-4
    [14] Liu L, Liu S, Deng P, et al. Targeting the IRAK1-S100A9 axis overcomes resistance to paclitaxel in nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Cancer Res, 2021, 81(5): 1413-1425. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-2125
    [15] Zhang Y, Liu Y, Hou M, et al. Reprogramming of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex by targeting SIRT3-COX4I2 axis attenuates osteoarthritis progression (adv. sci. 10/2023)[J]. Adv Sci, 2023, 10(10): 2370059. doi: 10.1002/advs.202370059
    [16] Xu Y, Tang Y, Lu J, et al. PINK1-mediated mitophagy protects against hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury by restraining NLRP3 inflammasome activation[J]. Free Radic Biol Med, 2020, 160: 871-886. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.09.015
    [17] Du H, Xu T, Yu S, et al. Mitochondrial metabolism and cancer therapeutic innovation[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2025, 10: 245. doi: 10.1038/s41392-025-02311-x
    [18] Mou Y, Chen Y, Fan Z, et al. Discovery of a novel small-molecule activator of SIRT3 that inhibits cell proliferation and migration by apoptosis and autophagy-dependent cell death pathways in colorectal cancer[J]. Bioorg Chem, 2024, 146: 107327. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2024.107327
    [19] Chio C C, Tai Y T, Mohanraj M, et al. Honokiol enhances temozolomide-induced apoptotic insults to malignant glioma cells via an intrinsic mitochondrion-dependent pathway[J]. Phytomedicine, 2018, 49: 41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.06.012
    [20] Bahar E, Han S Y, Kim J Y, et al. Chemotherapy resistance: Role of mitochondrial and autophagic components[J]. Cancers, 2022, 14(6): 1462. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061462
    [21] Wu Z, Wang Y, Lu S, et al. SIRT3 alleviates sepsis-induced acute lung injury by inhibiting pyroptosis via regulating the deacetylation of FoxO3a[J]. Pulm Pharmacol Ther, 2023, 82: 102244. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2023.102244
    [22] Xian Y, Liu B, Shen T, et al. Enhanced SIRT3 expression restores mitochondrial quality control mechanism to reverse osteogenic impairment in type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. Bone Res, 2025, 13(1): 30.
    [23] Yamashita S I, Sugiura Y, Matsuoka Y, et al. Mitophagy mediated by BNIP3 and NIX protects against ferroptosis by downregulating mitochondrial reactive oxygen species[J]. Cell Death Differ, 2024, 31(5): 651-661.
    [24] Liu Y, Wei H, Li J. A review on SIRT3 and its natural small molecule activators as a potential Preventive and therapeutic target[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2024, 963: 176155. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.176155
  • [1] 王安民, 刘忠发, 杨春辉, 邹广思, 施承民, 曾玉剑.  云南地区412例结直肠癌错配修复与微卫星状态的一致性及相关性分析, 昆明医科大学学报. 2025, 46(12): 101-111. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20251212
    [2] 武孔佳, 豆舒乾, 王媛, 王旗, 杜攀, 刘文军.  PINK1/Parkin通路介导的线粒体自噬在神经退行性疾病发展中的影响研究, 昆明医科大学学报. 2025, 46(6): 1-8. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20250601
    [3] 张晓霞, 党浩源, 番明谣, 裴环, 赵杰, 崔换天, 海青山.  大车前苷通过促进PINK1/Parkin线粒体自噬途径改善糖尿病周围神经病变的机制, 昆明医科大学学报. 2025, 46(9): 45-53. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20250905
    [4] 廉坤, 李咏梅, 施诚龙, 陈怡兰, 张磊, 杨薇, 许秀峰.  综合生物信息学方法识别精神分裂症状中关键线粒体自噬基因, 昆明医科大学学报. 2025, 46(1): 23-35. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20250104
    [5] 刘波, 吴乔联, 张权昌.  腹腔镜以及开腹手术对老年结直肠癌患者术后肠功能恢复时间的影响, 昆明医科大学学报. 2024, 45(1): 143-148. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240124
    [6] 曹朝阳, 刘思佳, 杨亚英.  影像组学技术在结直肠癌中的研究进展, 昆明医科大学学报. 2024, 44(1B): 1-7.
    [7] 王缘, 李蓉, 陈娇娇, 申艳丽, 胡凤娣.  粪便SDC2基因甲基化检测在结直肠癌早期筛查的临床价值, 昆明医科大学学报. 2023, 44(5): 138-143. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230524
    [8] 苟海梅, 方莉, 钟晓武.  KRAS、NRAS及BRAF基因突变与结直肠癌肝转移的关系, 昆明医科大学学报. 2023, 44(1): 19-24. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230106
    [9] 车河龙, 李志晋, 王克强, 邱卫明, 曹毅, 罗来斌.  结直肠癌切除术后吻合口出血急诊内镜治疗的疗效分析, 昆明医科大学学报. 2022, 43(10): 122-126. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221032
    [10] 乐宇斌, 郭世奎.  血清脂肪因子在结直肠癌患者远期预后中的评估价值, 昆明医科大学学报. 2022, 43(4): 82-88. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220417
    [11] 张丽菊, 姜晓明, 陈昌贤, 吴喜, 张振勇, 刘为军.  长链非编码RNA-p21调控微小RNA-9/去乙酰化酶1信号通路逆转结直肠癌细胞奥沙利铂耐药性, 昆明医科大学学报. 2022, 43(5): 27-32. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220519
    [12] 陈紫红, 孙士波, 王仙梅, 余杉杉, 吴秀方, 陈相山, 耿婷, 刘红, 刘贤敏, 南琼.  早期结直肠癌患者凝血指标异常及其临床意义, 昆明医科大学学报. 2021, 42(5): 96-100. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210518
    [13] 刘晶华, 常巍, 余福兵, 盛娟, 冯程程, 赵霓姗.  C/EBPδ在结直肠癌中的表达及其对癌细胞增殖的影响, 昆明医科大学学报. 2021, 42(9): 57-64. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210913
    [14] 杨镜玉, 李文亮.  MSI在结直肠癌中的应用研究新进展, 昆明医科大学学报. 2020, 41(04): 150-156.
    [15] 赵敏, 张强, 马永慈, 龙飞, 林艳苹, 徐学斌, 张锦平.  云南省肿瘤医院1000例结直肠癌患者临床特征, 昆明医科大学学报. 2018, 39(05): 90-93.
    [16] 王若天.  IL-2和IL-15诱导的CIK细胞联合化疗治疗直肠和结肠癌的临床疗效, 昆明医科大学学报. 2014, 35(11): -1.
    [17] 钟林.  ATBF1在结直肠癌中的表达及其与转移相关性研究, 昆明医科大学学报. 2014, 35(06): -.
    [18] 杨建华.  Tenascin-W在结直肠癌中的表达及临床意义, 昆明医科大学学报. 2014, 35(07): -.
    [19] 吴雪松.  替吉奥单药对比奥沙利铂、5-Fu /亚叶酸钙在大肠癌患者姑息手术后化疗的临床研究, 昆明医科大学学报. 2014, 35(09): -1.
    [20] 肖云.  白花蛇舌草提取物抗小鼠结直肠癌血管生成的实验研究, 昆明医科大学学报. 2013, 34(10): -.
  • 加载中
图(6)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-12-16

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回