PKRP与TmLRP治疗良性前列腺增生症的早期疗效及并发症

沈洁; 官润云; 何宗海; 郑明星

PKRP与TmLRP治疗良性前列腺增生症的早期疗效及并发症

昆明医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科

基金项目:

基金：国家自然科学基金资助项目 (81460141);

计量
- 文章访问数: 2207
- HTML全文浏览量: 805
- PDF下载量: 42
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-04-13

Comparison of the Efficacy and Complications of PKRP and TmLRP in Treatment of Early Benigh Prostate Hyperplasia

Funds:

基金：国家自然科学基金资助项目 (81460141);

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨经尿道等离子前列腺切除术 (surethral plasmakineticresection of prostate, PKRP) 与经尿道铥激光前列腺切除术 (thuliumlaser resection of theprostate, Tm LRP) 治疗良性前列腺增生症患者的近期疗效.方法将需接受手术治疗的前列腺增生症患者100名随机分成PKRP组及Tm LRP组, 各50例, 比较两种不同手术方式后患者的近期疗效.结果 Tm LRP组患者的术后、留置导尿管时间以及术后住院天数均少于PKRP组 (P<0.05) .2组患者术后国际前列腺症状评分 (IPSS) 、生活质量评分 (QOL) 、最大尿流率 (Qmax) 、残余尿量 (RUV) 与术前比较差异均有统计学意义 (P<0.01) , 组间比较差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05) .TMLRP组和PKRP组手术时间分别为 (61.2±24.2min) 和 (30.1±15.9min) , 2组间比较差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05) .Tm LRP组患者术后并发症发生例数少于PKRP组, 比较差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05) .结论 TMLRP手术时间较PKRP长, 但Tm LRP具有术中精准解剖前列腺切除、出血少、术后患者恢复快、痛苦小, 住院时间短、近期并发症发生率低、安全性高等优点, 近期疗效与PKRP相当.
- 前列腺增生症 /
- 前列腺电切 /
- 等离子 /
- 铥激光
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the short-term curative effect of PKRP and Tm LRP for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) . Me thods We selected 100 subjects who would like to accept surgical treatment, and then randomly divided them into two groups (PKRP and Tm LRP) , 50 in each group. Then we compared the recent curative effect between two different surgical methods. Re s ults The mean catheterization, irrigation and hospital stay time in the Tm LRP were shorter than those in the PKRP group respectively (P < 0.05) . The general results were satisfactory. The IPSS, QOLS, RUV and Qmax were impoved significantly (P < 0.01) , and the differences between groups had no statistical significance (P > 0.05) . Statistically significant difference was found in the operative time and postoperative complications between Tm LRP and PKRP with operative time 61.2 ±24.2 minutes and 30.1±15.9 minutes respectively (P < 0.05) whereas postoperative complications using Tm LRP treatment were less than PKRP (P < 0.05) . Conclus ion Despite longer operative time, Tm LRP treatment shows multiple advantages, such as more precise prostate intraoperative anatomic resection, less bleeding, shorter recovery period, lesser pain, shorter hospitalization, lower short-term complication rates, higher security, etc, and has similar short-term curative effect to PKRP treatment.
- Benign prostate hyperplasia /
- Electro-prostatectomy /
- Plasma /
- Thulium laser

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

[1]唐铁龙, 崔曙, 邓显忠, 等.PKRP与TURP治疗良性前列腺增生症的疗效比较[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志 (电子版) , 2009, 3 (6) :511-515.
[2]汪清, 艾克拜尔·吾曼尔, 王胜军, 等.三种经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效比较[J].现代泌尿外科杂志, 2008, 13 (1) :44-47.
[3]	[3]BAAZEEM A, ELHILALI M M.Surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia:current evidence[J].Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2008, 5 (10) :540-549.
[4]	[4]OELKE M, BACHMANN A, DESCAZEAUD A, et al.EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction[J].European Urol, 2013, 64 (1) :118-40.
[5]	[5]REICH O, GRATZKE C, BACHMANN A, et al.Morbidity, Mortality and Early Outcome of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate:A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of 10, 654 Patients[J].J Urol, 2008, 180 (1) :246-249.
[9] 许勇, 孙东翀, 杨勇, 等.2微米激光汽化切除术治疗良性前列腺增生症5年随访结果[J].中华外科杂志, 2013, 51 (2) :1-4.
[7]	[10]NETSCH C, BACH T, HERRMANN T R W, et al.Re:Thulium:YAG Vapo Enucleation of the Prostate in Large Glands:A Prospective Comparison Using 70-and 120-W2-mu m Lasers Editorial Comment[J].Asian Journal of Andrology, 2012, 14 (2) :325-329.
[8]	[11]HAUSER S, ROGENHOFER S, ELLINGER J, et al.Thulium Laser (Revolix) Vapoenucleation of the Prostate Is a Safe Procedure in Patients with an Increased Risk of Hemorrhage[J].Urologia Internationalis, 2012, 88 (4) :390-394.
[12]彭波, 郑军华.铥激光与等离子前列腺切除术疗效的比较研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 34 (9) :678-681.
[10]	[13]IACONO F.Efficacy and safety profile of a novel technique, Thu LEP (Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate) for the treatment of benign prostate hypertrophy.Our experience on 148 patients[J].BMC Surgery, 2012, 12 (1) :S21.
[14]程育胜.经尿道前列腺切除术后并发症14例分析[J].中国微创外科杂志, 2006, 6 (3) :199-200.
[15]陈云霞.留置导尿患者引起尿路感染的原因分析与护理对策[J].护理实践与研究, 2007, 4 (11) :18-19.
[16]喻学红.导尿与尿路感染的分析[J].护士进修杂志, 1999, 14 (6) :12-13.
[17]李磊, 高竹, 张国飞, 等.他达拉非对前列腺等离子电切术后勃起功能障碍的疗效观察[J].现代泌尿外科杂志, 2016, 21 (6) :423-426.
[15]	[18]ZHU Y, ZHUO J, XU D, et al.Thulium laser versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction:a systematic review and meta-analysis.[J].World Journal of Urology, 2015, 33 (4) :509-515.
[19]洪锴, 刘余庆, 卢剑, 等.钬激光与铥激光前列腺剜除术的效果以及对勃起功能影响的比较研究[J].中华男科学杂志, 2015, 21 (3) :245-250.
[17]	[20]SUN F, HAN B, CUI D, et al.Long-term results of thulium laser resection of the prostate:a prospective study at multiple centers[J].World Journal of Urology, 2015, 33 (4) :503-8.

相关文章(20)

[1]	谢平波, 刘明生, 周红庆, 武绍梅, 邵涛, 郭峰. 经尿道前列腺电切术联合内分泌治疗晚期前列腺癌的效果分析, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20231208
[2]	刘芸, 和红兵. 前列腺素E₂对骨改建作用的研究进展, 昆明医科大学学报. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210916
[3]	熊杰, 钟一鸣, 李健, 李珲, 张鹤云, 杨洋. 重度前列腺增生经尿道等离子剜除后腺体取出的3种方法比较, 昆明医科大学学报.
[4]	张建华, 申正超, 陈印, 顾鹏, 赵晖, 申吉泓, 柯坤彬. 铥激光治疗合并尿道狭窄的非肌层浸润性膀胱肿瘤, 昆明医科大学学报.
[5]	王洪. 前列腺素E2对COPD合并肺癌的致病机理, 昆明医科大学学报.
[6]	汪洋. 经尿道前列腺等离子剜除术与前列腺钬激光剜除术的近期疗效比较, 昆明医科大学学报.
[7]	张鹤云. 170例前列腺炎化验室资料临床分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
[8]	张劲松. 保留前列腺的根治性膀胱切除治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的适应症, 昆明医科大学学报.
[9]	董自平. 前列腺脓肿2例报道, 昆明医科大学学报.
[10]	李晓涛. 经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术的疗效及安全性评价, 昆明医科大学学报.
[11]	郭巍. 前列腺结石成分分析及形成原因探讨, 昆明医科大学学报.
[12]	彭明栋. 等离子电切镜在尿道狭窄合并膀胱结石治疗中的应用, 昆明医科大学学报.
[13]	曹绍党. 琥珀酸索利那新治疗经尿道前列腺电切术后患者尿失禁20例报道, 昆明医科大学学报.
[14]	刘晋宏. 塞来昔布治疗Ⅲb型前列腺炎的临床疗效观察, 昆明医科大学学报.
[15]	翟宇强. 老年男性前列腺增生与脂肪因子及脂代谢关系的研究, 昆明医科大学学报.
[16]	李义. 经尿道前列腺电切术后留置尿管困难的原因分析及处理, 昆明医科大学学报.
[17]	. 耻骨上前列腺摘除术治疗前列腺增生症98例临床分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
[18]	阮殿省. 耻骨上前列腺摘除术治疗前列腺增生症98例临床分析, 昆明医科大学学报.
[19]	. 高龄高危经尿道前列腺等离子电切术患者的心理护理, 昆明医科大学学报.
[20]	. 经尿道等离子电切术治疗良性前列腺增生98例报道, 昆明医科大学学报.