Volume 42 Issue 11
Nov.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Relative Articles
Article Navigation >  Journal of Kunming Medical University  > 2021  >  42(11): 148-152
Lingjun SHEN, Lin WANG, Zhiqiang MA, Xing LIU, Haiwen LI, Ge WANG, Wenming LI, Pengju LUO. Immunological Characteristics of Patients with Active and Nonactive Pulmonary Tuberculosis[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(8): 122-126. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220821
Citation: Ying-fang XU, Jie HUANG, Cheng XIAO, Jiang LI, Wei LI, Guang-fang XU, Jian-ling TAN. Application of Comprehensive Quality Management Intervention in the Inconsistent Results of Blood Group Identification[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(11): 148-152. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20211035
shu

Application of Comprehensive Quality Management Intervention in the Inconsistent Results of Blood Group Identification

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20211035

  • Dept. of Transfusion， The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University，Kunming Yunnan 650101，China

  • Received Date: 2021-07-05
    Available Online: 2021-11-30
  • Publish Date: 2021-11-30
    Abstract
  •   Objective  Through retrospective analysis of the inconsistency of the two blood type identification results of blood samples before and after the implementation of the “comprehensive blood transfusion quality management” in our hospital, the reasons were investigated and analyzed, and improvement measures were proposed to ensure the safety of clinical blood use.   Methods  We performed a comparative analysis of the 2 blood type identification results of blood samples which were tested in the first three years （January 2015 to December 2017） and the later three years （January 2018 to December 2020） in our hospital after implementation of “Comprehensive Blood Transfusion Quality Management”   Results  From 2015 to 2020, a total of 12,023 cases of blood type identification were performed twice, and a total of 46 blood samples were identified with inconsistent results. The incidence rate was 0.038%, including 34 cases （0.061%） in the first three years and 12 cases （0.019%） in the later three years （P < 0.05）. The related factors were investigated and analyzed. In the first three years after the implementation of “Comprehensive Blood Transfusion Quality Management”, the main reason was the wrong identification of patients, and the main responsibility was the nurse. In the later three years after the implementation of “Comprehensive Blood Transfusion Quality Management”, the main reason was that patients borrow other people’ s information, and the main responsibility was the patient.   Conclusion  The risk of blood transfusion can be effectively reduced by carrying out “Comprehensive Blood Transfusion Quality Management”, strictly implementing the operating procedures, and comparing the test results of two blood samples of the same patient’ s blood type and cross matching.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(15)
  • [1]
    田兆嵩, 刘赴平. 输血前检验应重视的几个问题[J]. 中华检验医学杂志,2001,24(3):10-11.
    [2]
    Lippi G, Blanckaert N, Bonini P, et al. Causes, consequences, detection, and prevention of identification errors in laboratory diagnostics[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med,2009,47(2):143-153.
    [3]
    Ibojie J, Urbaniak S. Comparing near misses with actual mistransfusion events: a more accurate reflection of transfusion errors[J]. Br J Haematol,2000,108(2):458-460. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01876.x
    [4]
    郭永建. 筑牢血液标本采集错误的防控机制——血型2次检测结果比对要求之习得与实施策略[J]. 中国输血杂志,2013,26(6):595-600.
    [5]
    尹湧华,孔玉洁,王美玉,等. 《血站技术操作规程(2015版)》研读[J]. 中国输血杂志,2016,29(11):1303-1305.
    [6]
    Najafpour Z, Hasoumi M, Behzadi F, et al. Preventing blood transfusion failures: FMEA, an effective assessment method[J]. BMC Health Services Research.,2017,17(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2380-3
    [7]
    宫济武, 李志强. 输血相容性试验标准检测流程[J]. 中国输血杂志,2012,25(9):815-817.
    [8]
    李喜莹, 甘佳, 王鹏. 输血相容性检测室内质量控制的失控判定与处理专家共识[J]. 中国输血杂志,2020,33(1):1-3.
    [9]
    张业玲,卜晓佳,张景莲,等. 智慧型闭环移动护理管理系统在临床用血质量管理中的应用[J]. 中国输血杂志,2021,34(4):420-423.
    [10]
    卢思超,廖奇峰,汪小燕,等. 失效模式与效应分析在输血安全管理中的应用[J]. 现代医院,2021,21(3):365-367,370.
    [11]
    汪蓉,杨宝义,李龙倜,等. 失效模式与效应分析在ICU 输血安全管理中的应用效果[J]. 中国医药导报,2019,16(26):186-188.
    [12]
    陈香凤,朱倩兰,张明霞,等. 医疗失效模式与效应分析在围手术期住院患者检查流程中的应用[J]. 护理管理杂志,2019,19(5):365-369.
    [13]
    胡正军,陈晨,戴潇青,等. 加强检验与临床沟通 促进检验结果对患者负责[J]. 中医药管理杂志,2017,25(15):166-168.
    [14]
    王远杰,刘家瑞,李红梅,等. 二次血型制配合输血管理系统阻止不相容血液发放的研究[J]. 国际输血及血液学杂志,2015,38(6):481-485.
    [15]
    朱静,詹廷西,王静,等. 162 967例二次血型结果分析及其在输血安全中的意义探讨[J]. 中外医学研究,2021,19(2):169-171.
    • Relative Articles(20)

  • Relative Articles

    [1] Xiaojuan ZHOU, Libin YANG, Peng YANG, Hao GONG, Xu YANG. Impact of Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation on Systemic Inflammatory Response and Transfusion Requirements after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2025, 46(3): 1-8.
    [2] Lan Shen, Tongqing Pu, Jiangbo Ding, lunqing Pu, Gang Ma, Tianrui Wang. Application Effect of Whole-process Management Based on Rapid Rehabilitation Combined with Damage Control in Multiple Injuries. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(8): 128-132.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230825
    [3] Yuan YUAN, Lijuan YIN, Yonglin QI. Studies on the Effect of Fasting or Feeding on Intestinal Oxygenation in Neonates during Blood Transfusion. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(1): 168-172.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230119
    [4] Yan WANG, Rong DING, Lvling ZHANG, Ruohua WANG, Xiaoling ZHAO, Na MA. Efficacy of Blood Transfusion Combined with Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer and its Effect on Tumor Markers and T Lymphocyte Levels. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(8): 61-65.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220809
    [5] Jin-hong LI, Hong WANG. Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan Amlodipine Tablets Combined with Alpha-lipoic Acid in the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy Complicated with Hypertension. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(4): 53-56.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210410
    [6] Li Rui , Ou Mi , Li Yan , Yang Ying , Wang Chun Hui , Lv Feng Lin . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(05): 163-166.
    [7] Zhang Hai Yan , Li Hui Min , Wang Lan . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(06): 174-177.
    [8] Li De Ying , Wang Yu Ming , Chai Hua Xiang , Dong Wei Qun . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2019, 40(11): 59-62.
    [9] Li Wei Hua , Zhao Gong Fang , Huang Hua , Lu Ming Liang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2018, 39(11): 98-102.
    [10] Mei Li Jun , Zhang Ning , Chen Wei . The Effect of Allogenic Blood Transfusion on the Prognosis after Esophagectomy among Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2018, 39(04): 73-78.
    [11] Li Xiao Tao , Li Jiong Ming , Liu Jian He , Jiang Yong Ming , Zhang Jing Song . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2017, 38(05): 56-60.
    [12] Zheng Dang . The Efficacy and Safety of Alpha Lipoic Acid Combined with Methycobal for Patients with Type-2 Diabetes Combined with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [13] Wang Dong Mei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [14] Chi Xiu Ping . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [15] Wang Dong Mei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [16] Xu Xia . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [17] Yao Yan Qiong . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [18] Xu Ying Fang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [19] Cai Ling Jun . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [20] . The Clinical Analysis of 60 Cases of Adverse Reactions caused by Blood Transfusion. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 田二朋，马伟立，刘美，齐亚楠. CD_4~+/CD_8~+比值联合细胞因子对活动性与非活动性肺结核的鉴别价值. 中国医药. 2024(10): 1466-1470 .
    2. 王若涛，吴敏校，杨虹，陈宗云. 外周血IFN-γ、PCT及OPN水平对活动性肺结核的诊断价值及其与抗结核治疗预后的相关性分析. 中国现代药物应用. 2024(19): 10-15 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0400.250.50.7511.25
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 36.3 %FULLTEXT: 36.3 %META: 63.0 %META: 63.0 %PDF: 0.8 %PDF: 0.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.8 %其他: 5.8 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %China: 3.5 %China: 3.5 %Doylestown: 0.0 %Doylestown: 0.0 %Falkenstein: 0.1 %Falkenstein: 0.1 %Lewisburg: 0.1 %Lewisburg: 0.1 %Matawan: 0.1 %Matawan: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Wixom: 0.1 %Wixom: 0.1 %上海: 8.7 %上海: 8.7 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %云浮: 0.0 %云浮: 0.0 %代顿: 0.1 %代顿: 0.1 %休斯敦: 0.1 %休斯敦: 0.1 %佛山: 0.0 %佛山: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %克拉玛依: 0.0 %克拉玛依: 0.0 %兰州: 0.0 %兰州: 0.0 %内华达: 0.0 %内华达: 0.0 %内华达州: 0.0 %内华达州: 0.0 %加利福尼亚: 0.1 %加利福尼亚: 0.1 %北京: 22.0 %北京: 22.0 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南充: 0.0 %南充: 0.0 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %南阳: 0.0 %南阳: 0.0 %博阿努瓦: 0.0 %博阿努瓦: 0.0 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %合肥: 0.0 %合肥: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %哈尔滨: 0.0 %哈尔滨: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %孝感: 0.0 %孝感: 0.0 %宁波: 0.0 %宁波: 0.0 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %密蘇里城: 0.0 %密蘇里城: 0.0 %尤金: 0.1 %尤金: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.0 %巴黎: 0.0 %布劳利: 0.2 %布劳利: 0.2 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %张家口: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %成都: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %抚州: 0.1 %抚州: 0.1 %拉雷多: 0.1 %拉雷多: 0.1 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 1.2 %昆明: 1.2 %晋中: 0.0 %晋中: 0.0 %杭州: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %江门: 0.0 %江门: 0.0 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %泉州: 0.0 %泉州: 0.0 %波士顿: 0.1 %波士顿: 0.1 %泸州: 0.1 %泸州: 0.1 %泽西: 0.1 %泽西: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %济宁: 0.0 %济宁: 0.0 %海东: 0.0 %海东: 0.0 %海得拉巴: 0.0 %海得拉巴: 0.0 %淄博: 0.0 %淄博: 0.0 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 1.0 %漯河: 1.0 %盐湖城: 0.1 %盐湖城: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %福州: 0.0 %福州: 0.0 %纳什维尔: 0.1 %纳什维尔: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.0 %绵阳: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 2.1 %芒廷维尤: 2.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %茂名: 0.0 %茂名: 0.0 %莱克兰: 0.1 %莱克兰: 0.1 %莱芜: 0.0 %莱芜: 0.0 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %西宁: 2.7 %西宁: 2.7 %西安: 0.0 %西安: 0.0 %西雅图: 0.0 %西雅图: 0.0 %诺沃克: 0.0 %诺沃克: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %遵义: 0.0 %遵义: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %重庆: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %长治: 0.0 %长治: 0.0 %阜阳: 0.1 %阜阳: 0.1 %随州: 0.0 %随州: 0.0 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %驻马店: 44.5 %驻马店: 44.5 %其他其他ChinaDoylestownFalkensteinLewisburgMatawanRochesterWixom上海东莞云浮代顿休斯敦佛山保定克拉玛依兰州内华达内华达州加利福尼亚北京十堰南京南充南通南阳博阿努瓦台州合肥呼和浩特哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴天津太原孝感宁波宣城密蘇里城尤金巴黎布劳利常州广州张家口成都扬州抚州拉雷多无锡昆明晋中杭州武汉江门沈阳泉州波士顿泸州泽西洛阳济南济宁海东海得拉巴淄博深圳温州湖州漯河盐湖城石家庄福州纳什维尔绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥茂名莱克兰莱芜衢州西宁西安西雅图诺沃克贵阳赤峰运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆长沙长治阜阳随州青岛驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(4)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (4258) PDF downloads(9) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © 《昆明医科大学学报》编辑部  滇ICP备00000000号-0

    Publishing: 昆明医科大学学报编辑部

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return