• Relative Articles

    [1] Fang LUO, Ruibin ZHAO, Guojun LI, Xuxian FU, Xianmou FAN, Shaoming SU, Yunbo WEN, Qilin HUANG, Bin LI. Researches on the Effect of Alcohol on Endogenous GHB in Human Blood by LC-MS/MS Method. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(5): 170-177.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240526
    [2] Canyu YANG, Kongchun SUN, Juan WANG, Huiping PU, Baochun SHEN. Metabolic Differences of Propranolol Enantiomers in Different Species of Liver Microsomes by HPLC-MS/MS. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(3): 15-21.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230321
    [3] Yuexin LIU, Fangdong TIAN, Xinyi LI, Gen XIONG, Xiangyu JIANG, Xian LI, Yanni LI. Determination of Scopolamine and Atropine in Blood and Urine by LC-MS / MS. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(9): 147-154.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220916
    [4] Xiaoqian YANG, Yuquan ZHANG, Huitao WANG, Tongxin YANG, Tao CHEN, Yuting WENG, Kewei FANG. Clinical Application of Doxazosin Mesylate in Female Overactive Bladder. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(9): 66-69.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220926
    [5] Yuan YANG, Li-jia PENG, Lan-qing PU, Jun-jie LI, Jian-lin SHAO, Xin YANG. Application of Propofol Combined with Dexmedetomidine or Midazolam in Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in the Elderly. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(2): 43-48.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210221
    [6] Zhang Zhi Xian , Gu Hou , Lin 劼, Lei Xue Fen , Jiang Li Feng , Li Nan , Lu Xin Yan , Yu Jia . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2019, 40(08): 97-101.
    [7] Lu Fa Huan , Li Ji Yin , Li Shu Hua , Zhao Wen Song , Wang Rui , Jie Run Fang , Yang Kai Run . Tissue Distribution of Yunaconitine in Rats by UPLC-MS/MS Method. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2018, 39(05): 16-20.
    [8] Qu Qi Cai . Application of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in Herniorrhaphy Surgery for Older Patients. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [9] Ke Zi Li . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [10] Wu Hai Ying . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [11] Lv Yan Ling . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [12] Mu Yun Zhen . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [13] Guo Xue Song . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [14] Min Wan Cang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [15] . Clinical Observation of Radiotherapy Combined with Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Patients with Bone Metastases Pain. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [16] . Curative Effects of Integrating Pantoprazole and Mosapride on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease after Esophagectomy. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [17] . The Observation of Combined Anesthetic Effects on Miniature Swines in Department of Burn Surgery. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [18] . Effects of Midazolam Combined with Morphine in the Treatment of COPD Patients who Received Invasive Ventilation. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [19] . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [20] Wang Zhao Jun . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 王婧. 手术治疗凶险型中央性前置胎盘的方法与预后分析. 临床医药文献电子杂志. 2018(28): 88-89 .
    2. 梁永恩. 围术期综合手术治疗凶险型前置胎盘的临床探讨. 人人健康. 2018(14): 20-21 .
    3. 陆富华,叶志球. 凶险性前置胎盘孕妇剖宫产术中双侧髂内动脉球囊封堵术的价值. 实用妇科内分泌杂志(电子版). 2018(29): 60-61 .
    4. 曾雯琼,徐金霞. 凶险性前置胎盘相关原因分析及介入治疗应用效果分析. 中国性科学. 2018(08): 113-115 .
    5. 李兰妹,周莉,卢思媛. 胎盘边缘切口剖宫产对中央型前置胎盘的治疗效果观察. 当代医学. 2017(27): 131-132 .
    6. 栗永梅. 凶险性前置胎盘治疗中介入治疗的临床效果分析. 临床医学研究与实践. 2017(32): 89-90 .
    7. 何静媛. 介入治疗在凶险性前置胎盘剖宫产术中的临床探讨. 医学理论与实践. 2017(22): 3381-3382 .
    8. 高美鸳. 凶险型前置胎盘围术期综合手术治疗的有效性与安全性分析. 基层医学论坛. 2017(34): 4808-4809 .
    9. 石淑颖. 凶险性前置胎盘的治疗体会. 中国继续医学教育. 2016(14): 140-141 .
    10. 陈晓燕. 凶险型前置胎盘手术治疗围术期综合治疗方法及疗效评估. 中国继续医学教育. 2016(31): 86-87 .
    11. 银杉. 围术期综合手术治疗凶险型前置胎盘的临床疗效. 临床合理用药杂志. 2016(27): 101-102 .
    12. 鞠春玲,刘小玲. 凶险性前置胎盘的临床治疗分析. 临床医学研究与实践. 2016(16): 48 .
    13. 黄敏红,钟凌丽. 综合手术应用于凶险型前置胎盘围手术期治疗的效果. 中国现代医生. 2016(32): 68-70+73 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • 加载中
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 28.1 %FULLTEXT: 28.1 %META: 71.8 %META: 71.8 %PDF: 0.0 %PDF: 0.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.1 %其他: 4.1 %China: 5.5 %China: 5.5 %上海: 7.2 %上海: 7.2 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %北京: 24.7 %北京: 24.7 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %太原: 0.0 %太原: 0.0 %宁波: 0.0 %宁波: 0.0 %安那罕: 0.1 %安那罕: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宿州: 0.0 %宿州: 0.0 %广元: 0.0 %广元: 0.0 %张家口: 0.1 %张家口: 0.1 %恩施: 0.0 %恩施: 0.0 %无锡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.3 %昆明: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %杭州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %波士顿: 0.0 %波士顿: 0.0 %泰州: 0.0 %泰州: 0.0 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.0 %漯河: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 0.6 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %西宁: 3.4 %西宁: 3.4 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %郑州: 0.9 %郑州: 0.9 %银川: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %马赛: 0.1 %马赛: 0.1 %驻马店: 51.5 %驻马店: 51.5 %其他China上海东莞北京台州太原宁波安那罕宣城宿州广元张家口恩施无锡昆明朝阳杭州武汉波士顿泰州深圳湖州漯河芒廷维尤衢州西宁贵阳郑州银川马赛驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2800) PDF downloads(146) Cited by(13)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return