Lizi ZHANG, Xinping YANG, Guangguang FANG. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University.
Citation: Lizi ZHANG, Xinping YANG, Guangguang FANG. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University.

Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

  • Received Date: 2024-09-10
    Available Online: 2025-02-20
  •   Objective  To analyze the effects of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on postoperative analgesic consumption, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in breast cancer patients, and to evaluate its advantages and disadvantages compared to general anesthesia (GA), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), and pectoral nerve block (PECS), providing a systematic review of its clinical application.   Methods  We searched English databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, as well as Chinese databases such as CNKI, Wanfang, and Weipu, including randomized controlled trials. The Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used for bias risk evaluation, and RevMan 3.5 software was utilized for meta-analysis.   Results  A total of 31 randomized controlled trials involving 2296 patients were included. The meta-analysis results indicated that the morphine consumption in the ESPB group was lower than that in the GA group at 24 hours postoperative (MD -17.57, 95% CI -23.99 to -11.14, P < 0.05). VAS scores at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperative were also lower in the ESPB group compared to the GA group (P < 0.05), and the incidence of PONV in patients was reduced (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.69, P < 0.05), with all differences being statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were found in morphine consumption at 24 hours postoperative between the ESPB and TPVB groups, nor in VAS scores at 2, 12, and 24 hours postoperative, and the number of PONV cases showed no statistically significant difference. The morphine consumption in the PECS group at 24 hours postoperative was lower than that in the ESPB group (MD 10.94, 95% CI 4.40 to 17.48, P < 0.05), and the VAS score at 12 hours postoperative in the PECS group was lower than that in the ESPB group (MD 0.59, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.99, P < 0.05), indicating statistical significance, while no significant differences were observed at other time points.   Conclusions  The analgesic effect of the ESPB group is superior to that of the GA group and similar to that of the TPVB group, but inferior to that of the PECS group. Compared to the GA group, ESPB significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative PONV, showing similarity with the TPVB and PECS groups.
  • [1]
    Abdella A,Arida E,Megahed N A,et al. Analgesia and spread of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgeries: A randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Anesthesiol,2022,22(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01860-w
    [2]
    Aksu C,Kus A,Yorukoglu H U,et al. Analgesic effect of the bi-level injection erector spinae plane block after breast surgery: A randomized controlled trial[J]. The Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology,2019,31(3):132-137.
    [3]
    Altiparmak B,Korkmaz Toker M,Uysal A I,et al. Comparison of the effects of modified pectoral nerve block and erector spinae plane block on postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores of patients after radical mastectomy surgery: A prospective,randomized,controlled trial[J]. J Clin Anesth,2019,54:61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.10.040
    [4]
    El Ghamry M R,Amer A F. Role of erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block in pain control after modified radical mastectomy. A prospective randomised trial[J]. Indian J Anaesth,2019,63(12):1008-1014. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_310_19
    [5]
    Elewa A M,Faisal M,Sjöberg F,et al. Comparison between erector spinae plane block and paravertebral block regarding postoperative analgesic consumption following breast surgery: A randomized controlled study[J]. BMC Anesthesiol,2022,22(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01724-3
    [6]
    Gad M,Abdelwahab K,Abdallah A,et al. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block compared to modified pectoral plane block for modified radical mastectomy operations[J]. Anesth Essays Res,2019,13(2):334-339. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_77_19
    [7]
    Genc C,Kaya C,Bilgin S,et al. Pectoserratus plane block versus erector spinae plane block for postoperative opioid consumption and acute and chronic pain after breast cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial[J]. J Clin Anesth,2022,79:110691. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110691
    [8]
    Gurkan Y,Aksu C,Kus A,et al. Erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia,2020,59:84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.06.036
    [9]
    Gurkan Y,Aksu C,Kus A,et al. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: A randomized controlled study[J]. J Clin Anesth,2018,50:65-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.033
    [10]
    He W S,Wu Z Y,Zu L J,et al. Application of erector spinae plane block guided by ultrasound for postoperative analgesia in breast cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Cancer Commun,2020,40(2-3):122-125. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12013
    [11]
    Moustafa M A,Alabd A S,Ahmed A M M,et al. Erector spinae versus paravertebral plane blocks in modified radical mastectomy: Randomised comparative study of the technique success rate among novice anaesthesiologists[J]. Indian J Anaesth,2020,64(1):49-54. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_536_19
    [12]
    Seelam S,Nair A S,Christopher A,et al. Efficacy of single-shot ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia after mastectomy: A randomized controlled study[J]. Saudi J Anaesth,2020,14(1):22-27. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_260_19
    [13]
    Sharma S,Arora S,Jafra A,et al. Efficacy of erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in total mastectomy and axillary clearance: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Saudi J Anaesth,2020,14(2):186-191. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_625_19
    [14]
    Singh S,Kumar G,Akhileshwar. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy: A randomised control study[J]. Indian J Anaesth,2019,63(3):200-204. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_758_18
    [15]
    Sinha C,Kumar A,Kumar A,et al. Pectoral nerve versus erector spinae block for breast surgeries: A randomised controlled trial[J]. Indian J Anaesth,2019,63(8):617-622. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_163_19
    [16]
    Sivrikoz N,Turhan Ö,Ali A,et al. Paravertebral block versus erector spinae plane block for analgesia in modified radical mastectomy: A randomized,prospective,double-blind study[J]. Minerva Anestesiologica,2022,88(12):1003-1012.
    [17]
    Swisher M W,Wallace A M,Sztain J F,et al. Erector spinae plane versus paravertebral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia after breast surgery: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine,2020,45(4):260-266. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101013
    [18]
    Wiech M,Piwowarczyk P,Mieszkowski M,et al. The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: A randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Anesthesiol,2022,22(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01760-z
    [19]
    Yao Y,Li H,He Q,et al. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after modified radical mastectomy: Randomized controlled trial[J]. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine,2020,45:5-9. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100983
    [20]
    陈程哲,李会芳,任益锋,等. 超声引导下胸神经阻滞和竖脊肌平面阻滞用于乳腺癌改良根治术后镇痛效果的比较[J]. 医学研究杂志,2020,49(4):108-112.
    [21]
    邓立平,李长红,林少锋. 超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞对乳腺肿物切除术后镇痛作用效果的研究[J]. 中国实用医药,2020,15(20):24-26.
    [22]
    纪久雨,鲁学文,刘月江. 超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞和胸椎旁阻滞对行乳腺癌根治术患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 东南大学学报(医学版),2020,39(4):440-444. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6264.2020.04.007
    [23]
    李晓,唐栋梁,王洁,等. 超声引导竖脊肌间隙阻滞与胸椎椎旁神经阻滞治疗乳腺癌术后急性疼痛疗效观察[J]. 介入放射学杂志,2020,29(8):777-781. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2020.08.008
    [24]
    李有辉,项余华,曹志得,等. 超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞对乳腺癌根治术后镇痛疗效评价[J]. 浙江临床医学,2019,21(3):398-400. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7664.2019.03.044
    [25]
    马丽雅,原大江,赵丽,等. 超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞与胸椎旁神经阻滞用于乳腺癌根治术术后镇痛效果的比较[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2022,22(4):761-765.
    [26]
    王和节,刘煜,戈文威,等. 超声引导下前锯肌平面和竖脊肌平面阻滞在乳腺癌根治术围术期应用的比较[J]. 中华医学杂志,2019,99(23):1809-1813. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.23.012
    [27]
    魏鑫,杨凯,高晓秋,等. 竖脊肌平面阻滞与胸椎旁神经阻滞用于乳腺癌根治术围术期镇痛效果的比较[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志,2020,36(9):871-875. doi: 10.12089/jca.2020.09.008
    [28]
    谢永香,刘妙惠,倪洪湖. 超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞联合自控静脉镇痛用于乳腺癌根治术后镇痛的研究[J]. 中国现代医药杂志,2020,22(8):37-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9463.2020.08.008
    [29]
    闫志兵,许立新. 超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞在乳腺癌术后镇痛中的应用[J]. 广州医科大学学报,2019,47(4):69-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9664.2019.04.19
    [30]
    张春艳,李宁. 超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞对乳腺癌改良根治术患者术后疼痛的影响[J]. 中国实用医刊,2018,45(5):50-53. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-4756.2018.05.017
    [31]
    周新,胡胜红,王胜斌,等. 超声引导下单次竖脊肌平面阻滞对单侧乳腺癌根治术后患者恢复的影响[J]. 癌症进展,2020,18(5):479-481,488.
    [32]
    Woodworth G E,Ivie R M J,Nelson S M,et al. Perioperative breast analgesia: a qualitative review of anatomy and regional techniques[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2017,42(5):609-631. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000641
    [33]
    Forero M,Adhikary S D,Lopez H,et al. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain[J]. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine,2016,41(5):621-627. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451
    [34]
    Leong R W,Tan E S J,Wong S N,et al. Efficacy of erector spinae plane block for analgesia in breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Anaesthesia,2021,76(3):404-413. doi: 10.1111/anae.15164
    [35]
    Hussain N,Brull R,Noble J,et al. Statistically significant but clinically unimportant: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the analgesic benefits of erector spinae plane block following breast cancer surgery[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2021,46(1):3-12. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101917
    [36]
    Altiparmak B,Korkmaz Toker M,Uysal A I,et al. Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block performed with different concentrations of bupivacaine on postoperative analgesia after mastectomy surgery: ramdomized,prospective,double blinded trial[J]. BMC Anesthesiol,2019,19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0700-3
    [37]
    ElHawary H,Abdelhamid K,Meng F Y,et al. Erector Spinae Plane Block Decreases Pain and Opioid Consumption in Breast Surgery: Systematic Review[J]. Prs-Glob Open,2019,7(11):8.
    [38]
    ElHawary H, Abdelhamid K, Meng F Y, et al. Erector spinae plane block decreases pain and opioid consumption in breast surgery: Systematic review[J]. Prs-Glob Open,2019,7(11):8.
  • Relative Articles

    [1] Shuang FANG, Libo ZHU, Ling LIU, Yanhua XU, Xue HU. Meta-analysis of the Impact of Early Enteral Nutrition on the Clinical Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight Premature Infants. Journal of Kunming Medical University,  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240920
    [2] Ya LUO, Yanting YU, Xue ZHANG, Zhongjuan WANG. A Meta-analysis of the Risk of Secondary Infection of Tocilizumab in the Treatment of COVID-19. Journal of Kunming Medical University,  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240208
    [3] Leijing RAN, Shaohua WANG, Lintong LI, Li GUI. A Meta-analysis of the Effect of Adjuvant Probiotics in Patients with Osteoporosis. Journal of Kunming Medical University,  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240209
    [4] Qingmei YU, Tao SHI, Hongxue GUAN, Yujun MAO, Zhaoyi LI, Jiao YANG. Prevalence and Influence Factors of Renal Function Impairment in Patients Following Radical Cystectomy:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Kunming Medical University,  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240913
    [5] Huaping WANG, Dingyun YOU, Yanhong YANG, Bowen CHEN, Yue HUAN, Rui LIAO. A Meta Analysis of the Incidence of Stillbirth in Pregnant and Postpartum Women in China from 1994 to 2020. Journal of Kunming Medical University,  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230907
    [6] Xiansong LU, Dongyan GUO, Fei QIAO. Comparison of Analgesic Level of Ultrasound-guided Paravertebral,Erector Spinae and Serratus Anterior Plane Blocks in Thoracic Surgery. Journal of Kunming Medical University,  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221226
    [7] Chen Fei , Wang Zhong Hui , Chen Liang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [8] Wang Xing Yao , Qian Jin Qiao . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [9] Zhou Yin Yan , Zhang Yu , Bai Wen Ya , Shen Yan Juan , Shao Jian Lin , Zhao Guo Liang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [10] Lin Yun Ke , Lin Yun Hong . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [11] Wang Jiong , Zhang Xian Zheng . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [12] Qiao Fei , Wang Jun, Zhan Xi , Yang Wen Yan . Clinical Application of Ultrasound-guided Paravertebral Nerve Block in Analgesia after Thoracotomy. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [13] Pang Jia Ning , Liu Jing Song , Li Xi , Wang Li Zhu , Zhang Xi Hua . Early Analgesic Effect of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [14] Deng Mei . Effects of Preoperative Anxiety on the Recovery of Anesthesia and Postoperative Analgesia in Patients undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [15] Chen Yong Lun . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [16] Nie Cui Feng . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [17] Deng Mei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [18] Jiang Hai Xia . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [19] . Sanchinoside for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy:A Meta Analysis. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [20] Zhang Cheng Hua . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-03010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.8 %其他: 2.8 %其他: 0.9 %其他: 0.9 %Falkenstein: 2.8 %Falkenstein: 2.8 %呼和浩特: 0.9 %呼和浩特: 0.9 %哥伦布: 0.9 %哥伦布: 0.9 %嘉兴: 0.9 %嘉兴: 0.9 %天津: 0.9 %天津: 0.9 %孝感: 0.9 %孝感: 0.9 %宣城: 0.9 %宣城: 0.9 %常州: 0.9 %常州: 0.9 %张家口: 15.1 %张家口: 15.1 %扬州: 2.8 %扬州: 2.8 %昆明: 10.4 %昆明: 10.4 %杭州: 0.9 %杭州: 0.9 %洛阳: 0.9 %洛阳: 0.9 %漯河: 7.5 %漯河: 7.5 %盐城: 0.9 %盐城: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %芒廷维尤: 29.2 %芒廷维尤: 29.2 %衡阳: 0.9 %衡阳: 0.9 %襄阳: 0.9 %襄阳: 0.9 %西宁: 12.3 %西宁: 12.3 %邯郸: 1.9 %邯郸: 1.9 %长沙: 0.9 %长沙: 0.9 %马鞍山: 0.9 %马鞍山: 0.9 %其他其他Falkenstein呼和浩特哥伦布嘉兴天津孝感宣城常州张家口扬州昆明杭州洛阳漯河盐城石家庄芒廷维尤衡阳襄阳西宁邯郸长沙马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(11)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (61) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return