留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

工程化噬菌体的核心策略及在疾病治疗中的应用研究进展

李雪林,  韩泽华,  杨小燕,  何润哲,  侯文腾,  杨爱,  陈昱良,  向盈盈

李雪林, 韩泽华, 杨小燕, 何润哲, 侯文腾, 杨爱, 陈昱良, 向盈盈. 工程化噬菌体的核心策略及在疾病治疗中的应用研究进展[J]. 昆明医科大学学报.
引用本文: 李雪林, 韩泽华, 杨小燕, 何润哲, 侯文腾, 杨爱, 陈昱良, 向盈盈. 工程化噬菌体的核心策略及在疾病治疗中的应用研究进展[J]. 昆明医科大学学报.
Xuelin LI, Zehua HAN, Xiaoyan YANG, Runzhe HE, Wenteng HOU, Ai YANG, Yuliang CHEN, Yingying XIANG. Core Strategies of Engineered Bacteriophages and Research Progress in Their Application for Disease Treatment[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University.
Citation: Xuelin LI, Zehua HAN, Xiaoyan YANG, Runzhe HE, Wenteng HOU, Ai YANG, Yuliang CHEN, Yingying XIANG. Core Strategies of Engineered Bacteriophages and Research Progress in Their Application for Disease Treatment[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University.

工程化噬菌体的核心策略及在疾病治疗中的应用研究进展

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(82360189);云南省高层次卫生健康技术人才培养专项基金(D2024005)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李雪林(1999~),女,云南昆明人,医学硕士,住院医师,主要从事口腔教学工作

    通讯作者:

    向盈盈,E-mail:25591394@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: Q939.48

Core Strategies of Engineered Bacteriophages and Research Progress in Their Application for Disease Treatment

  • 摘要: 噬菌体是特异性裂解细菌的天然病毒,在抗菌治疗中具有独特优势,但天然噬菌体存在宿主范围窄、稳定性差及免疫原性高等局限性。合成生物学与基因编辑技术的进步为噬菌体定向改造提供了有力支撑。通过基因编辑、化学修饰和材料包封的工程化策略,能有效拓宽噬菌体的宿主范围、增强其环境稳定性并降低免疫清除,显著提升治疗效果。对工程化噬菌体的核心策略及在抗感染、肿瘤治疗及疫苗开发中的研究进展进行综述,旨在推动工程化噬菌体的深入研究与临床转化,为应对抗生素耐药性问题及拓展精准医学应用提供新的解决方案。
  • 图  1  工程化噬菌体的核心策略和临床应用

    注:工程化噬菌体的三大核心策略包括基因工程、化学修饰和生物材料封装;其在体内的作用机制包括生物膜降解、毒力因子抑制、靶向递送和微生物群调节;最终实现抗感染治疗、肿瘤治疗及噬菌体疫苗的临床应用。

    Figure  1.  Core strategies and clinical applications of engineered bacteriophages

    图  2  工程化噬菌体基因组编辑技术机制

    A:同源重组:噬菌体感染宿主,供体质粒与噬菌体基因组同源重组,产生重组子代;B:BRED:噬菌体侵染后电转化编辑模板,依靠重组系统修饰基因组;C:酵母噬菌体基因组工程:噬菌体基因组片段与YAC载体导入酵母组装,电转化导入宿主;D:CRISPR-Cas辅助编辑:crRNA-Cas复合物切割野生型DNA,负筛选富集编辑噬菌体。

    Figure  2.  Mechanisms of engineered bacteriophages genome editing technologies

    表  1  四种噬菌体基因组编辑技术的特征比较

    Table  1.   Comparative characteristics of four bacteriophage genome editing technologies

    基因组编辑技术核心机制优势局限性应用范围参考文献
    同源重组重组酶催化同源DNA序列间的链交换,通过共感染或供体质粒实现基因整合操作门槛低,无需引入外源重组系统;可实现精准的基因组修饰效率低下,缺乏有效的筛选标记,筛选工作量大基因敲除、敲入及替换[19−21]
    电转化DNA 的噬菌体重组电转化线性dsDNA模板至噬菌体感染的宿主细胞,λ-Red系统介导高效同源重组编辑效率显著提升,操作相对简便;可与CRISPR-Cas系统联用作为反筛选工具受限于宿主细菌的转化效率,大片段编辑能力有限点突变、基因缺失、标记添加、外源基因嵌入[22−23]
    基于酵母的噬菌体基因组工程酿酒酵母内源重组机制介导大片段DNA克隆、组装与多位点编辑支持大片段DNA操作,规避细菌系统对毒性基因的限制流程复杂、周期较长,YAC转化效率及稳定性不足大片段基因组装、复杂基因组改造[24−25]
    CRISPR-Cas技术gRNA引导Cas蛋白靶向切割,结合同源重组修复,实现高效负筛选富集重组子编辑精度高,负筛选高效富集重组子依赖PAM序列,部分噬菌体对Cas9耐受;需关注CRISPR逃逸突变精准点突变、多靶点编辑、基因大片段置换[26]
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Netea M G, Schlitzer A, Placek K, et al. Innate and adaptive immune memory: An evolutionary continuum in the host’s response to pathogens[J]. Cell Host Microbe, 2019, 25(1): 13-26. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.12.006
    [2] Sahoo K, Meshram S. The evolution of phage therapy: A comprehensive review of current applications and future innovations[J]. Cureus, 2024, 16(9): e70414. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70414
    [3] Venkataraman S, Shahgolzari M, Yavari A, et al. Bacteriophages as targeted therapeutic vehicles: Challenges and opportunities[J]. Bioengineering (Basel), 2025, 12(5): 469. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050469
    [4] Hussain W, Yang X, Ullah M, et al. Genetic engineering of bacteriophages: Key concepts, strategies, and applications[J]. Biotechnol Adv, 2023, 64: 108116. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108116
    [5] Cao X, Yu T, Sun Z, et al. Engineered phages in anti-infection and anti-tumor fields: A review[J]. Microb Pathogen, 2025, 198: 107052. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2024.107052
    [6] Ding B, Fan M, Shi Y P, et al. Mechanistic roles and therapeutic potential of bacteriophages in inflammatory gastrointestinal diseases[J]. Microbiome Res Rep, 2025, 4(4): 40. doi: 10.20517/mrr.2025.62
    [7] Xiang Y, Yang R, Li X, et al. Phage PEf771 for the treatment of periapical periodontitis induced by Enterococcus faecalis YN771[J]. Crit Rev Immunol, 2024, 44(1): 41-53. doi: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2023050313
    [8] 韩泽华, 杨小燕, 陈昱良, 等. 噬菌体在龋病防治中的研究进展[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2026, 47(1): 140-147. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20260117
    [9] Zhang S, Kim J C, Ahn J. Phage engineering strategies to expand host range for controlling antibiotic-resistant pathogens[J]. Microbiol Res, 2025, 300: 128278. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2025.128278
    [10] Xiang Y, Ma C, Yin S, et al. Phage therapy for refractory periapical periodontitis caused by Enterococcus faecalis in vitro and in vivo[J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2022, 106(5-6): 2121-2131. doi: 10.1007/s00253-022-11810-8
    [11] Xiang Y, Wang S, Huang H, et al. A novel endolysin from an Enterococcus faecalis phage and application[J]. Microb Pathogen, 2024, 192: 106689. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2024.106689
    [12] Kim P, Sanchez A M, Penke T J R, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of LBP-EC01, a CRISPR-Cas3-enhanced bacteriophage cocktail, in uncomplicated urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli (ELIMINATE): The randomised, open-label, first part of a two-part phase 2 trial[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2024, 24(12): 1319-1332. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00424-9
    [13] Yue Y, Xu Z, Soteyome T, et al. Phage encapsulation and delivery technology: A strategy for treating drug-resistant pathogenic microorganisms[J]. Pharmaceuticals (Basel), 2025, 18(11): 1688. doi: 10.3390/ph18111688
    [14] Yang Y, Li R, Zhong Q, et al. In situ gut microbiota editing: Enhancing therapeutic efficacy for bacterial colitis by compatible oral hydrogel microspheres with phages[J]. Nat Commun, 2025, 16(1): 9785. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-65498-1
    [15] Ramadan MA, Ali MA, El-Badawy MF, et al. Phage display technology: a promising platform for cancer targeting, drug delivery, and vaccine development[J]. Future J Pharm Sci, 2025, 11: 74. doi: 10.1186/s43094-025-00825-3
    [16] Chongchai A, Bentayebi K, Chu G, et al. Targeted treatment of chondrosarcoma with a bacteriophage-based particle delivering a secreted tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand[J]. Mol Ther Oncol, 2024, 32(2): 200805. doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2024.200805
    [17] Kim S Y, Kim Y J, Kim M S. Protective efficacy of miR-155 encapsulated using MS2 bacteriophage-based virus-like particle (MS2-VLP) against viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) in olive flounder[J]. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2026, 168: 111000. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2025.111000
    [18] Lenneman B R, Fernbach J, Loessner M J, et al. Enhancing phage therapy through synthetic biology and genome engineering[J]. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2021, 68: 151-159. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.11.003
    [19] Mahler M, Costa A R, van Beljouw S P B, et al. Approaches for bacteriophage genome engineering[J]. Trends Biotechnol, 2023, 41(5): 669-685. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.08.008
    [20] Morrical S W. The bacteriophage T4 homologous recombination system: Mechanism, applications, conservation, and environmental significance[J]. EcoSal Plus, 2025, 13(1): eesp00032025. doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0003-2025
    [21] Alessa O, Aiba Y, Arbaah M, et al. Synthetic and functional engineering of bacteriophages: Approaches for tailored bactericidal, diagnostic, and delivery platforms[J]. Molecules, 2025, 30(15): 3132. doi: 10.3390/molecules30153132
    [22] Payaslian F, Gradaschi V, Piuri M. Genetic manipulation of phages for therapy using BRED[J]. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2021, 68: 8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.09.005
    [23] Wetzel K S, Guerrero-Bustamante C A, Dedrick R M, et al. CRISPY-BRED and CRISPY-BRIP: Efficient bacteriophage engineering[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 6796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86112-6
    [24] Costa A R, Azeredo J, Pires D P. Synthetic biology to engineer bacteriophage genomes[M]//Bacteriophage Therapy. New York, NY: Springer, 2023: 261-277.
    [25] Deng W, Li Y, Shao Y, et al. Engineering yeast chromosomal telomeres with a bacteriophage system[J]. Nat Commun, 2026, 17(1): 6571. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-73335-2
    [26] Chaudhary N, Sharma K, Kaur H, et al. CRISPR-Cas-assisted phage engineering for personalized antibacterial treatments[J]. Indian J Med Microbiol, 2025, 53: 100771. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2024.100771
    [27] Marinelli L J, Piuri M, Hatfull G F. Genetic manipulation of lytic bacteriophages with BRED: Bacteriophage recombineering of electroporated DNA[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2019, 1898: 69-80.
    [28] Kakkar A, Kandwal G, Nayak T, et al. Engineered bacteriophages: A Panacea against pathogenic and drug resistant bacteria[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(14): e34333. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34333
    [29] Ando H, Lemire S, Pires D P, et al. Engineering modular viral scaffolds for targeted bacterial population editing[J]. Cell Syst, 2015, 1(3): 187-196. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.08.013
    [30] Doudna J A, Charpentier E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9[J]. Science, 2014, 346(6213): 1258096. doi: 10.1126/science.1258096
    [31] Camara-Wilpert S, Mayo-Muñoz D, Russel J, et al. Bacteriophages suppress CRISPR-Cas immunity using RNA-based anti-CRISPRs[J]. Nature, 2023, 623(7987): 601-607. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06612-5
    [32] Khambhati K, Bhattacharjee G, Gohil N, et al. Phage engineering and phage-assisted CRISPR-Cas delivery to combat multidrug-resistant pathogens[J]. Bioeng Transl Med, 2023, 8(2): e10381. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10381
    [33] Huss P, Raman S. Engineered bacteriophages as programmable biocontrol agents[J]. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2020, 61: 116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.11.013
    [34] Souza E B, Pinto A R, Fongaro G. Bacteriophages as potential clinical immune modulators[J]. Microorganisms, 2023, 11(9): 2222. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092222
    [35] Guan J, Oromí-Bosch A, Mendoza S D, et al. Bacteriophage genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas13a[J]. Nat Microbiol, 2022, 7(12): 1956-1966. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01243-4
    [36] Hameed M, Hu Y, Khan A, et al. Chemically mediated modification of bacteriophages: Strategies, functionalities and applications in precision medicine[J]. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med, 2026, 74: 102944. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2026.102944
    [37] Peng H, Borg R E, Dow L P, et al. Controlled phage therapy by photothermal ablation of specific bacterial species using gold nanorods targeted by chimeric phages[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2020, 117(4): 1951-1961. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913234117
    [38] Peng H, Chen I A. Preparation of bioconjugates of chimeric M13 phage and gold nanorods[M]//Phage Engineering and Analysis: Methods and Protocols. New York, NY: Springer US, 2024: 131-141.
    [39] Brown L, Vidal A V, Dias A L, et al. Proximity-driven site-specific cyclization of phage-displayed peptides[J]. Nat Commun, 2024, 15: 7308. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51610-4
    [40] Jin L, Cao F, Gao Y, et al. Microenvironment-activated nanozyme-armed bacteriophages efficiently combat bacterial infection[J]. Adv Mater, 2023, 35(30): e2301349. doi: 10.1002/adma.202301349
    [41] Ma Y, Pacan J C, Wang Q, et al. Microencapsulation of bacteriophage felix O1 into chitosan-alginate microspheres for oral delivery[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2008, 74(15): 4799-4805. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00246-08
    [42] Hsu B B, Plant I N, Lyon L, et al. In situ reprogramming of gut bacteria by oral delivery[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1): 5030. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18614-2
    [43] Singla S, Harjai K, Raza K, et al. Phospholipid vesicles encapsulated bacteriophage: A novel approach to enhance phage biodistribution[J]. J Virol Methods, 2016, 236: 68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.07.002
    [44] Colom J, Cano-Sarabia M, Otero J, et al. Liposome-encapsulated bacteriophages for enhanced oral phage therapy against Salmonella spp[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2015, 81(14): 4841-4849. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00812-15
    [45] Meng L, Yang F, Pang Y, et al. Nanocapping-enabled charge reversal generates cell-enterable endosomal-escapable bacteriophages for intracellular pathogen inhibition[J]. Sci Adv, 2022, 8(28): eabq2005. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq2005
    [46] Dedrick R M, Guerrero-Bustamante C A, Garlena R A, et al. Engineered bacteriophages for treatment of a patient with a disseminated drug-resistant Mycobacterium abscessus[J]. Nat Med, 2019, 25(5): 730-733. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0437-z
    [47] Weiner I, Kahan-Hanum M, Buchstab N, et al. Phage therapy with nebulized cocktail BX004-A for chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis: A randomized first-in-human trial[J]. Nat Commun, 2025, 16(1): 5579. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60598-4
    [48] Bayat F, Stark M, Rahmani S, et al. AI-assisted phage formulation delivered via injectable hydrogels for localized control of implant-associated infections[J]. Bioact Mater, 2026, 63: 578-595.
    [49] Walter N, Brochhuasen C, EL Khassawna T, et al. Hydrogel-based local delivery of bacteriophages for infection control: A systematic review of in vivo evidence[J]. Journal of Controlled Release, 2026, 399: 115335. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2026.115335
    [50] Kaltenbrunner A, Martino A, Nigro M, et al. Conjugating M13 bacteriophage targeting folate receptor alpha with multiple photosensitizers: A flexible phototheranostic platform against ovarian cancer[J]. J Mater Chem B, 2026, 14(23): 7164-7178. doi: 10.1039/D5TB02844B
    [51] Mangeat T, Mairaville C, Chentouf M, et al. Generation using phage-display of pH-dependent antibodies against the tumor-associated antigen AXL[J]. Antibodies (Basel), 2025, 14(4): 83. doi: 10.3390/antib14040083
    [52] Mustafa B S, Nagalo B M, Tesfay M, et al. Abstract 2155: Phage display discovery of Trop-2 peptide for targeted liposomal chemo-immunotherapy in lung cancer[J]. Cancer Res, 2025, 85(8_Supplement_1): 2155.
    [53] Bush M, Rajaure M, Gentilucci C, et al. Lambda phage-based antibody-stimulating platform targeting EGFRvIII[J]. Vaccines, 2026, 14(3): 282. doi: 10.3390/vaccines14030282
    [54] Zhu J, Sha J, Batra H, et al. A modular bacteriophage T4 nanoparticle platform enables rapid design of dual COVID-19-flu mucosal vaccines[J]. Small Sci, 2025, 5(4): 2400580. doi: 10.1002/smsc.202400580
    [55] Wroe J A, Johnson C T, García A J. Bacteriophage delivering hydrogels reduce biofilm formation in vitro and infection in vivo[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2020, 108(1): 39-49. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36790
    [56] Ghafouri E, Fadaie M, Amirkhani Z, et al. Evaluation of humoral and cellular immune responses against Vibrio cholerae using oral immunization by multi-epitope-phage-based vaccine[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2024, 134: 112160. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112160
    [57] Alessa O, Aiba Y, Arbaah M, et al. Synthetic and functional engineering of bacteriophages: Approaches for tailored bactericidal, diagnostic, and delivery platforms[J]. Molecules, 2025, 30(15): 3132. doi: 10.3390/molecules30153132
    [58] International Organization for Standardization. Biotechnology—Bioprocessing—General requirements for bacteriophage preparation for therapeutic use: ISO/TS 20853: 2026[S]. Geneva: ISO, 2026.
    [59] Zhu J, Tao P, Chopra A K, et al. Bacteriophage T4 as a protein-based, adjuvant- and needle-free, mucosal pandemic vaccine design platform[J]. Annu Rev Virol, 2024, 11(1): 395-420. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-111821-111145
    [60] Kumar A, Krishan B, Dhiman S, et al. Beyond antibiotics: Innovative and translational strategies to overcome antimicrobial resistance[J]. 3 Biotech, 2026, 16(6): 201. doi: 10.1007/s13205-026-04836-6
  • [1] 韩泽华, 杨小燕, 李莲, 陈昱良, 杨爱, 李雪林, 向盈盈.  噬菌体内溶素的应用及其作用机制研究进展, 昆明医科大学学报. 2026, 47(6): 1-10. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20260601
    [2] 韩泽华, 杨小燕, 陈昱良, 李雪林, 杨镕羽, 向盈盈.  噬菌体在龋病防治中的研究进展, 昆明医科大学学报. 2026, 47(1): 1-8.
    [3] 韩泽华, 杨小燕, 陈昱良, 李雪林, 杨镕羽, 向盈盈.  噬菌体在龋病防治中的研究进展, 昆明医科大学学报. 2026, 47(1): 140-147. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20260117
    [4] 李响, 楚昭阳, 杨蘅莉, 冯昌增, 李丽, 刘建生, 马绍辉.  2022年两株新型柯萨奇病毒B组2型毒株的全基因组分析, 昆明医科大学学报. 2026, 47(5): 13-23. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20260502
    [5] 谢婉莹, 熊晶晶, 李湛华, 阳情姚, 黄永坤, 李檬.  母乳性黄疸和非黄疸婴儿肠道微生物组宏基因组学研究, 昆明医科大学学报. 2026, 47(8): 58-69. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20260806
    [6] 李雪林, 杨小燕, 韩泽华, 陈昱良, 徐兴源, 张春燕, 向盈盈.  噬菌体联合抗生素疗法的协同作用机制及应用进展, 昆明医科大学学报. 2025, 46(12): 1-8. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20251201
    [7] 孙娅红, 杨晓钰, 郑瑞.  噬菌体治疗碳青霉烯类耐药肺炎克雷伯菌感染研究进展与挑战, 昆明医科大学学报. 2025, 46(6): 163-170. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20250621
    [8] 黄浩, 李雪林, 韩泽华, 常琳, 朱鹏飞, 向盈盈.  噬菌体在口腔常见感染性疾病中的研究及应用, 昆明医科大学学报. 2025, 46(1): 148-153. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20250122
    [9] 马丹, 张亚娟, 马彬斌, 岳乔宁, 刘建平.  衰老与骨质疏松靶基因及小分子筛选的基因组分析, 昆明医科大学学报. 2025, 46(2): 141-150. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20250220
    [10] 赵金丽, 阳红燕, 杨佳倩, 陈馨忆, 赵庆, 张晓梅.  虫生真菌Samsoniella hepiali CDB9-31化学表观遗传修饰研究, 昆明医科大学学报. 2025, 46(8): 10-19. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20250802
    [11] 楚昭阳, 李佳玲, 陈俊薇, 冯昌增, 张名, 李丽, 马绍辉.  云南省柯萨奇病毒A组10型的全基因组分析, 昆明医科大学学报. 2025, 46(2): 23-29. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20250204
    [12] 杨镕羽, 宋飞, 魏云林, 杨向红, 段开文, 向盈盈.  不同富集培养方法对噬菌体PEf771的滴度影响, 昆明医科大学学报. 2022, 43(2): 7-11. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220218
    [13] 毛俊鸿, 鲁丹枫, 徐玉, 代毅聪, 张哲瑞, 李悦, 王昆华.  甲基苯丙胺改变成瘾小鼠突触可塑性基因的甲基化修饰, 昆明医科大学学报. 2022, 43(1): 1-7. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220121
    [14] 乔奕胜, 陈孝祥, 徐蛟天, 王威, 张超, 宋晓斌, 杨智勇, 邓兴力.  Nurr1基因修饰胚胎中脑神经干细胞移植治疗帕金森病, 昆明医科大学学报. 2021, 42(): 1-6. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210919
    [15] 乔奕胜, 陈孝祥, 徐蛟天, 王威, 张超, 宋晓斌, 杨智勇, 邓兴力.  Nurr1基因修饰胚胎中脑神经干细胞移植治疗帕金森病, 昆明医科大学学报. 2021, 42(8): 1-6. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210801
    [16] 向盈盈, 宋飞, 杨向红, 周静, 于鸿滨, 魏云林, 季秀玲.  噬菌体疗法在口腔感染性疾病中的应用, 昆明医科大学学报. 2020, 41(06): 167-173.
    [17] 代润, 张婵, 程瑜静, 陈婉璐, 李琦, 王玉明.  云南佤族和布朗族人群药物基因组学基因遗传差异, 昆明医科大学学报. 2020, 41(05): 33-40.
    [18] 杨金荣, 阮经艳, 曾云, 武坤, 聂波, 王雪娇.  DNMT3A在IDH1致急性髓系白血病基因组高甲基化中的作用, 昆明医科大学学报. 2019, 40(09): 12-17.
    [19] 李晓非.  噬菌体生物扩增技术在结核分枝杆菌利福平耐药性检测中的应用, 昆明医科大学学报. 2013, 34(04): -.
    [20] 吴高莉.  噬菌体鉴定食品中沙门菌污染情况调查分析, 昆明医科大学学报. 2013, 34(11): -.
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2
  • HTML全文浏览量:  5
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2026-06-09

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回