Evaluation and Application of the Patients Reported Outcomes Measurement Scale for Hypertension

Shunding TANG; Chonghua WAN; Ying SONG; Li DENG; Han WANG; Changwei SU; Xiaoqing ZHANG

doi:10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220312

Volume 43 Issue 3

Mar. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Kunming Medical University > 2022 > 43(3): 60-66

Shunding TANG, Chonghua WAN, Ying SONG, Li DENG, Han WANG, Changwei SU, Xiaoqing ZHANG. Evaluation and Application of the Patients Reported Outcomes Measurement Scale for Hypertension[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(3): 60-66. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220312

Citation:

Shunding TANG, Chonghua WAN, Ying SONG, Li DENG, Han WANG, Changwei SU, Xiaoqing ZHANG. Evaluation and Application of the Patients Reported Outcomes Measurement Scale for Hypertension[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(3): 60-66. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220312

Citation:

Shunding TANG, Chonghua WAN, Ying SONG, Li DENG, Han WANG, Changwei SU, Xiaoqing ZHANG. Evaluation and Application of the Patients Reported Outcomes Measurement Scale for Hypertension[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(3): 60-66. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220312

PDF( 663 KB)

Evaluation and Application of the Patients Reported Outcomes Measurement Scale for Hypertension

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220312

1.
School of Public Health，Kunming Medical University，Kunming Yunnan 650500
2.
Yunnan Center for Disease Control and Prevention，Kunming Yunnan 650022
3.
School of Humanities and Management，Guangdong Medical University，Guangzhou Guangdong 510000
4.
Baoshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention，Baoshan Yunnan 678000，China

Received Date: 2022-01-16
Available Online: 2022-02-18
Publish Date: 2022-03-22

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the reliability, validity and responsiveness of Patient Reported Outcome Instruments System for Chronic Disease-Hypertension, PROISCD-HY （V1.0）, a scale for measuring reported outcomes in patients with hypertension. Methods During May 2020 to October 2020, 111 community hypertension patients with initial hypertension were enrolled in PRO scale two surveys （before and after antihypertensive drug treatment）, and the reliability, validity and responsiveness were evaluated based on scale scores. Results The Cronbach’ α of the total table was 0.894 and the split - half reliability coefficient was 0.783. The Cronbach’ α of spiritual/belief health was 0.434, respectively, and 0.725 or above in other fields. The fractional reliability coefficients of physical health and spiritual/belief health were 0.585 and 0.489, respectively, and 0.678 and above in other fields. The scale was developed according to the PRO scale development and application guidelines issued by FDA, and has good content validity. Factor analysis of common modules extracted 11 common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 79.275%. Factor analysis of specific modules extracted 4 common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 64.554%. The scale has good structural validity. The ES value ranged from 0.129 to 0.594, the CR value ranged from -8.911% to -1.796%, and the SRM value ranged from 0.103 to 0.516, indicating that the scale had a good response degree in the same population at different times. Conclusion PROISCD-HY （V1.0）, a clinical outcome measurement scale reported by patients with hypertension, has good reliability, validity and reactivity, and can be used to measure the clinical outcome reported by patients with hypertension.
- Hypertension,
- Patient reported outcomes,
- Reliability,
- Validity,
- Responsiveness

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	万崇华,黄新萍,常巍,等. 患者报告的临床结局研究述评[J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版),2011,46(4):501-505. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6825.2011.04.001
[2]	U. S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,U. S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologic Evaluation and Research,U. S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radio logical Health. Guidance for industry:patient-reported outcome measures:use in medical product development to support labeling claims:draft guidance[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes,2006,4(6):79.
[3]	周慧,姚弥,陈杰,等. 《临床试验方案纳入患者报告结局的指南-扩展声明》解读[J]. 中国新药杂志,2021,30(14):1296-1301.
[4]	李其飞. 中医高血压病PRO量表的研制[D]. 广州: 广州中医药大学硕士学位论文, 2014.
[5]	杨程. 老年高血压的患者报告结局量表的研制[D]. 山东: 山东大学硕士学位论文, 2015.
[6]	欧玉英. 高血压患者报告的临床结局PRO量表研制及评价[D]. 昆明: 昆明医科大学硕士学位论文, 2015.
[7]	刘巧君. “基于高血压患者报告的临床结局评价量表”的编制与评价[D]. 山西: 山西医科大学硕士学位论文, 2011.
[8]	彭丽霞,张勇. 高血压患者报告结局的研究现状[J]. 保健医学研究与实践,2021,18(1):100-104.
[9]	张雯,黄青梅,黄跃师,等. 患者报告结局测量工具质量评价标准的研究进展[J]. 护士进修杂志,2020,35(20):1825-1830.
[10]	中国高血压防治指南（2018年修订版）[J]. 中国心血管杂志, 2019, 24（1）: 24-56.
[11]	张文彤, 董伟. SPSS统计分析高级教程[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2018: 414-415.
[12]	曾五一,黄炳艺. 调查问卷的可信度和有效度分析[J]. 统计与信息论坛,2005,20(6):13-17.
[13]	Dellis R F. Scale development: theory and applications[M]. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2011: 31-58.
[14]	李海龙,张川,黄超,等. 指南临床适用性评价工具信效度分析[J]. 中国循证医学杂志,2020,20(4):378-382.
[15]	孙振球, 徐勇勇. 医学统计学[M]. 4版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 1.
[16]	史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2):49-52.
[17]	陈艺蕾,张晟,柴菽彬,等. 糖尿病中医疗效评价PRO量表的反应度研究[J]. 中华中医药杂志,2020,35(4):2031-2033.
[18]	王浩,范小华,梁学敏,等. 结直肠癌术后中医生存质量量表信度和效度评价[J]. 中国中医药信息杂志,2021,28(11):108-111.
[19]	刘思奇,付晶晶,孔德辉,等. 社区老年人数字健康素养评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理研究,2021,691(23):4169-4174. doi: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.23.006
[20]	张晓磬,陈莹,崔文龙,等. 卫生系统反应性量表的信效度分析[J]. 中国全科医学,2013,16(40):4068-4070.
[21]	朱燕波,王琦,虞晓含,等. 中医体质量表-41条目简短版的结构效度和反应度评价[J]. 中国全科医学,2017,20(26):3282-3286.
[22]	曾碧珊. 中医健康状况量表对不同病种的反应度探讨[J]. 按摩与康复医学,2018,9(23):39-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1879.2018.23.019

Relative Articles(20)

Relative Articles

[1]	Huijuan ZENG, Bo TIAN, Hongling YUAN, Jie HE, Guanxi LI, Guojia RU, Min XU, Dong ZHAN. Predictive Modeling of Chronic Kidney Disease with Hypertension or Diabetes Based on Machine Learning Algorithms. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(3): 99-105. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240315
[2]	Qiuju MIAO, Yuanling CHEN, Na LUO, Xin SHI, Ruiyu LI, Ting SONG, Ying CHEN. Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Chronic Gastritis based on SEM Model. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(4): 41-48. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240406
[3]	Hualei DAI, Chengcheng HU, Guimin ZHANG, Siming TAO, Jiankun CHEN. Screening Biomarkers of Astragalus Membranaceus for Hypertensive Ventricular Remodeling Based on Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(8): 27-36. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20230819
[4]	Song LI, Juan CHEN, Chaogang ZHU, Daoli XIE, Hongxue GUAN, Lingyun RAN. Effect of 5 g Salt Reduction Based on Peer Education in Self-management of Elderly Hypertensive Patients in the Community. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(10): 187-192. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221009
[5]	Liu LI, Yaru WANG, Di ZHANG, Qincong CHEN, Ming WANG, Shuo WANG. Application of Gene Detection for Individualized Medication for Hypertension in Patients with Grade 3 Hypertension. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(4): 112-117. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220430
[6]	Chuntao WU, Ke LIN. Construction and Application of the Health Literacy Assessment Scale for Day Surgery Patients and Its Influence on Early Postoperative Recovery Quality. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(5): 179-184. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220515
[7]	Hai-ping ZHANG, Shu-juan YANG, Li-xia YANG, Zhao-juan RUAN, Rui-wei GUO. Effect of Hyperhomocysteinemia on Cardiac Function and Mortality of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Concomitant Hypertension underwent Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention after 6 Months. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(3): 73-78. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210319
[8]	Lian-ju HE, Chun-mei ZUO, Lan LIU, Wen-long CUI, Jin-bo LI, Yi MO, Lu-ming FAN, Le CAI. Analysis of Trend in Prevalence of Hypertension and Its Relationship with Different Obesity Indices among Rural Adults in Fumin County of Yunnan Province. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(10): 38-44. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20211008
[9]	Xiao-xiao SONG, Shan BAI, Yue-na YANG, Bing-bing YANG, Sai-xian LI, Ying-hui LIN, Zhe MA, Jia ZENG, Fan-wei QU. Reliability and Validity of A Questionnaire for International Students in China with Educational Service Satisfaction in English Version-Taking Kunming Medical University as A Case. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(3): 161-165. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210337
[10]	Zhang Li Qiong , Cai Le , Zhang Hong Qing , Cui Wen Long , Liu Ying Nan , Shen Jing Rong , He Lian Ju . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(03): 30-34.
[11]	Sun Cheng Huan , Zhou Jia , Mao Yong , Luo Jia Hong , Chu Tian Shu , Lai Chun Mi , Qi Bing Xian , Zhang Qing . The Awareness, Treatment and Control of Hypertension and Its Determinants in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients of Dean Nationality: A Multilevel Model Analysis. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2018, 39(01): 39-44.
[12]	Li Wen Hong . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[13]	Du Ying Rong . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[14]	Qu Qi Cai . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[15]	Zhang Ti Ling . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[16]	Li Hong Fei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[17]	Zhang Li Gang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[18]	Pang Xing Mei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[19]	Yang Zheng . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
[20]	Chen Xue Qiang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,