Volume 45 Issue 4
Apr.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Relative Articles
Article Navigation >  Journal of Kunming Medical University  > 2024  >  45(4): 67-73
Yunjuan YANG, Tao MA, Yuanyi ZHA, Litao CHANG, Hong LIU, Fan YANG, Limei DAI, Fang LI. Epidemic Trends and Characteristics of Hypertension among Primary and Secondary Students from 2017 to 2020 in Kunming，Yunnan[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(11): 17-21. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221104
Citation: Dongyan YANG, Hua LIN, Yuxiao ZHANG, Kunying ZHAO, Lirong XIANG, Shuda YANG, Weiyan HU. Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Combined with Temozolomide for Recurrent High-Grade Glioma[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2024, 45(4): 67-73. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240410
shu

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Combined with Temozolomide for Recurrent High-Grade Glioma

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20240410
  • 1.

    School of Pharmaceutical Science & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Pharmacology for Natural Products，Kunming Yunnan 650500

  • 2.

    Dept. of Pharmacy，The 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University，Kunming Yunnan 650100

  • 3.

    Biomedical Engineering Research Institute of Kunming Medical University，Kunming Yunnan 650500，China

  • Received Date: 2023-12-26
    Available Online: 2024-04-28
  • Publish Date: 2024-04-29
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To explore the short-term efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors affecting the overall survival （OS） of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma （HGG） treated with bevacizumab （BEV） alone and bevacizumab in combination with temozolomide （TMZ）.  Methods  According to the response assessment in neurooncology （RANO） criteria for the treatment of gliomas, objective response rate （ORR） and disease control rate （DCR） were used as indicators to retrospectively analyze the clinical medical records of 31 patients with recurrent HGG at Yunnan Cancer Hospital from August 2020 to July 2023. The patients were divided into a control group （BEV） and a treatment group （BEV+TMZ）, and the recent efficacy of the two groups was evaluated. Cox univariate and multivariate analysis methods were used to analyze the impact of group （control group vs. treatment group）, gender, age, disease grading, admission score, histopathological classification, etc., on the overall survival （OS） of 31 patients with recurrent HGG. Adverse reactions （ADR） between the two groups were compared using a chi-square test to evaluate the safety.  Results  The ORR of the treatment group was 63.16%, and the ORR of the control group was 16.67%. The difference was statistically significant （χ2 = 6.419, P = 0.011）. The DCR of the treatment group was 89.47%, and the DCR of the control group was 75.00%. There was no significant difference in DCR （χ2 = 0.320, P = 0.571）. The median survival time （mOS） in the control group was 7 months （95%CI: 3.605～10.395）, and the median survival time （mOS） in the treatment group was 14 months （95%CI: 3.853～24.147）. There was no significant difference in mOS between the two groups （χ2 = 0.829, P = 0.363）. There were significant differences in Cox univariate analysis admission score and histopathological classification among 31 patients with recurrent HGG （P < 0.05）, and statistically significant differences in histopathological classification by multivariate analysis （P < 0.05）. There was no significant difference in nausea, vomiting, fatigue and diarrhea between the two groups after treatment （P > 0.05）. There were statistically significant differences in the reduction rates of platelets and white blood cells （P < 0.05）, after symptomatic treatment, both groups of ADRs were alleviated.  Conclusion  The short-term curative effect of the treatment group was better than that of the control group in the treatment of recurrent HGG, the ADRs after recurrent HGG treatment in 2 groups were tolerable and safe, and the histopathological classification may be a prognostic factor affecting the OS of 31 patients with recurrent HGG.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(21)
  • [1]
    Miller K D,Ostrom Q T,Kruchko C,et al. Brain and other central nervous system tumor statistics[J]. CA:A Cancer Journal for Clinicians,2021,71(5):381-406. doi: 10.3322/caac.21693
    [2]
    Louis D N,Perry A,Wesseling P,et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: A summary[J]. Neuro-Oncology,2021,23(8):1231-1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106
    [3]
    Gritsch S,Batchelor T T,Gonzalez Castro L N. Diagnostic,therapeutic,and prognostic implications of the 2021 world health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system[J]. Cancer,2022,128(1):47-58. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33918
    [4]
    Ostrom Q T,Cioffi G,Waite K,et al. CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the united states in 2014-2018[J]. Neuro-Oncology,2021,23(12 Suppl 2):iii1-iii105. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab200
    [5]
    Sahebjam S,Forsyth P A,Tran N D,et al. Hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas: Results from a phase I study[J]. Neuro-Oncology,2021,23(4):677-686. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa260
    [6]
    Gimbrone M A,Leapman S B,Cotran R S,et al. Tumor dormancy in vivo by prevention of neovascularization[J]. Journal Experimental Medicine,1972,136(2):261-276. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.2.261
    [7]
    Wick W,Gorlia T,Bendszus M,et al. Lomustine and bevacizumab in progressive glioblastoma[J]. The New England Journal of Medicine,2017,377(20):1954-1963. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707358
    [8]
    Wen P Y,Macdonald D R,Reardon D A,et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: Response assessment in neuro-oncology working group[J]. Journal Clinical Oncology,2010,28(11):1963-1972. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541
    [9]
    张伟,王政. 中国抗癌协会脑胶质瘤整合诊治指南(精简版)[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2022,49(16):811-818.
    [10]
    Ameratunga M,Pavlakis N,Wheeler H,et al. Anti-angiogenic therapy for high-grade glioma[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2018,11(11):CD008218.
    [11]
    Xu Y A,Guan H J,Yu K F,et al. Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for recurrent high-grade glioma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.[J]. Fronts in Pharmacology,2023,14:1191480. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1191480
    [12]
    Chen Y L,Guo L B,Li X Z,et al. Reduced-dose bevacizumab vs. standard-dose bevacizumab in recurrent high-grade glioma: Which one is better? A meta-analysis[J]. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery,2020,198:106239. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106239
    [13]
    汪思亮,盛晓波,韦忠红,等. 肿瘤血管正常化与肿瘤治疗[J]. 肿瘤,2013,33(07):653-657.
    [14]
    Bergers G, Hanahan D, Modes of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy [J]. Nature Reviews Cancer, 2008, 8（8）: 592-603.
    [15]
    Pàez-Ribes M,Allen E,Hudock J,et al. Antiangiogenic therapy elicits malignant progression of tumors to increased local invasion and distant metastasis[J]. Cancer Cell,2009,15(3):220-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.01.027
    [16]
    Jain R K. Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: A new paradigm for combination therapy[J]. Nature Medicine,2001,7(9):987-989. doi: 10.1038/nm0901-987
    [17]
    张静,张文超,钱子君,等. 血管正常化提高肿瘤治疗疗效[J]. 中国癌症杂志,2016,26(2):188-192.
    [18]
    Macdonald D R, Temozolomide for recurrent high-grade glioma [J]. Seminars in Oncology, 2001, 28（Suppl 13）: 3-12.
    [19]
    崔润,郭琤琤,郭颖,等. 贝伐珠单抗治疗复发胶质母细胞瘤疗效和预后分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2022,49(21):1088-1093.
    [20]
    Armstrong T S,Cao Y,Scheurer M E,et al. Risk analysis of severe myelotoxicity with temozolomide: The effects of clinical and genetic factors[J]. Neuro Oncology,2009,11(6):825-32. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2008-120
    [21]
    Saran F,Chinot O L,Henriksson R,et al. Bevacizumab,temozolomide,and radiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Comprehensive safety results during and after first-line therapy[J]. Neuro Oncology,2016,18(7):991-1001. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov300
    • Relative Articles(20)

  • Relative Articles

    [1] Xiaofeng ZHU, Guangping ZHOU, Laicang WANG, Houjun ZHOU, Xin GENG, Hualin YU, Jinghui LI, Peng BAI. Clinical Effect of Reoperation for Recurrent Glioma. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(9): 77-83.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20220920
    [2] Jian-ping LI, Xue-ren GAO, Xiao-yan ZHANG, Ping CHEN, Su-rong CHEN, Wei-gang BIAN, Zhi-jun HUANG. Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine Combined with Bevacizumab or Single Agent of Capecitabine as Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(9): 119-126.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210908
    [3] Chen Xi , Xu Zhi Xing , Liu Xu Jie , Tian Jin Tao , Niu Xiao Qun , Pu Jun . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(09): 21-25.
    [4] Zhang Zhi Xian , Gu Hou , Feng Xin Rong , Lin 劼, Lei Xue Fen , Li Nan , Li Rui Zhi , Yu Jia . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2020, 41(05): 70-74.
    [5] Zhang Na , He Wen Xian , Yang Xue Mei , Li Gui Ping , Cui Yan Ting , Wu Jiang Hong . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2019, 40(04): 117-120.
    [6] Zhang Zhi Xian , Gu Hou , Lin 劼, Lei Xue Fen , Jiang Li Feng , Li Nan , Lu Xin Yan , Yu Jia . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2019, 40(08): 97-101.
    [7] Wang Ye Jing , Liu Huai Lei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2019, 40(08): 52-56.
    [8] Li Guo Lin , Li Chao , Li Feng . The Research of Correlation of Genetic Polymorphisms in IL1RN with Risk of Glioma. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2018, 39(04): 47-51.
    [9] Zhang Zhi Xian , Gu Hou , Lin 劼, Lei Xue Fen , Jiang Li Feng , Li Nan , Lu Xin Yan , Li Ting Ting . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2018, 39(12): 65-68.
    [10] Zhang Zhi Xian , Gu Hou , Lin 劼, Cao Hong Ming , Lei Xue Fen , Jiang Li Feng . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2018, 39(10): 33-37.
    [11] Xu Hua . The Effect of the Treatment of X-ray Radiation Combined with Chemotherapy on the Expression of CD133 and ABCG2 in Glioma. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [12] Lu Xi Wei . Clinical Effects of Cisplatin Combined with Temozolomide and Radiotherapy in Treatment of Glioblastomas after Surgery. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [13] Wang Can Zhi . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [14] Yuan Yong . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [15] Hao Jin Gang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [16] Niu Hua Tao . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [17] Shi Lei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [18] Wu Zhi Ping . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [19] Liang Yu Lin . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [20] Niu Hua Tao . Three-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy with Temozolomide in the Treatment of Postoperative Malignant Gliomas. Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 廉启国，次仁央宗，王延会，赵俊美，卢玉鑫，李娜，赵文虎，邓莉萍，刘志浩. 拉萨市藏族中学生血压偏高与超重肥胖及其共病影响因素分析. 中国学校卫生. 2024(03): 423-426+430 .
    2. 牟小平，王晓威，赵忠俊. 潍坊市中小学生血压偏高现状及影响因素分析. 中国初级卫生保健. 2024(10): 71-74 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04050100150200250
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 40.8 %FULLTEXT: 40.8 %META: 58.8 %META: 58.8 %PDF: 0.4 %PDF: 0.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.3 %其他: 5.3 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %Baden: 0.1 %Baden: 0.1 %Falkenstein: 0.4 %Falkenstein: 0.4 %上海: 10.9 %上海: 10.9 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %九江: 0.1 %九江: 0.1 %云浮: 0.2 %云浮: 0.2 %伊利: 0.1 %伊利: 0.1 %伊利诺伊州: 0.1 %伊利诺伊州: 0.1 %伊犁: 0.1 %伊犁: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %八打灵再也: 0.1 %八打灵再也: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六盘水: 0.1 %六盘水: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.1 %北京: 11.5 %北京: 11.5 %十堰: 0.3 %十堰: 0.3 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %博阿努瓦: 0.1 %博阿努瓦: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %吉林: 0.1 %吉林: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哈特菲尔德: 0.2 %哈特菲尔德: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.6 %大连: 0.3 %大连: 0.3 %天津: 1.9 %天津: 1.9 %安康: 0.2 %安康: 0.2 %安那罕: 0.2 %安那罕: 0.2 %安阳: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %张家口: 2.8 %张家口: 2.8 %张家界: 0.1 %张家界: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %德宏: 0.1 %德宏: 0.1 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %扬州: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %无锡: 0.4 %无锡: 0.4 %旧金山: 0.1 %旧金山: 0.1 %昆明: 1.7 %昆明: 1.7 %昭通: 0.1 %昭通: 0.1 %晋中: 0.1 %晋中: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %本溪: 0.1 %本溪: 0.1 %杭州: 0.8 %杭州: 0.8 %格兰特县: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.6 %洛杉矶: 0.1 %洛杉矶: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.8 %洛阳: 0.8 %济南: 1.3 %济南: 1.3 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 3.4 %漯河: 3.4 %石家庄: 1.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.1 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.1 %红河: 0.1 %红河: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 10.1 %芒廷维尤: 10.1 %芜湖: 0.1 %芜湖: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.7 %芝加哥: 0.7 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %西宁: 8.8 %西宁: 8.8 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %费耶特维尔: 0.1 %费耶特维尔: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %长春: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长沙: 2.6 %长沙: 2.6 %阿勒泰: 0.1 %阿勒泰: 0.1 %青岛: 1.1 %青岛: 1.1 %韶关: 0.1 %韶关: 0.1 %驻马店: 22.2 %驻马店: 22.2 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %其他其他BadenFalkenstein上海东莞临汾九江云浮伊利伊利诺伊州伊犁保定八打灵再也六安六盘水加利福尼亚州北京十堰南京南宁南昌南通博阿努瓦台州吉林呼和浩特咸阳哈特菲尔德嘉兴大连天津安康安那罕安阳宜昌宣城常州常德广州廊坊延安张家口张家界徐州德宏成都扬州无锡旧金山昆明昭通晋中晋城本溪杭州格兰特县武汉沈阳洛杉矶洛阳济南济宁淄博深圳温州湖州漯河石家庄福州科珀斯克里斯蒂红河绍兴芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏州蚌埠衡水衡阳西宁西安西雅图贵阳费耶特维尔运城邯郸郑州重庆长春长沙阿勒泰青岛韶关驻马店黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(6)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (859) PDF downloads(23) Cited by(4)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © 《昆明医科大学学报》编辑部  滇ICP备00000000号-0

    Publishing: 昆明医科大学学报编辑部

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return