Effects of Ranibizumab and Odix on the Microvascular Structure of the Macular Region
-
摘要:
目的 探讨雷珠单抗和傲迪适对视网膜静脉阻塞-黄斑水肿(RVO-ME)患者黄斑区微血管结构的影响。 方法 将眼科收治并确诊的RVO-ME所有患者纳入筛选范围,选取101例患者作为研究对象,纳入时间2020年1月至2021年12月,按治疗方法差异将其分成A、B组(观察组、对照组),各51例、50例,A组给予玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗,B组给予玻璃体腔注射傲迪适治疗,将2组年龄、性别及治疗前后的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、黄斑中心凹厚度(CMT)及视网膜浅层毛细血管层(SCP)、深层毛细血管层血流密度(DCP)及其他治疗有效率等指标纳入SPSS21.0软件处理,比较其治疗治疗差异。 结果 (1)A、B组治疗前BCVA、CMT、SCP、DCP相比差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),随着治疗时间的后延,A、B组的BCVA、CMT、SCP、DCP均显著改善,且B组较A组更优,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);(2)A组治疗后3、6个月时治疗总有效率各94.12%、98.04%,B组各84.00%、88.00%,且B组较A组更优,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 结论 傲迪适治疗能有效的改善RVO-ME患者的黄斑区微血管结构。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of ranibizumab and odix on the microvascular structure of the macular region in patients with retinal vein occlusion-macular edema (RVO-ME). Methods All patients with RVO-ME admitted and diagnosed in the ophthalmology department of our hospital were included in the screening scope, and 101 of them were selected as the research subjects. The inclusion time was from January 2020 to December 2021, and they were divided into the observation group and the control group according to the differences in treatment methods, with 51 cases and 50 cases in each group. The observation group was given intravitreal injection of ranibizumab, and the control group was given intravitreal injection of AODEX. The age, gender, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), macular fovea thickness (CMT), shallow retinal capillary layer (SCP), deep capillary layer blood flow density (DCP) and other effective rates of the two groups before and after the treatment were included in spss21.0 software to compare the treatment differences. Results (1) There was no significant difference in BCVA, CMT, SCP, and DCP between the two groups before the treatment (P > 0.05). With the delay of treatment time, BCVA, CMT, SCP and DCP of the two groups were significantly improved ,the control group was better than the observation group and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05) and (2) The total effective rates of the observation group were 94.12% and 98.04% at 3 and 6 months after the treatment while the total effective rates of the control group were 84.00% and 88.00%, showing that the control group was better than the observation group and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Autodix treatment can effectively improve the macular microvascular structure in RVO-ME patients. -
Key words:
- Ranibizumab /
- AODIX /
- Retinal vein occlusion /
- Macular edema /
- Microvascular structure of macular region
-
表 1 A、B组常规资料统计情况表[
$\bar x \pm s $ /n(%)]Table 1. Statistics of routine data of groups A and B [
$\bar x \pm s $ /n]组别 年龄区间(岁) 平均年龄(岁) 性别 患眼眼数(n) 男 女 A组 44~70 60.52 ± 5.78 31 20 51 B组 45~70 60.23 ± 5.56 29 21 50 χ2/t 0.257 0.081 P < 0.001* < 0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 2 A、B组治疗前后的BCVA差异比较[(
$ \bar x \pm s $ ),μm]Table 2. Comparison of BCVA differences between groups A and B before and after treatment [(
$ \bar x \pm s $ ),μm]组别 n 治疗前 治疗后 1 d 3个月 6个月 A组 51 1.09 ± 0.43 0.76 ± 0.47 0.67 ± 0.24* 0.58 ± 0.13* B组 50 1.12 ± 0.41 0.82 ± 0.35 0.51 ± 0.19 0.41 ± 0.21 t 0.359 −0.729 3.719 4.902 P 0.720 0.468 < 0.001* < 0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 3 A、B组治疗前后的CMT差异比较[(
$ \bar x \pm s $ ),μm]Table 3. Comparison of CMT differences between groups A and B before and after treatment [(
$ \bar x \pm s $ ),μm]组别 n 治疗前 治疗后 1 d 3个月 6个月 A组 51 470.35 ± 113.54 425.76 ± 100.47 376.67 ± 103.24* 342.14 ± 112.31* B组 50 472.32 ± 101.37 400.82 ± 102.36 320.51 ± 101.19 297.14 ± 106.52 t 0.092 1.236 2.861 2.078 P 0.927 0.219 0.007* 0.038* *P < 0.05。 表 4 A、B组治疗前后的SCP差异比较[(
$ \bar x \pm s $ ),%]Table 4. Comparison of SCP differences between groups A and B before and after treatment[(
$ \bar x \pm s $ ),%]组别 n 治疗前 治疗后 1 d 3个月 6个月 A组 51 51.09 ± 11.43 43.76 ± 8.47 46.67 ± 6.24* 54.58 ± 4.13* B组 50 40.12 ± 10.41 45.82 ± 8.35 52.51 ± 5.86 61.41 ± 4.26 t 0.014 −1.231 −4.849 −8.298 P 0.989 0.221 < 0.001* < 0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 5 A、B组治疗前后的DCP差异比较[(
$ \bar x \pm s $ ),%]Table 5. Comparison of DCP differences between groups A and B before and after treatment [(
$ \bar x \pm s $ ),%]组别 n 治疗前 治疗后 1 d 3个月 6个月 A组 51 41.09 ± 8.47 43.76 ± 6.47* 48.67 ± 7.24* 53.58 ± 8.13* B组 50 40.12 ± 8.43 46.82 ± 7.35 54.51 ± 7.19 62.34 ± 8.21 t 0.577 −2.219 −4.067 −5.387 P 0.565 0.029* < 0.001* < 0.001* *P < 0.05。 表 6 A、B组治疗前后的SRF差异比较[(
$ \bar x \pm s $ ),μm]Table 6. Comparison of SRF differences between groups A and B before and after treatment[(
$ \bar x \pm s $ ),μm]组别 n 治疗前 治疗后 1 d 3个月 6个月 A组 51 211.09 ± 38.46 188.46 ± 41.35* 148.64 ± 31.65* 43.64 ± 8.48* B组 50 210.46 ± 35.33 171.82 ± 37.75 124.51 ± 27.19 28.53 ± 6.73 t 0.085 2.112 4.113 9.929 P 0.576 0.037 < 0.001* < 0.001* *P < 0.05。 -
[1] Bandah-Rozenfeld D,Littink K W,Ben-Yosef T,et al. Novel null mutations in the EYS gene are a frequent cause of autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa in the Israeli population[J]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,2010,51(9):4387-4394. [2] Quinn P M,Mulder A A,Alves C H,et al. Loss of CRB2 in Müller glial cells modifies a CRB1-associated retinitis pigmentosa phenotype into a Leber congenital amaurosis phenotype[J]. Human Molecular Genetics,2019,28(1):105-123. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy337 [3] Garweg JG,Zandi S. Retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) in its treatment[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2016,254(7):1257-65. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3350-x [4] Rosenblatt A,Udaondo P,Cunha-Vaz J,et al. A collaborative retrospective study on the efficacy and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) in patients with diabetic macular edema:The European DME registry study[J]. Ophthalmology,2020,127(3):377-393. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.10.005 [5] Talib M,Cauwenbergh C V,Zaeytijd J D,et al. CRB1-associated retinal dystrophies in a Belgian cohort:Genetic characteristics and long-term clinical follow-up[J]. Br J Ophthalmol,2022,106(5):696-704. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316781 [6] Yeen-Fey H,Chao A,Chen K J,et al. Clinical outcomes and predictors of response to photodynamic therapy in symptomatic circumscribed choroidal hemangioma:A retrospective case series[J]. PLoS ONE,2018,13(5):e0197088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197088 [7] 郭丽莉,程湧,邓洵,等. 激光视网膜光凝与抗VEGF疗法治疗I型ROP后远期黄斑区形态比较及其对视力预后的影响[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2022,40(1):47-53. [8] Salerno F R,Alireza A,Sandrine L,et al. Outcomes and predictors of skin sodium concentration in dialysis patients[J]. Clin Kidney J,2022,15(6):1129-1136. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac021 [9] Satoshi E,Koji O,Kosuke K,et al. Predictors of Rituximab Effect on Modified Rodnan Skin Score in Systemic Sclerosis:a machine learning analysis of the DESIRES trial[J]. Rheumatology(Oxford),2020,15(7):171-173. [10] 鞠晓妮. 眼底激光联合雷珠单抗对糖尿病性视网膜病变患者视力及并发症的影响[J]. 当代医学,2021,27(10):182-183. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2021.10.077 [11] Van der Wijk AE,Canning P,Van Heijningen RP,et al. Glucocorticoids exert differential effects on the endothelium in an in vitro model of the blood-retinal barrier[J]. Acta Ophthalmol,2019,97(2):214-224. doi: 10.1111/aos.13909 [12] 郭建新,韩佳欣,李明新,等. 糖尿病视网膜病变患者泪膜脂质层厚度与黄斑微血管改变的相关性[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2020,20(3):449-454. [13] 彭立,张小花,劳娜,等. 康柏西普与雷珠单抗治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的Meta分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2020,20(3):455-463. [14] 陈敏华,张小花,谢青,等. 地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂对比雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效及安全性的荟萃分析[J]. 临床与病理杂志,2021,41(3):615-622. [15] 刘俐娜,钟兴武,刘红山,等. 雷珠单抗或加减驻景方对形觉剥夺性近视豚鼠眼轴和脉络膜厚度的短期影响[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2020,3(4):599-602. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2020.4.04 [16] 季红英,杨林青,郭黎霞,等. 视网膜激光联合球内注射雷珠单抗治疗视网膜静脉阻塞黄斑水肿对黄斑区微血管结构变化的影响[J]. 中国医师杂志,2021,23(10):1555-1558.