Meng ZHOU, Hongshan ZHANG, Kanghui GE, lin ZHANG, Xue HAN. Correlation of Frontal Planar QRS-T and Tp-e/QTc Ratio with Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(10): 147-152. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221030
Citation: Meng ZHOU, Hongshan ZHANG, Kanghui GE, lin ZHANG, Xue HAN. Correlation of Frontal Planar QRS-T and Tp-e/QTc Ratio with Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2022, 43(10): 147-152. doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221030

Correlation of Frontal Planar QRS-T and Tp-e/QTc Ratio with Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon

doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20221030
  • Received Date: 2022-06-13
    Available Online: 2022-10-09
  • Publish Date: 2022-10-31
  •   Objective  To investigate the relationship between electrocardiographic frontal QRS-T angle, Tp-e/QTc ratio, and coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP) and evaluate the predictive value of frontal QRS-T angle and Tp-e/QTc ratio.   Methods  Seventy-three patients with CSFP diagnosed by coronary angiography in our hospital from September 2019 to December 2021 were selected as the study group, and 67 patients with the normal coronary flow in the same period were randomly selected as the control group. The clinical data, related ECG parameters, and laboratory indexes of the two groups were compared. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors affecting the risk factors of CSFP. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to explore the predictive value of frontal QRS-T angle and Tp-e/QTc ratio.   Results  Compared with the control group, frontal QRS-T angle, Tp-e interval, Tp-e / Qt ratio, Tp-e / QTc ratio, BMI, Cr, RBC, Hb, and HCT were higher, and the two groups were statistically different (all P < 0.05). In the multivariate Logistic regression analysis show that BMI (OR = 1.137, P = 0.014)、Cr (OR = 1.048, P = 0.004), frontal QRS-T angle (OR = 1.020, P = 0.003), Tp-e/QTc (IQR) grade OR = 1.960, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for CSFP. ROC curve analysis displayed that the diagnostic cut-off value of frontal QRS-T angle was 45.5 degree, The area under the curve was 0.706, and the sensitivity and specificity were 56.2% and 80.1%, respectively; the diagnostic cut-off value of CSFP for Tp-Te/QTc ratio was 0.22, the area under the curve was 0.68, and the sensitivity and specificity were 66% and 66%, respectively. 69%.   Conclusion  Frontal QRS-T angle and Tp-e/QTc ratio were associated with CSFP, which had a certain potential predictive value for the occurrence of CSFP.
  • [1]
    Tambe A A,Demany M A,Zimmerman H A,et al. Angina pectoris and slow flow velocity of dye in coronary arteries-a new angiographic finding[J]. Am Heart J,1972,84(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(72)90307-9
    [2]
    Wang X,Nie S P. The coronary slow flow phenomenon:characteristics,mechanisms and implications[J]. Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy,2011,1(1):37-43.
    [3]
    XIA S,Deng S B,Wang Y,et al. Clinical analysis of the risk factors of slow coronary flow[J]. Heart and vessels,2011,26(5):480-6. doi: 10.1007/s00380-010-0081-5
    [4]
    Beltrame J F,Limaye S B,Horowitz J D. The coronary slow flow phenomenon-a new coronary microvascular disorder[J]. Cardiology,2002,97(4):197-202. doi: 10.1159/000063121
    [5]
    Işık F,Aslan B,Çap M,et al. The relationship between coronary slow-flow and frontal QRS-T angle[J]. Journal of electrocardiology,2021,66:43-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2021.03.003
    [6]
    Beltrame J F. Defining the coronary slow flow phenomenon[J]. Circulation journal:official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society,2012,76(4):818-820. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0205
    [7]
    Voulgari C,Pagoni S,Tesfaye S,et al. The spatial QRS-T angle:implications in clinical practice[J]. Current cardiology reviews,2013,9(3):197-210. doi: 10.2174/1573403X113099990031
    [8]
    Zhang X,Zhu Q,Zhu L,et al. Spatial/Frontal QRS-T Angle Predicts All-Cause Mortality and Cardiac Mortality:A Meta-Analysis[J]. PloS one,2015,10(8):e0136174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136174
    [9]
    Zhang Z M,Rautaharju P M,Prineas R J,et al. Electrocardiographic QRS-T angle and the risk of incident silent myocardial infarction in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study[J]. Journal of electrocardiology,2017,50(5):661-666. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.05.001
    [10]
    Yazici M,Demircan S,Durna K,et al. The role of adrenergic activity in slow coronary flow and its relationship to TIMI frame count[J]. Angiology,2007,58(4):393-400. doi: 10.1177/0003319707305118
    [11]
    剡冬冬,彭瑜,赵晶,等. 冠状动脉慢血流现象临床危险因素及形态学研究[J]. 中国介入心脏病学杂志,2021,29(1):29-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2021.01.007
    [12]
    Ziegler R,Bloomfield D K. A study of the normal QRS-T angle in the frontal plane[J]. Journal of electrocardiology,1970,3(2):161-167. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0736(70)80009-7
    [13]
    Schmitt N,Grunnet M,Olesen S P. Cardiac potassium channel subtypes:new roles in repolarization and arrhythmia[J]. Physiological reviews,2014,94(2):609-653. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00022.2013
    [14]
    Zehir R,Karabay C Y,Kalaycı A,et al. Evaluation of Tpe interval and Tpe/QT ratio in patients with slow coronary flow[J]. Anatolian journal of cardiology,2015,15(6):463-467.
    [15]
    Chua K C,Rusinaru C,Reinier K,et al. Tpeak-to-Tend interval corrected for heart rate:A more precise measure of increased sudden death risk?[J]. Heart rhythm,2016,13(11):2181-2185. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.08.022
    [16]
    Karaman K,Altunkaş F,Çetin M,et al. New markers for ventricular repolarization in coronary slow flow:Tp-e interval,Tp-e/QT ratio,and Tp-e/QTc ratio[J]. Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology:the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology,Inc,2015,20(4):338-344. doi: 10.1111/anec.12203
    [17]
    Atak R,Turhan H,Sezgin A T,et al. Effects of slow coronary artery flow on QT interval duration and dispersion[J]. Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology:the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology,Inc,2003,8(2):107-111. doi: 10.1046/j.1542-474X.2003.08203.x
    [18]
    Hawkins B M,Stavrakis S,Rousan T A,et al. Coronary slow flow-prevalence and clinical correlations[J]. Circulation journal:official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society,2012,76(4):936-942. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-11-0959
    [19]
    Ozyurtlu F,Yavuz V,Cetin N,et al. The association between coronary slow flow and platelet distribution width among patients with stable angina pectoris[J]. Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology,2014,10(3):161-165.
    [20]
    Canga A,Cetin M,Kocaman S A,et al. Increased serum resistin levels in patients with coronary slow-flow phenomenon[J]. Herz,2013,38(7):773-778. doi: 10.1007/s00059-013-3758-6
  • Relative Articles

    [1] Baoquan WU, Xiaoxia LIU. Predictive Ability of Platelet Reactivity,ROCK1 Combined with Electrocardiogram Findings for Slow Blood Flow/No Reflow in Elderly Patients after PCI. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2025, 46(4): 1-7.
    [2] Juan ZHAO, Teng-can TU, Mei-jun YANG, Xiao-yong ZHANG, Wei PAN. Assessment of Early Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(12): 47-50.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20211219
    [3] Li-yong WU, Yuan CHEN, Tian-shu CHU, Qing-wen ZHENG, Guo-fu ZHU. Association of Leptin and Leptin Receptor Gene Polymorphism with Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2021, 42(3): 109-114.  doi: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210328
    [4] Ye Xue Qun , Nie Lei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2017, 38(02): 95-98.
    [5] Luo Lin Ping , Liu Ming Yan , Wu Xiang , Nie Lei . Correlation between ECG Changes and Coronary Angiography of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2017, 38(01): 113-116.
    [6] Li Yi Lin . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [7] Gai Qi Ming . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [8] Lai Hai Bo . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [9] Feng Zhen Xia . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [10] Wu Jian . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [11] Peng Min An . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [12] Peng Min An . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [13] Min Jie Qing . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [14] Chen Ji Li . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [15] Li Fei . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [16] Liu Meng Si . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [17] Yang Fang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [18] Fu Zhong Yang . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [19] . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
    [20] Li Hua Ping . . Journal of Kunming Medical University,
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 38.4 %FULLTEXT: 38.4 %META: 61.0 %META: 61.0 %PDF: 0.6 %PDF: 0.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.4 %其他: 10.4 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %Austin: 0.0 %Austin: 0.0 %Baden: 0.0 %Baden: 0.0 %Belding: 0.0 %Belding: 0.0 %Canton: 0.3 %Canton: 0.3 %Carrboro: 0.1 %Carrboro: 0.1 %China: 4.1 %China: 4.1 %Clifton Springs: 0.0 %Clifton Springs: 0.0 %Doylestown: 0.1 %Doylestown: 0.1 %Falkenstein: 0.1 %Falkenstein: 0.1 %Fremont: 0.0 %Fremont: 0.0 %Girard: 0.1 %Girard: 0.1 %Grove City: 0.0 %Grove City: 0.0 %Gwynn Oak: 0.1 %Gwynn Oak: 0.1 %India: 0.0 %India: 0.0 %Malvern: 0.1 %Malvern: 0.1 %Nahant: 0.2 %Nahant: 0.2 %Norman: 0.1 %Norman: 0.1 %Ottawa: 0.1 %Ottawa: 0.1 %Perth Amboy: 0.0 %Perth Amboy: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.5 %Rochester: 0.5 %Saitama: 0.0 %Saitama: 0.0 %San Lorenzo: 0.0 %San Lorenzo: 0.0 %Valencia: 0.0 %Valencia: 0.0 %Wixom: 0.1 %Wixom: 0.1 %上海: 6.1 %上海: 6.1 %上饶: 0.0 %上饶: 0.0 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %九江: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %亳州: 0.0 %亳州: 0.0 %伊丽莎白: 0.0 %伊丽莎白: 0.0 %伊萨卡: 0.1 %伊萨卡: 0.1 %休斯敦: 0.1 %休斯敦: 0.1 %休斯顿: 0.1 %休斯顿: 0.1 %伦敦: 0.1 %伦敦: 0.1 %伯恩利: 0.0 %伯恩利: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %兰伯顿: 0.1 %兰伯顿: 0.1 %利斯维尔: 0.0 %利斯维尔: 0.0 %加利福尼亚: 0.0 %加利福尼亚: 0.0 %加利福尼亚州: 0.5 %加利福尼亚州: 0.5 %北京: 20.3 %北京: 20.3 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %十堰: 0.0 %十堰: 0.0 %南京: 0.0 %南京: 0.0 %南宁: 0.0 %南宁: 0.0 %南昌: 0.0 %南昌: 0.0 %南通: 0.0 %南通: 0.0 %博阿努瓦: 0.0 %博阿努瓦: 0.0 %卡罗尔顿: 0.0 %卡罗尔顿: 0.0 %史蒂文斯波因特: 0.0 %史蒂文斯波因特: 0.0 %吉安: 0.0 %吉安: 0.0 %哈瓦苏湖城: 0.0 %哈瓦苏湖城: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %唐山: 0.0 %唐山: 0.0 %圣克拉拉: 0.0 %圣克拉拉: 0.0 %圣地亚哥: 0.0 %圣地亚哥: 0.0 %圣安东尼奥: 0.1 %圣安东尼奥: 0.1 %圣路易斯: 0.1 %圣路易斯: 0.1 %坦佩: 0.1 %坦佩: 0.1 %埃克塞特: 0.0 %埃克塞特: 0.0 %堪萨斯城: 0.1 %堪萨斯城: 0.1 %塔科马: 0.0 %塔科马: 0.0 %多伦多: 0.0 %多伦多: 0.0 %大急流城: 0.1 %大急流城: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %奥兰多: 0.1 %奥兰多: 0.1 %孟菲斯: 0.1 %孟菲斯: 0.1 %安克拉治: 0.1 %安克拉治: 0.1 %安康: 0.0 %安康: 0.0 %安德森: 0.1 %安德森: 0.1 %安條克: 0.1 %安條克: 0.1 %安那罕: 0.0 %安那罕: 0.0 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %密尔沃基: 0.1 %密尔沃基: 0.1 %密蘇里城: 1.0 %密蘇里城: 1.0 %巴黎: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.1 %布罗克顿: 0.0 %布罗克顿: 0.0 %布雷登顿: 0.0 %布雷登顿: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %开罗: 0.1 %开罗: 0.1 %弗里霍尔德: 0.0 %弗里霍尔德: 0.0 %张家口: 0.1 %张家口: 0.1 %成都: 0.0 %成都: 0.0 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %拉斯维加斯: 0.1 %拉斯维加斯: 0.1 %拉雷多: 0.0 %拉雷多: 0.0 %拜仁: 0.0 %拜仁: 0.0 %新奥尔良: 0.0 %新奥尔良: 0.0 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %明尼阿波利斯: 0.0 %明尼阿波利斯: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %普雷斯科特山谷: 0.0 %普雷斯科特山谷: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %杭州: 0.0 %杭州: 0.0 %杰克逊维尔: 0.0 %杰克逊维尔: 0.0 %查尔斯顿: 0.1 %查尔斯顿: 0.1 %格里利: 0.1 %格里利: 0.1 %格雷特纳: 0.0 %格雷特纳: 0.0 %森尼韦尔: 0.2 %森尼韦尔: 0.2 %檀香山: 0.1 %檀香山: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %法拉盛: 0.0 %法拉盛: 0.0 %泽西: 0.0 %泽西: 0.0 %洛杉矶: 0.1 %洛杉矶: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.0 %淄博: 0.0 %淄博: 0.0 %深圳: 0.7 %深圳: 0.7 %温州: 0.0 %温州: 0.0 %漯河: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %瑟普赖斯: 0.1 %瑟普赖斯: 0.1 %瓦尔多夫: 0.0 %瓦尔多夫: 0.0 %皮斯卡特维: 0.0 %皮斯卡特维: 0.0 %盐湖城: 0.0 %盐湖城: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.0 %福州: 0.0 %福州: 0.0 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.1 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.1 %科隆: 0.1 %科隆: 0.1 %纳什维尔: 0.0 %纳什维尔: 0.0 %纽瓦克: 0.1 %纽瓦克: 0.1 %纽约: 0.2 %纽约: 0.2 %纽约州: 0.1 %纽约州: 0.1 %聖彼德斯堡: 0.1 %聖彼德斯堡: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 1.5 %芒廷维尤: 1.5 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %莱克查尔斯: 0.0 %莱克查尔斯: 0.0 %葵涌: 0.0 %葵涌: 0.0 %蒙特利尔: 0.0 %蒙特利尔: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %西宁: 2.2 %西宁: 2.2 %西安: 0.0 %西安: 0.0 %西棕榈滩: 0.0 %西棕榈滩: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %赣州: 0.0 %赣州: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.0 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %都伯林: 0.1 %都伯林: 0.1 %里弗赛德: 0.1 %里弗赛德: 0.1 %重庆: 0.0 %重庆: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %金曼: 0.0 %金曼: 0.0 %锡拉丘兹: 0.0 %锡拉丘兹: 0.0 %长沙: 0.1 %长沙: 0.1 %长治: 0.0 %长治: 0.0 %阿布奎基: 0.2 %阿布奎基: 0.2 %阿比林: 0.0 %阿比林: 0.0 %青岛: 0.0 %青岛: 0.0 %驻马店: 43.6 %驻马店: 43.6 %其他其他AustinBadenBeldingCantonCarrboroChinaClifton SpringsDoylestownFalkensteinFremontGirardGrove CityGwynn OakIndiaMalvernNahantNormanOttawaPerth AmboyRochesterSaitamaSan LorenzoValenciaWixom上海上饶东莞九江亳州伊丽莎白伊萨卡休斯敦休斯顿伦敦伯恩利保定兰伯顿利斯维尔加利福尼亚加利福尼亚州北京匹兹堡十堰南京南宁南昌南通博阿努瓦卡罗尔顿史蒂文斯波因特吉安哈瓦苏湖城哥伦布唐山圣克拉拉圣地亚哥圣安东尼奥圣路易斯坦佩埃克塞特堪萨斯城塔科马多伦多大急流城天津奥兰多孟菲斯安克拉治安康安德森安條克安那罕宣城密尔沃基密蘇里城巴黎布罗克顿布雷登顿广州廊坊开罗弗里霍尔德张家口成都扬州拉斯维加斯拉雷多拜仁新奥尔良无锡昆明明尼阿波利斯晋城普雷斯科特山谷朝阳杭州杰克逊维尔查尔斯顿格里利格雷特纳森尼韦尔檀香山武汉法拉盛泽西洛杉矶洛阳淄博深圳温州漯河瑟普赖斯瓦尔多夫皮斯卡特维盐湖城石家庄福州科珀斯克里斯蒂科隆纳什维尔纽瓦克纽约纽约州聖彼德斯堡芒廷维尤芝加哥莱克查尔斯葵涌蒙特利尔衡阳西宁西安西棕榈滩贵阳赣州赤峰运城邯郸郑州都伯林里弗赛德重庆金华金曼锡拉丘兹长沙长治阿布奎基阿比林青岛驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2972) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return